The quiet transformation of the EU Commission cabinet system

References

• Aspinwall, M. D., & Schneider, G. (2000). Same menu, separate tables: The institutionalist turn in political science and the study of European integration. European Journal of Political Research, 38(1), 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W. (2008). Diffuse anxieties, deprived entrepreneurs: Commission reform and middle management. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(5), 691–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802133187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brans, M., de Visscher, C., Gouglas, A., & Jaspers, S. (2017). Political control and bureaucratic expertise: Policy analysis by ministerial cabinet members. In M. Brans, & D. Aubin (Eds.), Policy Analysis in Belgium (pp. 57–77). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bulmer, S. J. (1993). The governance of the European Union: A new institutionalist approach. Journal of Public Policy, 13(4), 351–380. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X0000115X
   Google Scholar
• Bürgin, A. (2018). Intra- and inter-institutional leadership of the European Commission president: An assessment of Juncker’s organizational reforms. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(4), 837–853. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12648
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caritey, J. (1997). Comment faire l'histoire d'un cabinet ministériel? La Revue Administrative, 50(295), 104–111.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T. (1997). Tensions of European governance: Politicized bureaucracy and multiple accountability in the European commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(1), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/135017697344244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T., & Verdun, A. (2020). Historical institutionalism in the study of European integration. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.
   Google Scholar
• Cini, M. (1996). The European Commission: Leadership, Organisation, and Culture in the EU Administration. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connaughton, B. (2010). Glorified gofers, policy experts or good generalists: A classification of the roles of the Irish ministerial adviser. Irish Political Studies, 25(3), 347–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/07907184.2010.497636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombes, D. L. (1970). Politics and Bureaucracy in the European Community. A Portrait of the Commission of the E.E.C. Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Deckarm, R. (2016). From national enclaves to supporting offices: An analysis of the 1999 reform of European commissioners’ cabinets. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 12(3), 735–752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Mascio, F., & Natalini, A. (2013). Analysing the role of ministerial cabinets in Italy: Legacy and temporality in the study of administrative reforms. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(2), 328–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852313477972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutheillet Lamothe, A. (1965). Ministerial cabinets in France. Public Administration, 43(4), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.1965.tb01658.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M., & Heskestad, A. (2010). The denationalization of cabinets in the European Commission. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(4), 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02073.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1999a). Designing Tomorrow’s Commission: A Review of the Commission’s Organisation and Operation.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (1999b). The Formation of the New Commission: 1 Code of Conduct for Commissioners.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2010). Making global markets: Historical institutionalism in international political economy. Review of International Political Economy, 17(4), 609–638. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692291003723672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fioretos, O. (2011). Historical institutionalism in international relations. International Organization, 65(2), 367–399. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818311000002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, K. H., & Patz, R. (2016). Pressured budgets and the European Commission: Towards a more centralized EU budget administration? Journal of European Public Policy, 23(7), 1038–1056. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1162835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouglas, A., Brans, M., & Jaspers, S. (2017). European Commissioner cabinet advisers: Policy managers, bodyguards, stakeholder mobilizers. Public Administration, 95(2), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B., & Meyer, R. E. (2017). The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hanrieder, T. (2014). Gradual change in international organisations: Agency theory and historical institutionalism. Politics, 34(4), 324–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.12050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (1999). Crisis and the structural transformation of the state: Interrogating the process of change. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations, 1(3), 317–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.00018
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L. (2001). The European Commission and the Integration of Europe: Images of Governance. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Immergut, E. M. (2006). Historical institutionalism in political Science and the problem of change. In A. Wimmer, & R. Kössler (Eds.), Understanding Change (pp. 237–259). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Joana, J., & Smith, A. (2004). The politics of collegiality: The non-portfolio dimension. In A. Smith (Ed.), Politics and the European Commission (pp. 30–46). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, H. (2004). An historic achievement. Administrative reform under the Prodi commission. In D. Dimitrakopoulos (Ed.), The Changing European Commission (pp. 33–62). Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, H. (2008). ‘Mission impossible’, but mission accomplished: The Kinnock reforms and the European commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(5), 648–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802133146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassim, H., & Laffan, B. (2019). The Juncker presidency: The ‘political Commission’ in practice. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(S1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12941
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, H., Peterson, J., Bauer, M. W., Connolly, S., Dehousse, R., Hooghe, L., & Thompson, A. (2013). The European Commission of the Twenty-First Century. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kickert, W. J., & Van Der Meer, F. B. (2011). Small, slow, and gradual reform: What can historical institutionalism teach us? International Journal of Public Administration, 34(8), 475–485. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2011.583768
   Google Scholar
• Laffan, B. (1997). From policy entrepreneur to policy manager: The challenge facing the European commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(3), 422–438. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501769780000081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindner, J., & Rittberger, B. (2003). The creation, interpretation and contestation of institutions – Revisiting historical institutionalism. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 41(3), 445–473. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). A theory of gradual institutional change. In J. Mahoney, & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power (pp. 1–37). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, L. (2000). Reforming the commission: Will organizational efficiency produce effective governance? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(5), 817–841. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelmann, H. J. (1978). Multinational staffing and organizational functioning in the Commission of the European communities. International Organization, 32(2), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300026606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, H. (2020). Political Leadership and the European Commission Presidency. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norton, P. (2001). Playing by the rules: The constraining hand of parliamentary procedure. Journal of Legislative Studies, 7(3), 13–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/714003882
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, N., & Rhinard, M. (2015). The European Commission. Macmillan International Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Ongaro, E. (2013). The administrative reform trajectory of the European Commission in comparative perspective: Historical new institutionalism in compound systems. Public Policy and Administration, 28(4), 346–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076713481486
   Google Scholar
• Ross, G. (1995). Jacques Delors and European Integration. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rouban, L. (2007). Public management and politics: Senior bureaucrats in France. Public Administration, 85(2), 473–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00644.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saurugger, S. (2017). Sociological institutionalism and European integration. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics.
   Google Scholar
• Senninger, R., Finke, D., & Blom-Hansen, J. (2021). Coordination inside government administrations: Lessons from the EU commission. Governance, 34(3), 707–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheingate, A. (2010). Rethinking rules: Creativity and constraint in the US house of representatives. In J. Mahoney, & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power (pp. 168–203). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, D. (2006). The president, the college and the cabinets. In D. Spence (Ed.), The European Commission (pp. 25–74). Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. A. (2005). Introduction: Institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streeck, & K. A. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies (pp. 1–39). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2(1), 369–404. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tömmel, I. (2020). Political leadership in times of crisis: The Commission presidency of Jean-Claude Juncker. West European Politics, 43(5), 1141–1162. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1646507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• True, J. L., Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (1999). Punctuated equilibrium theory: Explaining stability and change in American policymaking. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 97–115). Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Evera, S. (1997). Guide to Methods for Students of Political Science. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walgrave, S., Caals, T., Suetens, M., & De Swert, K. (2004). Ministerial Cabinets and Partitocracy. A Career Pattern Study of Ministerial Cabinet Members in Belgium (PSW-Paper). University of Antwerp.
   Google Scholar
• Wille, A. (2013). The Normalization of the European Commission: Politics and Bureaucracy in the EU Executive. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K.. (2012). Designing case studies. In M. Laura & M. J. Gijsenberg (Eds.), Qualitative Research Methods (Vol. 5, pp. 359–386). Sage.
   Google Scholar