Populist governments, judicial independence, and public trust in the courts

References

• Ansolabehere, S. D., & White, A. (2020). Policy, politics, and public attitudes toward the Supreme Court. American Politics Research, 48(3), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X18765189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arkhangelsky, D., Athey, S., Hirshberg, D. A., Imbens, G. W., & Wager, S. (2021). Synthetic difference-in-differences. American Economic Review, 111(12), 4088–4118. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20190159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydın Çakır, A. (2023). The varying effect of court-curbing: Evidence from Hungary and Poland. Journal of European Public Policy, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2171089
   Google Scholar
• Aydın Çakır, A., & Şekercioğlu, E. (2016). Public confidence in the judiciary: The interaction between political awareness and level of democracy. Democratization, 23(4), 634–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2014.1000874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aytaç, S. E., & Elçi, E. (2018). Populism in Turkey. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bánkuti, M., Halmai, G., & Scheppele, K. L. (2012). Disabling the constitution. Journal of Democracy, 23(3), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2012.0054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benesh, S. C. (2006). Understanding public confidence in American courts. The Journal of Politics, 68(3), 697–707. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00455.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blokker, P. (2019). Populist counter-constitutionalism, conservatism, and legal fundamentalism. European Constitutional Law Review, 15(3), 519–543. https://doi.org/10.1017/S157401961900035X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bühlmann, M., & Kunz, R. (2011). Confidence in the judiciary: Comparing the independence and legitimacy of judicial systems. West European Politics, 34(2), 317–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.546576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaway, B., & Sant’Anna, P. H. C. (2021). Difference-in-differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225(2), 200–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo-Ortiz, P. (2019). The illiberal abuse of constitutional courts in Europe. European Constitutional Law Review, 15(1), 48–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019619000026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiopris, C., Nalepa, M., & Vanberg, G. (2021). A wolf in sheep’s clothing: Citizen uncertainty and democratic backsliding. Working Paper. https://www.monikanalepa.com/uploads/6/6/3/1/66318923/chioprisnalepavanberg.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, D., Pailañir, D., Athey, S., & Imbens, G. (2023). Synthetic difference in differences estimation. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2301.11859.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, S. A. (2016). How Erdogan made Turkey authoritarian again. The Atlantic 21. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/07/how-erdogan-made-turkey-authoritarian-again/492374/.
   Google Scholar
• De Micheli, D., & Taylor, W. K. (2022). Public trust in Latin American’s courts: Do institutions matter? Government and Opposition, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2022.6
   Google Scholar
• de Sa e Silva, F. (2022). Law and illiberalism: A sociolegal review and research road Map. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 18(1), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110921-105921
   Google Scholar
• Döring, H, Huber, C, & Manow, P. (2022). Parliaments and governments database (ParlGov): Information on parties, elections and cabinets in established democracies. Available at: https://www.parlgov.org/
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, A., & Nelson, M. J. (2023). The costs of court curbing: Evidence from the United States. The Journal of Politics, 85(2), 609–624. https://doi.org/10.1086/723021
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, A., & Macy, J. (2020). The collapse of judicial independence in Poland: A cautionary tale. Judicature, 104(3), 41–50. https://judicature.duke.edu/articles/the-collapse-of-judicial-independence-in-poland-a-cautionary-tale/
   Google Scholar
• Durr, R. H., Martin, A. D., & Wolbrecht, C. (2000). Ideological divergence and public support for the Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 768–776. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engst, B. G., & Gschwend, T. (2020). Attitudes on judicial independence. A discrete choice experiment in nine European countries. Working Paper. https://www.sowi.uni-mannheim.de/media/Lehrstuehle/sowi/Gschwend/Articel/202006_DCE-EU__1_.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2010). Turkey progress report. SEC (2010) 1327. https://www.ab.gov.tr/files/AB_Iliskileri/Tur_En_Realitons/Progress/turkey_progress_report_2010.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Felter, E. L., & Aydin, O. D. (2018). The death of judicial independence in Turkey: A lesson for others. Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary, 38, 34–56. https://digitalcommons.pepperdine.edu/naalj/vol38/iss1/3/.
   Google Scholar
• Ferejohn, J. A., & Kramer, L. (2002). Independent judges, dependent judiciary: Institutionalizing judicial restraint. New York University Law Review, 77(4), 962–1039. https://www.nyulawreview.org/issues/volume-77-number-4/independent-judges-dependent-judiciary-institutionalizing-judicial-restraint/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garoupa, N., & Magalhães, P. C. (2021). Public trust in the European legal systems: Independence, accountability and awareness. West European Politics, 44(3), 690–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1715605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, J. L., Caldeira, G. A., & Spence, L. K. (2003). Measuring attitudes toward the United States supreme court. American Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 354–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5907.00025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gidengil, E., Stolle, D., & Bergeron-Boutin, O. (2022). The partisan nature of support for democratic backsliding: A comparative perspective. European Journal of Political Research, 61(4), 901–929. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, T., Huq, A. Z., & Versteeg, M. (2018). The coming demise of liberal constitutionalism? University of Chicago Law Review, 85(2), 239–255. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26455907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gora, A., & de Wilde, P. (2022). The essence of democratic backsliding in the European Union: Deliberation and rule of law. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(3), 342–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1855465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, M. H., & Svolik, M. W. (2020). Democracy in America? Partisanship, polarization, and the robustness of support for democracy in the United States. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 392–409. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055420000052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GRECO. (2018). Ad hoc Report on POLAND (Rule 34). https://rm.coe.int/ad-hoc-report-on-poland-rule-34-adopted-by-greco-at-its-79th-plenary-m/168079c83c.
   Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., Mummolo, J., & Xu, Y. (2019). How much should we trust estimates from multiplicative interaction models? Simple tools to improve empirical practice. Political Analysis, 27(2), 163–192. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakhverdian, A., & Mayne, Q. (2012). Institutional trust, education, and corruption: A micro-macro interactive approach. The Journal of Politics, 74(3), 739–750. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381612000412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, S., & Vachudova, A. (2018). Understanding the illiberal turn: Democratic backsliding in the Czech Republic. East European Politics, 34(3), 276–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2018.1493457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazama, Y. (2023). From activism to resilience: The Turkish constitutional court in comparative perspective. Turkish Studies, 24(3-4), 570–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2023.2173069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M. (2018). [PiS]sing off the courts: The PiS party’s effect on judicial independence in Poland. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 51(4), 1153–1190. https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vjtl/vol51/iss4/5
   Google Scholar
• IDEA. (2022). The global state of democracy, v6. IDEA. https://www.idea.int/gsod-indices/dataset-resources.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Myhill, A., Quinton, P., & Tyler, T. R. (2012). Why do people comply with the law?: Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1051–1071. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azs032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalaycıoğlu, E. (2012). Kulturkampf in Turkey: The constitutional referendum of 12 September 2010. South European Society and Politics, 17(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13608746.2011.600555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kam, C. D., & Trussler, M. J. (2017). At the nexus of observational and experimental research: Theory, specification, and analysis of experiments with heterogeneous treatment effects. Political Behavior, 39(4), 789–815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9379-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. D. (2012). The political foundations of judicial independence in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.632127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingzette, J., Druckman, J. N., Klar, S., Krupnikov, Y., Levendusky, M., & Ryan, J. B. (2021). How affective polarization undermines support for democratic norms. Public Opinion Quarterly, 85(2), 663–677. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfab029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosař, D. (2016). Perils of judicial self-government in transitional societies: Holding the least accountable branch to account. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kosař, D., Baroš, J., & Dufek, P. (2019). The twin challenges to separation of powers in Central Europe: Technocratic governance and populism. European Constitutional Law Review, 15(3), 427–461. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019619000336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacey, N. (2019). Populism and the rule of law. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 15(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042919
   Google Scholar
• Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayne, Q., & Hakhverdian, A. (2017). Education, socialization, and political trust. In S. Zmerli, & T. W. G. van der Meer (Eds.), Handbook on political trust (pp. 176–196). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mazepus, H., & Toshkov, D. (2022). Standing up for democracy? Explaining citizens’ support for democratic checks and balances. Comparative Political Studies, 55(8), 1271–1297. https://doi.org/10.1177/00104140211060285
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moliterno, J. E., & Čuroš, P. (2021). Recent attacks on judicial independence: The vulgar, the systemic, and the insidious. German Law Journal, 22(7), 1159–1191. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.63
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2017). Populism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müftüler-Baç, M. (2019). Backsliding in judicial reforms: Domestic political costs as limits to EU’s political conditionality in Turkey. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 27(1), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2019.1567477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarrete, R. M., & Castillo-Ortiz, P. (2020). Constitutional courts and citizens’ perceptions of judicial systems in Europe. Comparative European Politics, 18(2), 128–150. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-019-00154-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nivette, A. (2014). Legitimacy and crime: Theorizing the role of the state in cross-national criminological theory. Theoretical Criminology, 18(1), 93–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362480613499793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions and their consequences for economic performance. In K. S. Cook, & M. Levi (Eds.), The limits of rationality (pp. 383–401). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2022). Quarterly National Accounts. https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=350. Accessed on 10th October, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Ovádek, M. (2023). The making of landmark rulings in the European Union: The case of national judicial independence. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(23), 1119–1141. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2066156
   Google Scholar
• Pailañir, D., & Clarke, D. (2022). SDID: Stata module to perform synthetic difference-in-differences estimation, inference, and visualization. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:boc:bocode:s459058.
   Google Scholar
• Pech, L., & Scheppele, K. L. (2017). Illiberalism within: Rule of law backsliding in the EU. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 19, 3–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2017.9
   Google Scholar
• Pemstein, D., Marquardt, K.L., Tzelgov, E., Wang, Y., Medzihorsky, J., Krusell, J., Miri, F., von Römer , J.,. (2022).The V-Dem Measurement Model: Latent Variable Analysis for Cross-National and Cross-Temporal Expert-Coded Data V-Dem Working Paper No. 21 University of Gothenburg: Varieties of Democracy Institute. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3595962
   Google Scholar
• Petrov, J. (2022). (De-)judicialization of politics in the era of populism: Lessons from Central and Eastern Europe. The International Journal of Human Rights, 26(7), 1181–1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2021.1931138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rode, M. (2013). Do good institutions make citizens happy, or do happy citizens build better institutions? Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(5), 1479–1505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-012-9391-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roodman, D., Nielsen, M. O., MacKinnon, J. G., & Webb, M. D. (2019). Fast and wild: Bootstrap inference in Stata using boottest. The Stata Journal: Promoting Communications on Statistics and Stata, 19(1), 4–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X19830877
   Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., Van Kessel, S., Froio, C., Pirro, A., De Lange, S., Halikiopoulou, D., Lewis, P., Mudde, C., & Taggart, P. (2019). The populist: An overview of populist, far right, far left and Eurosceptic parties in Europe. https://popu-list.org.
   Google Scholar
• Roussey, L., & Deffains, B. (2012). Trust in judicial institutions: An empirical approach. Journal of Institutional Economics, 8(3), 351–369. https://doi.org/10.1017/S174413741200001X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadurski, W. (2019). Polish constitutional tribunal under PiS: From an activist court, to a paralysed tribunal, to a governmental enabler. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 11(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40803-018-0078-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salzman, R., & Ramsey, A. (2013). Judging the judiciary: Understanding public confidence in Latin American courts. Latin American Politics and Society, 55(1), 73–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-2456.2013.00184.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheppele, K. L. (2015). Understanding Hungary’s constitutional revolution. In A. von Bogdandy, & P. Sonnevend (Eds.), Constitutional crisis in the European constitutional area (pp. 124–137). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Scheppele, K. L. (2018). Autocratic legalism. University of Chicago Law Review, 85(2), 545–583. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26455917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheppele, K. L. (2019). The opportunism of populists and the defense of constitutional liberalism. German Law Journal, 20(3), 314–331. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2019.25
   Google Scholar
• Sheets, S. (2021). Stronger than they seem: ‘Parchment barriers’ and the state of judicial independence in Hungary and Poland [PhD dissertation]. University of Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Simonovits, G., McCoy, J., & Littvay, L. (2022). Democratic hypocrisy and out-group threat: Explaining citizen support for democratic erosion. The Journal of Politics, 84(3), 1806–1811. https://doi.org/10.1086/719009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaaning, S.-E. (2022). The global state of democracy indices methodology. https://www.idea.int/gsod-indices/sites/default/files/inline-files/global-state-of-democracy-indices-methodology-v6_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Śledzińska-Simon, A. (2018). The rise and fall of judicial self-government in Poland: On judicial reform reversing democratic transition. German Law Journal, 19(7), 1839–1870. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2071832200023257
   Google Scholar
• Smekal, H., Benák, J., & Vyhnánek, L. (2022). Through selective activism towards greater resilience: The Czech constitutional court’s interventions into high politics in the age of populism. The International Journal of Human Rights, 26(7), 1230–1251. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2021.2003337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stutzer, A., & Frey, B. S. (2006). Political participation and procedural utility: An empirical study. European Journal of Political Research, 45(3), 391–418. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00303.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svolik, M. W., Avramovska, E., Lutz, J., & Milaèiæ, F. (2023). In Europe, democracy erodes from the right. Journal of Democracy, 34(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2023.0000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szente, Z. (2015). The decline of constitutional review in Hungary–towards a partisan constitutional court? In Z. Szente, F. Mandak, & Z. Fejes (Eds.), Challenges and pitfalls in the recent Hungarian constitutional development (pp. 185–219). L’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Tahiroglu, M. (2020). How Turkey’s leaders dismantled the rule of law. The Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 44(1), 67–96. https://www.jstor.org/stable/48599281
   Google Scholar
• Varol, O. O. (2015). Stealth authoritarianism. Iowa Law Review, 100(4), 1673–1742. https://ilr.law.uiowa.edu/print/volume-100-issue-4/stealth-authoritarianism
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varol, O. O., Dalla Pellegrina, L., & Garoupa, N. (2017). An empirical analysis of judicial transformation in Turkey. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 65(1), 187–216. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcl/avx013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wacławska, W. (2018). The average citizen vs. the court: Polish citizens trust in the judiciary in the period of judicial reforms (from 2015 to the present). Polish Political Science Review, 6(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.2478/ppsr-2018-0002
   Google Scholar
• Wenzel, J. P., Bowler, S., & Lanoue, D. J. (2003). The sources of public confidence in state courts. American Politics Research, 31(2), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X02250295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2022). DataBank: Worldwide governance indicators. https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/. Accessed on: 10th October, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Yeginsu, C. (2010). Turkey packs the court. The New York review of books, September 22nd, 2010. https://www.nybooks.com/online/2010/09/22/turkey-packs-court/.
   Google Scholar
• Ziółkowski, M. (2020). Two faces of the Polish Supreme Court after ‘reforms’ of the judiciary system in Poland: The question of judicial independence and appointments. European Papers-A Journal on Law and Integration, 5(1), 347–362. https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/e-journal/two-faces-of-polish-supreme-court-after-reforms-of-judiciary-system-in-poland
   Google Scholar
• Zoll, F., & Wortham, L. (2018). Judicial independence and accountability: Withstanding political stress in Poland. Fordham International Law Journal, 42(3), 875–948. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ilj/vol42/iss3/5
   Google Scholar