Entangled agencies and embedded preferences: National Regulatory Agencies in multi-level European governance

References

• Abbott, K. W., Levi-Faur, D., & Snidal, D. (2017). Theorizing regulatory intermediaries: The RIT model. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716216688272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arras, S., & Braun, C. (2018). Stakeholders wanted! Why and how European Union agencies involve non-state stakeholders. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(9), 1257–1275. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1307438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, T., De Francesco, F., Maggetti, M., & Ruffing E. (2016). Transnational bureaucratic politics: An institutional rivalry perspective on EU network governance. Public Administration, 94(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, D., & Newman, A. (2014). Domestic drivers of transgovernmental regulatory cooperation. Regulation & Governance, 8(4), 395–417. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, T., Ruffing, E., & Yesilkagit, K. (2015). The differential empowering effects of Europeanization on the autonomy of national agencies. Governance, 28(3), 285–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbieri, D. (2006). Transnational networks meet national hierarchies: The cases of the Italian competition and environment agencies. In M. Egeberg (Ed.), Multilevel union administration: The transformation of executive politics in Europe (pp. 180–193). Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bawn, K. (1995). Political control versus expertise: Congressional choices about administrative procedures. The American Political Science Review, 89(1), 62–73. https://doi.org/10.2307/2083075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianculli, A. C., Jordana, J., & Juanatey, A. G. (2015). International networks as drivers of agency independence: The case of the Spanish nuclear safety council. Administration & Society, 49(9), 1246–1271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399715581034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauberger, M., & Rittberger, B. (2015). Conceptualizing and theorizing EU regulatory networks. Regulation & Governance, 9(4), 367–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buess, M. (2015). Accountable and under control: Explaining governments’ selection of management board representatives. Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(3), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busuioc, M. (2013). EU agencies: Law and practices of accountability. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, J. G., & Nielsen, V. L. (2010). Administrative capacity, structural choice and the creation of EU agencies. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(2), 176–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760903561757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coen, D., & Thatcher, M. (2008). Network governance and multi-level delegation: European networks of regulatory agencies. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X08000779
   Google Scholar
• Danielsen, O. A., & Yesilkagit, K. (2014). The effects of European regulatory networks on the bureaucratic autonomy of national regulatory authorities. Public Organization Review, 14(3), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-013-0220-4
   Google Scholar
• Dehousse, R. (1997). Regulation by networks in the European community: The role of European agencies. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(2), 246–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501769709696341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehousse, R. (2008). Delegation of powers in the European Union: The need for a multi-principals model. West European Politics, 31(4), 789–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380801906072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberlein, B., & Grande, E. (2005). Beyond delegation: Transnational regulatory regimes and the EU regulatory state. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(1), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000311925
   Google Scholar
• Eberlein, B., & Newman, A. L. (2008). Escaping the international governance dilemma? Incorporated transgovernmental networks in the European Union. Governance, 21(1), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00384.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M. (2006). Multilevel union administration. The transformation of executive politics in Europe. Palgrave studies in European Union studies. Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2009). National agencies in the European administrative space: Government driven, commission driven or networked? Public Administration, 87(4), 779–790. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01779.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Court of Auditors. (2020). Future of EU agencies – potential for more flexibility and cooperation (Special report 22).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2021). The management boards of decentralized agencies. Policy Department for Budgetary Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Gilardi, F. (2002). Policy credibility and delegation to independent regulatory authorities: A comparative empirical analysis. Journal of European Public Policy, 9, 873–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordana, J. (2017). Transgovernmental networks as regulatory intermediaries: Horizontal collaboration and the realities of soft power. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670(1), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217694591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordana, J., Pérez-Durán, I., & Triviño-Salazar, J. C. (2020). Drivers of integration? EU agency board members on transboundary crises. Comparative European Politics, 19, 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-020-00221-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. D., & Tarrant, A. D. (2011). The political foundations of the Eurocracy. West European Politics, 34(5), 922–947. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.591076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D. (2011). Regulatory networks and regulatory agencification: Towards a single European regulatory space. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 810–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.593309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodge, M., & Koop, C. (2014). Exploring the co-ordination of economic regulation. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(9), 1311–1329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.923023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggetti, M., & Papadopoulos, Y. (2018). The principal–agent framework and independent regulatory agencies. Political Studies Review, 16(3), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929916664359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, M. (2006). National regulators between union and governments: A study of the EU’s environmental policy network IMPEL. In M. Egeberg (Ed.), Multilevel union administration: The transformation of executive politics in Europe (pp. 124–142). Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Martinsen, D. S., Schrama, R., & Mastenbroek, E. (2021). Experimenting European healthcare forward. Do institutional differences condition networked governance? Journal of European Public Policy, 28(11), 1849–1870. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1804436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastenbroek, E., & Martinsen, D. S. (2018). Filling the gap in the European administrative space: The role of administrative networks in EU implementation and enforcement. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(3), 422–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1298147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCubbins, M. D., Noll, R. D., & Weingast, B. R. (1987). Administrative procedures as instruments of political control. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 3, 243–277. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a036930
   Google Scholar
• Newman, A. L. (2010). International organization control under conditions of dual delegation: A transgovernmental politics approach. In D. D. Avant & M. Finnemore (Eds.), Who governs the globe? (pp. 131–152). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Durán, I. (2019). Political and stakeholder’s ties in European Union agencies. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1375545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roger, C. B. (2020). The origins of informality: Why the legal foundations of global governance are shifting, and why it matters. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2008). Learning from difference: The new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU. European Law Journal, 14(3), 271–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2008.00415.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saurugger, S., & Terpan, F. (2021). Normative transformations in the European Union: On hardening and softening law. West European Politics, 44(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1762440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terpan, F. (2015). Soft law in the European Union – The changing nature of EU law. European Law Journal, 21(1), 68–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingast, B. R. (1984). The congressional-bureaucratic system: A principal-agent perspective (with applications to the SEC). Public Choice, 44(1), 147–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00124821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingast, B. R., & Moran, M. J. (1983). Bureaucratic discretion or congressional control? Regulatory policymaking by the Federal Trade Commission. Journal of Political Economy, 14, 167–194. https://doi.org/10.1086/261181
   Google Scholar
• Yesilkagit, K. (2004). Bureaucratic autonomy, organizational culture, and habituation: Politicians and independent administrative bodies in the Netherlands. Administration & Society, 36(5), 528–552. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399704268501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yesilkagit, K. (2011). Institutional compliance. European networks of regulation and the bureaucratic autonomy of national regulatory authorities. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(7), 962–969. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.599965
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar