EU climate and energy governance in times of crisis: towards a new agenda

References

• Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biscop, S. (2018). European strategy in the 21st century. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bocquillon, P., & Maltby, T. (2017). The more the merrier? Assessing the impact of enlargement on EU performance in energy and climate change policies. East European Politics, 33(1), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2017.1279605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. (2002). Pace-setting, foot-dragging, and fence-sitting. Member state responses to Europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browning, C. S. (2019). Brexit populism and fantasies of fulfilment. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 32(3), 222–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1567461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, C., Eckersley, P., & Tobin, P. (2020). EU environmental policy in times of crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1561741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzogány, A., & Ćetković, S. (2021). Fractionalized but ambitious? Voting on energy and climate policy in the European Parliament. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918220
   Google Scholar
• Counterpoint. (2021). Green wedge. Mapping dissent against climate policy in Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Creutz, K., Iso-Markku, T., Raik, K., & Tiilikainen, T. (2019). The changing global order and its implications for the EU, Finnish Institute of International Affairs, FIAA Report 59.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, W. (2018). Nervous states: How feeling took over the world. Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Delbeke, J., & Vis, P. (2019). Towards a climate-neutral Europe: Curbing the trend. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, C. E., & Hobolt, S. B. (2020). Political entrepreneurs: The rise of challenger parties in Europe. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dias, A., Nosowicz, A., & Seeuws, S. (2020). EU border carbon adjustment and the WTO: Hand in hand towards tackling climate change. Global Trade and Customs Journal, 15(1), 15–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dinan, D., Nugent, N., & Paterson, W. E. (Eds.). (2017). The European Union in Crisis. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dupont, C., Oberthür, S., & von Homeyer, I. (2020). The Covid-19 crisis: A critical juncture for EU climate policy development? Journal of European Integration, 42(8), 1095–1110. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2020.1853117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019). Report on the implementation of the Action Plan Against Disinformation. JOIN(2019) 12 final. European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency (EEA). (2020). Trends and projections in Europe 2020: Tracking progress towards Europe’s climate and energy targets (EEA Report No 13/2020).
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, G. (2016). The EU’s current crisis and its policy effects: Research design and comparative findings. Journal of European Integration, 38(3), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2016.1140154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Follesdal, A., & Hix, S. (2006). Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 533–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00650.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraune, C., & Knodt, M. (2018). Sustainable energy transformations in an age of populism, post-truth politics, and local resistance. Energy Research & Social Science, 43, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.05.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genschel, P., & Jachtenfuchs, M. (2018). From market integration to core state powers: The Eurozone crisis, the refugee crisis and integration theory. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(1), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidron, N., & Hall, P. A. (2020). Populism as a problem of social integration. Comparative Political Studies, 53(7), 1027–1059. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414019879947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gravey, V., & Jordan, A. J. (2020). Policy dismantling at EU level: Reaching the limits of ‘an ever-closer ecological union’? Public Administration, 98(2), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, T., Held, D., & Young, K. (2013). Gridlock: Why global cooperation is failing when we need it most. Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. (2020). The electoral politics of growth regimes. Perspectives on Politics, 18(1), 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592719001038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, D., & Puetter, U. (2019). The European Union in disequilibrium: New intergovernmentalism, postfunctionalism and integration theory in the post-Maastricht period. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(8), 1153–1171. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1569712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, A. (2021). Making EU environmental policy more legitimate? In A. Jordan & V. Gravey (Eds.), Environmental Policy in the EU (pp. 317–333). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howorth, J. (2016). EU global strategy in a changing world: Brussels’ approach to the emerging powers. Contemporary Security Policy, 37(3), 389–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2016.1238728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, R., Maltby, T., Szulecki, K., & Ćetković, S. (2021). Is populism a challenge to European energy and climate policy? Empirical evidence across varieties of populism. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918214
   Google Scholar
• Iversen, T., & Soskice, D. (2019). Democracy and Prosperity: Reinventing Capitalism through a Turbulent Century. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, W., & Meunier, S. (2010). Europe and the management of globalization. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(3), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501761003662107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahn, D. (2021). Quick and dirty: How populist parties in government affect greenhouse gas emissions in EU Member States. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918215
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. J., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., Rayner, T., & Berkhout, F. (Eds.). (2010). Climate change policy in the European Union: Confronting the dilemmas of mitigation and adaptation? Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A. J., & Moore, B. (2020). Durable by design? Policy feedback in a changing climate. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. D. (2020). The European Union's authoritarian equilibrium. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 481–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1712455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knodt, M., Ringel, M., & Müller, R. (2020). ‘Harder’ soft governance in the European Energy Union. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(6), 787–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1781604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulovesi, K., & Oberthür, S. (2020). Assessing the EU’s 2030 Climate and Energy Policy Framework: Incremental change toward radical transformation? Review of European, Comparative and International Environmental Law, 29(2), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupchan, C. (2012). No one’s world. The West, the rising rest, and the coming global turn. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb, W. F., Mattioli, G., Levi, S., Roberts, J. T., Capstick, S., Creutzig, F., Minx, J. C., Müller-Hansen, F., Culhane, T., & Steinberger, J. K. (2020). Discourses of climate delay. Global Sustainability, 3, e17. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.13
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M. (2018). Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: Exploring the linkages. Environmental Politics, 27(4), 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2009). Representative versus responsible government. MPlfG Working Paper 09/8, Cologne.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, G., & Hooghe, L. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. (2019). Bound to fail. The rise and fall of the liberal international order. International Security, 43(4), 7–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolaïdis, K. (2019). Sustainable integration: The silver lining of a democratically challenged EU. In B. Stiftung (Ed.), Twelve Stars (pp. 117–126). Gütersloh.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2018). Understanding Brexit. Cultural resentment versus economic grievances, Faculty Research Working Paper Series RWP18-021. John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S., & Dupont, C. (2021). The European Union’s international climate leadership: Towards a grand climate strategy? Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918218
   Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S., & Pallemaerts, M. (Eds.). (2010). The new climate policies of the European Union: Internal legislation and climate diplomacy. VUB Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petri, F., & Biedenkopf, K. (2021). Weathering growing polarisation? The European Parliament and EU foreign climate policy ambitions. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918216
   Google Scholar
• Rietig, K. (2021). Accelerating low carbon transitions via budgetary processes? EU climate governance in times of crisis. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918217
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2018). The revenge of the places that don’t matter (and what to do about it). Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 11(1), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2013). Global governance, individual preferences, June 28. https://www.gcf.ch/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/GCF_Prof-Rodrik-Global-Governance-Individual-Preferences-6.28.13.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schaller, S., & Carius, A. (2019). Convenient truths: Mapping climate agendas of right-wing populist parties in Europe. Adelphi.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Introduction: The problem-solving capacity of multi-level governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(4), 520–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/135017697344046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (2017). De-constitutionalisation and majority rule: A democratic vision for Europe. European Law Journal, 23(5), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2018). European integration (theory) in times of crisis. A comparison of the euro and Schengen crises. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(7), 969–989. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1421252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V., & Wood, M. (2019). Conceptualizing throughput legitimacy: Procedural mechanisms of accountability, transparency, inclusiveness and openness in EU governance. Public Administration, 97(4), 727–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schout, A., & Schwieters, C. (2018). Two decades of better regulation in the EU Commission – Towards evidence-based policymaking? Clingendael Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Schulmeister, P. (Ed.). (2019) Closer to the citizen, closer to the ballot. Eurobarometer Survey 91.1, European Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Siddi, M., & Kustova, I. (2021). From a liberal to a strategic actor: The evolution of the EU’s approach to international energy governance. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918219
   Google Scholar
• Skjærseth, J. B., Eikeland, P. O., Gulbrandsen, L. H., & Jevnaker, T. (2016). Linking EU climate and energy policies: decision-making, implementation and reform. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Slominski, P. (2016). Energy and climate policy: Does the competitiveness narrative prevail in times of crisis? Journal of European Integration, 38(3), 343–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2016.1140759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffek, J. (2014). The democratic output legitimacy of international organizations, Discussion Paper, SP IV 2014–101, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Tooze, A. (2018). Crashed. How a decade of financial crises changed the world. Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Weishaar, S. E. (2018). Carbon taxes at EU levels. WIFO Working Papers, No. 556, Austrian Institute of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Weko, S. (2021). Communitarians, cosmopolitans, and climate change: Why identity matters for EU climate and energy. Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918751
   Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, J., Nicoli, F., & Laffan, B. (2019). Introduction: The European Union beyond the polycrisis? Integration and politicization in an age of shifting cleavages. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(7), 963–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1619803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar