Mind the gap! UK employment policy both during and beyond EU membership: from policy layering to policy drift

References

• Armstrong, K. A., & Bulmer, S. J. (1998). The governance of the single European market. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bachtler, J., & Begg, I. (2017). Cohesion policy after Brexit: The economic, social and institutional challenges. Journal of Social Policy, 46(4), 745–763. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279417000514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barysch, K. (2013). The working times directive: What’s the fuss about? Centre for European Reform Working Paper. https://www.cer.org.uk/sites/default/files/publications/attachments/pdf/2013/pb_workingtimedir_kb_26april13_bl-7268.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• BBC. (2005). UK to keep EU work time opt-out. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4540531.stm.
   Google Scholar
• Béland, D. (2007). Ideas and institutional change in social security: Conversion, layering, and policy drift. Social Science Quarterly, 88(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00444.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Béland, D., Carstensen, M., & Seabrooke, L. (2016). Ideas, political power and public policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 215–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1122163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blair, A., & Leopoid, J. (2001). An awkward partner? Britain’s implementation of the working time directive. Time & Society, 10(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961463X01010001004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• British Chambers of Commerce. (2022). Large-scale deregulation not a priority for UK Businesses. https://www.britishchambers.org.uk/news/2022/11/large-scale-deregulation-not-a-priority-for-uk-businesses.
   Google Scholar
• Bulmer, S. (1998). New institutionalism and the governance of the single European market. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(3), 365–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/135017698343875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, D. (2013). EU Speech at Bloomberg, 23 January 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/eu-speech-at-bloomberg.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional change and globalization. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cartensen, M. (2011). Ideas are not as stable a political scientists want them to be: A theory of incremental ideational change. Political Studies, 59(3), 596–615. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00868.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartensen, M., & Schmidt, V. (2016). Power through, over and in ideas: Conceptualising ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 318–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, H., Goodwin, M., & Whitely, P. (2017). Brexit: Why Britain voted to leave the European Union. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conservative Party. (2010). Invitation to join the government of Britain.
   Google Scholar
• Conservative Party. (2019). Get Brexit done: Unleash Britain’s potential.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, P. (2014). EU enlargement, the clash of capitalisms, and the European social dimension. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Copeland, P. (2016). Europeanization and de-Europeanization in UK employment policy: Changing governments and shifting agendas. Public Administration, 94(4), 1124–1139. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, P. (2022). The Juncker commission as a politicising Bricoleur and the renewed momentum in social Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111jcms.13336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2022). Adequate minimum wages in the EU. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/adequate-minimum-wages/.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. (2019). From severe to routine labour exploitation: The case of migrant workers in the UK food industry. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 19(3), 294–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895818762264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2020). The European pillar of social rights action plan. https://op.europa.eu/webpub/empl/european-pillar-of-social-rights/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrera, M. (2014). Social Europe and its components in the midst of the crisis. West European Politics, 37(4), 825–843. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.919771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Financial Times. (2021). UK workers’ rights at risk in plans to rip up EU labour market rules. https://www.ft.com/content/55588f86-a4f8-4cf3-aecb-38723b787569.
   Google Scholar
• Financial Times. (2022). Liz Truss quashes Jacob Rees-Mogg’s ‘half-baked’ labour market reforms. https://www.ft.com/content/799ed62c-86bc-469d-a442-d1553c6e47ec.
   Google Scholar
• Fitch-Roy, O., Fairbrass, J., & Benson, D. (2020). Ideas, coalitions and compromise: Reinterpreting EU-ETS lobbying through discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(1), 82–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1567573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garben, S. (2019). The European pillar of social rights: An assessment of its meaning and significance. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 21, 101–127. https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2019.3
   Google Scholar
• Gifford, C. (2016). The United Kingdom’s Eurosceptic political economy. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18(4), 779–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148116652776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glencross, A. (2016). Why the UK voted for Brexit. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hacker, Jacob S. (2004). Privatizing Risk without Privatizing the Welfare State: The Hidden Politics of Social Policy Retrenchment in the United States. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404001121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P., & Taylor, R. (1996). Political science and the tree new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb00343.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hantrais, L. (2018). Assessing the past and future development of EU and UK social policy. Social Policy and Society, 17(2), 265–279. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746417000483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. M. Government. (2013). Cut EU Red Tape: Report from the Business Taskforce. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/249969/TaskForce-report-15-October.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• H.M. Government. (2014). Review of the balance of competences between the United Kingdom and the European Union: Social and employment policy. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/332524/review-of-the-balance-of-competences-between-the-united-kingdom-and-the-european-union-social-and-employment-policy.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• H.M. Government. (2022). The benefits of Brexit: How the UK is taking advantage of leaving the EU. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1054643/benefits-of-brexit.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Independent. (2022). Jacob Rees-Mogg to tar up workers’ rights in smaller firms to make the economy ‘dynamic’. https://www.independent.co.uk/independentpremium/uk-news/jacob-rees-mogg-worker-rights-brexit-b2195346.html.
   Google Scholar
• James, S., Hussein, K., & Warren, T. (2022). From Big Bang to Brexit: The city of London and the discursive power of finance. Political Studies, 70(3), 719–738. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720985714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2018). Neoliberalization, uneven development, and Brexit: Further reflections on the organic crisis of the British state and society. European Planning Studies, 26(9), 1728–1746. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2018.1501469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labour Party. (2021). Employment Rights Green Paper: A new deal for working people. https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/New-Deal-for-Working-People-Green-Paper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Leibfried, S. (2010). Social policy: Left to the markets and the judges. In H. in Wallace, W. Wallace, & M. Pollack (Eds.), Policy making in the European union (pp. 253–282). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Livingstone, E., & Mann, J. (2021). What will change in UK employment law as a result of Brexit? https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/hr-topics/global-hr/pages/uk-employment-law-brexit.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Lourie, J. (1996). The Working Time Directive. House of Commons Research Paper. 96 / 106, 19 November 196.
   Google Scholar
• Maccaferri, M. (2019). Splendid isolation again? Brexit and the role of the press and online media in Re-narrating the European discourse. Critical Discourse Studies, 16(4), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2019.1592766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, T. (2016). Statement from the New Prime Minister Theresa May. https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/statement-from-the-new-prime-minister-theresa-may.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, C. (2015). Margaret thatcher: The authorised biography, volume 2: Everything She wants. Penguin Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Mustchin, S., & Martínez Lucio, M. (2020). The evolving nature of labour inspections, enforcement of employment rights and the regulatory reach of the state in Britain. Journal of Industrial Relations, 62(5), 735–757. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022185620908909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. (2021). Labour market overview, UK: April 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Official Journal of the European Union. (2019). Directive on transparent and predictable working conditions in the European Union. L186/105. 11/07/2019.
   Google Scholar
• Official Journal of the European Union. (2021). Trade and cooperation agreement between the EU and the UK. L. 149/10. 30/04/2021.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, G. (2019). Institutional theory in political science. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• PoliticsHome. (2021). Ditching Employment Bill from Queen’s Speech Shows Boris Johnson “Has No Plan for Working People”. https://www.politicshome.com/news/article/employment-bill-queens-speech-boris-johnson-labour-unions-criticism.
   Google Scholar
• Prime Minister’s Office. (2021). International treaty summary explainer. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/agreements-reached-between-the-united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland-and-the-european-union/summary-explainer.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2004). Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2003/88/EC concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (2006). The joint-decision trap revisited. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(4), 845–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00665.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. (2002). The futures of European capitalism. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. (2008). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, K., Cooper, K., & Shutes, I. (2019). What does Brexit mean for social policy in the UK? SPDO Research Paper 3, February 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M., Marsh, G., Nicol, D., & Broadbent, P. (2017). Good work: The Taylor review of modern working practices. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/627671/good-work-taylor-review-modern-working-practices-rg.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Teague, P., & Donaghey, J. (2018). Brexit: EU social policy and the UK employment model. Industrial Relations Journal, 49(5-6), 512–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/irj.12235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelan, K. (2004). How Institutions Evolve The Political Economy of Skills in Germany. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, M. (2018). Brexit, the left behind and the let down: The political abstraction of the economy and the UK’s EU referendum. British Politics, 13(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-017-0062-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar