Monitoring and evaluating the CAP: a (post-) exceptionalist policy arrangement?

References

• Alons, G. (2017). Environmental policy integration in the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy: Greening or greenwashing? Journal of European Public Policy, 24(11), 1604–1622. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1334085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alons, G., & Zwaan, P. (in press). The common agricultural policy: Still the elephant in the room? In S. Faure & C. Lequesne (Eds.), Elgar Companion to the European Union. Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Arts, B., Leroy, P., & Van Tatenhove, J. (2006). Political modernisation and policy arrangements: A framework for understanding environmental policy change. Public Organization Review, 6(2), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-006-0001-4
   Google Scholar
• Badampudi, D., Wohlin, C., & Petersen, K. (2015). Experiences from using snowballing and database searches in systematic literature studies. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering (pp. 1–10). https://doi.org/10.1145/2745802.2745818
   Google Scholar
• Beijen, B. A., Van Rijswick, H., & Anker, H. (2014). The importance of monitoring for the effectiveness of environmental directives: A comparison of monitoring obligations in European environmental directives. Utrecht Law Review, 10(2).
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., ‘t Hart, P., & Kuipers, S. (2008). The politics of policy evaluation. In R. E. Goodin, M. Rein, & M. Moran (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy (pp. 320–335). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bozzini, E., & Hunt, J. (2015). Bringing evaluation into the policy cycle CAP cross compliance and the defining and re-defining of objectives and indicators. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 6(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00004281
   Google Scholar
• COM (European Commission). (2012a). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A simplification agenda for the MFF 2014-2020. COM/2012/042 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52012DC0042
   Google Scholar
• COM (European Commission). (2012b). Report of the first meeting of the expert group on ‘monitoring and evaluating the cap’ – 14 June 2012 In Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• COM (European Commission). (2015). Better regulation toolbox [complement to SWD(2015)111]. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/better-regulation-toolbox-2015_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• COM (European Commission). (2017). Technical handbook on the CMEF of the CAP 2014–20.
   Google Scholar
• COM (European Commission). (2018a). Staff working document impact assessment. SWD/2018/301 final – 2018/0216 (COD). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=SWD%3A2018%3A301%3AFIN
   Google Scholar
• COM (European Commission). (2018b). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP Strategic Plans) and financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council COM/2018/392 final - 2018/0216 (COD), https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2018%3A392%3AFIN
   Google Scholar
• COM (European Commission). (2018c). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of the Common Monitoring and Evaluation Framework and first results on the performance of the Common Agricultural Policy. COM(2018)790 final. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/fe3c8f74-f894-11e8-9982-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-search
   Google Scholar
• COM (European Commission). (2018d). Minutes of the 13th meeting of the expert group for monitoring and evaluating the CAP – 12 March 2018. https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/expert-groups-register/screen/meetings/consult?lang=en&meetingId=2042&fromExpertGroups=true
   Google Scholar
• COM (European Commission). (2018e). Minutes of the 14th meeting of the expert group for monitoring and evaluating the CAP – 19 September 2018 https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/expert-groups-register/screen/meetings/consult?lang=en&meetingId=4759&fromExpertGroups=true
   Google Scholar
• Copa-Cogeca. (2018). Copa and Cogeca position on the CAP post 2020. https://www.copa-cogeca.eu/Download.ashx?ID=1900725&fmt=pdf
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2012a). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financing, management and monitoring of the Common Agricultural Policy – working document from the Commission services.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2012b). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financing, management and monitoring of the Common Agricultural Policy (the horizontal regulation) – Presidency consolidated revised text.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2018). Communication on ‘the future of food and farming’ – presidency conclusions https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-7324-2018-INIT/en/pdf_
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2020a). Proposal for a regulation on CAP strategic plans (Annex I) – Drafting suggestions from five delegations. (Internal document).
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2020b). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP strategic plans) and financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council and regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council – general approach. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-12148-2020-ADD-1/en/pdf
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2021). Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing rules on support for strategic plans to be drawn up by Member States under the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP Strategic Plans) and financed by the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing regulation (EU) No 1305/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council and regulation (EU) No 1307/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council – four column document. https://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-6129-2021-INIT/en/pdf
   Google Scholar
• Court of Auditors. (2016). Special report is the Commission’s system for performance measurement in relation to farmers’ incomes well designed and based on sound data? https://www.eca.europa.eu/Lists/ECADocuments/SR16_01/SR_FARMERS_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Court of Auditors. (2018). Opinion No 7/2018 (pursuant to Article 322(1)(a) TFEU) concerning Commission proposals for regulations relating to the Common Agricultural Policy for the post-2020 period (COM(2018) 392, 393 and 394 final) (2019/C 41/01). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52018AA0007&rid=1
   Google Scholar
• Croatian Presidency. (2020). Untitled memo. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/44646/hr-pres-progress-report-final-16-06-20.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Daugbjerg, C., & Feindt, P. H. (2017). Post-exceptionalism in public policy: Transforming food and agricultural policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(11), 1565–1584. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1334081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckhard, S., & Jankauskas, V. (2019). The politics of evaluation in international organizations: A comparative study of stakeholder influence potential. Evaluation, 25(1), 62–79. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389018803967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2013). Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financing, management and monitoring of the Common Agricultural Policy (COM(2011)0628 – C7-0341/2011 – COM(2012)0551 – C7-0312/2012 – 2011/0288(COD)).
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2020). Amendments adopted by the European Parliament on 23 October 2020 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the financing, management and monitoring of the Common Agricultural Policy and repealing regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 (COM(2018)0393 - C8-0247/2018 – 2018/0217(COD))(2). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2020-0288_EN.html
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament, Council & Commission. (2016). Interinstitutional agreement on better law-making. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32016Q0512%2801%29
   Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, T. (2012). Evaluating legislation: An alternative approach for evaluating EU internal market and services law. Evaluation, 18(4), 477–499. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389012460439
   Google Scholar
• Greer, A. (2017). Post-exceptional politics in agriculture: an examination of the 2013 CAP reform. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(11), 1585–1603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, H. F. (2005). Choosing evaluation models: A discussion on evaluation design. Evaluation, 11(4), 447–462. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389005060265
   Google Scholar
• Hart, K. (2015). The fate of green direct payments in the CAP reform negotiations. In J. Swinnen (Ed.), The political economy of the 2014-2020 reforms of the common agricultural policy: An imperfect Storm, Brussels: Centre for European Policy Studies/Rowman and Littlefield International (pp. 245–276).
   Google Scholar
• Højlund, S. (2014). Evaluation use in evaluation systems – the case of the European commission. Evaluation, 20(4), 428–446. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389014550562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knops, L., & Swinnen, J. (2014). The first CAP reform under the ordinary legislative procedure: A political economy perspective. Study commissioned by the European Parliament, Directorate General for internal policies, Policy department B, Structural and cohesion policies.
   Google Scholar
• Liefferink, D. (2006). The dynamics of policy arrangements: Turning round the tetrahedron. In B. J. M. Arts & P. Leroy (Eds.), Institutional Dynamics in Environmental Governance (pp. 45–68). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lovec, M., Šumrada, T., & Erjavec, E. (2020). New CAP delivery model, Old issues. Intereconomics, 55(2), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-020-0880-6
   Google Scholar
• Maréchal, A., Baldock, D., Erjavec, E., Juvančič, L., Rac, I., Dwyer, J., & Hart, K. (2018). Towards a step change for enhanced delivery of environmental and social benefits from EU farming and forestry. EuroChoices, 17(3), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metta, M. (2020, November 17). CAP performance monitoring and evaluation framework – EP position. https://www.arc2020.eu/cap-performance-monitoring-and-evaluation-framework-ep-position
   Google Scholar
• Metta, M., Wetzel, H., & Armijo Campos, R. M. (2020). CAP strategic plans project CAP reform post 2020: Lost in Ambition? (Report). ARC2020. https://www.arc2020.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/ARC_Strategic_Plans_2020_web_version_compressed_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moulton, S., & Sandfort, J. R. (2017). The strategic action field framework for policy implementation research. Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 144–169. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyssens, C. (2020, July 9). The European Commission must not greenwash the Common Agricultural Policy. https://capreform.eu/the-european-commission-must-not-greenwash-the-common-agricultural-policy/
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2020). How Can Governments Leverage Policy Evaluation to Improve Evidence Informed Policy Making? Highlights from an OECD Comparative Study.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., Cox, M., & Schlager, E. (2014). An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework and introduction of the social-ecological systems framework. In P. A. Sabatier & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 267–306). Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• LSE GV314 Group & Page, E. C. (2014). Evaluation under contract: Government pressure and the production of policy research. Public Administration, 92(1), 224–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pe’er, G., Lakner, S., Müller, R., Passoni, G., Bontzorlos, V., Clough, D., Moreira, F., Azam, C., Berger, J., Bezak, P., Bonn, A., Hansjürgens, B., Hartmann, L., Kleemann, J., Lomba, A., Sahrbacher, A., Schindler, S., Schleyer, C., Schmidt, J., … Zinngrebe, Y. (2017). Is the CAP fit for Purpose? An evidence-based fitness check assessment. German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research.
   Google Scholar
• Pe’er, G., Zinngrebe, Y., Moreira, F., Sirami, C., Schindler, S., Müller, R., Bontzorlos, V., Clough, D., Bezák, P., Bonn, A., Jürgens, B. H., Lomba, A., Möckel, S., Passoni, G., Schleyer, C., Schmidt, J., & Lakner, S. (2019). A greener path for the EU Common Agricultural Policy. Science, 365(6452), 449–451. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax3146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• REFIT platform. (2016). Opinion on the submission by the European Environmental Bureau on Effectiveness and Efficiency of the Common Agricultural Policy. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/default/files/opinion_agriculture_i_4a_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration, 80(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandfort, J., & Moulton, S. (2015). Effective Implementation in Practice: Integrating Public Policy and Management. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. (1998). The politics of evaluation reconsidered: A comparative study of Israeli programs. Evaluation, 4(3), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/13563899822208617
   Google Scholar
• Smith, M. (1992). The agricultural policy network: Maintaining a closed relationship. In R. Rhodes & D. Marsh (Eds.), Policy Networks in British Government (pp. 27–55). Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, P. (2015). Reconciling audit and evaluation?: The shift to performance and effectiveness at the European Court of Auditors. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 6(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X0000430X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, E. (2009). Evaluation policy in the European Union and its institutions. In W. M. K. Trochim, M. M. Mark, & L. J. Cooksy (Eds.), Evaluation Policy and Evaluation Practice: New Directions for Evaluation (pp. 67–85). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Trochim, W. M. K. (2009). Evaluation policy and evaluation practice. In W. M. K. Trochim, M. M. Mark, & L. J. Cooksy (Eds.), Evaluation policy and evaluation practice: New directions for evaluation (pp. 13–32). Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Vedung, E. (1997). Public policy and program evaluation. Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Voorst, S., Zwaan, P., & Schoenefeld, J. (in press). Policy evaluation: An evolving and expanding feature of EU governance. In P. R. Graziano & J. Tosun (Eds.), Elgar encyclopedia of European Union public policy.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, C. H. (1993). Where politics and evaluation research meet. Evaluation Practice, 14(1), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409301400119
   Google Scholar
• Wergin, J. F. (1976). The evaluation of organizational policy making: A political model. Review of Educational Research, 46(1), 75–115. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543046001075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, P., & Alons, G. (2015). Legitimating the CAP: The European commission’s discursive strategies for regaining support for direct payments. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 11(2).
   Google Scholar