1,738
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The ties that unbind: intergovernmental decision rules and the policy-opinion link

ORCID Icon

References

  • Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2008). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist's companion. Princeton University Press.
  • Archibugi, D. (2010). The architecture of cosmopolitan democracy. In G. W. Brown & D. Held (Eds.), The cosmopolitanism reader (pp. 312–334). Polity Press.
  • Arregui, J., & M. J. Creighton (2018). Public opinion and the shaping of immigration policy in the European council of ministers. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(6), 1323–1344. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12745
  • Bailer, S. (2004). Bargaining success in the European Union. European Union Politics, 5(1), 99–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116504040447
  • Bailer, S., Mattila, M., & Schneider, G. (2015). Money makes the EU go round: The objective foundations of conflict in the council of ministers. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(3), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12194
  • Barbier, J. (2012). Tracing the fate of EU ‘social policy’: Changes in political discourse from the ‘Lisbon Strategy’ to ‘Europe 2020’. International Labour Review, 151(4), 377–399. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.2012.151.issue-4
  • Barnard, C. (2012). EU employment law. OUP.
  • Barnard, C. (2014). EU employment law and the European social model: The past, the present and the future. Current Legal Problems, 67(1), 199–237. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuu015
  • Barnard, C., & Hervey, T. (2001). European Union employment and social policy 1999–2000. Yearbook of European Law, 20(1), 297–329. https://doi.org/10.1093/yel/20.1.297
  • Benoit, K., Conway, D., Lauderdale, B. E., Laver, M., & Mikhaylov, S. (2016). Crowd-sourced text analysis: Reproducible and agile production of political data. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 278–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000058
  • Benoit, K., & Laver, M. (2006). Party policy in modern democracies. Taylor & Francis.
  • Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249–275. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355304772839588
  • Broniecki, P. (2020). Power and transparency in political negotiations. European Union Politics, 21(1), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116519870870
  • Burns, C., Rasmussen, A., & Reh, C. (2013). Legislative codecision and its impact on the political system of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(7), 941–952. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.795366
  • Carrubba, C. J. (2001). The electoral connection in European Union politics. The Journal of Politics, 63(1), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00062
  • Carrubba, C., & Timpone, R. J. (2005). Explaining vote switching across first-and second-order elections: Evidence from Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 38(3), 260–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414004272693
  • Caughey, D., O'Grady, T., & Warshaw, C. (2019). Policy ideology in European mass publics, 1981–2016. American Political Science Review, 113(3), 674–693. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000157
  • Cheneval, F., & Schimmelfenning, F. (2013). The case for demoicracy in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 51(2), 334–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.2013.51.issue-2
  • Christiano, T. (2018). The rule of the many: Fundamental issues in democratic theory. Routledge.
  • Costello, R. (2011). Does bicameralism promote stability? Inter-institutional relations and coalition formation in the European Parliament. West European Politics, 34(1), 122–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.523548
  • Costello, R., Thomassen, J., & Rosema, M. (2012). European parliament elections and political representation: Policy congruence between voters and parties. West European Politics, 35(6), 1226–1248. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.713744
  • Costello, R., & Thomson, R. (2011). The nexus of bicameralism: Rapporteurs' impact on decision outcomes in the European Union. European Union Politics, 12(3), 337–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116511410087
  • Costello, R., & Thomson, R. (2013). The distribution of power among EU institutions: Who wins under codecision and why? Journal of European Public Policy, 20(7), 1025–1039. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.795393
  • Craig, P., & De Búrca, G. (2020). EU law: Text, cases, and materials. Oxford University Press.
  • Crombez, C., & Hix, S. (2015). Legislative activity and gridlock in the European Union. British Journal of Political Science, 45(3), 477–499. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000380
  • Cross, J. P. (2013). Everyone'e a winner (almost): Bargaining success in the Council of Ministers of the European Union. European Union Politics, 14(1), 70–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116512462643
  • Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. Yale University Press.
  • Dahl, R. A., Shapiro, I., & Cheibub, J. A. (2003). The democracy sourcebook. Mit Press.
  • Dalton, R. J. (2015). Party representation across multiple issue dimensions. Party Politics, 23(6), 609–622. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815614515
  • De la Porte, C., & Heins, E. (2016). A new era of European integration? Governance of labour market and social policy since the sovereign debt crisis. In E. Heins & C. de la Porte (Eds.), The sovereign debt crisis, the EU and welfare state reform (pp. 15–41). Springer.
  • De Vries, C. E., & Tillman, E. R. (2011). European Union issue voting in East and West Europe: The role of political context. Comparative European Politics, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2009.7
  • Döring, H. (2013). The collective action of data collection: A data infrastructure on parties, elections and cabinets. European Union Politics, 14(1), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116512461189
  • Duina, F., & Lenz, T. (2017). Democratic legitimacy in regional economic organizations: The European Union in comparative perspective. Economy and Society, 46(3–4), 398–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2017.1377946
  • Erikson, R. S., MacKuen, M. B., & Stimson, J. A. (2002). The macro polity. Cambridge University Press.
  • Filippov, M., Ordeshook, P. C., & Shvetsova, O. (2004). Designing federalism: A theory of self-sustainable federal institutions. Cambridge University Press.
  • Follesdal, A., & Hix, S. (2006). Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 533–562. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.2006.44.issue-3
  • Geyer, R. R. (2013). Exploring European social policy. John Wiley & Sons.
  • Golder, M., & Stramski, J. (2010). Ideological congruence and electoral institutions. American Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.2010.54.issue-1
  • Goodin, R. E. (2007). Enfranchising all affected interests, and its alternatives. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 35(1), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.2007.35.issue-1
  • Häge, F. M., & Naurin, D. (2013). The effect of codecision on Council decision-making: Informalization, politicization and power. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(7), 953–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.795372
  • Hagemann, S., Hobolt, S. B., & Wratil, C. (2017). Government responsiveness in the European Union: Evidence from council voting. Comparative Political Studies, 50(6), 850–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015621077
  • Held, D. (2006). Models of democracy. Stanford University Press.
  • Hix, S. (2008). What's wrong with the EU and how to fix it. Polity Press.
  • Hix, S. (2018). When optimism fails: Liberal intergovernmentalism and citizen representation. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(7), 1595–1613. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12785
  • Hix, S., & Høyland, B. (2013). Empowerment of the European Parliament. Annual Review of Political Science, 16(1), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1146/polisci.2013.16.issue-1
  • Hix, S., & Marsh, M. (2010). Second-order effects plus pan-European political swings: An analysis of European parliament elections across time. Electoral Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2010.09.017
  • Hix, S., Noury, A. G., & Roland, G. (2007). Democratic politics in the European parliament. Cambridge University Press.
  • Hobolt, S. B., & Klemmensen, R. (2008). Government responsiveness and political competition in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 41(3), 309–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414006297169
  • Hobolt, S. B., & Spoon, J.-J. (2012). Motivating the European Voter: Parties, issues and campaigns in European Parliament elections. European Journal of Political Research, 51(6), 701–727. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejpr.2012.51.issue-6
  • Hobolt, S. B., Spoon, J.-J., & Tilley, J. (2009). A vote against Europe? Explaining defection at the 1999 and 2004 European parliament elections. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000422
  • Hobolt, S. B., & Wratil, C. (2020). Contestation and responsiveness in EU Council deliberations. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 362–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1712454
  • Kardasheva, R. (2009). The power to delay: The European Parliament's influence in the consultation procedure. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(2), 385–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2009.00809.x
  • Kleine, M., Arregui, J., & Thomson, R. (2022). The impact of national democratic representation on decision-making in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(1), 1–11.
  • Kousser, T. (2004). Retrospective voting and strategic behavior in European Parliament elections. Electoral Studies, 23(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(02)00030-6
  • Kreppel, A. (2002a). Moving beyond procedure: An empirical analysis of European Parliament legislative influence. Comparative Political Studies, 35(7), 784–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414002035007002
  • Kreppel, A. (2002b). The European Parliament and supranational party system. A study in institutional development. Cambridge University Press.
  • Kreppel, A. (2018). Bicameralism and the balance of power in EU legislative politics. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 24(1), 11–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572334.2018.1444623
  • Lammers, I., van Gerven-Haanpää, M. M. L., & Treib, O. (2018). Efficiency or compensation? The global economic crisis and the development of the European Union's social policy. Global Social Policy, 18(3), 304–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468018118790957
  • Lenz, T., & Marks, G. (2016). Regional institutional design. In T. A. Börzel and T. Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism (pp. 512–538).
  • May, J. D. (1978). Defining democracy: A bid for coherence and consensus. Political Studies, 26(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1978.tb01516.x
  • McElroy, G., & Benoit, K. (2010). Party policy and group affiliation in the European Parliament. British Journal of Political Science, 40(2), 377–398. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123409990469
  • Mill, J. S. (1869). On liberty. Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer.
  • Moravcsik, A. (1993). Preferences and power in the European Community: A liberal intergovernmentalist approach. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(4), 473–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1993.tb00477.x
  • Moravcsik, A. (2002). Reassessing legitimacy in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), 603–624. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00390
  • Moravcsik, A. (2008). The European constitutional settlement. World Economy, 31(1), 158–183.
  • Moravcsik, A., & Schimmelfenning, F. (2019). Liberal intergovernmentalism. In A. Weiner, T. Börzel, & T. Risse (Eds.), European integration theory (pp. 64–87). Oxford University Press.
  • Nye Jr., J. S. (2001). Globalization's democratic defecit: How to make international institutions more accountable. Foreign Affairs, 80(4), 2–6. https://doi.org/10.2307/20050221
  • O'Grady, T. (2020). Causal inference for undergraduates. https://github.com/tomogradyucl/Causal-Inference-for-Beginning-Undergraduates
  • Powell, G. B. (2004). Political representation in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 7(1), 273–296. https://doi.org/10.1146/polisci.2004.7.issue-1
  • Rae, D., & Taylor, M. (1971). Decision rules and policy outcomes. British Journal of Political Science, 1(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400008954
  • Rasmussen, A., Reher, S., & Toshkov, D. (2019). The opinion–policy nexus in Europe and the role of political institutions. European Journal of Political Research, 58(2), 412–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejpr.2019.58.issue-2
  • Rauh, C. (2020). Data & resources. https://sites.google.com/site/christianrauh/data-and-resources
  • Raunio, T. (2009). National Parliaments and European Integration: What we know and agenda for future research. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 15(4), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330903302430
  • Rehfeld, A. (2005). The concept of constituency: Political representation, democratic legitimacy, and institutional design. Cambridge University Press.
  • Rehfeld, A. (2008). Extremism in the defense of moderation: A response to my critics. Polity, 40(2), 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.polity.2300097
  • Reif, K., & Schmitt, H. (1980). Nine second-order national elections: A conceptual framework for the analysis of European elections results. European Journal of Political Research, 8(1), 3–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejpr.1980.8.issue-1
  • Ringe, N. (2010). Who decides, and how? Preferences, uncertainty, and policy choice in the European Parliament. Oxford University Press.
  • Rittberger, B. (2012). Institutionalizing representative democracy in the European Union: The case of the European Parliament. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 50(S1), 18–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.2012.50.issue-s1
  • Rittberger, B., & Schroeder, P. (2016). The legitimacy of regional institutions. In T. A. Börzel & Thomas Risse (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative regionalism (pp. 579–599).
  • Russell, M. (2001). The territorial role of second chambers. Journal of Legislative Studies, 7(1), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/714003852
  • Schmitt, H., & Thomassen, J. J. A. (1999). Political representation and legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford University Press.
  • Schmitter, P. C. (2000). How to democratize the EU and why bother. Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Schneider, C. J. (2018). The responsive union: National elections and European governance. Cambridge University Press.
  • Shapiro, I. (1999). Democratic justice. Yale University Press.
  • Sorace, M. (2018). The European Union democratic deficit: Substantive representation in the European Parliament at the input stage. European Union Politics, 19(1), 0–0. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116517741562
  • Sorace, M. (2021a). Debating in a legislature with competing incentives. In H. Bäck, M. Debus, & J. M. Fernandes (Eds.), The politics of legislative debates (pp. 304–328). Oxford University Press.
  • Sorace, M. (2021b). Productivity-based retrospective voting: Legislative productivity and voting in the 2019 European Parliament elections. Politics, 41(4), 504–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395721991403Forthcomin.
  • TEU. (2012). Consolidated version of the treaty on European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:2bf140bf-a3f8-4ab2-b506-fd71826e6da6.0023.02/DOC_1&format=PDF
  • Thomson, R. (2011). Resolving controversy in the European Union: Inputs, processes and outputs in legislative decision-making before and after enlargement. Cambridge University Press.
  • Toshkov, D. (2011). Public opinion and policy output in the European Union: A lost relationship. European Union Politics, 12(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116510395043
  • Treier, S., & Hillygus, D. S. (2009). The nature of political ideology in the contemporary electorate. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(4), 679–703. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp067
  • Trubek, D. M., & Mosher, J. S. (2003). New governance, employment policy and the European social model. In J. Zeitlin, & D. M. Trubek (Eds.), Governing work and welfare in a new economy: European and American experiments (pp. 33–58). Oxford University Press.
  • Tsebelis, G. (1995). Decision making in political systems: Veto players in presidentialism, parliamentarism, multicameralism and multipartyism. British Journal of Political Science, 25(3), 289–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400007225
  • Vasilopoulou, S., & Gattermann, K. (2013). Matching policy preferences: The linkage between voters and MEPs. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(4), 606–625. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.718892
  • Walczak, A., & Van der Brug, W. (2013). Representation in the European Parliament: Factors affecting the attitude congruence of voters and candidates in the EP elections. European Union Politics, 14(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116512456089
  • Weber, T. (2011). Exit, voice, and cyclicality: A micrologic of midterm effects in European Parliament elections. American Journal of Political Science, 55(4), 907–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.2011.55.issue-4
  • Wlezien, C. (1995). The public as thermostat: Dynamic preferences for spending. American Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 981–1000. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111666
  • Wlezien, C. (2017). Public opinion and policy representation: On conceptualization, measurement, and interpretation. Policy Studies Journal, 45(4), 561–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.v45.4
  • Wlezien, C., & Soroka, S. N. (2012). Political institutions and the opinion–policy link. West European Politics, 35(6), 1407–1432. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.713752
  • Wratil, C. (2018). Evidence from the European Union. American Journal of Political Science Online Fir. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12403.
  • Zeitlin, J., & Vanhercke, B. (2018). Socializing the European Semester: EU social and economic policy co-ordination in crisis and beyond. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(2), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1363269
  • Zürn, M. (2014). The politicization of world politics and its effects: Eight propositions. European Political Science Review, 6(1), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773912000276