1,641
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Articles

Police and criminal justice co-operation after Brexit

&
Pages 2519-2539 | Received 13 Dec 2022, Accepted 10 Feb 2023, Published online: 24 Feb 2023

References

  • House of Lords European Union Committee. Brexit: future UK-EU security and police cooperation, 7th Report, session 2016–17, para. 27.
  • Brouwer, E. (2009). The EU Passenger Name Records (PNR) system and human rights: Transferring passenger data or passenger freedom? CEPS Working Document 320/09.
  • Christou, T. A., et al. (2010). European cross border justice: A case study of the EAW. AIRE Centre.
  • Curtin, D. (1993). The constitutional structure of the union: A Europe of bits and pieces. Common Market Law Review, 30(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA1993003
  • Czerniak, D. (2022). The (lack of) consequences of reasonable doubts on the independence of the judiciary system on cooperation in criminal matters in the EU. Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal, 8(1), 3. doi:10.22197/rbdpp.v8i1.689
  • Fennelly, D. (2019). Data retention: the life, death and afterlife of a directive. Era Forum, 19(4), 1–20 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-018-0516-5
  • Giannoulopoulos, D. (2016). Fair trial rights in the UK post Brexit: Out with the charter and EU law, in with the ECHR? New Journal of European Criminal Law, 7(4), 387–398 at 389. https://doi.org/10.1177/203228441600700402
  • Hinarejos, A., Spencer, J. R., & Peers, S. (2012). Opting out of EU criminal law: What is actually involved? CELS Working Paper, New Series, Vol. 1, University of Cambridge Faculty of Law.
  • Lazowski, A. (2020). Mind the fog, stand clear of the cliff! From the political declaration to the post-Brexit EU-UK legal framework – part I. European Papers, 5, 1105–1141.
  • Mancano, L. (2021). You’ll never work alone: A systemic assessment of the European Arrest Warrant and judicial independence. Common Market Law Review, 58(3).
  • Marguery, T. P. (2012). The protection of fundamental rights in European criminal law after Lisbon: What role for the charter of fundamental rights? European law Review, 4, 444–463.
  • Marin, L. (2008). The European arrest warrant and domestic legal orders. Tensions between mutual recognition and fundamental rights: the Italian case. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative law, 15(4), 473–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X0801500403
  • May, T. (2014). Fight Europe by all means, but not over this Arrest Warrant. Daily Telegraph, November 9.
  • Mitsilegas, V. (2006). The constitutional implications of mutual recognition in criminal matters in the EU. Common Market Law Review, 43(5), 1277. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2006074
  • Mitsilegas, V. (2009). EU criminal law. Hart.
  • Mitsilegas, V. (2016). EU criminal law after Lisbon. Hart.
  • Mitsilegas, V. (2017). European criminal law after Brexit. Criminal Law Forum, 28(2), 219–250. doi:10.1007/s10609-017-9314-y
  • Mitsilegas, V. (2021). The privatisation of surveillance in the digital age. In V. Mitsilegas & N. Vavoula (Eds.), Surveillance and privacy in the digital age. European, transatlantic and global perspectives (pp. 101–158). Hart.
  • Mitsilegas, V. (2022). Eu criminal law (2nd ed.). Hart.
  • Mitsilegas, V., Carrera, S., & Eisele, K. (2014). The end of the transitional period for police and criminal justice measures adopted before the Lisbon treaty. In Who monitors trust in the European justice area?, CEPS paper in liberty and security in Europe, no. 74. Centre for European Policy Studies.
  • Peers, S., et al. (2021). The EU charter of fundamental rights: A commentary. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Richardson, J., & Rittberger, B. (2020). Brexit: Simply as omnishambles or a major policy fiasco? https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2020/04/28/brexit-simply-an-omnishambles-or-a-major-policy-fiasco/.
  • Spencer, R. J. (2015). The UK and EU criminal law: Should we be leading, following or abstaining? In V. Mitsilegas, P. Alldridge, & P. Cheliotis (Eds.), Globalisation, criminal law and criminal justice. Theoretical, comparative and transnational perspectives (pp. 101–158). Hart.
  • White, M. (2021). Is the incompatibility of UK data retention law with EU law really a victory? Legal Studies, 47(1), 130–155. doi:10.1017/lst.2020.35
  • Wolff, S., & Piquet, A. (2022). Post-Brexit Europeanization: Re-thinking the continuum of British policies, polity, and politics trajectories. Conparative European Politics, 20, 513–526. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057s41295-022-00293-6.
  • Woods, L. (2021). https://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2021/02/data-protection-uk-and-eu-draft.html.