EU sectoral integration in the Eastern Neighbourhood: the case of Frontex-Moldova relations in border management

References

• Adler, E., & Pouliot, V. (2011). International practices. International Theory, 3(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/S175297191000031X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aggestam, L., & Bicchi, F. (2019). New directions in EU foreign policy governance: Cross-loading, leadership and informal groupings. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(3), 515–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12846
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asderaki, F., & Markozani, E. (2019). European migration policy: Frontex, differentiation and Brexit. In S. Gänzle, B. Leruth, & J. Trondal (Eds.), Differentiated integration and disintegration in a post-Brexit Era (pp. 91–109). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Balibar, E. (2003). Europe: Vanishing mediator. Constellations (Oxford, England), 10(3), 312–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.00335
   Google Scholar
• Baltag, D., & Bosse, G. (2014). The ENP as an instrument for building a security community? The case of Moldova. Norwegian Institute of International Affairs Working Paper, 833(1), 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Baltag, D., & Bosse, G. (2016). The EU’s Eastern partnership with Moldova: A “best-case” scenario for EU security community-building? In P. Rieker (Ed.), External governance as security community building: The limits and potential of the European neighbourhood policy (pp. 49–77). The European Union in International Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Bolkvadze, K. (2016). ‘Cherry picking EU conditionality: Selective compliance in Georgia’s hybrid regime’. Europe-Asia Studies, 68(3), 409–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2016.1154138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, T. A., & Lebanidze, B. (2015). European neighbourhood policy at the crossroads: Evaluating the past to shape the future. MAXCAP Working Paper Series, 12(1), 1–44.
   Google Scholar
• Bruszt, L., & Langbein, J. (2017, February 4). Varieties of dis-embedded liberalism. EU integration strategies in the eastern peripheries of Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(2), 297–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1264085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busuioc, M. (2016). Friend or Foe? Inter-agency cooperation, organizational reputation, and turf. Public Administration, 94(1), 40–56. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busuioc, M., Groenleer, M., & Trondal, J. (2012). The agency phenomenon in the European Union: Emergence, institutionalisation and everyday decision-making. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buzogány, A. (2013). Selective adoption of EU environmental norms in Ukraine. Convergence á La carte. Europe-Asia Studies, 65(4), 609–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2013.766039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Checkel, J. T. (2005). International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework. International Organization, 59(4), 801–826. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818305050289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, T., Petito, F., & Tonra, B. (2000). ‘Fuzzy politics around fuzzy borders: The European Union’s `near abroad’’. Cooperation and Conflict, 35(4), 389–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/00108360021962183
   Google Scholar
• Civitta. (2016). Eastern Partnership Integrated Border Management Capacity Building Project: Mid-Term Evaluation of Eastern Partnership (EaP) Integrated Border Management (IBM) Capacity Building Project in Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova and Ukraine.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2020). 6930/20 Joint communication to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Eastern Partnership Policy Beyond 2020 Reinforcing Resilience - an Eastern Partnership That Delivers for All.
   Google Scholar
• Dandashly, A., & Noutcheva, G. (2022). Conceptualizing norm diffusion and norm contestation in the European neighbourhood: Introduction to the special issue. Democratization, 29(3), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2021.2012161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehousse, R. (1997). Regulation by networks in the European community: The role of European agencies. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(2), 246–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501769709696341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delcour, L. (2013). Meandering europeanisation: EU policy instruments and policy convergence in Georgia under the eastern partnership. East European Politics, 29(3), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2013.807804
   Google Scholar
• Dimitrova, A., & Dragneva, R. (2013). Shaping convergence with the EU in foreign policy and state Aid in post-orange Ukraine: Weak external incentives, powerful veto players. Europe-Asia Studies, 65(4), 658–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2013.766040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EaP-IBM Project. (2015a). EaP-IBM Project Quarterly Newsletter, Issue 1, May 2015.
   Google Scholar
• EaP-IBM Project. (2015b). EaP-IBM Project Quarterly Newsletter, Issue 2, September 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Eberlein, B., & Newman, A. L. (2008). Escaping the international governance dilemma? Incorporated transgovernmental networks in the European Union. Governance, 21(1), 25–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2007.00384.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M. (2006). Multilevel union administration: The transformation of executive politics in Europe. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2016). Agencification of the European Union Administration: Connecting the Dots. TARN Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2017). Researching European Union agencies: What have we learnt (and where do we go from here)?: European Union agencies. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(4), 675–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M., Trondal, J., & Vestlund, N. M. (2015). The quest for order: Unravelling the relationship between the European commission and European Union agencies. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(5), 609–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.976587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2004). European Neighbourhood Strategy Paper, COM 2004(373). Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2011). SEC(2011) 1075 final Joint Staff Working Paper: First progress report of the implementation by the Republic of Moldova of the Action Plan on Visa Liberalisation.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015a). Joint Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy - JOINT(2015) 50 Final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015b). Joint Staff Working Document: Towards a New European Neighbourhood Policy.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2011). Agreement between the European Union and Georgia on the Readmission of Persons Residing without Authorisation.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2019). Regulation (EU) 2019/1896 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2019 on the European Border and Coast Guard and Repealing Regulations (EU) No 1052/2013 and (EU) 2016/1624.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2022). Agreement between the European Union and the Republic of Moldova on Operational Activities Carried out by the European Border and Coast Guard Agency in the Republic of Moldova.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher Onar, N., & Nicolaïdis, K. (2013). The decentring agenda: Europe as a post-colonial power. Cooperation and Conflict, 48(2), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836713485384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyburg, T. (2011). Transgovernmental networks as catalysts for democratic change? EU functional cooperation with Arab authoritarian regimes and socialization of involved state officials into democratic governance. Democratization, 18(4), 1001–1025. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.584737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyburg, T., Lavenex, S., Schimmelfennig, F., Skripka, T., & Wetzel, A. (2009). EU promotion of democratic governance in the neighbourhood. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(6), 916–934. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760903088405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyburg, T., Lavenex, S., Schimmelfennig, F., Skripka, T., & Wetzel, A. (2011). Democracy promotion through functional cooperation? The case of the European neighbourhood policy. Democratization, 18(4), 1026–1054. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.584738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyburg, T., Lavenex, S., Schimmelfennig, F., Skripka, T., & Wetzel, A. (2015). Democracy promotion by functional cooperation: The European Union and Its neighbourhood. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Frontex. (2008). Working Arrangement on the Establishment of Operational Cooperation between the European Agency for the Management of Operational Cooperation at the External Borders of the Member States of the European Union (Frontex) and the Border Guard Service of the Republic of Moldova.
   Google Scholar
• Frontex. (2011). Second Progress Report of the Implementation by Republic of Moldova of the Action Plan on Visa Liberalisation.
   Google Scholar
• Frontex. (2012). General Report 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Frontex. (2013a). Annual Activity Report 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Frontex. (2013b). General Report 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Frontex. (2014). General Report 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Frontex. (2015). General Report 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Frontex. (2016). Training Needs Assessment: 2016 Report.
   Google Scholar
• Frontex. (2017). MANAGEMENT BOARD 38 /2017 of 20 December 2017 Adopting the Programming Document 2018 - 2020 Containing the Multiannual Programming 2018–2020, the Annual Work Programme 2018 and the Budget 2018 (Including the Establishment Plan).
   Google Scholar
• Frontex. (2018). Report to the EU Parliament on Frontex Cooperation with Third Countries in 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Frontex. (2019a). Frontex Evaluation Report 2018: Focal Points Concept - Joint Operation Coordination Points Air 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Frontex. (2019b). Frontex Evaluation Report: JO Flexible Operational Activities 2018 Land on Border Surveillance.
   Google Scholar
• Frontex. (2020a). Frontex Evaluation Report 2019: Focal Points Concept - Joint Operation Coordination Points Air 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Frontex. (2020b). Frontex, the European Border and Coast Guard Agency: Cooperation with Third Countries in 2019. Report to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Frontex. (2021). Frontex Evaluation Report: JO Coordination Points 2020 Air.
   Google Scholar
• Frontex. (2022a). Cooperation between Frontex and Third Countries in 2021: Report to the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Frontex. (2022b). Frontex: Beyond EU Borders.
   Google Scholar
• Frontex and MIA Moldova. (2021). 2022-2024 Cooperation Plan: Operational Cooperation between the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) and The General Inspectorate of Border Police of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Moldova.
   Google Scholar
• Frontex, IOM, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine. (2018b). Eastern Partnership - Interoperability Assessment Programme Study 2017-2018.
   Google Scholar
• Frontex, IOM, WCO, and ICMPD. (2015). Eastern Partnership (EaP) - Integrated Border Management - Capacity Building Project: Interim Report Year 1.
   Google Scholar
• Frontex, IOM, WCO, and ICMPD. (2017). Eastern Partnership (EaP) - Integrated Border Management - Capacity Building Project: Interim Report Year 3.
   Google Scholar
• Frontex, IOM, WCO, and ICMPD. (2018a). EaP-IBM Project: Final Narrative Report.
   Google Scholar
• Gawrich, A., Melnykovska, I., & Schweickert, R. (2010). Neighbourhood Europeanization through ENP: The case of Ukraine. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(5), 1209–1235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02110.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gils, E. v. (2017). Differentiation through bargaining power in EU–Azerbaijan relations: Baku as a tough negotiator. East European Politics, 33(3), 388–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2017.1322957
   Google Scholar
• Groenleer, M. (2014). ‘Agency autonomy actually: Managerial strategies, legitimacy, and the early development of the European Union’s agencies for drug and food safety regulation’. International Public Management Journal, 17(2), 255–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2014.905416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gstöhl, S., & Frommelt, C. (2023). Beyond downloading: Venues for associated neighbouring countries to influence EU Law and policies. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13436
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guvernul Republicii Moldolva. (2012). HOTĂRÂRE Nr. 434 Din 19-06-2012 Cu Privire La Poliţia de Frontieră.
   Google Scholar
• Guvernul Republicii Moldolva. (2015a). HOTĂRÂRE Nr. 429 Din 07-07-2015 Pentru Aprobarea Regulamentului Cu Privire La Sistemul de Coordonare a Securității Frontaliere.
   Google Scholar
• Guvernul Republicii Moldolva. (2015b). HOTĂRÂRE Nr. 902 Din 31-12-2015 Cu Privire La Consiliul Naţional Pentru Managementul Integrat al Frontierei de Stat.
   Google Scholar
• Guvernul Republicii Moldolva. (2016). HOTĂRÂRE Nr. HG84/2016 Din 10.02.2016 Pentru Aprobarea Acordului Dintre Guvernul Republicii Moldova Și Cabinetul de Miniștri al Ucrainei Cu Privire La Organizarea Schimbului de Informații Privind Persoanele Și Mijloacele de Transport Cu Care Persoanele Traversează Frontiera de Stat Moldo-Ucraineană, Întocmit La Chişinău La 4 Noiembrie 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Guvernul Republicii Moldolva. (2017). HOTĂRÂRE Nr. 901 Din 06-11-2017 Pentru Aprobarea Acordului Dintre Guvernul Republicii Moldova Şi Cabinetul de Miniştri al Ucrainei Privind Controlul În Comun al Persoanelor, Mijloacelor de Transport, Mărfurilor Şi Obiectelor În Punctele Comune de Trecere a Frontierei de Stat Moldo-Ucrainene, Întocmit La Chişinău La 6 Octombrie 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Guvernul Republicii Moldolva. (2018). HOTĂRÂRE Nr. 1101 Din 14-11-2018 Cu Privire La Aprobarea Strategiei Naționale de Management Integrat al Frontierei de Stat Pentru Perioada 2018-2023 Și a Planurilor de Acțiuni Privind Implementarea Acesteia.
   Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. (2015). On defining institutions: Rules versus equilibria. Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(3), 497–505. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137415000028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, H. C. H., Vos, E., & Chamon, M. (2019). The external dimension of EU agencies and bodies. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Inspectoratul General al Politei de Frontiera. (2018). Raport de Activitate al Politei de Frontiera Pentru Anul 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, H., & Menon, A. (2003). The principal-agent approach and the study of the European Union: Promise unfulfilled? Journal of European Public Policy, 10(1), 121–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176032000046976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuleers, F., Fonck, D., & Keukeleire, S. (2016). Beyond EU navel-gazing: Taking stock of EU-centrism in the analysis of EU foreign policy. Cooperation and Conflict, 51(3), 345–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836716631777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klose, S., Perot, E., & Temizisler, S. (2023). Spot the difference: Differentiated co-operation and differentiated integration in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(1), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korosteleva, E. A. (2016). The European Union and Belarus: Democracy promotion by technocratic means? Democratization, 23(4), 678–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2015.1005009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langbein, J. (2014). European Union governance towards the Eastern Neighbourhood: Transcending or redrawing Europe’s East–West divide? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. (2004). EU external governance in “wider Europe”. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 680–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000248098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. (2011). Concentric circles of flexible “European” integration: A typology of EU external governance relations. Comparative European Politics, 9(4–5), 372–393. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2011.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. (2015). The external face of differentiated integration: Third country participation in EU sectoral bodies. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(6), 836–853. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1020836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S., & Križić, I. (2019). Conceptualising Differentiated Integration: Governance, Effectiveness and Legitimacy. EUIDEA Research Paper No. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S., & Lutz, P. (2023). Third country access to EU agencies: Exploring spaces for influence. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi-Faur, D. (2011). Regulatory networks and regulatory agencification: Towards a single European regulatory space. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 810–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.593309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1995). The European community as a regulatory state. Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1997). The New European agencies: Regulation by information. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(2), 262–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501769709696342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major, C. (2005). Europeanisation and foreign and security policy – undermining or rescuing the nation state? Politics, 25(3), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2005.00242.x
   Google Scholar
• Malmström, C. (2012). Letter to the JHA Agencies.
   Google Scholar
• Marin, L. (2020). The cooperation between frontex and third countries in information sharing: Practices, law and challenges in externalizing border control functions. European Public Law, 26(1), 157–180. https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2020009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merheim-Eyre, I. (2017). ‘Exploring the European Union’s rationalities of governing: The case of cross-border mobility in the eastern partnership’. East European Politics, 33(3), 371–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2017.1331908
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monar, J. (2013). Eurojust and the European public prosecutor perspective: From cooperation to integration in EU criminal justice? Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 14(3), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/15705854.2013.817807
   Google Scholar
• Müftüler-Baç, M., & Luetgert, B. (2016). ‘The European Union’s alternative models for maximizing Its integration strategy for candidates and neighbouring states: A process of external differentiation’. Free University Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Muhhina, K. (2022). Governance improvement by sectoral cooperation: Toward a framework of policy designs for the Eastern Neighbourhood. East European Politics, 0(0), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, P., & Gazsi, D. (2023). Populist capture of foreign policy institutions: The Orbán Government and the de-Europeanization of Hungarian foreign policy. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 61(2), 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemann, A., & Zaun, N. (2018). EU refugee policies and politics in times of crisis: Theoretical and empirical perspectives. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1994). Economic performance through time. The American Economic Review, 84(3), 359–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrova, I., & Delcour, L. (2020). From principle to practice? The resilience–local ownership nexus in the EU eastern partnership policy. Contemporary Security Policy, 41(2), 336–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2019.1678280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Politia de Frontiera. (2015). Raport: Privind Gradul de Realizare a Planului de Implementare a Strategiei Naționale de Management Integrat al Frontierei de Stat Pentru Perioada 2015-2017 (HG Nr. 1005 Din 10.12.2014), Pentru I Semestru al Anului 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Pollak, J., & Slominski, P. (2009). Experimentalist but Not accountable governance? The role of frontex in managing the EU’s external borders. West European Politics, 32(5), 904–924. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380903064754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. (2006). Europeanization: Solution or problem? In M. Cini, & A. Bourne (Eds.), European Union studies (pp. 56–76). Palgrave Advances. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rimkutė, D., & Shyrokykh, K. (2019). Transferring the acquis through EU agencies: The case of the European neighbourhood policy countries. In H. C. H. Hofmann, E. Vos, & M. Chamon (Eds.), The external dimension of EU agencies and bodies (pp. 183–203). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sagrera, R. H. i. (2014). Exporting EU integrated border management beyond EU borders: Modernization and institutional transformation in exchange for more mobility? Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 27(1), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2012.734784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2015). Europeanization beyond Europe. Living Reviews in European Governance, 10(1), 1–34.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., Leuffen, D., & Rittberger, B. (2015). The European Union as a system of differentiated integration: Interdependence, politicization and differentiation. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(6), 764–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1020835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2005). Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of central and Eastern Europe. In F. Schimmelfennig, & U. Sedelmeier (Eds.), The europeanization of central and Eastern Europe (pp. 1–28). Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F., & Winzen, T. (2019). Grand theories, differentiated integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(8), 1172–1192. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1576761
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shyrokykh, K., & Rimkutė, D. (2019). EU rules beyond its borders: The policy-specific effects of transgovernmental networks and EU agencies in the European neighbourhood. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(4), 749–767. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, D. (2013). Foucault, subjectivity and ethics: Towards a self-forming subject. Organization, 20(6), 904–923. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412460419
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thatcher, M., & Coen, D. (2008). Reshaping European regulatory space: An evolutionary analysis. West European Politics, 31(4), 806–836. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380801906114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turhan, E., & Yildiz, A. (2022). Turkey’s external differentiated integration with the EU in the field of migration governance: The case of border management. In B. Leruth, & S. Gänzle (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of differentiation in the European Union (pp. 502–518). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vestlund, N. M. (2017). Pooling administrative resources through EU regulatory networks. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(7), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1118147
   Google Scholar
• Whitman, R. G. (2013). ‘The Neo-normative turn in theorising the EU’s international presence’. Cooperation and Conflict, 48(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836713485538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolczuk, K., Delcour, L., Dragneva, R., Maniokas, K., & Žeruolis, D. (2017). The Association Agreements as a Dynamic Framework: Between Modernization and Integration. EU-STRAT Working Paper Series 6.
   Google Scholar
• Wolff, S., Gazsi, D., Huber, D., & Fisher-Onar, N. (2022). How to reflexively decentre EU foreign policy: Dissonance and contrapuntal reconstruction in migration, religious and neighbourhood governance. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 60(6), 1611–1628. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, S., Wichmann, N., & Mounier, G. (Eds.). (2013). The external dimension of justice and home affairs: A different security agenda for the European Union? Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wonka, A., & Rittberger, B. (2011). Perspectives on EU governance: An empirical assessment of the political attitudes of EU agency professionals. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 888–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.593315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, J. (2015). Extending experimentalist governance? The European Union and transnational regulation. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar