Frank Knight's ‘categories’ and the definition of economics

References

• Asso, P. F., & Fiorito, L. (2008). Was Frank Knight an institutionalist?Review of Political Economy, 20, 59–77.
   Google Scholar
• Backhouse, R. E., & Medema, S. G. (2009a). Defining economics: The long road to acceptance of the Robbins definition. Economica, 76, 805–820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backhouse, R. E., & Medema, S. G. (2009b). On the definition of economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23, 221–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. (1980). The methodology of economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, J. M. (1987). The economizing element in Knight's ethical critique of capitalist order. Ethics, 98, 61–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgin, A. (2009). The radical conservatism of Frank H. Knight. Modern Intellectual History, 6, 513–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colander, D. (2009). What was “it” that Robbins was defining?Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 31, 437–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. B. (2009). Individualism. In J.Peil & I.van Staveren (Eds.), Handbook of economics and ethics (pp. 261–266). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Emmett, R. B. (2006a). De gustibus est disputandum: Frank H. Knight's reply to George Stigler and Gary Becker's “De gustibus non est disputandum” with an introductory essay. Journal of Economic Methodology, 13, 97–111.
   Google Scholar
• Emmett, R. B. (2006b). Frank Knight, Max Weber, Chicago economics and institutionalism. Max Weber Studies, Beiheft 1: Weber and Economics, pp. 101–119; page references are to the reprint in R.B. Emmett, Frank Knight and the Chicago School in American Economics, London: Routledge, 2009, Chapter 9, pp. 111–123.
   Google Scholar
• Emmett, R. B. (2007). Knight's challenge (to Hayek): Spontaneous order is not enough for governing a liberal society. In P.McNamara & L.Hunt (Eds.), Liberalism, conservatism and Hayek's idea of spontaneous order (pp. 67–86). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorito, L. (2009). Frank H. Knight, pragmatism, and American institutionalism: A note. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 16, 475–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, J. D. (1991). Frank Knight's antipositivism. History of Political Economy, 23, 359–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hands, D. W. (2006). Frank Knight and pragmatism. European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 13, 571–605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchison, T. W. (1938). The significance and basic postulates of economic theory. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: Hart, Schaffner and Marx; page references are to the reprint by Harper and Row, New York, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1922). Ethics and the economic interpretation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 36; page references are to F. H. Knight, The ethics of competition, London: Allen & Unwin, 1935, pp. 19–40.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1923). The ethics of competition. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 37; page references are to F. H. Knight, The ethics of competition, London: Allen & Unwin, 1935, pp. 41–75.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1929). Freedom as fact and criterion. International Journal of Ethics, 39; page references are to F. H. Knight, Freedom and reform, Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1982, pp. 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1930). Statics and dynamics. Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 2; page references are to F. H. Knight, The ethics of competition, London: Allen & Unwin, 1935, pp. 161–185.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1933a). The economic organization. Chicago: University of Chicago; later published in 1951 as The economic organization, with an article ‘Notes on cost and utility’, New York: Augustus Kelley; page references are to the reprint in The Chicago Tradition in Economics 1898–1946, Volume VII: Frank H. Knight ed. R.B. Emmett, London: Routledge, 2002 (pp. 5–32)
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1933b). Preface to the 1933 re-issue. In F. H.Knight (Ed.), Risk, uncertainty and profit (pp. xiii–xxxviii). New York: Harper and Row, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H (1934a). Economic theory and nationalism. Essay presented to a meeting of the American Economic Association at Chicago, December; page references are to F. H. Knight, The ethics of competition, London: Allen & Unwin, 1935, pp. 277–359.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1934b). The nature of economic science in some recent discussion. American Economic Review, 24, 225–238.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1934c). Review of Robbins (1932). International Journal of Ethics, 44, 358–361.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1934d). Social science and the political trend. University of Toronto Quarterly, 3; page references are to F. H. Knight, Freedom and reform, Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1982, pp. 24–43.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1935a). Intellectual confusion on morals and economics. International Journal of Ethics, 45, 200–220.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1935b). Social science and social action. International Journal of Ethics, 46, 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1936). Pragmatism and social action. International Journal of Ethics, 46, 229–236; page references are to F. H. Knight, Freedom and reform, Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1982, pp. 44–54.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1939). Ethics and economic reform. Economica. N.S. 6; page references are to F. H. Knight, Freedom and reform, Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1982, pp. 55–153.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1940). ‘What is truth’ in economics?Journal of Political Economy, 48, 1–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1941). Social science. International Journal of Ethics, 51; page references are to F. H. Knight, On the history and method of economics, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1956, pp. 121–134.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1942). Fact and value in social science. In R.Anshen (Ed.), Science and man. New York: Harcourt, Brace; page references are to F. H. Knight, Freedom and reform, Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1982, pp. 268–292.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1943). Social causation. American Journal of Sociology, 49; page references are to F. H. Knight, On the history and method of economics, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1956, pp. 135–150.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1944). Human nature and world democracy. American Journal of Sociology, 49, 408–420; page references are to F. H. Knight, Freedom and reform, Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1982, pp. 358–384.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1951). The role of principles in economics and politics. American Economic Review, 41, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, F. H. (1960). Intelligence and democratic action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Machlup, F. (1946). Marginal analysis and empirical research. American Economic Review, 36, 519–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machlup, F. (1967). Theories of the firm: Marginalist, behavioral, managerial. American Economic Review, 57, 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machlup, F. (1978). Methodology of economics and other social sciences. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reder, M. W. (1982). Chicago economics: Permanence and change. Journal of Economic Literature, 20, 1–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, L. (1932, 1935). An essay on the nature and significance of economic science (1st and 2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Van Horn, R., & Emmett, R. B. (2012). The Chicago school of democratic capitalism. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the History of Economics Society, Brock University, St Catherines, Ontario, Canada.
   Google Scholar