Five theses on neuroeconomics

References

• AlchianA. (1950). Uncertainty, evolution, and economic theory. Journal of Political Economy, 58, 211–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BartraO., McGuireJ. T., & KableJ. W. (2013). The valuation system: A coordinate-based meta-analysis of BOLD fMRI experiments examining neural correlates of subjective value. NeuroImage, 76, 412–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BaumbergerJ. (1977). No Kuhnian revolutions in economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 11, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BenhabibJ., & BisinA. (2005). Modeling internal commitment mechanisms and self-control: A neuroeconomics approach to consumption-saving decisions. Games and Economic Behavior, 52, 460–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BernheimB. D. (2009). On the potential of neuroeconomics: A critical (but hopeful) appraisal. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 1(2), 1–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BlaugM. (1975). Kuhn versus Lakatos, or paradigms versus research programmes in the history of economics. History of Political Economy, 7, 399–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CamererC. F. (2007). Neuroeconomics: Using neuroscience to make economic predictions. The Economic Journal, 117, C26–C42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CamererC. F. (2008). The case for mindful economics. In A.Caplin & A.Schotter (Eds.), The foundations of positive and normative economics. A handbook (pp. 43–69). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• CamererC. F. (2013). A review essay about Foundations of Neuroeconomic Analysis by Glimcher, P.Journal of Economic Literature, 51, 1155–1182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CamererC. F., LoewensteinG., & PrelecD. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform Economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43, 9–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CaplinA., & DeanM. (2008). Dopamine, reward prediction error, and economics. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123, 663–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CaplinA., DeanM., GlimcherP. W., & RutledgeR. B. (2010). Measuring beliefs and rewards: A neuroeconomic approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125, 923–960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CarterR. M., JR., MeyerJ. R., & HuettelS. A. (2010). Functional neuroimaging of intertemporal choice models: A review. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 3, 27–45.
   Google Scholar
• CooperN., KableJ. W., KimB. K., & ZaubermanG. (2013). Brain activity in valuation regions while thinking about the future predicts individual discount rates. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 13150–13156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CraverC. F., & AlexandrovaA. (2008). No revolution necessary: Neural mechanisms for economics. Economics and Philosophy, 24, 381–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DavisJ. B. (2009). Competing conceptions of the individual in recent economics. In H.Kincaid & D.Ross (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of economics (pp. 223–244). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DayanP., & DawN. (2008). Decision theory, reinforcement learning, and the brain. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 429–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DorrisM. C., & GlimcherP. W. (2004). Activity in posterior parietal cortex is correlated with the relative subjective desirability of action. Neuron, 44, 365–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FehrE., & CamererC. F. (2007). Social neuroeconomics: The neural circuitry of social preferences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 419–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FehrE., & RangelA. (2011). Neuroeconomic foundations of economic choice – recent advances. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25, 3–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FudenbergD., & LevineD. (2006). A dual self model of impulse control. American Economic Review, 96, 1449–1476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FumagalliR. (2010). The disunity of neuroeconomics: A methodological appraisal. Journal of Economic Methodology, 17, 119–131.
   Google Scholar
• FumagalliR. (2011). On the neural enrichment of economic models: Tractability, trade-offs and multiple levels of description. Biology and Philosophy, 26, 617–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FumagalliR. (2013). The futile search for true utility. Economics and Philosophy, 29, 325–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FumagalliR. (2014). Neural findings and economic models: Why brains have limited relevance for economics. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 44, 606–629.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GlimcherP. W. (2009). Choice: Towards a standard back-pocket model. In P. W.Glimcher, C.Camerer, E.Fehr, & R.Poldrack (Eds.), Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain (pp. 503–521). London: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• GlimcherP. W. (2011). Foundations of neuroeconomic analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• GlimcherP. W., DorrisM. C., & BayerH. M. (2005). Physiological utility theory and the neuroeconomics of choice. Games and Economic Behavior, 52, 213–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GlimcherP. W., & RustichiniA. (2004). Neuroeconomics: The consilience of brain and decision. Science, 306, 447–452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GualaF. (2012). Are preferences for real? Choice theory, folk psychology, and the hard case for commonsensible realism. In A.Lehtinen, et al. (Eds.), Economics for real: Uskali Mäki and the place of truth in economics (pp. 137–155). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• GulF., & PesendorferW. (2008). The case for mindless economics. In A.Caplin & A.Schotter (Eds.), The case for mindless economics (pp. 3–42). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HandsW. D. (2012). Realism, commonsensibles, and economics: The case of contemporary revealed preference theory. In A.Lehtinen, et al. (Eds.), Realism, commonsensibles, and economics: The case of contemporary revealed preference theory (pp. 156–178). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• HarrisonG. (2008). Neuroeconomics: A critical reconsideration. Economics and Philosophy, 24, 303–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarrisonG., & RossD. (2010). The methodologies of neuroeconomics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 17, 185–196.
   Google Scholar
• HausmanD. M. (1992). The inexact and separate science of economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• HausmanD. M. (2011). Mistakes about preferences in the social sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 41, 3–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KableJ. W. (2011). The cognitive neuroscience toolkit for the neuroeconomist: A functional overview. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 4, 63–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• KableJ. W., & GlimcherP. W. (2007). The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1625–1633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KableJ. W., & GlimcherP. W. (2009). The neurobiology of decision: Consensus and controversy. Neuron, 63, 733–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KahnemanD. (2003). A psychological perspective on economics. American Economic Review, 93, 162–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KahnemanD., & TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory. An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KuhnT. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• LakatosI. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I.Lakatos & A.Musgrave (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–195). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• LevyD. J., & GlimcherP. W. (2012). The root of all value: A neural common currency for choice. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 22, 1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LibetB. (1983). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity. Brain, 106, 23–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LoomesG., & SugdenR. (1982). Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal, 92, 805–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MäkiU. (1996). Two portraits of economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 3(1), 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• MäkiU. (2010). When economics meets neuroscience: Hype and hope. Journal of Economic Methodology, 17, 107–117.
   Google Scholar
• MarshallA. (1980/1961). Principles of economics (9th ed.). London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McCabeK. (2008). Neuroeconomics and the economic sciences. Economics and Philosophy, 24, 345–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClureS. M., EricsonK. M., LaibsonD. I., LoewensteinG., & CohenJ. D. (2007). Time discounting for primary rewards. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 5796–5804.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClureS. M., LaibsonD. I., LoewensteinG., & CohenJ. D. (2004). Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, 306, 503–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MundaleJ., & BechtelW. (1996). Integrating neuroscience, psychology, and evolutionary biology through a teleological conception of function. Minds and Machines, 6, 481–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NoonanM. P., MarsR. B., & RushworthM. F. (2011). Distinct roles of three frontal cortical areas in reward-guided behavior. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 14399–14412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padoa-SchioppaC. (2008). The syllogism of neuro-economics. Economics and Philosophy, 24, 449–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padoa-SchioppaC. (2011). Neurobiology of economic choice: A good-based model. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 34, 333–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PiccininiG., & CraverC. (2011). Integrating psychology and neuroscience: Functional analyses as mechanism sketches. Synthese, 183, 283–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QuartzS. R. (2008). From cognitive science to cognitive neuroscience to neuroeconomics. Economics and Philosophy, 24, 459–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RabinM. (1998). Psychology and economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 11–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RobbinsL. (1932). An essay on the nature and significance of economic science. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• RosenbergA. (2009). If economics is a science, what kind of a science is it? In H.Kincaid & D.Ross (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of economics (pp. 55–67). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• RossD. (2008). Two styles of neuroeconomics. Economics and Philosophy, 24, 473–483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RossD. (2009). Integrating the dynamics of multiscale economic agency. In H.Kincaid & D.Ross (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of economics (pp. 245–279). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• RossD. (2011). Cognitive variables and parameters in economic models. In R.Sun (Ed.), Grounding social sciences in cognitive science (pp. 287–314). Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• RossD., SharpC., VuchinichR., & SpurrettD. (2008). Midbrain mutiny: The picoeconomics and neuroeconomics of disordered gambling. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• RustichiniA. (2009). Is there a method of neuroeconomics?American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 1, 48–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RutledgeR. B., DeanM., CaplinA., & GlimcherP. W. (2010). Testing the reward prediction error hypothesis with an axiomatic model. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 13525–13536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SatzD., & FerejohnJ. (1994). Rational choice and social theory. The Journal of Philosophy, 91, 71–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SchotterA. (2008). What's so informative about choice? In A.Caplin & A.Schotter (Eds.), The foundations of positive and normative economics: A handbook (pp. 70–94). New York, NY: Oxford University Press, Chapter 3.
   Google Scholar
• ShillerR. J. (2011). The neuroeconomics revolution. Retrieved from http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-neuroeconomics-revolution.
   Google Scholar
• SimonH. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69, 99–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SmithV. L. (2007). Rationality in economics: Constructivist and ecological forms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SuppeF. (1989). The semantic conception of theories and scientific realism. Urbana, Chicago, IL: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• VercoeM., & ZakP. J. (2010). Inductive modeling using causal studies in neuroeconomics: Brains on drugs. Journal of Economic Methodology, 17, 133–146.
   Google Scholar
• VromenJ. (2007). Neuroeconomics as a natural extension of bioeconomics: The shifting scope of standard economic theory. Journal of Bioeconomics, 9, 145–167.
   Google Scholar
• VromenJ. (2010). Where economics and neuroscience might meet. Journal of Economic Methodology, 17, 171–183.
   Google Scholar
• VromenJ. (2011). Neuroeconomics: Two camps gradually converging: What can economics gain from it?International Review of Economics, 58, 267–285.
   Google Scholar
• VromenJ. (2012). Review of Foundations of Neuroeconomic Analysis, P.W. Glimcher. Oxford University Press, 2010. Economics and Philosophy, 28, 108–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ZakP. J., & DenzauA. (2001). Economics is an evolutionary science. In A.Somit & P.Peterson (Eds.), Evolutionary approaches in the behavioral sciences: Toward a better understanding of human nature (pp. 31–65). Bingley: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar