Values in economics: a recent revival with a twist

References

• Alexandrova, A. (2017). A philosophy for the science of well-being. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexandrova, A. (2018). Can the science of well-being be objective? The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 69(2), 421–445. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axw027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. (1995). Value in ethics and economics. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, E. (2004). Uses of value judgments in science: A general argument, with Lessons from a case study of feminist research on Divorce. Hypatia, 19(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2004.tb01266.x
   Google Scholar
• Backhouse, R. E. (2005). Economists, values and ideology: A neglected agenda. Revue de philosophie économique, 11, 31–55.
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, J. (2013). State of the field: Transient underdetermination and values in science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 44(1), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2012.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. (1992). The methodology of economics: Or, how economists explain. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boumans, M., & Davis, J. B. (2015). Economic methodology: Understanding economics as a science. Macmillan International Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. J. (2013). Values in science beyond underdetermination and inductive risk. Philosophy of Science, 80(5), 829–839. https://doi.org/10.1086/673720
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cenci, A., & Hussain, M. A. (2020). Epistemic and non-epistemic values in economic evaluations of public health. Journal of Economic Methodology, 27(1), 66–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2019.1646922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn, J. N. (2006). The use of race and ethnicity in medicine: Lessons from the African-American heart failure trial. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 34(3), 552–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2006.00068.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colander, D., & Su, H. C. (2015). Making sense of economists’ positive-normative distinction. Journal of Economic Methodology, 22(2), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2015.1024877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P. (1993). An inquiry into well-being and destitution. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, P. (2005). What do economists analyze and why: Values or facts? Economics and Philosophy, 21(2), 221–278. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026626710500057X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. B. (2005). Robbins, textbooks, and the extreme value neutrality view. History of Political Economy, 37(2), 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-37-2-191
   Google Scholar
• Davis, J. B. (2013). Economists’ odd stand on the positive-normative distinction: A behavioral economics view. In G. DeMartino & D. McCloskey (Eds.), Handbook on professional economic ethics: View from the economics profession and beyond (pp. 200–218). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diekmann, S., & Peterson, M. (2013). The role of non-epistemic values in engineering models. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(1), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9300-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, H. (2000). Inductive risk and values in science. Philosophy of Science, 67(4), 559–579. https://doi.org/10.1086/392855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, H. (2009). Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, H. (2016). Values in science. In P. Humpreys (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of science (pp. 609–630). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, K. C. (2011). Is a little pollution good for you? Incorporating societal values in environmental research. OUP USA.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, K. C. (2017). A tapestry of values: An introduction to values in science. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1953). The methodology of positive economics. Essays in Positive Economics, 3(3), 145–178.
   Google Scholar
• Hands, D. W. (2012). The positive-normative dichotomy and economics. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science, 13, 219–239.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, S. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge? Thinking from women’s lives. Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, D. M. (2015). Valuing health: Well-being, freedom, and suffering. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hausmann, D. M., & McPherson, M. S. (2006). Economic analysis. In Moral Philosophy, and Public Policy. 2nd ed.
   Google Scholar
• Heilmann, C. (2017). Values in time discounting. Science and Engineering Ethics, 23(5), 1333–1349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9950-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hicks, D. J. (2014). A new direction for science and values. Synthese, 191(14), 3271–3295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0447-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard, R. (1990). The politics of women’s biology. Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Intemann, K. (2001). Science and values: Are value judgments always irrelevant to the justification of scientific claims? Philosophy of Science, 68(S3), S506–S518. https://doi.org/10.1086/392932
   Google Scholar
• Intemann, K. (2005). Feminism, underdetermination, and values in science. Philosophy of Science, 72(5), 1001–1012. https://doi.org/10.1086/508956
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intemann, K. (2015). Distinguishing between legitimate and illegitimate values in climate modeling. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 5(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-014-0105-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katikireddi, S. V., & Valles, S. A. (2015). Coupled ethical–epistemic analysis of public health research and practice: Categorizing variables to improve population health and equity. American Journal of Public Health, 105(1), e36–e42. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, E. F. (1988). Demarcating public from private values in evolutionary discourse. Journal of the History of Biology, 21(2), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00146986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. (2001). Science, truth, and democracy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. (2011). Science in a democratic society. Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Koshrowi, D. (2019). Trade-offs between epistemic and moral values in evidence-based policy. Economics and Philosophy, 35(1), 49–78. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267118000159
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kourany, J. A. (2010). Philosophy of science after feminism. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. (1977). Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice. In T. Kuhn (Ed.), The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change (pp. 320–329). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lacey, H. (2003). The behavioral scientist qua scientist makes value judgments. Behavior and Philosophy, 31, 209–223.
   Google Scholar
• Laudan, L. (1984). Science and values. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laudan, L. (2004). The epistemic, the cognitive, and the social. In P. Machamer & G. Wolters (Eds.), Science, values, and objectivity (pp. 14–23). University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd, E. (2005). The case of the female orgasm: Bias in the science of evolution. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Longino, H. E. (1995). Gender, politics, and the theoretical virtues. Synthese, 104(3), 383–397. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longino, H. E. (2008). Values, heuristics, and the politics of knowledge. In M. Carrier, D. Howard, & J. Kourany (Eds.), The challenge of the social and the pressure of practice: Science and values revisited (pp. 68–86). University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Longino, H. E. (2013). Studying human behavior: How scientists investigate aggression and sexuality. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Małecka, M. (2020). The normative decision theory in economics: A philosophy of science perspective. The case of the expected utility theory. Journal of Economic Methodology, 27(1), 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2019.1640891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Małecka, M. (in press). Behaviour, knowledge, and policy. Questioning the epistemic presuppositions of applying behavioural science in public policymaking. Synthese.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullin, E. (1982). Values in science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1982(2), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1982.2.192409
   Google Scholar
• Mireles-Flores, L. (2016). Economic science for use: Causality and evidence in policy making. PhD manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Mirowski, P. (1990). Learning the meaning of a dollar: Conservation principles and the social theory of value in economic theory. Social Research, 57, 689–717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mongin, P. (2006). Value judgments and value neutrality in economics. Economica, 73(290), 257–286. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.2006.00501.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. A. (2008). Economists, value judgments, and climate change: A view from feminist economics. Ecological Economics, 65(3), 441–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, J. A. (2017). Gender and risk-taking: Economics, evidence, and why the answer matters (Vol. 17). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nordhaus, W. D. (2007). A review of the Stern review on the economics of climate change. Journal of Economic Literature, 45(3), 686–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okruhlik, K. (1994). Gender and the biological sciences. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 24(sup1), 21–42.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, H., & Walsh, V. (Eds.). (2012). The end of value-free economics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, J. (2008). Error in economics: The methodology of evidence-based economics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, J. (2013). Philosophy of economics: A contemporary introduction. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, J. (2017). Fact-value entanglement in positive economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 24(2), 134–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2017.1309749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins, L. C. (1935). An essay on the nature & signifance of economic science. Macmillan & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Rooney, P. (1992, January). On values in science: Is the epistemic/non-epistemic distinction useful? In PSA: Proceedings of the biennial meeting of the philosophy of science association (Vol. 1992, No. 1, pp. 13–22). Philosophy of Science Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rudner, R. (1953). The scientist qua scientist makes value judgments. Philosophy of Science, 20(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1086/287231
   Google Scholar
• Scarantino, A. (2009). On the role of values in economic science: Robbins and his critics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 31(4), 449–473. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1053837209990253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, S. A. (2019). Which values should be built into economic measures? Economics and Philosophy, 35(3), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267118000317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2005). Walsh on Sen after Putnam. Review of Political Economy, 17(1), 107–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/0953825042000313834
   Google Scholar
• Slocum, S. (1975). Woman the gatherer: Male bias in anthropology. In R. R. Reiter (Ed.), Toward an anthropology of women (p. 49). Monthly Review Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, M. (1992). Scientific rationality and human reasoning. Philosophy of Science, 59(3), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1086/289680
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterling, K. (2014). Man the hunter, woman the gatherer? The impact of gender studies on hunter-gatherer research (a retrospective). In V. Cummings & P. Jordan (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the archaeology and anthropology of hunter-gatherers (pp. 151). OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Su, H. C., & Colander, D. (2013). A failure to communicate: The fact-value divide and the Putnam-Dasgupta debate. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 6(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.23941/ejpe.v6i2.131
   Google Scholar
• Svetlova, E. (2014). Modelling beyond application: Epistemic and non-epistemic values in modern science. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 28(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2014.915656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuana, N., Sriver, R. L., Svoboda, T., Olson, R., Irvine, P. J., Haqq-Misra, J., & Keller, K. (2012). Towards integrated ethical and scientific analysis of geoengineering: A research agenda. Ethics, Policy & Environment, 15(2), 136–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2012.685557
   Google Scholar
• Wylie, A. (2007). The constitution of archaeological evidence: gender politics and science. In T. Insoll (Ed.), The archaeology of identities: A Reader (pp. 97–18). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zihlman, A. L. (1985). Gathering stories for hunting human nature (A review essay). Feminist Studies, 11(2), 365. https://doi.org/10.2307/3177929
   Google Scholar