References
- Arregui, J., & Perarnaud, C. (2021). A new dataset on legislative decision-making in the European Union: The DEUIII dataset (1999–2019). Journal of European Public Policy. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1991983
- Austen-Smith, D. (1993). Information and influence: Lobbying for agendas and votes. American Journal of Political Science, 37(3), 799–833. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2111575
- Austen-Smith, D., & Wright, J. R. (1992). Competitive lobbying for a legislator's vote. Social Choice and Welfare, 9(3), 229–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00192880
- Bartolini, S. (2001). La structure des clivages nationaux et la question de l’intégration dans L’Union Européenne. Politique Européenne, 4(3), 15–45. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3917/poeu.004.0015
- Benoit, K., & Laver, M. (2012). The dimensionality of political space: Epistemological and methodological considerations. European Union Politics, 13(2), 194–218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116511434618
- Berardo, R., & Scholz, J. T. (2010). Self-organizing policy networks: Risk, partner selection, and cooperation in estuaries. American Journal of Political Science, 54(3), 632–649. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00451.x
- Brack, N. (2012). Eurosceptics in the European Parliament: Exit or voice? Journal of European Integration, 34(2), 151–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2012.641087
- Carpenter, D. P., Esterling, K. M., & Lazer, D. M. J. (2004). Friends, brokers, and transitivity: Who informs whom in Washington politics? The Journal of Politics, 66(1), 224–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2508.2004.00149.x
- Cavallaro, M., Flacher, D., & Zanetti, M. A. (2018). Radical right parties and European economic integration: Evidence from the seventh European Parliament. European Union Politics, 19(2), 321–343. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116518760241
- Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1086/228943
- Denzau, A. T., & North, D. C. (2000). Shared mental models: Ideologies and institutions. In A. Lupia, M. D. McCubbins, & S. L. Popkin (Eds.), Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality (pp. 23–46). Cambridge University Press.
- Eguia, J. X. (2013). Challenges to the standard Euclidean spatial model. In N. Schofield, G. Caballero, & D. Kselman (Eds.), Advances in political economy: Institutions, modelling and empirical analysis (pp. 169–180). Springer.
- Hooghe, L., Marks, G., & Wilson, C. J. (2002). Does left/right structure party positions on European integration? Comparative Political Studies, 35(8), 965–989. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/001041402236310
- Huhe, N., Naurin, D., & Thomson, R. (2018). The evolution of political networks: Evidence from the Council of the European Union. European Union Politics, 19(1), 25–51. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116517740228
- Huhe, N., Naurin, D., & Thomson, R. (2020). Don’t cry for me Britannia: The resilience of the European Union to Brexit. European Union Politics, 21(1), 152–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116519882096
- Humphreys, M., & Laver, M. (2010). Spatial models, cognitive metrics, and majority rulse equilibria. British Journal of Political Science, 40(1), 11–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123409990263
- Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2011). Power and Interdependence (4th ed.). Pearson.
- König, T., & Bräuninger, T. (1998). The formation of policy networks: Preferences, institutions and actors’ choice of information and exchange relations. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10(4), 445–471. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692898010004004
- Laumann, E. O., & Knoke, D. (1987). The organizational state: Social choice in national policy domains. University of Wisconsin Press.
- Leifeld, P., & Schneider, V. (2012). Information exchange in policy networks. American Journal of Political Science, 56(3), 731–744. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00580.x
- Leinaweaver, J., & Thomson, R. (2014). Testing models of legislative decision-making with measurement error: The robust predictive power of bargaining models over procedural models. European Union Politics, 15(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116513501908
- Leinaweaver, J., & Thomson, R. (2016). Greener governments: Partisan ideologies, executive institutions, and environmental policies. Environmental Politics, 25(4), 633–660. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1144271
- Lowe, W., Benoit, K., Mikhaylov, S., & Laver, M. (2011). Scaling policy preferences from coded political texts. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 36(1), 123–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-9162.2010.00006.x
- McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
- Milward, A. S. (1992). The European rescue of the nation state. Routledge.
- Moravcsik, A. (1998). The choice for Europe. Cornell University Press.
- Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
- Naurin, D. (2018). Liberal intergovernmentalism in the councils of the EU: A baseline theory? Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(7), 1526–1543. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12786
- Naurin, D., Johansson, M., & Lindahl, R. (2020). The negotiations in the Council of the European Union Dataset. University of Gothenburg, Centre for European Research, Swedish National Data Service. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5878/cfsv-k581
- Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
- Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. University of Michigan Press.
- Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Princeton University Press.
- Ripley, R. M., Snijders, T. A. B., Boda, Z., Vörös, A., & Preciado, P. (2020). Manual for RSiena. University of Oxford: Department of Statistics, Nuffield College; University of Groningen, Department of Sociology.
- Rooduijn, M., Van Kessel, S., Froio, C., Pirro, A., De Lange, S., Halikiopoulou, D., Lewis, P., Mudde, C. & Taggart, P. (2019). The populist: An overview of populist, far right, far left and Eurosceptic parties in Europe. www.popu-list.org
- Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (2007). The advocacy coalition: Innovations and clarifications. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 189–220). Westview Press.
- Schedler, A. (1996). Anti-political-establishment parties. Party Politics, 2(3), 291–312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068896002003001
- Snijders, T. A. B. (2005). Models for longitudinal network data. In P. J. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis (pp. 215–247). Cambridge University Press.
- Snijders, T. A. B., Van de Bunt, G. G., & Steglich, C. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32(1), 44–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.02.004
- Thomson, R. (2011). Resolving controversy in the European Union: Legislative decision- making before and after enlargement. Cambridge University Press.
- Thomson, R., Arregui, J., Leuffen, D., Costello, R., Cross, J., Hertz, R., & Jensen, T. (2012). A new dataset on decision-making in the European Union before and after the 2004 and 2007 enlargements (DEUII). Journal of European Public Policy, 19(4), 604–622. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.662028
- Thomson, R., Stokman, F. N., Achen, C. H., & König, T. (Eds.). (2006). The European Union decides. Cambridge University Press.
- Van Hauwaert, S., & Van Kessel, S. (2018). Beyond protest and discontent: A cross-national analysis of the effect of populist attitudes and issue positions on populist party support. European Journal of Political Research, 57(1), 68–92. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12216
- Volkens, A., Burst, T., Krause, W., Lehmann, P., Matthieß, T., Merz, N., Regel, S., Weßels, B. & Zehnter, L. (2020). The manifesto data collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2020b. Berlin. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25522/manifesto.mpds.2020b
- Wratil, C. (2018). Modes of government responsiveness in the European Union: Evidence from Council negotiation positions. European Union Politics, 19(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116517735599