Let’s take the bias out of econometrics

References

• Abadie, A., & Cattaneo, M. D. (2018). Econometric methods for program evaluation. Annual Review of Economics, 10, 465–503. doi:10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abu-Mostafa, Y. S., Magdon-Ismail, M., & Lin, H.-T. (2012). Learning from data: A short course. AMLbook.com.
   Google Scholar
• Aldrich, J. (1993). Cowles exogeneity and core exogeneity. Discussion papers in economics and econometrics, University of Southampton, No 9308.
   Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. (1990). Lifetime earnings and the Vietnam era draft lottery: Evidence from social security administrative records. American Economic Review, 80, 313–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist, J., Imbens, G., & Rubin, D. (1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 444–455. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1996.10476902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D, & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Does compulsory school attendance affect schooling and earnings? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 979–1014. doi: 10.2307/2937954
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. (2015). Mastering ‘metrics: The path from cause to effect. Princeton, NJ: Pinceton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biørn, E. (2017). Identification, instruments, omitted variables, and rudimentary models: Fallacies in the ‘experimental approach’ to econometrics, memorandum No 13/2017. Oslo: Department of Economics, University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Bjerkholt, O., & Qin, D. (Eds.). (2010). A dynamic approach to economic theory: The yale lectures of ragnar frisch in 1930. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2007). Changes in the labor supply behaviour of married women: 1980–2000. Journal of Labor Economics, 25, 393–438. doi: 10.1086/513416
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breiman, L. (2001). Statistical modeling: The Two cultures (with comments and a rejoinder by the author). Statistical Science, 16(3), 199–231. doi: 10.1214/ss/1009213726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C. (2009). Microeconometrics: Current methods and some recent developments. In K. Patterson & T. C. Mills (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of econometrics (Vol. vol. 2, pp. 729–774). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2005). Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christ, C. F. (1952). History of the cowles commission, 1932-1952. In Economic theory and measurement: A twenty year research report 1932-1952 (pp. 3–65). Chicago: Cowles Commission for Research in Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Christ, C. F. (1960). A symposium on simultaneous equation estimation: Simultaneous equation estimation: Any verdict Yet? Econometrica, 28, 835–845. doi: 10.2307/1907565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D. R. (1992). Causality: Some statistical aspects. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society). 155, 291–301. doi: 10.2307/2982962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D. R. (2006). Principles of statistical inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, D. R., & Wermuth, N. (1996). Multivariate dependencies: Models, analysis and interpretation. London: Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, D. R., & Wermuth, N. (2004). Causality: A statistical view. International Statistical Review, 72, 285–305. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-5823.2004.tb00237.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaton, A. (2010). Instruments, randomization, and learning about development. Journal of Economic Literature, 48, 424–455. doi: 10.1257/jel.48.2.424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaton, A., & Cartwright, N. (2018). Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials. Social Science & Medicine, 210, 2–21. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einav, L., & Levin, J. (2014). Economics in the age of big data. Science, 346(6210), 715–721. doi: 10.1126/science.1243089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwert, F. (2013). Graphical causal models. In S. L. Morgan (Ed.), Handbook of causal analysis for social research (Chapter 13, pp. 245–273). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Engle, R. F., Hendry, D. F., & Richard, J.-F. (1983). Exogeneity. Econometrica, 51, 277–304. doi: 10.2307/1911990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, R. (1987). A history of econometrics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, R. (1989). The fall of OLS in structural estimation. Oxford Economic Papers, 41, 94–107. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, N. R., & Hendry, D. F. (2004). The ET interview: Professor David F. Hendry: Interviewed by neil R. Ericsson. Econometric Theory, 20, 745–806. doi: 10.1017/S0266466604204078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman, D. A. (1991). Statistical models and shoe leather. Sociological Methodology, 21, 291–313. doi: 10.2307/270939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girshick, M. A., & Haavelmo, T. (1947). Statistical analysis of the demand for food: Examples of simultaneous estimation of structural equations. Econometrica, 15, 79–110. doi: 10.2307/1907066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glymour, C. (2010). Explanation and truth. In Mayo and Spanos (Eds.). (pp. 331–350). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haavelmo, T. (1943). The statistical implications of a system of simultaneous equations. Econometrica, 11, 1–12. doi: 10.2307/1905714
   Google Scholar
• Haavelmo, T. (1944). The probability approach in econometrics. Econometrica, 12(Supplement).
   Google Scholar
• Haavelmo, T. (1947). Methods of measuring the marginal propensity to consume. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 42, 105–122. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1947.10501917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, D. J. (1994). Deconstructing statistical questions. Journal of Royal Statistical Society A, 157, Part 3, 317–356. doi: 10.2307/2983526
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. (1976). A life-cycle model of earnings, learning, and consumption. Journal of Political Economy, 84, S11–S44. doi: 10.1086/260531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. (1978). Dummy endogenous variables in a simultaneous equation system. Econometrica, 46, 931–959. doi: 10.2307/1909757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161. doi: 10.2307/1912352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. (1992). Randomization and social program. In C. Manski & I. Garfinkel (Eds.), Evaluating welfare and training programs (pp. 201–230). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. (1996). Randomization as an instrumental variable. Review of Economics and Statistics, 78, 336–341. doi: 10.2307/2109936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry, D. F. (1980). Econometrics-Alchemy or science?. Economica, 47, 387–406. doi: 10.2307/2553385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendry, D. F. (1995). Dynamic econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hendry, D. F. (2009). The methodology of empirical econometric modelling: Applied econometrics through the looking-glass. In K. Patterson & T. C. Mills (Eds.), Palgrave handbook of econometrics (Vol. vol. 2, pp. 3–67). London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hendry, D. F., & Doornik, J. A. (2014). Empirical model discovery and theory evaluation. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, K. D. (2000). The methodology of empirical macroeconomics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2013). An introduction to statistical learning. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kalisch, M., & Bühlmann, P. (2014). Causal structure learning and inference: A selective review. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 11, 3–21. doi: 10.1080/16843703.2014.11673322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, P. (2002). Sinning in the basement: What are the rules? The ten commandments of econometrics. Journal of Economic Survey, 16, 569–589. doi: 10.1111/1467-6419.00179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, P. (2008). A guide to econometrics (6th ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Leamer, E. E. (1983a). Model choice and specification analysis. In Griliches & Intriligator (Eds.), Handbook of econometrics (Vol. vol 1, pp. 285–328). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Leamer, E. E. (1983b). Let’s take the con out of econometrics. American Economic Review, 73, 31–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-Dependent and qualitatively variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mäki, U. (Ed.). (2002). Fact and fiction in economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Malinvaud, E. (1966). Statistical methods in econometrics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Marschak, J. (1953). Economic measurements for policy and prediction. In W. C. Hood & T. Koopmans (Eds.), Studies In econometric method (pp. 1–26). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mayo, D. G., & Spanos, A. (Eds.). (2010). Error and inference: Recent exchanges on experimental reasoning, reliability and the objectivity and rationality of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. M. (1997). Machine learning. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. L. (Ed.). (2013). Handbook of causal analysis for social research. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Pagan, A. (1984). Econometric issues in the analysis of regressions with generated regressors. International Economic Review, 25, 221–247. doi: 10.2307/2648877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning and inference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pratt, J. W., & Schlaifer, R. (1984). On the nature and discovery of structure. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79, 9–21. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1984.10477054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt, J. W., & Schlaifer, R. (1988). On the interpretation and observation of laws. Journal of Econometrics, 39, 23–52. doi: 10.1016/0304-4076(88)90039-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puhani, P. A. (2000). The Heckman correction for sample selection and its critique. Journal of Economic Survey, 14, 53–68. doi: 10.1111/1467-6419.00104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, D. (1993). Formation of econometrics: A historical perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, D. (2013). A history of econometrics: The reformation from the 1970s. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, D. (2014). Inextricability of confluence and autonomy in econometrics. Oeconomia, 4(3), 321–341. doi: 10.4000/oeconomia.883
   Google Scholar
• Qin, D. (2015). Resurgence of the endogeneity-backed instrumental variable methods. Economics: The Open-Access, Open-Assessment E-Journal, 9(2015-7), 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Qin, D., van Hüllen, S., & Wang, Q.-C. (2016). How credible are shrinking wage elasticities of married women labour supply? Econometrics, 4(1), 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard, J.-F. (1980). Models with several regimes and changes in exogeneity. Review of Economic Studies, 47, 1–20. doi: 10.2307/2297101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romer, P. (2016). The trouble with macroeconomics. Working paper, stern school of business, New York University.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, F. (2014). What invariance is and how to test for it. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 28, 157–183. doi: 10.1080/02698595.2014.932528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rust, J. (2015). Mostly useless econometrics? Assessing the causal effect of econometric theory. Foundations and Trends® in Accounting, 10(2-4), 125–203. doi: 10.1561/1400000049
   Google Scholar
• Senn, S. (1998). Mathematics: Governess or handmaiden? The Statistician, 47(Part 2), 251–259.
   Google Scholar
• Shalev-Shwartz, S., & Ben-David, S. (2014). Understanding machine learning: From theory to algorithms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shalizi, C. R. (2017). Advanced Data Analysis from an Elementary Point of View (manuscript from http://www.stat.cmu.edu/~cshalizi/ADAfaEPoV/.).
   Google Scholar
• Sims, C. A. (1980). Macroeconomics and reality. Econometrica, 48, 1–48. doi: 10.2307/1912017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spirtes, P. (2005). Graphical models, causal inference, and econometric models. Journal of Economic Methodology, 12(1), 3–34. doi: 10.1080/1350178042000330887
   Google Scholar
• Spirtes, P. (2009). Variable definition and causal inference. Proceedings of the 13th international congress of logic methodology and philosophy of science, pp. 514–553.
   Google Scholar
• Stock, J. H., & Watson, M. W. (2003). Introduction to econometrics. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Swamy, P. A. V. B., Tavlas, G. S., & Hall, S. G. (2015). On the interpretation of instrumental variables in the presence of specification errors. Econometrics, 3, 55–64. doi: 10.3390/econometrics3010055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of relationships of limited dependent variables. Econometrica, 26, 24–36. doi: 10.2307/1907382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Klaauw, B. (2014). From micro data to causality: Forty years of empirical labor economics. Labour Economics, 30, 88–97. doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2014.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hüllen, S., & Qin, D. (2018). Compulsory Schooling and the Returns to Education: A Re-examination, under review with Journal of Economics and Statistics; see SOAS Department of Economics Working Paper Series, No. 199 for an earlier version.
   Google Scholar
• Waugh, F. V. (1961). The place of Least Squares in econometrics. Econometrica, 29, 386–396. doi: 10.2307/1909638
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wermuth, N. (1992). On block-recursive regression equations (with discussion). Brazilian Journal of Probability and Statistics, 6, 1–56.
   Google Scholar
• Wermuth, N., & Cox, D. R. (2011). Graphic Markov models: Overview. In J. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed. Vol. 10, pp. 341–350). Amsterdam: Elesevier.
   Google Scholar
• Wold, H. O. A. (1954). Causality and econometrics. Econometrica, 22, 162–177. doi: 10.2307/1907540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wold, H. O. A. (1956). Causal inference from observational data: A review of ends and means. Journal of Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 119, 28–61. doi: 10.2307/2342961
   Google Scholar
• Wold, H. O. A. (1960). A generalization of causal chain models (part III of a triptych on causal chain systems). Econometrica, 28, 443–463. doi: 10.2307/1907733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wold, H. O. A., & Juréen, L. (1953). Demand analysis: A study in econometrics. New York: Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A. (2017). Consistent without inference: Instrumental variables in practical application. LSE Working Paper.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, J., & Spirtes, P. (2011). Intervention, determinism, and the causal minimality condition. Synthese, 182(13), 335–347. doi: 10.1007/s11229-010-9751-1
   Google Scholar