European (networked) agencies between independence and influence

Bibliography

• Boeger, N., & Corkin, J. (2017). Institutional path-dependencies in Europe's networked modes of governance. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(5), 974–992. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busuioc, M. (2012). European agencies and their boards: Promises and pitfalls of accountability beyond design. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(5), 719–736. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.646785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collier, D., Seawright, J., & Munck, G. L. (2004). ‘The quest for standards: King, Keohane, and Verba’s designing social inquiry’. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, 21, 21–26.
   Google Scholar
• De Francesco, F., & Castro, G. (2018). Beyond legal transposition: Regulatory agencies and de facto convergence of EU rail liberalization. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(3), 369–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1254272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M. (forthcoming). ‘Supranationalization of government and governance’. In J. Tosun, & P. Grazioano (Eds.), Encyclopedia of European Union Public Policy. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2017). Researching European Union agencies: What have we learnt (and where do we go from here)? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(4), 675–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M., Trondal, J., & Vestlund, N. M. (2015). The quest for order: Unravelling the relationship between the European Commission and European Union agencies. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(5), 609–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.976587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ermacora, F. (2010). The agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER). In C. Jones (Ed.), EU energy law. The internal energy market (pp. 257–326). Claeys & Casteels.
   Google Scholar
• Gehring, T., & Krapohl, S. (2007). Supranational regulatory agencies between independence and control: The EMEA and the authorisation of pharmaceuticals in the European single market. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(2), 208–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760601122407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenleer, M. (2009). The autonomy of European Union agencies. A comparative study of institutional development. Eburon.
   Google Scholar
• Groenleer, M. (2014). Agency autonomy actually: Managerial strategies, legitimacy, and the early development of the European union's agencies for drug and food safety regulation. International Public Management Journal, 17(2), 255–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2014.905416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidbreder, E. G. (2015). ‘Horizontal capacity pooling: Direct, decentralized, joint policy execution’, in, The Palgrave handbook of the European administrative system: Springer, pp. 369–382.
   Google Scholar
• Klika, C. (2015). The implementation of the REACH authorisation procedure on chemical substances of concern: What kind of legitimacy? Politics and Governance, 3(1), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v3i1.85
   Google Scholar
• Krapohl, S. (2008). Risk regulation in the single market. The governance of pharmaceuticals and foodstuff in the European Union. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Kreppel, A., & Oztas, B. (2017). Leading the band or just playing the tune? Reassessing the agenda-setting powers of the European Commission. Comparative Political Studies, 50(8), 1118–1150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414016666839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D. (2011). Regulatory networks and regulatory agencification: Towards a single European regulatory space. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 810–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.593309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggetti, M. (2007). De facto independence after delegation: A fuzzy-set analysis. Regulation & Governance, 1(4), 271–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2007.00023.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggetti, M., & Verhoest, K. (2014). Unexplored aspects of bureaucratic autonomy: A state of the field and ways forward. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 80(2), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314524680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (2001). Two logics of delegation: Agency and fiduciary relations in EU governance. European Union Politics, 2(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116501002001005
   Google Scholar
• Ossege, C. (2015). Driven by expertise and insulation? The autonomy of European regulatory agencies. Politics and Governance, 3(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v3i1.75
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, M. A. (1997). Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the European Community. International Organization, 51(1), 99–134. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauh, C. (2021). One agenda-setter or many? The varying success of policy initiatives by individual directorates-general of the European Commission 1994–2016. European Union Politics, 22(1), 3–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116520961467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffing, E. (2021). What price to pay? The trade-off between independence and influence in European regulation. Public Policy and Administration, 36(3), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076719886744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G., & Garrett, G. (1996). Agenda setting power, power indices, and decision making in the European Union. International Review of Law and Economics, 16(3), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(96)00021-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoest, K., & Lægreid, P. (2010). ‘Organizing public sector agencies: Challenges and reflections’. In P. Lægreid, & K. Verhoest (Eds.), Governance of Public Sector Organizations. Proliferation, Autonomy and Performance. Houndsmill (pp. 267–297). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Versluis, E., & Tarr, E. (2013). Improving compliance with European Union law via agencies: The case of the european railway agency. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(2), 316–333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2012.02312.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestlund, N. M. (2015). Exploring EU commission-agency relationship: Partnership or parenthood? In M. Bauer, & J. Trondal (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of the European Administrative System (pp. 349–368). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, M. (2018). Mapping EU agencies as political entrepreneurs. European Journal of Political Research, 57(2), 404–426. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yackee, S. W. (2019). The politics of rulemaking in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 37–55. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-050817-092302
   Google Scholar