References
- Adams, J., Dow, J., & Merrill, S. (2006). The political consequences of alienation-based and indifference-based voter abstention: Applications to presidential elections. Political Behavior, 28(1), 65–86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-005-9002-1
- American Academy of Arts & Sciences. (2020). Our common purpose: Reinventing American democracy for the 21st century. Retrieved December 1, 2020, from https://www.amacad.org/ourcommonpurpose/report
- Benoit, K., & Laver, M. (2007). Estimating party policy positions: Comparing expert surveys and hand-coded content analysis. Electoral Studies, 26(1), 90–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2006.04.008
- Bittner, A. (2011). Platform or personality?: The role of party leaders in elections. Oxford University Press.
- Brams, S. J., & Fishburn, P. C. (1978). Approval voting. American Political Science Review, 72(3), 831–847. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1955105
- Brams, S., & Fishburn, P. C. (2007). Approval voting. Springer Science & Business Media.
- Brams, S. J., & Fishburn, P. C. (2010). Going from theory to practice: The mixed success of approval voting. In J. F. Laslier & M. R. Sanver (Eds.), Handbook on approval voting (pp. 19–37). Springer Science & Business Media.
- Burnett, C. M., & Kogan, V. (2015). Ballot (and voter)“exhaustion” under Instant Runoff Voting: An examination of four ranked-choice elections. Electoral Studies, 37, 41–49.
- Colomer, J. M., & McLean, I. (1998). Electing popes: Approval balloting and qualified-majority rule. The Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 29(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/002219598551616
- Cox, G. W. (1990). Centripetal and centrifugal incentives in electoral systems. American Journal of Political Science, 34(4), 903–935. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2111465
- Crosson, J. (2020). Extreme districts, moderate winners: Same-party challenges, and deterrence in top-two primaries. In Political science research and methods (pp. 1–17).
- Dalton, R. (2016). Party identification and its implications. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. http://politics.oxfordre.com/view/https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-72
- Drutman, L. (2019). A new voting system could fix American democracy: Ranked-choice ballots. NBC News. https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/new-voting-system-could-fix-american-democracy-ranked-choice-ballots-ncna1078491
- Duverger, M. (1951). Les Partis Politiques. A. Colin.
- Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of political action in a democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 135–150.
- Fromuth, P. (2019). Ranked choice voting is easier than it sounds. Maybe it would cure our awful politics. USA Today. Retrieved September 5, 2019, from https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/09/06/ranked-choice-voting-elevate-moderates-reduce-polarization-column/1196693002/
- Girard, C. (2010). Acclamation voting in sparta: An early use of approval voting. In J. F. Laslier & M. R. Sanver (Eds.), Handbook on approval voting (pp. 15–17). Berlin: Springer.
- Green, J., & Hobolt, S. B. (2008). Owning the issue agenda: Party strategies and vote choices in British elections. Electoral Studies, 27(3), 460–476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2008.02.003
- Green, J., & Jennings, W. (2017). The politics of competence: Parties, public opinion and voters. Cambridge University Press.
- Grose, C. R. (2014). The adoption of electoral reforms and ideological change in the California State Legislature. Schwarzenegger Institute Report, University of Southern California, Price School of Public Policy.
- Grose, C. R. (2020). Reducing legislative polarization: Top-two and open primaries Are associated with more moderate legislators. Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy, 1(2), 267–287. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1561/113.00000012
- Kellett, J., & Mott, K. (1977). Presidential primaries: Measuring popular choice. Polity, 9(4), 528–537. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3234329
- Laver, M., & Benoit, K. (2015). The basic arithmetic of legislative decisions. American Journal of Political Science, 59(2), 275–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12111
- Lavine, H. G., Johnston, C. D., & Steenbergen, M. R. (2012). The ambivalent partisan: How critical loyalty promotes democracy. Oxford University Press.
- Llavador, H. (2006). Electoral platforms, implemented policies, and abstention. Social Choice and Welfare, 27(1), 55–81. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-006-0111-5
- Lowe, W., Benoit, K., Mikhaylov, S., & Laver, M. (2011). Scaling policy preferences from coded political texts. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 36(1), 123–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-9162.2010.00006.x
- Mitchell, P. (2014). The single transferable vote and ethnic conflict: The evidence from Northern Ireland. Electoral Studies, 33, 246–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2013.07.022
- Plane, D. L., & Gershtenson, J. (2004). Candidates' ideological locations, abstention, and turnout in U.S. midterm senate elections. Political Behavior, 26(1), 69–93. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/B:POBE.0000022344.05382.b4
- Santucci, J. (2018). Maine ranked-choice voting as a case of electoral-system change. Representation, 54(3), 297–311. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2018.1502208
- Shea, I. E. (1984). The grange was my life. Ye Galleon Press.
- Tsebelis, G. (2014). The Greek constitution from a political science point of view. Greek Political Science Review, 42, 145–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12681/hpsa.14575
- Tsebelis, G. (2018). How can we keep direct democracy and avoid “Kolotoumba”. Homo Oeconomicus, 35(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s41412-018-0069-4
- Tsebelis, G., & Crosson, J. M. (2020). Can the Dutch electoral system be improved upon? Munich Social Science Review.
- Tsebelis, G., & Ha, E. Y. (2014). Coalition theory: A veto players’ approach. European Political Science Review, 6(3), 331–357. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773913000106
- Volkens, A., Lehmann, P., Matthieß, T., Merz, N., Regel, S., & Weßels, B. (2017). The manifesto data collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2017a. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25522/manifesto.mpds.2017a
- Warwick, P. (1996). Coalition government membership in Western European parliamentary democracies. British Journal of Political Science, 26(4), 471–499. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400007572
- Warwick, P. (1998). Policy distance and parliamentary government. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 23(3), 319–345. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/440357