The Helsinki approach to economic methodology, or, how to espouse the mainstream?

References

• Boland, L. A. (2001). Towards a useful methodology discipline. The Journal of Economic Methodology, 8(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780010022785
   Google Scholar
• Colander, D. (2013). The systemic failure of economic methodologists. Journal of Economic Methodology, 20(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2013.774848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colander, D., Holt, R., & Rosser, B. (2004). The changing face of mainstream economics. Review of Political Economy, 16(4), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953825042000256702
   Google Scholar
• Dow, S. C. (2001). Methodology in a pluralist environment. The Journal of Economic Methodology, 8(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780010022811
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, I. (1933). Statistics in the service of economics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 28(181), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1933.10502629
   Google Scholar
• Frey, B. S. (2001). Why economists disregard economic methodology. Journal of Economic Methodology, 8(1), 41–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780010022820
   Google Scholar
• Hands, D. W. (1990). Thirteen theses on progress in economic methodology. Finnish Economic Papers, 3(1), 72–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hands, D. W. (2001a). Economic methodology is Dead–Long Live Economic methodology: Thirteen theses on the New Economic methodology. Journal of Economic Methodology, 8(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780010022839
   Google Scholar
• Hands, D. W. (2001b). Reflection without rules: Economic methodology and contemporary science theory. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, D. M. (1989). Economic methodology in a Nutshell. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.3.2.115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover, K. D. (2012). Microfoundational programs. In P. G. Duarte & G. T. Lima (Eds.), Microfoundations reconsidered (pp. 19–61). Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. (1992). The naturalists return. The Philosophical review, 101(1), 53–114. https://doi.org/10.2307/2185044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuorikoski, J., & Lehtinen, A. (2018). Model selection in Macroeconomics: DSGE and Ad Hocness. Journal of Economic Methodology, 25(3), 252–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2018.1488563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuorikoski, J., Lehtinen, A., & Marchionni, C. (2010). Economic modelling as robustness analysis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61(3), 541–567. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axp049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtinen, A. (2006). Signal extraction for simulated games with a large number of players. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 50(9), 2495–2507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2005.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtinen, A. (2007a). The Borda rule is also intended for dishonest men. Public Choice, 133(1–2), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-007-9178-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtinen, A. (2007b). The welfare consequences of strategic voting in two commonly used parliamentary Agendas. Theory and Decision, 63(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-007-9028-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtinen, A. (2008). The welfare consequences of strategic behaviour under approval and plurality voting. European Journal of Political Economy, 24(3), 688–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2008.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtinen, A. (2011). A welfarist critique of social choice theory. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 23(3), 359–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629811411753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtinen, A., & Kuorikoski, J. (2007a). Computing the Perfect model: Why do economists shun simulation? Philosophy of Science, 74(3), 304–329. https://doi.org/10.1086/522359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtinen, A., & Kuorikoski, J. (2007b). Unrealistic assumptions in rational choice theory. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 37(2), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393107299684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäki, U. (2008). Realism from the ‘lands of Kaleva’: An interview with Uskali Mäki. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 1(1), 124–146. https://doi.org/10.23941/ejpe.v1i1.16
   Google Scholar
• Mayo, D. G. (2018). Statistical inference as severe testing. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCloskey, D. N. (1986). The rhetoric of economics. Wheatsheaf Books.
   Google Scholar
• McKelvey, R. D., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1972). A general theory of the calculus of voting. In J. F. Herndon & J. L. Bernd (Eds.), Mathematical applications in political science (pp. 32–78). University Press of Virginia.
   Google Scholar