1,028
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Special Issue: The East-West Divide: Assessing Tensions within the European Union. Guest Editors: Clara Volintiru, Rachel A. Epstein, Adam Fagan, and Neculai-Cristian Surubaru

Economic nationalists, regional investment aid, and the stability of FDI-led growth in East Central Europe

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 874-899 | Received 28 Apr 2022, Accepted 10 Jan 2024, Published online: 07 Feb 2024

References

  • Ádám, Z. (2019). Explaining orbán: A political transaction cost theory of authoritarian populism. Problems of Post-Communism, 66(6), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/10758216.2019.1643249
  • Ambroziak, A. A. (2022). State aid in the European union. Similarities and differences among Visegrad group countries. In M. Staníčková & L. Melecký (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th international conference on European integration 2022 (pp. 29–38). VSB – Technical University of Ostrava. https://doi.org/10.31490/9788024846057
  • Baccaro, L., Blyth, M., & Pontusson, J. (2022). Diminishing returns: The new politics of growth and stagnation. Oxford University Press.
  • Baccaro, L., & Pontusson, J. (2019). Social blocs and growth models: An analytical framework with Germany and Sweden as illustrative cases (Unequal Democracies: Working Papers, 7). https://unequaldemocracies.unige.ch/files/7815/5421/4353/wp7.pdf
  • Ban, C., & Adascalitei, D. (2022). The FDI-Led growth models of the east-central and the south-eastern European periphery. In L. Baccaro, M. Blyth, & J. Pontusson (Eds.), Diminishing returns. The new politics of growth and stagnation (pp. 189–209). Oxford University Press.
  • Ban, C., Scheiring, G., & Vasile, M. (2023). The political economy of national-neoliberalism. European Politics and Society, 24(1), 96–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2021.1956241
  • Bayer, L. (2018). Europe’s eastern tigers roar ahead. Politico. 23 January 2018. https://www.politico.eu/article/central-and-eastern-eu-gdp-growth-economies/
  • Bluhm, K., & Varga, M. (2020). Conservative developmental statism in East Central Europe and Russia. New Political Economy, 25(4), 642–659. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1639146
  • Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2009). Varieties of capitalism and capitalism « tout court ». European Journal of Sociology / Archives Européennes de Sociologie, 50(3), 355–386. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003975609990178
  • Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2012). Capitalist diversity on Europe’s periphery. Cornell University Press.
  • Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2019). Politicising embedded neoliberalism: Continuity and change in Hungary’s development model. West European Politics, 42(5), 1069–1093. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1511958
  • Bohle, D., & Regan, A. (2021). The comparative political economy of growth models: Explaining the continuity of FDI-led growth in Ireland and Hungary. Politics & Society, 49(1), 75–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329220985723
  • Börzel, T. A., & Langbein, J. (2019). Core–periphery disparities in Europe: Is there a link between political and economic divergence? West European Politics, 42(5), 941–964. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1558534
  • Brazys, S., & Regan, A. (2017). The politics of capitalist diversity in Europe: Explaining Ireland’s divergent recovery from the euro crisis. Perspectives on Politics, 15(2), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717000093
  • Bruszt, L., & Langbein, J. (2020). Manufacturing development: How transnational market integration shapes opportunities and capacities for development in Europe’s three peripheries. Review of International Political Economy, 27(5), 996–1019. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1726790
  • Camba, A., & Epstein, R. A. (2023). From Duterte to Orbán: The political economy of autocratic hedging. Journal of International Relations and Development, 26(2), 347–372. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-022-00287-7
  • The Chancellery of the Prime Minister. (2023). Prime Minister Mateusz Morawiecki: It is of immense importance that Poland will be the location for investments that ensure security and influence technological development. Gov.Pl. 16 June 2023. https://www.gov.pl/web/primeminister/prime-minister-mateusz-morawiecki-it-is-of-immense-importance-that-poland-will-be-the-location-for-investments-that-ensure-security-and-influence-technological-development
  • Cini, M. (2001). The soft law approach: Commission rule-making in the EU’s state aid regime. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(2), 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110041541
  • Clift, B., & Woll, C. (2012). Economic patriotism: Reinventing control over open markets. Journal of European Public Policy, 19(3), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.638117
  • Coman, R., & Volintiru, C. (2023). Anti-liberal ideas and institutional change in Central and Eastern Europe. European Politics and Society, 24(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2021.1956236
  • Crouch, C. (2019). The globalization backlash. Polity Press.
  • Culpepper, P. D. (2010). Quiet politics and business power. Corporate control in Europe and Japan. Cambridge University Press.
  • Domański, B. (2005). Transnational corporations and the post-socialist economy: Learning the ropes and forging new relationships in contemporary Poland. In C. G. Alvstam & E. W. Schamp (Eds.), Linking industries across the world: Processes of global networking (pp. 147–172). Ashgate Publishing.
  • Drahokoupil, J. (2009). Globalization and the state in central and eastern Europe: The politics of foreign direct investment. Routledge.
  • Epstein, R. A. (2020). The economic successes and sources of discontent in East Central Europe. Canadian Journal of European and Russian Studies, 13(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.22215/cjers.v13i2.2619
  • Evans, P. (1979). Dependent development: The alliance of multinational, state, and local capital in Brazil. Princeton University Press.
  • Feldmann, M., & Morgan, G. (2022). Business elites and populism: Understanding business responses. New Political Economy, 27(2), 347–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1973397
  • Galgóczi, B., & Drahokoupil, J. (Eds.). (2017). Condemned to be left behind? Can Central and Eastern Europe emerge from its low-wage model? European Trade Union Institute (ETUI). https://www.etui.org/content/download/32615/302859/file/post-FDI-WEB.pdf
  • Gerőcs, T., & Pinkasz, A. (2019). Relocation, standardization and vertical specialization: Core–periphery relations in the European automotive value chain. Society and Economy, 41(2), 171–192. https://doi.org/10.1556/204.2019.001
  • Gerschewski, J. (2013). The three pillars of stability: Legitimation, repression, and co-optation in autocratic regimes. Democratization, 20(1), 13–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.738860
  • Győrffy, D. (2022). The middle-income trap in Central and Eastern Europe in the 2010s: Institutions and divergent growth models. Comparative European Politics, 20(1), 90–113. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41295-021-00264-3
  • Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford University Press.
  • Hartmann, T. (2023). Intel launches ‘largest investment in Polish history’. 16 June 2023. Euractiv. https://www.euractiv.com/section/industrial-strategy/news/intel-launches-largest-investment-in-polish-history/.
  • Heimler, A., & Jenny, F. (2012). The limitations of European Union control of state aid. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 28(2), 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grs005
  • Höpner, M., & Schäfer, A. (2015). Integration among unequals: How the heterogeneity of European varieties of capitalism shapes the social and democratic potential of the EU. In J. M. Magone (Ed.), Routledge handbook of European politics (pp. 725–745). Routledge.
  • Johnson, J., & Barnes, A. (2015). Financial nationalism and its international enablers: The Hungarian experience. Review of International Political Economy, 22(3), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2014.919336
  • Johnston, A., & Matthijs, M. (2022). The political economy of the eurozone’s post-crisis growth model. In L. Baccaro, M. Blyth, & J. Pontusson (Eds.), Diminishing returns. The new politics of growth and stagnation (pp. 117–142). Oxford University Press.
  • Johnston, A., & Regan, A. (2016). European monetary integration and the incompatibility of national varieties of capitalism. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(2), 318–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12289
  • Johnston, A., & Regan, A. (2018). Introduction: Is the European union capable of integrating diverse models of capitalism? New Political Economy, 23(2), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2017.1370442
  • Karas, D. (2022). Financialization and state capitalism in Hungary after the global financial crisis. Competition & Change, 26(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/10245294211003274
  • Kędzierski, R. (2022). Niemcy zbudują w Polsce olbrzymią fabrykę, Morawiecki przypomina, gdzie Polacy jeździli na szparagi. nextgazetapl. 15 July 2022. https://next.gazeta.pl/next/7,151003,28690650,niemcy-zbuduja-w-polsce-olbrzymia-fabryke-morawiecki-przypomina.html
  • Kołodko, G. W. (2023). Global consequences of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Springer.
  • Lindstrom, N. (2021). Aiding the state: Administrative capacity and creative compliance with European state aid rules in new member states. Journal of European Public Policy, 28(11), 1789–1806. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1791935
  • Losonczi, M. (2023). Hungary committed to becoming region’s top destination for Chinese investors, Minister States in Shanghai. Hungarian Conservative. 6 November 2023. https://www.hungarianconservative.com/articles/current/hungary_regions_top_destination_for_chinese_investors_minister_nagy_shanghai_expo/
  • Máténé Bella, K., & Ritzlné Kazimir, I. (2020). Effects of multinational corporations’ strategic decisions on the production side of Hungarian GDP. Statisztikai Szemle, 98(3), 212–241. https://doi.org/10.20311/stat2020.3.hu0212
  • Medve-Bálint, G. (2014). The role of the EU in shaping FDI flows to East Central Europe. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12077
  • Mérő, K., & Piroska, D. (2016). Banking union and banking nationalism—explaining opt-out choices of Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic. Policy and Society, 35(3), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2016.10.001
  • Myant, M. (2018). Dependent capitalism and the middle-income trap in Europe and East Central Europe. International Journal of Management and Economics, 54(4), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2018-0028
  • Naczyk, M. (2022). Taking back control: Comprador bankers and managerial developmentalism in Poland. Review of International Political Economy, 29(5), 1650–1674. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2021.1924831
  • Nölke, A., & Vliegenthart, A. (2009). Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World Politics, 61(4), 670–702.
  • Oellerich, N. (2022). Promoting domestic bank ownership in central and eastern Europe: A case study of economic nationalism and rent-seeking in Hungary. East European Politics, 38(2), 167–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2021.1937137
  • Orbán, V. (2023). Viktor Orbán’s speech at the anniversary celebrations of Weltwoche weekly. 22 November 2023. https://miniszterelnok.hu/orban-viktor-eloadasa-a-weltwoche-hetilap-jubileumi-unnepsegen/
  • Panyi, S. (2020). How Orbán played Germany, Europe’s great power. Direkt36.Hu. 18 September 2020. https://www.direkt36.hu/en/a-magyar-nemet-kapcsolatok-rejtett-tortenete/
  • PAP. (2023). Otwarcie nowej fabryki PepsiCO. Premier: Będzie tu ponad 600 miejsc pracy. Polish Press Agency. 31 May 2023. https://www.pap.pl/aktualnosci/news%2C1579111%2Cotwarcie-nowej-fabryki-pepsico-premier-bedzie-tu-ponad-600-miejsc-pracy
  • Puhl, J., & Sauga, M. (2023). ‘Mafia methods’: Viktor Orbán ups the pressure on German companies to leave Hungary. Der Spiegel. 31 March 2023. https://www.spiegel.de/international/business/mafia-methods-viktor-orban-ups-the-pressure-on-german-companies-to-leave-hungary-a-cf38f4d2-1576-4f55-896a-b65f19542f43
  • Riedel, R. (2020). Undermining the standards of liberal democracy within the European union: The polish case and the limits of post-enlargement democratic conditionality. In J. Bátora & J. E. Fossum (Eds.), Towards a segmented European political order (pp. 175–205). Routledge.
  • Riedel, R. (2021). Poland and the middle-income trap. In A. Visvizi, A. Matysek-Jedrych, & K. Mroczek-Dabrowska (Eds.), Poland in the single market (pp. 86–102). Routledge.
  • Sallai, D., Schnyder, G., Kinderman, D., & Nölke, A. (2023). The antecedents of MNC political risk and uncertainty under right-wing populist governments. Journal of International Business Policy. https://doi.org/10.1057/s42214-023-00154-3
  • Šćepanović, V. (2013). FDI as a solution to the challenges of late development: Catch-up without convergence? PhD Dissertation. Budapest: Central European University. http://www.etd.ceu.hu/2014/scepanovic_vera.pdf
  • Scharpf, F. W. (1970). Demokratietheorie zwischen Utopie und Anpassung. Universitätsverlag.
  • Scheiring, G. (2020). The retreat of liberal democracy. Authoritarian capitalism and the accumulative state in Hungary. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Scheiring, G. (2021). Varieties of dependency, varieties of populism: Neoliberalism and the populist countermovements in the Visegrád four. Europe-Asia Studies, 73(9), 1569–1595. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2021.1973376
  • Schito, M. (2022). The effects of state aid policy trade-offs on FDI openness in Central and Eastern European Countries. International Review of Public Policy, 4(2). Article 2. https://doi.org/10.4000/irpp.2725
  • Sebők, M., & Simons, J. (2022). How Orbán won? Neoliberal disenchantment and the grand strategy of financial nationalism to reconstruct capitalism and regain autonomy. Socio-Economic Review, 20(4), 1625–1651. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwab052
  • Šitera, D. (2021). Exploring neoliberal resilience: The transnational politics of austerity in Czechia. Journal of International Relations and Development, 24(3), 781–810. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41268-021-00214-2
  • Szent-Iványi, B. (Ed.). (2017). Foreign direct investment in central and eastern Europe: Post-crisis perspectives. Springer.
  • Toplišek, A. (2020). The political economy of populist rule in post-crisis Europe: Hungary and Poland. New Political Economy, 25(3), 388–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598960
  • Tőrös, Á., Mészáros, Á., & Dani, Á. (2017). Investment promotion in the Visegrad Countries: A comparative analysis. In B. Szent-Iványi (Ed.), Foreign direct investment in central and eastern Europe: Post-crisis perspectives (pp. 193–217). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40496-7_9
  • Volintiru, C., Bargaoanu, A., Ștefan, G., & Durach, F. (2021). East-west divide in the European Union: Legacy or developmental failure? Romanian Journal of European Affairs, 21(1), 93–118.
  • Vukov, V. (2020). More Catholic than the Pope? Europeanisation, industrial policy and transnationalised capitalism in Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(10), 1546–1564. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1684976
  • Vukov, V. (2021). Dependency, development, and the politics of growth models in Europe’s peripheries. In A. Madariaga & S. Palestini (Eds.), Dependent capitalisms in contemporary Latin America and Europe (pp. 157–181). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71315-7_7
  • Vukov, V. (2023). Growth models in Europe’s eastern and southern peripheries: Between national and EU politics. New Political Economy, 28(5), 832–848. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2023.2189695
  • Wróblewska, D. (2022). Regional investment aid in Poland and Czechia. Review of European and Comparative Law, 50(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.31743/recl.13960