Responsible judges or judging responsibilities? EU Court of Justice, Bundesverfassungsgericht and EU economic governance

References

• Alter, K. (1998). Who are the ‘Masters of the Treaty’? European governments and the European Court of Justice. International Organization, 52(1), 121–147. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Trondal, J. (2018). Governing turbulence: An organizational-institutional agenda. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvx013
   Google Scholar
• Beukers, T., & De Witte, B. (2013). The Court of Justice approves the creation of the European Stability Mechanism outside the EU legal order: Pringle. Common Market Law Review, 50(6), 805–848. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2013160
   Google Scholar
• Bickel, A. M. (1962). The least dangerous branch. The Supreme Court at the bar of politics. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blauberger, M., Heindlmaier, A., Kramer, D., Martinsen, D. S., Sampson Thierry, J., Schenk, A., & Werner, B. (2018). ECJ judges read the morning papers. Explaining the turnaround of European citizenship jurisprudence. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(10), 1422–1441. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1488880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauberger, M., & Martinsen, D. S. (2020). The Court of Justice in times of politicisation: ‘law as a mask and shield’ revisited. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(3), 382–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1712460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, N., & Salát, O. (2021). Parliaments in times of crisis: COVID-19, populism and executive dominance. West European Politics, 44(5–6), 1103–1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2021.1930733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borger, V. (2016). Outright Monetary Transactions and the stability mandate of the ECB: Gauweiler. Common Market Law Review, 53(1), 139–196. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2016007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brekke, S. A., Fjelstul, J. C., Lyder Hermansen, S. S., & Naurin, D. (2023). The CJEU database platform: Decisions and decision-makers. Journal of Law and Courts, 11(2), 389–410. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlc.2022.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burley, A.-M, & Mattli, W. (1993). Europe before the Court: A political theory of legal integration. International Organization, 47(1), 41–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buti, M., & Fabbrini, S. (2023). Next Generation EU and the future of economic governance: Towards a paradigm change or just a big one-off? Journal of European Public Policy, 30(4), 676–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2022.2141303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrubba, C. J., & Gabel, M. (2014). International courts and the performance of international agreements: A general theory with evidence from the European Union. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Closa, C., & Maatsch, A. (2014). In a spirit of solidarity? Justifying the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) in national parliamentary debates. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(4), 826–842. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12119
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crespy, A., Massart, T., & Schmidt, V. (2023). How the impossible became possible: Evolving frames and narratives on responsibility and responsiveness from the Eurocrisis to NextGenerationEU. Journal of European Public Policy, online first, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2282164.
   Google Scholar
• Crespy, A., & Schramm, L. (2021). Breaking the budgetary taboo: German preference formation in the EU's response to the Covid-19 crisis. German Politics, online first, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2021.2020253.
   Google Scholar
• Dederke, J., & Naurin, D. (2018). Friends of the Court? Why EU governments file observations before the Court of Justice. European Journal of Political Research, 57(4), 867–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Wilde, P. (2013). Representative claims analysis: Theory meets method. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(2), 278–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.746128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Witte, B. (2021). The European Union’s COVID-19 recovery plan: The legal engineering of an economic policy shift. Common Market Law Review, 58(3), 635–682. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2021046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draghi, M. (2012). Speech at the global investment conference. London, Retrieved December 21, 2023. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2012/html/sp120726.en.html.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, L., & Martin, A. D. (2011). Does public opinion influence the Supreme Court? Probably yes (but we’re not sure why). University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(2), 263–281.
   Google Scholar
• Fabbrini, F. (2022). Next Generation EU: Legal structure and constitutional consequences. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 24, 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2022.2
   Google Scholar
• Flemming, R. B., & Wood, B. D. (1997). The public and the Supreme Court: Individual justice responsiveness to American policy moods. American Journal of Political Science, 41(2), 468–498. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontan, C., & Howarth, D. (2021). The European Central Bank and the German Constitutional Court: Police patrols and fire alarms. Politics and Governance, 9(2), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i2.3888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromage, D. (2022). Continuity and change – How the challenges of today prepare the ground for tomorrow. ECB Legal Conference 2021. https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/other/ecb.ecblegalconferenceproceedings202204~c2e5739756.en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Garben, S. (2019). Competence creep revisited. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 57(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joerges, C., & Kreuder-Sonnen, C. (2017). European studies and the European crisis: Legal and political science between critique and complacency. European Law Journal, 23(1-2), 118–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E., Kelemen, R. D., & Meunier, S. (2016). Failing forward? The Euro risis and the incomplete nature of European integration. Comparative Political Studies, 49(7), 1010–1034. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015617966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karremans, J. (2021). This time wasn’t different: Responsiveness and responsibility in the Eurozone between 2007 and 2019. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 59(6), 1536–1554. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinski, L. (2018). Whom to represent? National parliamentary representation during the Eurozone crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(3), 346–368. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1253764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinski, L. (2021). European representation in EU national parliaments. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kombos, C. (2019). Constitutional review and the economic crisis: In the courts we trust? European Public Law, 25(1), 105–133. https://doi.org/10.54648/EURO2019007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuder-Sonnen, C., & White, J. (2022). Europe and the transnational politics of emergency. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(6), 953–965. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1916059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, O., & Naurin, D. (2016). Judicial independence and political uncertainty: How the risk of override affects the Court of Justice of the EU. International Organization, 70(1), 377–408. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818316000047
   Google Scholar
• Leino-Sandberg, P., & Raunio, T. (2023). From bad to worse: The continuous dilemma facing parliaments in European economic and fiscal governance. Government and Opposition, online first, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2023.29.
   Google Scholar
• Leino-Sandberg, P., & Ruffert, M. (2022). Next Generation EU and Its constitutional ramifications: A critical assessment. Common Market Law Review, 59(2), 433–472. https://doi.org/10.54648/COLA2022031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2009). Representative versus responsible government. MPIfG Discussion Paper 09/8. https://www.mpifg.de/pu/workpap/wp09-8.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P. (2013). Smaghi versus the parties: Representative government and institutional constraints. In A. Schäfer & W. Streeck (Eds.), Politics in the age of austerity (pp. 143–168). Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martinsen, D. S. (2011). Judicial policy-making and Europeanization: The proportionality of national control and administrative discretion. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(7), 944–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.599962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkel, A. (2010). Government declaration on the measures to stabilize the Euro. Plenary Protocol of the 42nd Plenary Session of the German Bundestag (17/42), 4126 B. https://dserver.bundestag.de/btp/17/17042.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Miró, J. (2022). Debating fiscal solidarity in the EU: Interests, values and identities in the legitimation of the Next Generation EU plan. Journal of European Integration, 44(3), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.1977292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mishler, W., & Sheehan, R. S. (1993). The Supreme Court as a countermajoritarian institution? The impact of public opinion on Supreme Court decisions. American Political Science Review, 87(1), 87–101. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puntscher-Riekmann, S., & Wydra, D. (2013). Representation in the European state of emergency: Parliaments against governments? Journal of European Integration, 35(5), 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2013.799943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, U., Charles, M. T., & Hart, P. (1989). Coping with crises: The management of disasters, riots, and terrorism. Springfield: C.C. Thomas.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, D. (2016). A Banking Union of ideas? The impact of ordoliberalism and the vicious circle on the EU Banking Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(4), 961–980. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12351
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (2012). Perpetual momentum: Directed and unconstrained? Journal of European Public Policy, 19(1), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2012.632152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, S. K. (2018). The European Court of Justice and the policy process: The shadow of case law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2022). European emergency politics and the question of legitimacy. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(6), 979–993. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1916061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schramm, L. (2023). Economic ideas, party politics, or material interests? Explaining Germany’s support for the EU Corona recovery plan. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(1), 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2021.1985592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinbeis, M. (2014). OMT-Vorlage: Richter Huber signalisiert Demut gegenüber dem EuGH. Verfassungsblog. Retrieved December 21, 2023, from https://verfassungsblog.de/omt-vorlage-richter-huber-signalisiert-demut-gegenueber-eugh/.
   Google Scholar
• Stiansen, Ø., & Voeten, E. (2020). Backlash and judicial restraint: Evidence from the European Court of Human Rights. International Studies Quarterly, 64(4), 770–784. https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqaa047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdun, A., & Zeitlin, J. (2018). Special issue: EU socio-economic governance since the crisis: The European semester in theory and practice. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(2), 137–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voßkuhle, A. (2016). “Integration durch Recht” – Der Beitrag des Bundesverfassungsgerichts. Juristenzeitung, 71(4), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1628/002268816X14489031056439
   Google Scholar
• Waas, L., & Rittberger, B. (2023). The Berlin puzzle: Why European solidarity prevailed in the adoption of the Corona recovery fund. European Journal of Political Research, online first, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12614.
   Google Scholar