1,082
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

A solidarity bias? Assessing the effects of individual transnationalism on redistributive solidarity in the EU

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley.
  • Banting, K., & Kymlicka, W. (2017). The strains of commitment: The political sources of solidarity in diverse societies. Oxford University Press.
  • Baute, S., Meuleman, B., & Abts, K. (2019). Welfare state attitudes and support for social Europe: Spillover or obstacle? Journal of Social Policy, 48(1), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279418000314
  • Binder, J., Zagefka, H., Brown, R., Funke, F., Kessler, T., Mummendey, A., Leyens, J. P., Demoulin, S., & Leyens, J.-P. (2009). Does contact reduce prejudice or does prejudice reduce contact? A longitudinal test of the contact hypothesis among majority and minority groups in three European countries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 843–856. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013470
  • Blekesaune, M., & Quadagno, J. (2003). Public attitudes toward welfare state policies: A comparative analysis of 24 nations. European Sociological Review, 19(5), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/19.5.415. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3559532
  • Calhoun, C. (2003). ‘Belonging’ in the cosmopolitan imaginary. Ethnicities, 3(4), 531–553. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468796803003004005
  • Careja, R., & Harris, E. (2022). Thirty years of welfare chauvinism research: Findings and challenges. Journal of European Social Policy, 32(2), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/09589287211068796
  • Ciornei, I., & Recchi, E. (2017). At the source of European solidarity: Assessing the effects of cross-border practices and political attitudes. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(3), 468–485. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12507
  • Crepaz, M. M. (2008). Trust beyond borders: Immigration, the welfare state, and identity in modern societies. University of Michigan Press.
  • Delhey, J., Deutschmann, E., & Cirlanaru, K. (2015). Between ‘class project’ and individualization: The stratification of Europeans’ transnational activities. International Sociology, 30(3), 269–293. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580915578744
  • Deutsch, K. W., Burrell, S. A., Kann, R. A., & Lee, M. (1957). Political community and the north Atlantic area. Greenwood Press.
  • De Vries, C. E. (2018). Euroscepticism and the future of European integration. Oxford University Press.
  • De Wilde, P. (2019). Mapping policy and polity contestation about globalization: Issue linkage in the news. In P. De Wilde, R. Koopmans, W. Merkel, O. Stribijs, & M. Zürn (Eds.), The struggle over borders (pp. 89–115). Cambridge University Press.
  • Donati, N., Pellegata, A., & Visconti, F. (2021). European solidarity at a crossroads. Citizen views on the future of the European Union (REScEU Working Paper). http://www.euvisions.eu/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/mass_survey_report_2019-1.pdf
  • European Parliament. (2016). Major changes in European public opinion regarding the European Union. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/at-your-service/files/be-heard/eurobarometer/2016/major-changes-in-european-public-opinion-2016/report/en-report-exploratory-study-201611.pdf
  • Ferrera, M. (2005). The boundaries of welfare: European integration and the new spatial politics of social protection. Oxford University Press.
  • Ferrera, M. (2009). The JCMS annual lecture: National welfare states and European integration: In search of a ‘virtuous nesting’. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2009.00802.x
  • Gerhards, J., Lengfeld, H., Ignácz, Z. S., Kley, F. K., & Priem, M. (2019). European solidarity in times of crisis: Insights from a thirteen-country survey. Routledge.
  • Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279
  • Ignácz, Z. S. (2021). Similarities between European and national solidarity. Sozialpolitik, 1, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.18753/2297-8224-172
  • Iversen, T., & Soskice, S. (2019). Democracy and prosperity: Reinventing capitalism through a turbulent century. Princeton University Press.
  • Jaeger, M. M. (2009). United but divided: Welfare regimes and the level and variance in public support for redistribution. European Sociological Review, 25(6), 723–737. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcn079
  • Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Lachat, R., Dolezal, M., Bornschier, S., & Frey, T. (2006). Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research, 45(6), 921–956. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00644.x
  • Kuhn, T. (2015). Experiencing European integration. Transnational lives and European identity. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199688913.001.0001
  • Kuhn, T. (2019). Grand theories of European integration revisited: Does identity politics shape the course of European integration? Journal of European Public Policy, 26(8), 1213–1230. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1622588
  • Kulin, J., & Svallfors, S. (2013). Class, values, and attitudes towards redistribution: A European comparison. European Sociological Review, 29(2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcr046. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24479960
  • Kyriazi, A., & Visconti, F. (2021). The Europeanisation of political involvement: Examining the role of individual transnationalism. Electoral Studies, 73, Article 102383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102383
  • Lahusen, C. (2020). Citizens’ solidarity in Europe: Civic engagement and public discourse in times of crises. Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Lahusen, C., & Grasso, M. T. (2018). Solidarity in Europe: Citizens’ responses in times of crisis. Springer Nature.
  • Marks, G., Attewell, D., Rovny, J., & Hooghe, L. (2021). Cleavage theory. In M. Riddervold, J. Trondal, & A. Newsom (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of EU crises (pp. 173–193). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Mau, S., Mewes, J., & Zimmermann, A. (2008). Cosmopolitan attitudes through transnational social practices? Global Networks, 8(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2008.00183.x
  • Medrano, J. D., & Gutiérrez, P. (2001). Nested identities: National and European identity in Spain. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24(5), 753–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870120063963
  • Miller, D. (1995). On nationality. Clarendon Press.
  • Pagano, G., & Regazzoni, P. (2019). The social dimension in the electoral programs of the European political groups. EuVisions. Retrieved November 11, 2022, from http://www.euvisions.eu/the-social-dimension-in-the-electoral-programs-of-the-european-political-groups/?pdf=2070
  • Pellegata, A., & Visconti, F. (2021). Transnationalism and welfare chauvinism in Italy: Evidence from the 2018 election campaign. South European Society and Politics, 26(1), 55–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2020.1834214
  • Pettigrew, T. F., Tropp, L. R., Wagner, U., & Christ, O. (2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(3), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.03.001
  • Recchi, E., & Favell, A. (2019). Everyday Europe: Social transnationalism in an unsettled continent. Policy Press.
  • Reinl, A. K. (2022). Transnational solidarity within the EU: Public support for risk-sharing and redistribution. Social Indicators Research, 163(3), 1373–1397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-02937-2
  • Salamońska, J., & Recchi, E. (2016). Europe between mobility and sedentarism: Patterns of cross-border practices and their consequences for European identification (Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS, 50).
  • Schotte, S., & Winkler, H. (2018). Why are the elderly more averse to immigration when they are more likely to benefit? Evidence across countries. International Migration Review, 52(4), 1250–1282. https://doi.org/10.1177/0197918318767927
  • Stjernø, S. (2009). Solidarity in Europe: The history of an idea. Cambridge University Press.
  • Teney, C., & Helbling, M. (2017). Solidarity between the elites and the masses in Germany. In K. Banting & W. Kymlicka (Eds.), The strains of commitment: The political sources of solidarity in diverse societies (pp. 127–151). Oxford University Press.
  • van der Waal, J., Achterberg, P., Houtman, D., De Koster, W., & Manevska, K. (2010). ‘Some are more equal than others’: Economic egalitarianism and welfare chauvinism in the Netherlands. Journal of European Social Policy, 20(4), 350–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928710374376
  • van Parijs, P. (2017). Concluding reflections. In W. Kymlicka & K. G. Banting (Eds.), The strains of commitment: The political sources of solidarity in diverse societies (pp. 420–426). Oxford University Press.
  • Verhaegen, S. (2018). What to expect from European identity? Explaining support for solidarity in times of crisis. Comparative European Politics, 16(5), 871–904. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-017-0106-x
  • Ziller, C., & Careja, R. (2022). Personal and contextual foundations of welfare chauvinism in Western Europe. In M. M. L. Crepaz (Ed.), Handbook on migration and welfare (pp. 175–194). Edward Elgar.