Missed opportunities: the impact of internal compartmentalisation on EU diplomacy across the international regime complex on climate change

References

• Abbott, K. W. (2012). The transnational regime complex for climate change. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(4), 571–590. https://doi.org/10.1068/c11127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afionis, S. (2017). The European Union in international climate change negotiations. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Allison, G. (1971). Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Little Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Alter, K. J. (2022). The promise and perils of theorizing international regime complexity in an evolving world. The Review of International Organizations, 17, 375–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-021-09448-8
   Google Scholar
• Alter, K. J., & Meunier, S. (2009). The politics of international regime complexity. Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, T., & Wegrich, K. (2019). Blind spots, biased attention, and the politics of non-coordination. In T. Bach & K. Wegrich (Eds.), The blind spots of public bureaucracy and the politics of non-coordination (pp. 3–28). Executive politics and governance. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76672-0_1
   Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K., & Elgström, O. (2013). The EU's role in climate change negotiations: From leader to ‘leadiator’. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(10), 1369–1386. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.781781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, P. (2021). The EU’s role in the Paris Agreement. In H. Jepsen, K. Monheim, M. Lundgren, & H. Walker (Eds.), Negotiating the Paris agreement: The insider stories (pp. 111–138). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biedenkopf, K., & Petri, F. (2021). The European External Action Service and EU climate diplomacy: Coordinator and supporter in Brussels and beyond. European Foreign Affairs Review, 26(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.54648/EERR2021007
   Google Scholar
• Brun, A. (2016). Conference diplomacy: The making of the Paris Agreement. Politics and Governance, 4(3), 115. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v4i3.649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, M. L. (2007). Overlapping institutions, forum shopping, and dispute settlement in international trade. International Organization, 61(4), 735–761. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818307070257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2016). The New York Declaration of the Coalition for an Ambitious HFC Amendment—Approval of signature on behalf of the European Union (12196/16). Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Delreux, T. (2015). Bureaucratic politics, new institutionalism and principal-agent models. In K. Jørgensen, A. Aarstad, E. Drieskens, K. Laatikainen, & B. Tonra (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of European foreign policy (pp. 152–165). SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Delreux, T. (2018). Multilateral environmental agreements: A key instrument of global environmental governance. In K. Biedenkopf, C. Adelle, & D. Torney (Eds.), European Union external environmental policy: Rules, regulation and governance beyond borders (pp. 19–38). Palgrave Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Delreux, T., & Earsom, J. (2023). The European Union as an actor navigating international regime complexes. Politics and Governance, 11(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i2.6901
   Google Scholar
• Dupont, C. (2016). Climate policy integration into EU energy policy: Progress and prospects. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Earsom, J., & Delreux, T. (2021a). Evaluating EU responsiveness to the evolution of the international regime complex on climate change. International environmental agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 21, 711–728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-021-09541-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earsom, J., & Delreux, T. (2021b). A nice tailwind: The EU’s goal achievement at the IMO Initial Strategy. Politics and Governance, 9(3), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.4296
   Google Scholar
• Earsom, J., & Delreux, T. (2023). One Big conversation: The EU's climate diplomacy across the international regime complex on the Paris agreement negotiations. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(1), 198–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13365
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgström, O., & Pilegaard, J. (2008). Imposed coherence: Negotiating economic partnership agreements. Journal of European Integration, 30(3), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036330802141949
   Google Scholar
• European Commission & European External Action Service. (2011). Joint reflection paper: “towards a renewed and strengthened EU climate diplomacy”. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission & European External Action Service. (2013). EU climate diplomacy for 2015 and beyond. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission & European External Action Service. (2015). Action plan for climate diplomacy: From Lima to Paris: Climate diplomacy in 2015. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission & European External Action Service. (2016). European Climate Diplomacy After COP21: Elements for continued climate diplomacy in 2016. (5853/16). Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Faude, B., & Parizek, M. (2020). Contested multilateralism as credible signaling: How strategic inconsistency can induce cooperation among states. The Review of International Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-020-09398-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furness, M., & Gänzle, S. (2017). The security-development nexus in European Union foreign relations after Lisbon: Policy coherence at last? Development Policy Review, 35(4), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartlapp, M., Metz, J., & Rauh, C. (2014). Which policy for Europe?: Power and conflict inside the European Commission. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., & Lenschow, A. (2010). Environmental policy integration: A state of the art review. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20(3), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., & Schout, A. (2006). The coordination of the European Union: Exploring the capacities of networked governance. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jupille, J., Mattli, W., & Snidal, D. (2013). Institutional choice and global commerce. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kellow, A. (2012). Multi-level and multi-arena governance: The limits of integration and the possibilities of forum shopping. International environmental agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 12(4), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-012-9172-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710004068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurze, K., & Lenschow, A. (2018). Horizontal policy coherence starts with problem definition: Unpacking the EU integrated energy-climate approach. Environmental Policy and Governance, 28(5), 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marangoni, A.-C., & Raube, K. (2014). Virtue or vice? The Coherence of the EU’s External Policies. Journal of European Integration, 36(5), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2014.883505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marx, A., & Westerwinter, O. (2022). An ever more entangled Union? The European Union’s Interactions with Global Governance Institutions. Journal of European Integration, 44(5), 597–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2022.2080819
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin, J.-F., & Orsini, A. (2014). Policy coherency and regime complexes: The case of genetic resources. Review of International Studies, 40(2), 303–324. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210513000168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. C., & Keohane, R. O. (2014). Contested multilateralism. The Review of International Organizations, 9(4), 385–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-014-9188-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S., & Dupont, C. (2021). The European Union’s international climate leadership: Towards a grand climate strategy? Journal of European Public Policy, 28(7), 1095–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1918218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S., & Groen, L. (2018). Explaining goal achievement in international negotiations: The EU and the Paris Agreement on climate change. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(5), 708–727. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1291708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2018). The challenge of policy coordination. Policy Design and Practice, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1437946
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. W. (2017). Finishing the job: The Montreal Protocol moves to phase down hydrofluorocarbons. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 26(3), 220–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1994). Games real actors could play: Positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692894006001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunz, S. (2019). The European Union’s environmental foreign policy: From planning to a strategy? International Politics, 56(3), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-017-0130-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skovgaard, J. (2018). Policy coherence and organizational cultures: Energy efficiency and greenhouse gas reduction targets. Environmental Policy and Governance, 28(5), 350–358. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1821
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torney, D., & Cross, M. K. D. (2018). Environmental and climate diplomacy: Building coalitions through persuasion. In K. Biedenkopf, C. Adelle, & D. Torney (Eds.), European Union external environmental policy: Rules, regulation and governance beyond borders (pp. 39–58). Palgrave Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Vanhoonacker, S., Dijkstra, H., & Maurer, H. (2010). Understanding the role of bureaucracy in the European security and defence policy: The state of the art. European Integration Online Papers, 1, 14. https://doi.org/10.1695/2010004
   Google Scholar
• Vantaggiato, F. P., Kassim, H., & Connolly, S. (2020). Breaking out of silos: Explaining cross-departmental interactions in two European bureaucracies. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(9), 1432–1452. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1784253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdier, D. (2022). Bargaining strategies for governance complex games. The Review of International Organizations, 17, 349–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-020-09407-9
   Google Scholar
• Young, A. R., & Peterson, J. (2013). ‘We care about you, but … ’: The politics of EU trade policy and development. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 26(3), 497–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2012.734782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaelke, D., Borgford-Parnel, N., & Anderson, S. O. (2018). Primer on HFCs: Fast action under the Montreal Protocol can limit growth of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), prevent 100 to 200 billion tonnes of CO2-eq by 2050, and avoid up to 0.5°C of warming by 2100 (IGSD Working Paper 11 January 2018). Institute for Governance & Sustainable Development.
   Google Scholar