How differentiated integration shapes the constraining dissensus

References

• Anderson, C. J. (1998). When in doubt, use proxies: Attitudes toward domestic politics and support for European integration. Comparative Political Studies, 31(5), 569–601. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414098031005002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R., Kröger, S., & Lorimer, M. (2021). Party views on differentiated integration. Comparative European Politics, 19(5), 622–641. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-021-00250-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boomgaarden, H. G., Schuck, A. R., Elenbaas, M., & De Vreese, C. H. (2011). Mapping EU attitudes: Conceptual and empirical dimensions of euroscepticism and EU support. European Union Politics, 12(2), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116510395411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A., Hofmann, T., & Panke, D. (2012). Caving in or sitting it out? Longitudinal patterns of non-compliance in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(4), 454–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.607338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bølstad, J. (2015). Dynamics of European integration: Public opinion in the core and periphery. European Union Politics, 16(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116514551303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinegar, A., Jolly, S., & Kitschelt, H. (2004). Varieties of capitalism and political divides over European integration. In G. Marks, & M. R. Steenbergen (Eds.), European integration and political conflict (pp. 62–89). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carrieri, L., & Angelucci, D. (2022). The valence side of the EU: EU issue voting in the aftermath of the Eurozone crisis. Swiss Political Science Review, 28(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12492
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, N., Evans, M., Alderman, K., & Gorham, S. (1998). Europe, goldsmith and the referendum party. Parliamentary Affairs, 51(3), 470–486. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pa.a028811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiocchetti, P. (2023). A quantitative analysis of legal integration and differentiation in the European Union, 1958–2020. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, online first. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13467
   Google Scholar
• Claassen, C. (2020). In the mood for democracy? Democratic support as thermostatic opinion. American Political Science Review, 114(1), 36–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Blok, L., & De Vries, C. E. (2023). A blessing and a curse? Examining public preferences for differentiated integration. European Union Politics, 24(1), 143-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/146511652211336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, C. E., & Hobolt, S. B. (2020). Political entrepreneurs. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Wilde, P. (2011). No polity for old politics? A Framework for analyzing the politicization of European Integration. Journal of European Integration, 33(5), 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2010.546849
   Google Scholar
• De Wilde, P., & Rauh, C. (2019). Going full circle: The need for procedural perspectives on EU responsiveness. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(11), 1737–1748. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1668043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duttle, T., Holzinger, K., Malang, T., Schäubli, T., Schimmelfennig, F., & Winzen, T. (2017). Opting out from European Union legislation: The differentiation of secondary law. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(3), 406–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1149206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, G., & Mellon, J. (2019). Immigration, Euroscepticism, and the rise and fall of UKIP. Party Politics, 25(1), 76–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818816969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, C., & Frieden, J. (2017). Crisis of trust: Socio-economic determinants of Europeans’ confidence in government. European Union Politics, 18(4), 511–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116517723499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, M. N., & Wlezien, C. (1997). The responsive public: Issue salience, policy change, and preferences for European unification. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 9(3), 347–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692897009003005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. C., van Elsas, E. J., & de Vreese, C. H. (2021a). One union, different futures? Public Preferences for the EU’s Future and Their Explanations in 10 EU countries. European Union Politics, 22(4), 721-740. https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165211034150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. C., van Elsas, E. J., & De Vreese, C. H. (2021b). Eurovisions: An exploration and explanation of public preferences for future EU scenarios. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 59(2), 222–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13057
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, C. (2012). A giant fast asleep? Party incentives and the politicisation of European integration. Political Studies, 60(1), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2011.00895.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heidbreder, E. G. (2022). Europeanization and differentiation. In P. R. Graziano and J. Tosun (Eds.), Elgar Encyclopedia of European Union Public Policy (pp. 515–525). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. B., & De Vries, C. E. (2016). Public support for European integration. Annual Review of Political Science, 19(1), 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042214-044157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. B., & Wratil, C. (2020). Contestation and responsiveness in EU Council deliberations. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 362–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1712454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzinger, K., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2012). Differentiated integration in the European Union: Many concepts, sparse theory, few data. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(2), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.641747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honaker, J., & King, G. (2010). What to do about missing values in time-series cross-section data. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 561-581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00447.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2009). A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science, 39(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2018). Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(1), 109–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imai, K., Kim, I. S., & Wang, E. H. (2021). Matching methods for causal inference with time-series cross-sectional data. American Journal of Political Science, Online first. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12685
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, W. (2009). The public thermostat, political responsiveness and error-correction: border control and asylum in Britain, 1994–2007. British Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 847-870. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712340900074X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, C. B., & Slapin, J. B. (2012). Institutional hokey-pokey: The politics of multispeed integration in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(6), 779–795. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.610694
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karp, J. A., Banducci, S. A., & Bowler, S. (2003). To know it is to love it? Satisfaction with democracy in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies, 36(3), 271–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414002250669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kölliker, A. (2001). Bringing together or driving apart the union? Towards a theory of differentiated integration. West European Politics, 24(4), 125–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380108425468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, D. A., & Leuffen, D. (2015). Enhanced cooperation in practice. An Analysis of Differentiated Integration in EU Secondary law. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(3), 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.956781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leruth, B., Gänzle, S., & Trondal, J. (2019). Exploring differentiated disintegration in a post-Brexit European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(5), 1013–1030. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leruth, B., Gänzle, S., & Trondal, J. (2022). Introduction: Differentiation in the European union as a field of study. In B. Leruth,S. Gänzle, and J. Trondal (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of differentiation in the European union (1–19). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Leuffen, D., Rittberger, B., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2022). Integration and differentiation in the European Union: Theory and policies. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Leuffen, D., Schuessler, J., & Gómez Díaz, J. (2022). Public support for differentiated integration: individual liberal values and concerns about member state discrimination. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(2), 218-237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1829005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C. (2015). Utopia or dystopia? Towards a normative analysis of differentiated integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(6), 783–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1020839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malang, T. (2017). Better = faster? Explaining citizens’ desired speed of European integration. Journal of European Integration, 39(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2016.1253691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malang, T. (2023). Can the social dimension of time contribute to explain the public evaluation of political change? The case of European integration. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 64(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/00207152221108641
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malang, T., & Holzinger, K. (2020). The political economy of differentiated integration: The case of common agricultural policy. The Review of International Organizations, 15(3), 741–766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-020-09384-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moland, M. (2022). Does differentiation beget differentiation?: Examining the link between implementation of and support for differentiation, SocArXiv.
   Google Scholar
• Rasmussen, A., Reher, S., & Toshkov, D. (2019). The opinion-policy nexus in Europe and the role of political institutions. European Journal of Political Research, 58(2), 412–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, L. (2003). Reconsidering the link between incumbent support and Pro-EU opinion. European Union Politics, 4(3), 259–279. https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165030043001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., & Winzen, T. (2014). Instrumental and constitutional differentiation in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(2), 354–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., & Winzen, T. (2020). Ever looser union?: Differentiated European integration. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. J. (2019). The responsive union: National elections and European governance. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schraff, D. (2020). Is the member stats’ curse the EU’s blessing? Inequality and EU regime evaluations. Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(5), 1215–1234. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraff, D., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2020). Does differentiated integration strengthen the democratic legitimacy of the EU? Evidence from the, 2015 Danish opt-out referendum. European Union Politics, 21(4), 590–611. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116520949698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schüssler, J., Heermann, M., Leuffen, D., De Blok, L., & De Vries, C. E. (2023). Mapping public support for the varieties of differentiated integration. European Union Politics, 24(1), 164–183. https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165221127633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S. N., & Wlezien, C. (2010). Degrees of democracy: Politics, public opinion, and policy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, D. E. (1963). Spatial models of party competition. American Political Science Review, 57(2), 368-377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stubb, A. C. G. (1996). A categorization of differentiated integration. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 34(2), 283–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1996.tb00573.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Telle, S., de Blok, L., de Vries, C. E., & Cicchi, L. (2022). Elite-mass linkages in the preference formation on differentiated integration. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, online first. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13339
   Google Scholar
• Toshkov, D. (2011). Public opinion and policy output in the European Union: A lost relationship. European Union Politics, 12(2), 169–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116510395043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vergioglou, I., & Hegewald, S. (2023). From causes to consequences: Investigating the effects of differentiated integration on citizens’ EU support. European Union Politics, 24(1), 206–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/14651165221135742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkens, A., Burst, T., Krause, W., Lehmann, P., Matthieß, T., Regel, S., Weßels, B., & Zehnter, L. (2021). The manifesto data collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2021a.
   Google Scholar
• Walter, S. (2020). The mass politics of international disintegration. CIS Working Paper (105).
   Google Scholar
• Winzen, T. (2016). From capacity to sovereignty: Legislative politics and differentiated integration in the European nion. European Journal of Political Research, 55(1), 100–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12124
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winzen, T. (2020). Government euroscepticism and differentiated integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(12), 1819–1837. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1703789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winzen, T., & Schimmelfennig, F. (2023). National differentiation experience and citizen support for differentiated integration. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, online first. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13460
   Google Scholar
• Wlezien, C. (1996). Dynamics of representation: The case of US spending on defence. British Journal of Political Science, 26(1), 81-103. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400007420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlezien, C. (2017). Public opinion and policy representation: On conceptualization, measurement, and interpretation. Policy Studies Journal, 45(4), 561–582. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wlezien, C., & Soroka, S. N. (2012). Political institutions and the opinion–policy link. West European Politics, 35(6), 1407–1432. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.713752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wratil, C. (2018). Modes of government responsiveness in the European Union: Evidence from council negotiation positions. European Union Politics, 19(1), 52–74. doi:10.1177/1465116517735599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar