Policy issue salience and legislative output of populist governments: evidence from immigration policies

References

• Abou-Chadi, T. (2016). Political and institutional determinants of immigration policies. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 42(13), 2087–2110. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2016.1166938
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, J., Böhmelt, T., Ezrow, L., & Schleiter, P. (2022). Backlash policy diffusion to populists in power. PLoS ONE, 17(9), e0273951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adhikari, P., Mariam, S., & Thomson, R. (2022). The fulfilment of election pledges in India. Journal of Contemporary Asia, Forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afonso, A. (2015). Choosing whom to betray: Populist right-wing parties, welfare state reforms, and the trade-off between office and votes. European Political Science Review, 7(2), 271–292. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773914000125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, T. (2012). Comparing radical right parties in government: Immigration and integration policies in nine countries (1996-2010). West European Politics, 35(3), 511–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2012.665738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, T. (2015). Immigration policy and electoral competition in Western Europe: A fine-grained analysis of party positions over the past Two decades. Party Politics, 21(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812462928
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, T., de Lange, S., & Rooduijn, M. (2016). Radical right-wing populist parties in Western Europe: Into the mainstream? Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, A., Mudde, C., & Zaslove, A. (2014). How populists are the people? Measuring populist attitudes in voters. Comparative Political Studies, 47(9), 1324–1353. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414013512600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, A., Zaslove, A., & Spruyt, B. (2017). ‘We the people’ or ‘We the peoples’? A comparison of support for the populist radical right and populist radical left in The Netherlands. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(4), 377–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, R. M. (1998). Information and elections. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., Böhmelt, T., & Ward, H. (2017). Public opinion and environmental policy output: A cross-national analysis of energy policies in Europe. Environmental Research Letters, 12(11), 114011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa8f80
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakaki, Z., Böhmelt, T., & Ward, H. (2020). The triangular relationship between public concern for environmental issues, policy output, and media attention. Environmental Politics, 29(7), 1157–1177. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1655188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bara, J. (2005). A question of trust: Implementing party manifestos. Parliamentary Affairs, 58(3), 585–599. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsi053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, M. W., & Becker, S. (2020). Democratic backsliding, populism, and public administration. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 3(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvz026
   Google Scholar
• Blais, A., Blake, D., & Dion, S. (1993). Do parties make a difference? Parties and the size of government in liberal democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 37(1), 40–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhmelt, T. (2021a). Populism and environmental performance. Global Environmental Politics, 21(3), 97–123. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhmelt, T. (2021b). How public opinion steers national immigration policies. Migration Studies, 9(3), 1461–1479. https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnz039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhmelt, T., & Ezrow, L. (2022). How party platforms on immigration become policy. Journal of Public Policy, 42(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X20000331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhmelt, T., Ezrow, L., Lehrer, R., Schleiter, P., & Ward, H. (2017). Why dominant governing parties are cross-nationally influential. International Studies Quarterly, 61(4), 749–759. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqx067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhmelt, T., Ezrow, L., Lehrer, R., & Ward, H. (2016). Party policy diffusion. American Political Science Review, 110(2), 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, L., Van der Brug, W., & De Vreese, C. (2010). Media coverage of right-wing populist leaders. Communications, 35(2), 141–163.
   Google Scholar
• Brambor, T., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpi014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bräuninger, T. (2005). A partisan model of government expenditure. Public Choice, 125(3-4), 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-005-3055-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breunig, C., Cao, X., & Luedtke, A. (2012). Global migration and political regime type: A democratic disadvantage. British Journal of Political Science, 42(4), 825–854. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromley-Trujillo, R., & Poe, J. (2020). The importance of salience: Public opinion and state policy action on climate change. Journal of Public Policy, 40(2), 280–304. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X18000375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busby, E. C., Gubler, J. R., & Hawkins, K. A. (2019). Framing and blame attribution in populist rhetoric. Journal of Politics, 81(2), 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1086/701832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canovan, M. (1981). Populism. Junction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Caramani, D. (2017). Will vs. Reason: The populist and technocratic forms of political representation and their critique to party government. American Political Science Review, 111(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055416000538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carson, A., Gibbons, A., & Martin, A. (2019). Did the minority Gillard government keep Its promises? A study of promissory representation in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2019.1588956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castanho Silva, B., Andreadis, I., Anduiza, E., Blanusa, N., Corti, Y. M., Delfino, G., Rico, G., Ruth, S., Spruyt, B., Steenbergen, M. R., & Littvay, L. (2018). Public opinion surveys: A New scale. In K. A. Hawkins, R. Carlin, L. Littvay, & C. R. Kaltwasser (Eds.), The ideational approach to populism: Concept, theory, and analysis (pp. 150–178). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Castanho Silva, B., Jungkunz, S., Helbling, M., & Littvay, L. (2020). An empirical investigation of seven populist attitude scales. Political Research Quarterly, 73(2), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912919833176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combei, C. R., & Giannetti, D. (2020). The immigration issue on twitter political communication: Italy 2018-2019. Communicazione Politica, 21(2), 231–263.
   Google Scholar
• Cornelius, W., & Rosenblum, M. R. (2005). Immigration and politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 8(1), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104854
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dassonneville, R., Feitosa, F., Hooghe, M., & Oser, J. (2021). Policy responsiveness to all citizens or only to voters? A longitudinal analysis of policy responsiveness in OECD countries. European Journal of Political Research, 60(3), 583–602. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Torre, C. ed. (2014). The promise and perils of populism: Global perspectives. University Press of Kentucky.
   Google Scholar
• De Sousa, L., Fernandes, D., & Weiler, F. (2021). Is populism Bad for business? Assessing the reputational effect of populist incumbents. Swiss Political Science Review, 27(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döring, H., & Manow, P. (2012). Parliament and government composition database (ParlGov): An infrastructure for empirical information on parties, elections, and governments in modern democracies. Available online at: http://parlgov.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, D. (2011). The legitimacy of political institutions: Explaining contemporary populism in Latin America. Comparative Political Studies, 44(11), 1447–1473. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011407469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duval, D., & Pétry, F. (2019). Time and the fulfillment of election pledges. Political Studies, 67(1), 207–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321718762882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elling, R. C. (1979). State party platforms and state legislative performance: A comparative analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 23(2), 383–405. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson, R., MacKuen, M., & Stimson, J. (2002). The macro polity. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ezrow, L., Fenzl, M., & Hellwig, T. (2023). Bicameralism and policy responsiveness to public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, Forthcoming.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezrow, L., Hellwig, T., & Fenzl, M. (2020). Responsiveness, If You Can afford It: Policy responsiveness in good and Bad economic times. The Journal of Politics, 82(3), 1166–1170. https://doi.org/10.1086/707524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forchtner, B., & Kølvraa, C. (2015). The nature of nationalism: Populist radical right parties on countryside and climate. Nature and Culture, 10(2), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.3167/nc.2015.100204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, G. (1995). Modes of immigration policies in liberal democratic states. International Migration Review, 29(4), 881–902. https://doi.org/10.1177/019791839502900401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, H. d., Natter, K., & Vezzoli, S. (2014). Compiling and coding migration policies: Insights from the DEMIG POLICY database. Oxford Department of International Development.
   Google Scholar
• Hainmueller, J., Mummolo, J., & Xu, Y. (2019). How much should we trust estimates from multiplicative interaction models? Simple tools to improve empirical practice. Political Analysis, 27(2), 163–192. https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2018.46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hameleers, M., Bos, L., & de Vreese, C. (2017). The appeal of media populism: The media preferences of citizens with populist attitudes. Mass Communication and Society, 20(4), 481–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1291817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K. A. (2003). Populism in Venezuela: The rise of Chavismo. Third World Quarterly, 24(6), 1137–1160. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590310001630107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K. A., Carlin, R., Littvay, L., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2019). The ideational approach to populism: Concept, theory, and analysis. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K. A., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2018). Introduction – concept, theory, and method. In K. A. Hawkins, R. Carlin, L. Littvay, & C. R. Kaltwasser (Eds.), The ideational approach to populism: Concept, theory, and analysis (pp. 1–24). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C., & Stoker, G. (2009). Revitalising politics: Have we lost the plot? Representation, 45(3), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890903129681
   Google Scholar
• Heinisch, R. (2003). Success in opposition – failure in government: Explaining the performance of right-wing populist parties in public office. West European Politics, 26(3), 91–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380312331280608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbling, M., & Kalkum, D. (2018). Migration policy trends in OECD countries. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(12), 1779–1797. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1361466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henisz, W. J. (2002). The institutional environment for infrastructure investment. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(2), 355–389. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/11.2.355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, A. M., & Swank, D. H. (1992). Politics, institutions, and welfare spending In industrialized democracies, 1960-82. American Political Science Review, 86(3), 658–674. https://doi.org/10.2307/1964129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, S. (2016). The brexit vote: A divided nation, A divided continent. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(9), 1259–1277. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1225785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, M. (2010). The impact of the Far right on citizenship policy in Europe: Explaining continuity and change. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(5), 735–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691831003763922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, R. A. (2020). The role of populist attitudes in explaining climate change skepticism and support for environmental protection. Environmental Politics, 29(6), 959–982. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1708186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, E., Rueschemeyer, D., & Stephens, J. (1993). The impact of economic development on democracy. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(3), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.7.3.71
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, R. A., & Ruth, S. P. (2017). Mind the Gap! populism, participation, and representation in Europe. Swiss Political Science Review, 23(4), 462–484. https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, R., & Schimpf, C. H. (2016). Friend or Foe? Testing the influence of populism on democratic quality in Latin America. Political Studies, 64(4), 872–889. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, R. A., & Schimpf, C. H. (2017). On the distinct effects of left-wing and right-wing populism on democratic quality. Politics and Governance, 5(4), 146–165. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v5i4.919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, W., & Wlezien, C. (2018). Election polling errors across time and space. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(4), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0315-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, S.-G., & Powell, B. (2010). Representation and policy responsiveness: The median voter, election rules, and redistributive welfare spending. The Journal of Politics, 72(4), 1014–1028. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karreth, J., Polk, J. T., & Allen, C. S. (2013). Catchall or catch and release? The electoral consequences of social democratic parties’ march to the middle in Western Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 46(7), 791–822. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012463885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keman, H. ed. (2002). Comparative democratic politics: A guide to contemporary theory and research. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J., Alcantara, C., & Armstrong, D. (2021). Do governments keep their promises? An analysis of speeches from the throne. Governance, 34(1), 917–934. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12548
   Google Scholar
• King, G., Tomz, M., & Wittenberg, J. (2000). Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science, 44(2), 347–361. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishishita, D., & Yamagishi, A. (2021). Contagion of populist extremism. Journal of Public Economics, 193, 104324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knill, C., Debus, M., & Heichel, S. (2010). Do parties matter in internationalised policy areas? The impact of political parties on environmental policy outputs in 18 OECD countries, 1970-2000. European Journal of Political Research, 49(3), 301–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01903.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, W., & Wagner, A. (2019). Becoming part of the gang? Established and non-established populist parties and the role of external efficacy. Party Politics, 27(1), 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819839210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H. (2014). The populist challenge. West European Politics, 37(2), 361–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2014.887879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, P., & Zobel, M. (2018). Positions and saliency of immigration in party manifestos: A novel dataset using crowd coding. European Journal of Political Research, 57(4), 1056–1083. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M. (2018). Right-Wing populism and the climate change agenda: Exploring the linkages. Environmental Politics, 27(4), 712–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lührmann, A., Düpont, N., Higashijima, M., Kavasoglu, Y. B., Marquardt, K. L., Bernhard, M., Döring, H., Hicken, A., Laebens, M., Lindberg, S. I., & Medzihorsky, J. (2020). Codebook varieties of party identity and organisation (V-party) V1. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project.
   Google Scholar
• Lundquist, S. (2022). Do parties matter for environmental policy stringency? Exploring the program-to-policy link for environmental issues in 28 countries 1990-2015. Political Studies, Forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, P. (2019). Variation in policy success: Radical right populism and migration policy. West European Politics, 42(3), 517–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1504509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz, P. (2021). Reassessing the gap-hypothesis: Tough talk and weak action in migration policy? Party Politics, 27(1), 174–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068819840776
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthieß, T. (2020). Retrospective pledge voting: A comparative study of the electoral consequences of government parties’ pledge fulfilment. European Journal of Political Research, 59(4), 774–796. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarty, N., Poole, K. T., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, M., & Budge, I. (2005). Elections, parties, democracy: Conferring the median mandate. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meguid, B. M. (2005). Competition between unequals: The role of mainstream party strategy in niche party success. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meguid, B. (2008). Party competition between unequals. Strategies and electoral fortunes in Western Europe. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mény, Y., & Surel, Y. (2002). Democracies and the populist challenge. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Moffitt, B. (2018). The populism/anti-populism divide in Western Europe. Democratic Theory, 5(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2018.050202
   Google Scholar
• Money, J. (2010). Comparative immigration policy. In R. Denemark (Ed.), The International studies encyclopedia. Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government & Opposition, 39(3), 541–563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2012). Populism and (liberal) democracy: A framework for analysis. In C. Mudde, & C. R. Kaltwasser (Eds.), Populism in Europe and the Americas (pp. 1–26). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, W. C., & Strøm, K. (1999). Policy, office, or votes? How political parties in Western Europe make hard decisions. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naurin, E. (2009). Promising democracy. Parties, citizens, and election promises. Department of Political Science: Statsvetenskapliga institutionen.
   Google Scholar
• Naurin, E. (2011). Election promises, party behavior, and voter perceptions. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Naurin, E., Royed, T. J., & Thomson, R. (2019). Party mandates and democracy: Making, breaking, and keeping election pledges in twelve countries. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naurin, E., & Thomson, R. (2020). The fulfillment of election pledges. In M. Cotta, & F. Russo (Eds.), Research handbook on political representation (pp. 289–300). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2019). Cultural backlash. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. E., & Rahn, W. M. (2016). Rise of the trumpenvolk: Populism and the 2016 election. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 667(1), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716216662639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otjes, S., & Louwerse, T. (2015). Populists in parliament: Comparing left-wing and right-wing populism in The Netherlands. Political Studies, 63(1), 60–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panizza, F. (2000). New wine in Old bottles? Old and New populism in Latin America. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 19(2), 145–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-9856.2000.tb00095.x
   Google Scholar
• Peters, Y. (2016, September 20–21). The politics of representation. Paper prepared for presentation at the “Stein Rokkan’s Heritage” Workshop, Bergen, Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Riera, P., & Pastor, M. (2022). Cordons sanitaires or tainted coalitions? The electoral consequences of populist participation in government. Party Politics, 28(5), 889–902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. (2007). Latin America’s populist revival. The SAIS Review of International Affairs, 27(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1353/sais.2007.0018
   Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M. (2019). State of the field: How to study populism and adjacent topics? A pleas for both more and less focus. European Journal of Political Research, 58(1), 362–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., & Akkerman, T. (2017). Flank attacks: Populism and left-right radicalism in Western Europe. Party Politics, 23(3), 193–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815596514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., De Lange, S. L., & Van der Brug, W. (2014). A populist zeitgeist? Programmatic contagion by populist parties in Western Europe. Party Politics, 20(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068811436065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, M., Van der Brug, W., & De Lange, S. L. (2016). Expressing or fuelling discontent? The relationship between populist voting and political discontent. Electoral Studies, 43, 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2016.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffer, L. M., Oehl, B., & Bernauer, T. (2022). Are policymakers responsive to public demand in climate politics? Journal of Public Policy, 42(1), 136–164. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X21000088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, S., & Wlezien, C. (2010). Degrees of democracy. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taggart, P. (2002). Populism and the pathology of representative politics. In Y. Mény, & Y. Surel (Eds.), Democracies and the populist challenge (pp. 62–80). Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, R. (1999). The party mandate: Election pledges and government actions in the Netherlands, 1985-1998 [PhD Dissertation]. University of Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, R., Royed, T., Naurin, E., Artés, J., Costello, R., Ennser-Jedenastik, L., Ferguson, M., Kostadinova, P., Moury, C., Pétry, F., & Praprotnik, K. (2017). The fulfillment of parties’ election pledges: A comparative study on the impact of power sharing. American Journal of Political Science, 61(3), 527–542. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachudova, M. (2021). Populism, democracy, and party system change in Europe. Annual Review of Political Science, 24(1), 471–498. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hauwaert, S., Schimpf, C., & Azevedo, F. (2020). The measurement of populist attitudes: Testing cross-national scales using item response theory. Politics, 40(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263395719859306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vercesi, M. (2019). Do populists govern differently? The management of the Italian M5S-league coalition in comparative perspective. Perspectivas – Journal of Political Science, 21, 9–24. https://doi.org/10.21814/perspectivas.2557
   Google Scholar
• Vodová, P. (2021). What makes a good minister of a political party? Impact of party- and field-related experience on party pledge fulfilment. Party Politics, Forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, S. (2021). The backlash against globalization. Annual Review of Political Science, 24(1), 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-041719-102405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, A. (2019). Voters’ preferences for party representation: Promise-keeping, responsiveness to public opinion, or enacting the common good. International Political Science Review, 40(4), 486–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512118787430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, A., & Geibler, H. (2019). Do populists represent? Theoretical considerations on How populist parties (might) enact their representative function. Representation, 55(4), 379–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2019.1643776
   Google Scholar
• Weyland, K. (2003). Economic voting reconsidered: Crisis and charisma in the election of hugo chavez. Comparative Political Studies, 36(7), 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414003255106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuttke, A., Schimpf, C., & Schoen, H. (2020). When the whole is greater than the Sum of its parts: On the conceptualization and measurement of populist attitudes and other multidimensional constructs. American Political Science Review, 114(2), 356–374. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar