Normative and positive theories of public finance: contrasting Musgrave and Buchanan

References

• Arrow, K. J. (1951/1963). Social choice and individual values (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Backhouse, R. E. (2005). Economist, values and ideology: A neglected agenda. Revue de philosophie économique, 6, 31–55.
   Google Scholar
• Bergson, A. (1938). A reformulation of certain aspects of welfare economics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 52, 310–334.
   Google Scholar
• Bergson, A. (1954). On the concept of social welfare. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 68, 233–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. (1992). The methodology of economics (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brochier, H. (1995). L'économie comme science positive et normative [Economics as a positive and normative science]. In A.d'Autume & J.Cartelier (Eds.), L'économie devient-elle une science dure?[Is Economics becoming a hard science?] (pp. 38–54). Paris: Economica.
   Google Scholar
• Brochier, H. (1997). Le dualisme du positif et du normatif en économie et dans les sciences sociales [The positive normative dualism in economics and in social sciences]. In H.Brochier, R.Frydman, B.Gazier, & J.Lallement (Eds.), L'économie normative[Normative economics] (pp. 23–37). Paris: Economica.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1949). The pure theory of government finance: A suggested approach. The Journal of Political Economy, 57, 496–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1954). Social choice, democracy, and free markets. Journal of Political Economy, 62, 114–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1958). The Thomas Jefferson center for studies in political economy. The University of Virginia News Letter, Charlottesville, Vol. XXXV, p. 2. https://doi.org/http://www.coopercenter.org/publications/thomas-jefferson-center-studies-political-economy.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1959). Positive economics, welfare economics, and political economy. Journal of Law and Economics, 2, 124–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1960). Review: The theory of public finance. Southern Economic Journal, 26, 234–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1964). What should economists do?Southern Economic Journal, 30, 213–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1967/1999). Public finance in a democratic process: Fiscal institutions and individual choice (Vol. 4). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1968/1999). The demand and supply of public goods (Vol. 5). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1975/1999). The limits of liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan (Vol. 7). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1979). Notes on the history and direction of public choice. In What should economists do? (pp. 175–182). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1986). Political economy: 1957–82. In Liberty, market and state: Political economy in the 1980s (pp. 8–18). Brighton: Wheatsheaf Books.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1989). Richard Musgrave, public finance, and public choice. Public Choice, 61, 289–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1992). From the inside looking out. Reproduced in Buchanan, J.M. (2007) In Economics from the outside in: Better than plowing and beyond (pp. 147–157). College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (2007). Economics from the outside in: ‘Better than plowing and beyond’. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M., & Samuels, W. J. (1975). On some fundamental issues in political economy: An exchange of correspondence. Journal of Economic Issues, 9, 15–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M., & Tullock, G. (1962/1999). The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy (Vol. 3). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M., & Wagner, R. E. (1977/1999). Democracy in deficit. The political legacy of Lord Keynes (Vol. 8). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund. The Collected Works of James M. Buchanan.
   Google Scholar
• Desreumaux, V. (2009). La justice sociale et le marché: Essai sur l'économie du bien-être parétienne [Social justice and the market: An essay on Paretian welfare economics] (Ph.D. thesis). Université Lille 1.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1953). The methodology of positive economics. In Essays in positive economics (pp. 3–43). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, S. (1976). The new contractarians. Journal of Political Economy, 84, 573–590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hands, D. W. (2012). The positive–normative dichotomy and economics. In U.Mäki (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophy of science. Volume 13: Philosophy of economics (pp. 219–239). Oxford: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, D. M., & McPherson, M. S. (2006). Economic analysis, moral philosophy, and public policy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Head, J. G. (1970). A voluntary exchange theory of the public economy. FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis, 29, 112–121.
   Google Scholar
• Hutchison, T. W. (1964). ‘Positive’ economics and policy objectives. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Keynes, J. N. (1890/1917). The scope and method of political economy (4th ed.). New York, NY: Augustus M. Kelley. Reprint of 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Little, I. M. D. (1950/1957). A critique of welfare economics (2nd ed.). London: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Little, I. M. D. (1952). Social choice and individual values. Journal of Political Economy, 60, 422–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machlup, F. (1978). Positive and normative economics. In Methodology of economics and other social sciences (pp. 99–124). New York, NY: Academic Press, conference given at the New School in 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Marciano, A. (2009). Buchanan's catallactic critique of Robbins' definition of economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 16, 125–138.
   Google Scholar
• Marciano, A. (2011). Buchanan on externalities: An exercise in applied subjectivism. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 80, 280–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marschak, J. (1950). Rational behavior, uncertain prospects, and measurable utility. Econometrica, 18, 111–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D. N. (1994). Knowledge and persuasion in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D. N. (2011). Hobbes, Rawls, Nussbaum, Buchanan, and all seven of the virtues. Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, 17, 1–28.
   Google Scholar
• McLure, C. E. J. (1968). Merit wants: A normatively empty box. Finanzarchiv, 27, 474–483.
   Google Scholar
• Mongin, P. (1999). Normes et jugements de valeur en economie normative [Norms and value judgements in normative economics]. Social Science Information, 38, 521–553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongin, P. (2006). Value judgments and value neutrality in economics. Economica, 73, 257–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1939). The voluntary exchange theory of public economy. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 53, 213–237.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1941). The planning approach in public economy: A reply. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 55, 319–324.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1957). A multiple theory of budget determination. Finanzarchiv, 17, 333–343.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The theory of public finance: A study in public economy (international student ed). Tokyo: McGraw Hill Kogakusha.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1969). Provision for social goods. In J.Margolis & H.Guitton (Eds.), Public economics: An analysis of public production and consumption and their relations to the private sectors (pp. 124–144). London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1970). Buchanan on the demand and supply of public goods. FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis, 29, 122–127.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1983). Public finance, now and then. Finanzarchiv, 41, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1986). In retrospect. In Public finance in a democratic society. Volume I: Social goods, taxation, and fiscal policy. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1991/2000a). Social science, ethics, and the role of the public sector. In Public finance in a democratic society (Vol. III, pp. 104–115). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1991/2000b). Tableau Fiscale. In Public finance in a democratic society (Vol. III, pp. 116–125). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1996/2000). The role of the state in fiscal theory. In Public finance in a democratic society (Vol. III, pp. 247–258). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A. (1999). Public finance and public choice: Two contrasting visions of the state. In R. A.Musgrave & J. M.Buchanan (Eds.), The nature of the fiscal state: The roots of my thinking (pp. 29–49). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Musgrave, R. A., & Musgrave, P. (1984/2007). Public finance in theory and practice. In W.Ver Eecke (Ed.), An anthology regarding merit goods: The unfinished ethical revolution in economic theory (4th ed., pp. 48–55). West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myrdal, G. (1929/1953). The political element in the development of economic theory. Translated from German by Paul Streeten. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Pareto, V. (1916/1968). Traité de sociologie générale[Mind and society]. Genève: Droz, Oeuvres Complètes, Tome XII.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H. (2002). The collapse of the fact/value dichotomy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robbins, L. (1945). An essay on the nature & significance of economic science (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, P. C. (1969). Politics and science: A critique of Buchanan's assessment of Polanyi. Ethics, 79, 235–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, W. J. (1972). In defense of a positive approach to government as an economic variable. Journal of Law and Economics, 15, 453–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, W. J. (1980). Toward positive public choice theory. Review of Social Economy, 38, 55–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, W. J. (1981). A necessary normative context of positive economics?Journal of Economic Issues, 15, 721–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, W. J. (1990). Introduction. In W. J.Samuels (Ed.), Economics as discourse. An analysis of the language of economists (pp. 1–14). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. (1947). Foundations of economic analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36, 387–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P. A. (1955). Diagrammatic exposition of a theory of public expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 37, 350–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J. R. (1964). How to derive ‘ought’ from ‘is’. The Philosophical Review, 73, 43–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sent, E.-M. (2008). Rationality, history of the concept. In S. N.Durlauf & L. E.Blume (Eds.), The new Palgrave dictionary of economics. Palgrave Macmillan. Retrieved from http://www.dictionaryofeconomics.com/article?id=pde2008_R000256.
   Google Scholar
• Stigler, G. J. (1965). Textual exegesis as a scientific problem. Economica, 32, 447–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturn, R. (2010). ‘Public goods’ before Samuelson: Interwar Finanzwissenschaft and Musgrave's synthesis. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 17, 279–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, H.-c. (2012). Beyond the positive–normative dichotomy: Some remarks on Colander's Lost Art of Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 19, 37–41.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1904/1949). ‘Objectivity’ in social science and social policy. In The methodology of the social sciences. Translated and Edited by Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1917/1949). The meaning of ‘ethical neutrality’ in sociology and economics. In The methodology of the social sciences. Translated and Edited by Edward A. Shils and Henry A. Finch. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1921/1947). The theory of social and economic organization. Part I of Economy and Society. Translated by A.M. Henderson and Talcott Parsons. New York, NY: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. (1985/2010). Ethics and the limits of philosophy (Routlege Classics Edition). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar