The regulatory security state in Europe

References

• Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (Eds.). (2020). The governor's dilemma: Indirect governance beyond principals and agents. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abbott, K. W., Levi-Faur, D., & Snidal, D. (2017). Theorizing regulatory intermediaries: The RIT model. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 670(1), 14–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716216688272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellanova, R., Carrapico, H., & Duez, D. (2022). Digital/sovereignty and European security integration: An introduction. European Security, 31(3), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2101887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benish, A., & Levi-Faur, D. (2020). The expansion of regulation in welfare governance. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 691(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716220949230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauberger, M., & Weiss, M. (2013). ‘If you can't beat me, join me!’: How the commission pushed and pulled member states into legislating defence procurement. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(8), 1120–1138. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.781783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, I., & Huelss, H. (2018). Autonomous weapons systems and changing norms in international relations. Review of International Studies, 44(3), 393–413. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210517000614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode, I., & Huelss, H. (2023). Constructing expertise: The front- and back-door regulation of AI’s military applications in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1230–1254. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2174169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A., & Zürn, M. (2021). Contestations of the liberal international order: From liberal multilateralism to postnational liberalism. International Organization, 75(2), 282–305. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruin, E. de. (2020). Mapping coercive institutions: The State Security Forces dataset, 1960–2010. Journal of Peace Research, 58(2), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343320913089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, M., & Thelen, K. (2020). Institutional sources of business power. World Politics, 72(3), 448–480. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004388712000009X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramani, D. (2017). Will vs. Reason: The populist and technocratic forms of political representation and their critique to party government. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, M. (2016). Public-private partnerships in national cyber-security strategies. International Affairs, 92(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrapico, H., & Barrinha, A. (2017). The EU as a coherent (cyber)security actor? Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(6), 1254–1272. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12575
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2022a). Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/338. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri = uriserv%3AOJ.L_.2022.060.01.0001.01.ENG&toc = OJ%3AL%3A2022%3A060%3ATOC.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2022b). Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/339. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri = uriserv%3AOJ.L_.2022.061.01.0001.01.ENG&toc = OJ%3AL%3A2022%3A061%3ATOC.
   Google Scholar
• Csernatoni, R. (2022). The EU’s hegemonic imaginaries: From European strategic autonomy in defence to technological sovereignty. European Security, 31(3), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2103370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culpepper, P. (2011). Quiet politics and business power: Corporate control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Der Spiegel. (2022). Rheinmetall baut Munitionsfabriken in Deutschland aus. Spiegel Online, 15 December 2022, https://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/rheinmetall-baut-munitionsfabriken-in-deutschland-aus-a-cdc0abb0-6160-4d5a-a478-865b38b7e7be.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn Cavelty, M., & Smeets, M. (2023). Regulatory cybersecurity governance in the making: The formation of ENISA and its struggle for epistemic authority. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1330–1352. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2173274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn Cavelty, M., & Wenger, A. (2019). Cyber security meets security politics: Complex technology, fragmented politics, and networked science. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(1), 5–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2019.1678855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egloff, F. J., & Dunn Cavelty, M. (2021). Attribution and knowledge creation assemblages in cybersecurity politics. Journal of Cybersecurity, 7(1), https://doi.org/10.1093/cybsec/tyab002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, M. (2022). The anachronism of bellicist state-building. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(12), 1901–1915. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2141825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, J. (2013). Market imperative meets normative power: Human rights and European arms transfer policy. European Journal of International Relations, 19(2), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111415883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, J. (2018). Dangerous trade: Arms exports, human rights, and international reputation. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esterling, K. (2004). The political economy of expertise. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farrand, B., & Carrapico, H. (2022). Digital sovereignty and taking back control: From regulatory capitalism to regulatory mercantilism in EU cybersecurity. European Security, 31(3), 435–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2022.2102896
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., & Newman, A. (2019). Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42–79. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudlsperger, C., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2022). Transboundary crises and political development: Why war is not necessary for European state-building. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(12), 1871–1884. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2141822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genschel, P. (2022). Bellicist integration? The war in Ukraine, the European Union and core state powers. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(12), 1885–1900. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2141823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genschel, P., & Jachtenfuchs, M. (Eds.). (2014). Beyond the regulatory polity? The European integration of core state powers. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Genschel, P., & Jachtenfuchs, M. (2018). From market integration to core state powers: The Eurozone crisis, the refugee crisis, and integration theory. Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(1), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genschel, P., & Jachtenfuchs, M. (2023). The security state in Europe: Regulatory or positive? Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1447–1457. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2174580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genschel, P., & Zangl, B. (2014). State transformations in OECD countries. Annual Review of Political Science, 17(1), 337–354. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-061312-113943
   Google Scholar
• Gheciu, A., & Wohlforth, W. C. (2018). The future of security studies. In A. Gheciu & W. C. Wohlforth (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international security (pp. 3–13). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guidi, M., Guardiancich, I., & Levi-Faur, D. (2020). Modes of regulatory governance: A political economy perspective. Governance, 33(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12479
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, P. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (1997). Institutions, interests and ideas in the comparative political economy of the industrialized nations. In M. Lichbach, & A. Zuckerman (Eds.), Comparative politics: Rationality, culture and structure (pp. 174–207). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, L., & Nissenbaum, H. (2009). Digital disaster, cyber security, and the Copenhagen School. International Studies Quarterly, 53(4), 1155–1175. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27735139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2009.00572.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haroche, P. (2020). Supranationalism strikes back: A neofunctionalist account of the European Defence Fund. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(6), 853–872. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1609570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2004). Ideas, interests and institutions in the comparative political economy of great transformations. Review of International Political Economy, 11(1), 204–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969229042000179811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, S. (1994). The study of the European Community: The challenge to comparative politics. West European Politics, 17(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389408424999
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S. (1999). The political system of the European Union. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeffler, C. (2012). European armament co-operation and the renewal of industrial policy motives. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(3), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.640803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoeffler, C. (2023). Beyond the regulatory state? The European Defence Fund and national military capacities. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1281–1304. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2174581
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, S. C. (2013). European security in NATO’s shadow: Party ideologies and institution building. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, M. (2010). The diffusion of military power: Causes and consequences for international politics. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jachtenfuchs, M. (2001). The governance approach to European integration. Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(2), 245–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordana, J., & Levi-Faur, D. (2004). The politics of regulation: Examining regulatory institutions and instruments in the age of governance. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. D., & McNamara, K. R. (2022). State-building and the European Union: Markets, war, and Europe’s uneven political development. Comparative Political Studies, 55(6), 963–991. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211047393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O., Macedo, S., & Moravcsik, A. (2009). Democracy-enhancing multilateralism. International Organization, 63(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309090018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaaren, J. (2021). The emergence of regulatory capitalism in Africa. Economy and Society, 50(1), 100–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2021.1841934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koop, C., & Lodge, M. (2017). What is regulation? An interdisciplinary concept analysis. Regulation and Governance, 11(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruck, A. (2014). Theorising the use of private military and security companies: A synthetic perspective. Journal of International Relations and Development, 17(1), 112–141. https://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2013.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruck, A. (2016). Resilient blunderers: Credit rating fiascos and rating agencies’ institutionalized status as private authorities. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(5), 753–770. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1127274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruck, A. (2018). Private governance failures and their consequences. In A. Kruck, K. Oppermann, & A. Spencer (Eds.), Political mistakes and policy failures in international relations (pp. 123–144). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kruck, A. (2020). Governing private security companies: Politics, dependence, and control. In K. W. Abbott, B. Zangl, D. Snidal, & P. Genschel (Eds.), The governor's dilemma: Indirect governance beyond principals and agents (pp. 137–156). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T., & Nicoli, F. (2020). Collective identities and integration of core state powers. Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake, D. A. (2010). Rightful rules: Authority, order, and the foundations of global governance. International Studies Quarterly, 54(3), 587–613. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2478.2010.00601.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S., Serrano, O., & Büthe, T. (2021). Power transitions and the rise of the regulatory state: Global market governance in flux. Regulation and Governance, 15(3), 445–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leander, A. (2005). The power to construct international security: On the significance of private military companies. Journal of International Studies, 33(3), 803–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298050330030601
   Google Scholar
• Leander, A. (ed.). (2013). Commercialising security in Europe: Political consequences for peace operations. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leander, A., Gonzales, C., Lobato, L., & dos Santos Maia, P. (2023). Ripples and their returns: Tracing the regulatory security state from the EU to Brazil, back and beyond. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1379–1405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2174583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D. (2005). The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716204272371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D. (2011). Regulatory networks and regulatory agencification: Towards a single European regulatory space. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 810–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.593309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D. (2023). The regulatory security state as a risk state. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1458–1471. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2174170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, M., & Maertens, L. (2021). Why international organizations hate politics: Depoliticizing the world. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (2010). A gradual theory of institutional change. In J. Mahoney & K. Thelen (Eds.), Explaining institutional change: Ambiguity, agency, and power (pp. 1–37). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1994). The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. West European Politics, 17(3), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389408425031
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1997). From the positive to the regulatory state: Causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance. Journal of Public Policy, 17(2), 139–167. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X00003524
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu, E. (2016). Regulatory delegation in the European Union: Networks, committees and agencies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• McNamara, K. R., & Kelemen, R. D. (2022). Seeing Europe like a state. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(12), 1916–1927. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2141826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mérand, F. (2008). European defence policy: Beyond the nation state. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, T. M. (2019). The politics of institutional reform: Katrina, education, and the second face of power. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, G., & Ibsen, C. (2021). Quiet politics and the power of business: New perspectives in an era of noisy politics. Politics & Society, 49(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329220985749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mügge, D. (2023). The securitization of the EU’s digital tech regulation. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1431–1446. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2171090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, I. B., & Sending, O. J. (2018). Expertise and practice: The evolving relationship between the study and practice of security. In A. Gheciu, & W. C. Wohlforth (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international security (pp. 29–40). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Obendiek, A., & Seidl, T. (2023). The (False) promise of solutionism: Ideational business power and the construction of epistemic authority in digital security governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1305–1329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2172060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, T. V., & Ripsman, N. (2010). Globalization and the national security state. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rimkutė, D. (2020). Building organizational reputation in the European regulatory state. Governance, 33(2), 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimkutė, D., & Mazepus, H. (2023). A widening authority–legitimacy gap in EU regulatory governance? An experimental study of the European Medicines Agency’s legitimacy in health security regulation. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1406–1430. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2171091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripsman, N., & Paul, T. V. (2010). Globalization and the national security state. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B., & Wonka, A. (2011). Introduction: Agency governance in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 780–789. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.593356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rixen, T., & Viola, L. A. (2015). Putting path dependence in its place: Toward a taxonomy of institutional change. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 27(2), 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629814531667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Regieren in Europa: Effektiv und demokratisch? Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Schilde, K. (2017). The political economy of European security. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schilde, K. (2023). Weaponising Europe? Rule-makers and rule-takers in in the EU security state. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1255–1280. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2174582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivan-Sevilla, I. (2023). Supranational security states for national security problems: Governing by rules and capacities in technology-driven European security spaces. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1353–1378. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2172063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slayton, R., & Clark-Ginsberg, A. (2018). Beyond regulatory capture: Coproducing expertise for critical infrastructure protection. Regulation and Governance, 12(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffek, J. (2021). International organization as technocratic utopia. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thatcher, M., & Stone Sweet, A. (2002). Theory and practice of delegation to non-majoritarian institutions. West European Politics, 25(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/713601583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1985). War making and state making as organized crime. In P. B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, & T. Skocpol (Eds.), Bringing the state back in (pp. 169–191). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, S. K. (1996). Freer markets, more rules: Regulatory reform in advanced industrial countries. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, M. (2018). How to become a first mover? Mechanisms of military innovation and the development of drones. European Journal of International Security, 3(2), 187–210. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2017.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, M. (2019). From wealth to power? The failure of layered reforms in India’s defense sector. Journal of Global Security Studies, 4(4), 560–578. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogz036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, M., & Biermann, F. (2021a). Cyberspace and the protection of critical national infrastructure. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 1–18. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2021.1905530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, M., & Biermann, F. (2021b). Networked politics and the supply of European defence integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 29, 910–931. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1916057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, M., & Heinkelmann-Wild, T. (2020). Disarmed principals: Institutional resilience and the non-enforcement of delegation. European Political Science Review, 12(4), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773920000181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, M., & Jankauskas, V. (2019). Securing cyberspace: How states design governance arrangements. Governance, 32(2), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfers, A. (1962). Discord and collaboration: Essays on international politics. Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. (2018). A theory of global governance: Authority, legitimacy, and contestation. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar