Beyond the regulatory state? The European Defence Fund and national military capacities

References

• Baczynska, G. (2016). Bienkowska wants joint bonds to finance defence projects after Brexit. Reuters, 16 September.
   Google Scholar
• Beesley, A., & Barker, A. (2016). Brussels wants EU “defence bonds”. Financial Times, 15 September.
   Google Scholar
• Biscop, S. (2015). The state of defence in Europe: dependence, deterrence and deployment. Global Affairs, 1(2), 169–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2015.1034976
   Google Scholar
• Blauberger, M., & Weiss, M. (2013). ‘If you can't beat me, join me!’ How the Commission pushed and pulled member states into legislating defence procurement. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(8), 1120–1138. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.781783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clift, B. (2012). Comparative capitalisms, ideational political economy and french post- Dirigiste responses to the global financial crisis. New Political Economy, 17(5), 565–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2012.636147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daviter, F. (2007). Policy framing in the European union. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(4), 654–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760701314474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drent, M. (2013). If security matters, institutions matter. In Sven Biscop & Daniel Fiott (Eds.), The state of defence in Europe: State of emergency? (pp. 79–83). Egmont Royal Institute for International Relations.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). Defence industry and markets task force non-paper.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2013). Towards a more competitive and efficient defence and security sector. COM(2013)542.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016). European defence action plan. COM(2016) 950.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. (2013). ‘Remarks by the president herman Van Rompuy following the first session of the European Council’. Brussels, 19 December.
   Google Scholar
• Fiott, D. (2017). Promoting European defence cooperation and the promise of financial incentives. 16. EUISS.
   Google Scholar
• Freudlsperger, C., & Jachtenfuchs, M. (2021). A member state like any other? Germany and the European integration of core state powers. Journal of European Integration, 43(2), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.1877695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genschel, P., & Jachtenfuchs, M. eds. (2014). Beyond the regulatory polity? the European integration of core state powers. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein, J. (1989). The impact of ideas on trade policy: the origins of U.S. agricultural and manufacturing policies. International Organization, 43(1), 31–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300004550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håkansson, C. (2021). The European Commission’s new role in EU security and defence cooperation: the case of the European Defence Fund. European Security, 30(4), 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2021.1906229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haroche, P. (2019). Supranationalism strikes back: a neofunctionalist account of the European Defence Fund. Journal of European Public Policy, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1609570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidbreder, E. G. (2014). Regulating capacity building by stealth: Pattern and extent of EU involvement in public Administration. In P. Genschel, & M. Jachtenfuchs (Eds.), Beyond the regulatory polity? (pp. 144–165). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoeffler, C. (2019). Differentiated integration in CSDP through defence market integration. European Review of International Studies, 6(2), 43–70. https://doi.org/10.3224/eris.v6i2.03
   Google Scholar
• Hoeffler, C., & Joana, J. (2022). The impact of austerity: spending cuts, coping strategies and institutional change in the case of French defense policy. Defence Studies, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702436.2022.2080660
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, S., & Staeger, U. (2019). Frame contestation and collective securitisation: The case of EU energy policy. West European Politics, 42(2), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1510197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth, D., & Schild, J. (2021). Nein to “Transfer Union”: The German brake on the construction of a European Union fiscal capacity. Journal of European Integration, 43(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.1877690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2014). Policy design: What, Who, How and Why? In C. Halpern, P. Lascoumes, & P. L. Galès (Eds.), L’instrumentation de l’action publique. (pp. 281–316). Presses de Sciences Po.
   Google Scholar
• Jabko, N. (1999). In the name of the Market: how the European Commission paved the way for monetary union. Journal of European Public Policy, 6(3), 475–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/135017699343630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, A. D. (2018). Policy entrepreneurship and agenda setting: comparing and contrasting the origins of the European research programme for security and defense. In N. Karampekios, I. Oikonomou, & E. G. Carayannis (Eds.), The emergence of EU Defense Research Policy from innovation to militarization (pp. 15–43). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jüde, J. (2022). Making or un-making states: When does war have formative effects? European Journal of International Relations, 28(1), 209–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661211053628
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juncker, J.-C. (2014). Political guidelines for the next European Commission. Strasbourg, 15 July.
   Google Scholar
• Juncker, J.-C. (2016). Towards a better Europe - a Europe that protects, empowers and defends. Strasbourg, 14 September.
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. D., & McNamara, K. R. (2022). State-building and the European union: Markets, War, and Europe’s uneven political development. Comparative Political Studies, 55(6), 963–991. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211047393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleine, M. (2013). Informal governance in the European union: How governments make international organizations work. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruck, A., & Weiss, M. (2023). The regulatory security state in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(7), 1205–1229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2172061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laczynski, M. (2016). Ein Fonds soll die EU beschützen. Die Presse. 30 November.
   Google Scholar
• Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P.2004). Gouverner par les instruments. Presses de Sciences Po.
   Google Scholar
• Leander, A. (2004). Wars and the un-making of states. Taking Tilly seriously in the contemporary world. In S. Guzzini & D. Jung (Eds.), Contemporary security analysis and Copenhagen peace research (pp. 69–80). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1994). The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. West European Politics, 17(3), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389408425031
   Google Scholar
• Mérand, F. (2021). Political work in the stability and growth pact. Journal of European Public Policy, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1901961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prime Minister’s Office. (2013). European Council December 2013: David Cameron’s press conference.
   Google Scholar
• Saurugger, S. (2018). The constructivist turn in EU public policy approaches. In H. in Heinelt & S. Münch (Eds.), Handbook of European policies (pp. 19–34). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe: effective and democratic? Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. C. (2005). Ernst B. Haas and the legacy of neofunctionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(2), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500043951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siles-Brügge, G. (2013). The power of economic ideas: A constructivist political economy of EU trade policy. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 9(4), 597–617. https://doi.org/10.30950/jcer.v9i4.437
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2016). The politics of economic activity. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tansey, O. (2007). Process tracing and elite interviewing: A case for Non-probability sampling. PS: Political Science & Politics, 40(04), 765–772. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096507071211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1992). Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990-1992. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Warlouzet, L. (2019). The EEC/EU as an evolving compromise between French dirigism and German ordoliberalism (1957–1995). JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(1), 77–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woll, C. (2008). Firm interests: How governments shape business lobbying on global trade. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar