Making regulation flexible for the governance of disruptive innovation: A comparative study of AVs regulation in the United Kingdom and South Korea

References

• Abbott, R. (2018). The reasonable computer: Disrupting the paradigm of tort liability. George Washington Law Review, 86(1), 1–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham, K. S., & Rabin, R. L. (2019). Automated vehicles and manufacturer responsibility for accidents: A New legal regime for a New Era. Virginia Law Review, 105(1), 127–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adcock, R., & Collier, D. (2001). Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 529–546. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055401003100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical values for lawshe’s Content validity ratio. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayres, I., & Braithwaite, J. (1992). Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bardach, E., & Kagan, R. A. (1982). Going by the Book: The Problem of Regulatory Unreasonableness. Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennear, L. S., & Coglianese, C. (2013). Flexible approaches to environmental regulation. In S. Kamieniecki, & M. E. Kraft (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of U.S. Environmental Policy (pp. 582–604). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berliner, D., & Prakash, A. (2014). Public authority and private rules: How domestic regulatory institutions shape the adoption of global private regimes. International Studies Quarterly, 58(4), 793–803. https://doi.org/10.1111/isqu.12166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black, J. (2008). Forms and paradoxes of principles-based regulation. Capital Markets Law Journal, 3(4), 425–457. https://doi.org/10.1093/cmlj/kmn026
   Google Scholar
• Black, J., Hopper, M., & Band, C. (2007). Making a success of principles-based regulation. Law and Financial Markets Review, 1(3), 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/17521440.2007.11427879
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J. (2005). Markets in Vice, Markets in Virtue. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J., & Hong, S. (2015). The iteration deficit in responsive regulation: Are regulatory ambassadors an answer? Regulation & Governance, 9(1), 16–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownsword, R. (2008). So what does the world need now? Reflections on regulating technologies. In R. Brownsword, & K. Yeung (Eds.), Regulating Technologies: Legal Futures, Regulatory Frames and Technological Fixes (pp. 23–48). Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Busse, R., Schreyögg, J., & Henke, K. D. (2005). Regulation of pharmaceutical markets in Germany: Improving efficiency and controlling expenditures? The International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 20(4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.818
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, B. H. (2019). Crashworthy code. Washington Law Review, 94(1), 39–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coglianese, C. (2010). Management-Based Regulation: implications for Public policy.’. In G. Bounds, N. Malyshev, & J. Konvitz (Eds.), Risk and Regulatory Policy: Improving the Governance of Risk. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Coglianese, C., & Lazer, D. (2003). Management-Based regulation: Prescribing private management to achieve public goals. Law & Society Review, 37(4), 691–730. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0023-9216.2003.03703001.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coglianese, C., Nash, J., & Olmstead, T. (2003). Performance-based regulation: Prospects and limitations in health, safety, and environmental protection. Administrative Law Review, 55(4), 705–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. J. (2010). Governance legalism: Hayek and Sabel on reason and rules, organization and law. Wisconsin Law Review, 2021(2), 357–388.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (2019). Between Truth and Power: The Legal Constructions of Informational Capitalism. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, A. (2016) ‘Google's self-driving car caused its first crash‘, Wired, 29 Feb, Available: https://www.wired.com/2016/02/googles-self-driving-car-may-caused-first-crash/ [Accessed Sep 30, 2020].
   Google Scholar
• De Bruyne, J., & Werbrouck, J. (2018). Merging self-driving cars with the law. Computer Law & Security Review, 34(5), 1150–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2018.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolata, U. (2013). The Transformative Capacity of new Technologies: A Theory of Sociotechnical Change. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dorf, M. C., & Sabel, C. F. (1998). A constitution of democratic experimentalism. Columbia Law Review, 98(2), 267–473. https://doi.org/10.2307/1123411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. (2014). The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 40, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. (2015). Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 167–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick, M., Kaal, W. A., & Vermeulen, E. P. (2016). Regulation tomorrow: What happens when technology is faster than the law. American University Business Law Review, 6(3), 561–594.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, C. (2017). Innovation and the State: Finance, Regulation, and Justice. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geistfeld, M. A. (2017). A roadmap for autonomous vehicles: State tort liability, automobile insurance, and federal safety regulation. California Law Review, 105(6), 1611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenblatt, J. B., & Saxena, S. (2015). Autonomous taxis could greatly reduce greenhouse-gas emissions of US light-duty vehicles. Nature Climate Change, 5(9), 860–863. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N. (2009). Environment law, regulation and governance: Shifting architectures. Journal of Environmental Law, 21(2), 179–212. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqp011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N. A., & Grabosky, P. (1998). Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, M. A. (2011). College students’ prevalence and perceptions of text messaging while driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43(4), 1516–1520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.03.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasselbalch, J. A. (2018). Innovation assessment: Governing through periods of disruptive technological change. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(12), 1855–1873. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1363805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008–1015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimer, C. A., & Gazley, J. L. (2012). Performing regulation: Transcending regulatory ritualism in HIV clinics. Law & Society Review, 46(4), 853–887. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00519.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiriart, Y., Martimort, D., & Pouyet, J. (2004). On the optimal use of ex ante regulation and ex post liability. Economics Letters, 84(2), 231–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2004.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, S., & You, J. s. (2018). Limits of regulatory responsiveness: Democratic credentials of responsive regulation. Regulation & Governance, 12(3), 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., & Song, C.-K. (2020). Changes in air pollutant emissions from road vehicles due to autonomous driving technology: A conceptual modeling approach. Environmental Engineering Research, 25(3), 366–373. https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2019.117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostadinova, P. (2015). Improving the transparency and accountability of EU institutions: The impact of the office of the European ombudsman. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(5), 1077–1093. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmassani, H. S. (2016). 50th anniversary invited article—autonomous vehicles and connected vehicle systems: Flow and operations considerations. Transportation Science, 50(4), 1140–1162. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.2016.0712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumdar, S. K., & Marcus, A. A. (2001). Rules versus discretion: The productivity consequences of flexible regulation. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 170–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millard-Ball, A. (2018). Pedestrians, autonomous vehicles, and cities. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 38(1), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X16675674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nonet, P., & Selznick, P. (1978). Law and Society in Transition: Toward Responsive Law. Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Regulatory Policy and Governance: Supporting Economic Growth and Serving the Public Interest. OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ogus, A. (1992). Information, error costs and regulation. International Review of Law and Economics, 12(4), 411–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/0144-8188(92)90019-N
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, S., & Cronin, S. L. (2019). Stakeholder views on the social issues relating to the introduction of autonomous vehicles. Transport Policy, 81, 64–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, S., Fritschi, L., & Norman, R. (2018). The potential implications of autonomous vehicles in and around the workplace. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(9), 1876. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15091876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piore, M. J., & Schrank, A. (2008). Toward managed flexibility: The revival of labour inspection in the latin world. International Labour Review, 147(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2008.00021.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pires, R. R. C. (2011). Beyond the fear of discretion: Flexibility, performance, and accountability in the management of regulatory bureaucracies. Regulation & Governance, 5(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01083.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramanathan, R., Ramanathan, U., & Bentley, Y. (2018). The debate on flexibility of environmental regulations, innovation capabilities and financial performance – A novel use of DEA. Omega, 75, 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasouli, A., & Tsotsos, J. K. (2019). Autonomous vehicles that interact with pedestrians: A survey of theory and practice. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(3), 900–918. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2019.2901817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhiu, I., Kwon, S., Bahn, S., Yun, M. H., & Yu, W. (2015). Research issues in smart vehicles and elderly drivers: A literature review. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31(10), 635–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2015.1070540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. (1980). The Analytic Hierarch Process. McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Sabel, C. F. (1993). Learning by Monitoring: The Institutions of Economic Development. Columbia University School of Law.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, J. T. (1984). Cooperation, deterrence, and the ecology of regulatory enforcement. Law & Society Review, 18(2), 179–224. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuelke-Leech, B. A., Jordan, S. R., & Barry, B. (2019). Regulating autonomy: An assessment of policy language for Highly automated vehicles. Review of Policy Research, 36(4), 547–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selznick, P. (1992). The Moral Commonwealth: Social Theory and the Promise of Community. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shavell, S. (1984). A model of the optimal use of liability and safety regulation. The Rand Journal of Economics, 15(2), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.2307/2555680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C., & Torfing, J. (2010). Improving democratic governance through institutional design: Civic participation and democratic ownership in Europe. Regulation & Governance, 4(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2010.01072.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G., & Hensher, D. A. (2020). Towards a framework for mobility-as-a-service policies. Transport Policy, 89, 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. & Theseira, W. (2020) Workshop 5 report: How much regulation should disruptive transport technologies be subject to? Research in Transportation Economics, 83, 100915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2016). Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sossa, J. W. Z., Halal, W., & Zarta, R. H. (2019). Delphi method: Analysis of rounds, stakeholder and statistical indicators. Foresight (los Angeles, Calif ), 21(5), 525–544. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-11-2018-0095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, J. E. (2007). Regulating multinational corporations: Towards principles of cross-border legal framework in a globalized world balancing rights with responsibilities. American University International Law Review, 23(3), 451.
   Google Scholar
• Taeihagh, A., & Lim, H. S. M. (2019). Governing autonomous vehicles: Emerging responses for safety, liability, privacy, cybersecurity, and industry risks. Transport Reviews, 39(1), 103–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1494640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellinga, N. E. (2019). Automated driving and its challenges to international traffic law: Which way to go? Law, Innovation and Technology, 11(2), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2019.1665798
   Google Scholar
• Vladeck, D. C. (2014). Machines without principals: Liability rules and artificial intelligence. Washington Law Review, 89(1), 117–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, R. M. (2017). Resistance Is futile; disruption Is inevitable. Journal of Financial Service Professionals, 71(2), 55–59.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, F. A., & Stimpson, J. P. (2010). Trends in fatalities from distracted driving in the United States, 1999 to 2008. American Journal of Public Health, 100(11), 2213–2219. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.187179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, J., & Coughlin, J. F. (2014). In-vehicle technology for self-driving cars: Advantages and challenges for aging drivers. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 15(2), 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-014-0034-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar