Balancing reputational strategies in the European administrative space: how private actors and agencies talk about regulation

References

• Agency for the Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER). (2020). Implementation framework for the European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with manual activation’.
   Google Scholar
• Albareda, A., & Fraussen, B. (2023). The representative capacity of interest groups: Explaining how issue features shape membership involvement when establishing policy positions. Journal of Public Policy, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonova, S. (2011). “Capacity-building” in global Internet governance: The long-term outcomes of “multistakeholderism”. Regulation & Governance, 5(4), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5991.2011.01117.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arras, S., & Beyers, J. (2020). Access to European Union agencies: Usual suspects or balanced interest representation in open and closed consultations? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 58(4), 836–855. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bach, T., Jugl, M., Köhler, D., et al. (n/a). Regulatory agencies, reputational threats, and communicative responses. Regulation & Governance.
   Google Scholar
• Banet, C., & Jevnaker, T. (2022). ‘Implementation and adjustment ahead: Enforcing, applying and revising the TCMs during transition and crisis’, INC Research Brief # 4.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, M. (2019). When public principals give up control over private agents: The new independence of ICANN in internet governance. Regulation & Governance, 13(4), 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binderkrantz, A. S., Blom-Hansen, J., Bækgaard, M., et al. (2023). The core of organisational reputation: Taking multidimensionality, audience multiplicity, and agency subunits seriously. Journal of European Public Policy, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2188081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauberger, M., & Rittberger, B. (2015). Conceptualizing and theorizing EU regulatory networks. Regulation & Governance, 9(4), 367–376. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, C., & Busuioc, M. (2020). Stakeholder engagement as a conduit for regulatory legitimacy? Journal of European Public Policy, 27(11), 1599–1611. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1817133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunea, A., & Nørbech, I. (2022). Preserving the old or building the new? Reputation-building through strategic talk and engagement with stakeholder inputs by the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busuioc, E. M., & Lodge, M. (2016). The reputational basis of public accountability. Governance, 29(2), 247–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busuioc, M., & Jevnaker, T. (2020). EU agencies’ stakeholder bodies: Vehicles of enhanced control, legitimacy or bias? Journal of European Public Policy, 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busuioc, M., & Rimkutė, D. (2019). The promise of bureaucratic reputation approaches for the EU regulatory state. Journal of European Public Policy, 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busuioc, M., & Rimkutė, D. (2020). Meeting expectations in the EU regulatory state? Regulatory communications amid conflicting institutional demands. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(4), 547–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1603248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Capelos, T., Provost, C., Parouti, M., et al. (2016). Ingredients of institutional reputations and citizen engagement with regulators. Regulation & Governance, 10(4), 350–367. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D. (2010). Reputation and power: Organizational image and pharmaceutical regulation at the FDA. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D. P. (2002). Groups, the media, agency waiting costs, and FDA drug approval. American Journal of Political Science, 46(3), 490–505. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D. P., & Krause, G. A. (2012). Reputation and public administration. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02506.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberlein, B., & Grande, E. (2005). Beyond delegation: Transnational regulatory regimes and the EU regulatory state. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(1), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000311925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, S. (2019). Corporate power and regulation. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Eckert, S., & Eberlein, B. (2020). Private authority in tackling cross-border issues. The hidden path of integrating European energy markets. Journal of European Integration, 42(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2019.1708340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2017). Researching European Union agencies: What have we learnt (and where do we go from here)? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55(4), 675–690. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eikeland, P. O. (2011). The third internal energy market package: New power relations among member states, EU institutions and non-state actors? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02140.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ENTSO-E. (2018a). ‘All TSOs’ proposal for the implementation framework for a European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with manual activation in accordance with Article 20 of Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 establishing a guideline on electricity balancing’.
   Google Scholar
• ENTSO-E. (2018b). ‘ENTSO-E’s response to the public consultation on All TSOs’ proposal for the implementation framework for a European platform for the exchange of balancing energy from frequency restoration reserves with manual activation accordance with Article 20 of Commission Regulation (EU) 2017/2195 establishing a guideline on electricity balancing’.
   Google Scholar
• Fink, S., & Ruffing, E. (2020). Stakeholder consultations as reputation-building: A comparison of ACER and the German Federal Network Agency. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(11), 1657–1676. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1817129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What's in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. The Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchino, F. (2002). Efficiency or credibility? Testing the two logics of delegation to the European Commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(5), 677–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760210162302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilad, S., Maor, M., & Bloom, P. B.-N. (2015). Organizational reputation, the content of public allegations, and regulatory communication. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(2), 451–478. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mut041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilardi, F. (2002). Policy credibility and delegation to independent regulatory agencies: A comparative empirical analysis. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(6), 873–893. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176022000046409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, J. F. (2018). Transnational delegation in global environmental governance: When do non-state actors govern? Regulation & Governance, 12(2), 263–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haber, H., & Heims, E. (2020). Regulating with the masses? Mapping the spread of participatory regulation. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(11), 1742–1762. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1817128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancher, L., Kehoe, A. M., & Rumpf, J. (2020). The EU electricity network codes and guidelines: A legal perspective. European University Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Haufler, V. (2001). A public role for the private sector. Industry self-regulation in a global economy. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
   Google Scholar
• Jevnaker, T. (2015). Pushing administrative EU integration: The path towards European network codes for electricity. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(7), 927–947. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.1000363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jevnaker, T., Fink, S., Taranger, K. K., et al. (2022). Stocktaking of the adopted TCMs. Towards harmonization or diversity. INC Research Brief #3. 2022 (September).
   Google Scholar
• Kelemen, R. D., & Tarrant, A. D. (2011). The political foundations of the eurocracy. West European Politics, 34(5), 922–947. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2011.591076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koop, C., & Lodge, M. (2014). Exploring the co-ordination of economic regulation. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(9), 1311–1329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.923023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1994). The rise of the regulatory state in Europe. West European Politics, 17(3), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389408425031
   Google Scholar
• Maor, M. (2020). Strategic communication by regulatory agencies as a form of reputation management: A strategic agenda. Public Administration, 98(4), 1044–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maor, M., Gilad, S., & Bloom, P. B.-N. (2013). Organizational reputation, regulatory talk, and strategic silence. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(3), 581–608. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, E. (2020). Functional stakes and EU regulatory governance: Temporal patterns of regulatory integration in energy and telecommunications. West European Politics, 43(4), 991–1010. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2019.1622353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattli, W., & Büthe, T. (2005). Accountability in accounting? The politics of private rule-making in the public interest. Governance, 18(3), 399–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00282.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mörth, U. (2009). The market turn in EU governance—The emergence of public–private collaboration. Governance, 22(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.01423.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimkutė, D. (2018). Organizational reputation and risk regulation: The effect of reputational threats on agency scientific outputs. Public Administration, 96(1), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimkutė, D. (2019). ‘Building organizational reputation in the European regulatory state: An analysis of EU agencies’ communications’, Governance, n/a(n/a).
   Google Scholar
• Rimkutė, D. (2020). Building organizational reputation in the European regulatory state: An analysis of EU agencies’ communications. Governance, 33(2), 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12438
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimkutė, D. (2020). Strategic silence or regulatory talk? Regulatory agency responses to public allegations amidst the glyphosate controversy. Journal of European Public Policy, 27(11), 1636–1656. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1817130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffing, E. (2015). Agencies between two worlds: Information asymmetry in multi-level policy-making ‘. Journal of European Public, 22(8), 1109–1126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vantaggiato, F. P. (2019). Networking for resources: How regulators use networks to compensate for lower staff levels. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(10), 1540–1559. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1535611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoest, K., Boon, J., Boye, S., et al. (2023). How does organizational task matter for the reputation of public agencies? Regulation & Governance, 17(1), 158–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12441
   Google Scholar
• Yesilkagit, K., & Jordana, J. (2022). Entangled agencies and embedded preferences: National regulatory agencies in multi-level European governance. Journal of European Public Policy, 29(10), 1677–1697. doi:10.1080/13501763.2022.2103170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar