How-possibly explanations in economics: anything goes?

References

• Alexandrova, A. (2008). Making models count. Philosophy of Science, 75(3), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.1086/592952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandrova, A., & Northcott, R. (2013). It’s just a feeling: Why economic models do not explain. Journal of Economic Methodology, 20(3), 262–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2013.828873
   Google Scholar
• Arrow, K. J., & Debreu, G. (1954). Existence of an equilibrium for a competitive economy. Econometrica, 22(3), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athreya, K. B. (2013). Big ideas in macroeconomics: A nontechnical view. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Axelrod, R., Ford, G. R., Riolo, R. L., & Cohen, M. D. (2002). Beyond geography: Cooperation with persistent Links in the absence of clustered neighborhoods. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(4), 341–346. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0604_08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydinonat, N. E. (2007). Models, conjectures and exploration: An analysis of Schelling’s checkerboard model of residential segregation. Journal of Economic Methodology, 14(4), 429–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780701718680
   Google Scholar
• Aydinonat, N. E. (2018). The diversity of models as a means to better explanations in economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 25(3), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2018.1488478
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydinonat, N. E., & Köksal, E. (2019). Explanatory value in context: The curious case of Hotelling’s location model. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 0(0), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672567.2019.1626460
   Google Scholar
• Basso, A., Lisciandra, C., & Marchionni, C. (2017). Hypothetical models in social Science. In Magnani, L., & Bertolotti, T. (Eds.). Springer Handbook of model-based Science (pp. 413–433). Springer Handbooks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_19
   Google Scholar
• Brandon, R. N. (2014). Adaptation and environment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. (2002). Ugly currents in modern economics. In U. Mäki (Ed.), Fact and fiction in economics. Models, realism, and social construction (pp. 35–56). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blaug, M. (2003). The formalist revolution of the 1950s. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 25(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/1042771032000083309
   Google Scholar
• Bokulich, A. (2014). How the tiger bush got its stripes: “How possibly” vs. “How actually” model explanations. The Monist 97(3), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist201497321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bokulich, A. (2016). Fiction as a vehicle for truth: Moving beyond the ontic conception. The Monist, 99(3), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1093/monist/onw004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2011). A cooperative species: Human reciprocity and its evolution. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dray, W. H. (1968). On explaining How-possibly. The Monist, 52(3), 390–407. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist196852339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dymski, G. A. (1996). On Krugman’s model of economic geography. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 27(4), 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(96)00029-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, B. (2017). Modal justification via theories. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Forber, P. (2010). Confirmation and explaining how possible. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 41(1), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2009.12.006
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fumagalli, R. (2016). Why we cannot learn from minimal models. Erkenntnis, 81(3), 433–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-015-9749-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2009). Learning from minimal economic models. Erkenntnis, 70(1), 81–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-008-9138-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2013a). Appraising models nonrepresentationally. Philosophy of Science, 80(5), 850–861. https://doi.org/10.1086/673893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2013b). Genuineness resolved: A reply to Reiss’ purported paradox. Journal of Economic Methodology, 20(3), 255–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2013.828866
   Google Scholar
• Hands, D. W. (2016). Derivational robustness, Credible Substitute systems and mathematical economic models: The case of stability analysis in Walrasian general equilibrium theory. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 6(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-015-0130-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman, D. M. (1992). The inexact and separate science of economics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hubálek, M. (2020, August 1–22). A brief (hi)story of just-so stories in evolutionary science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393120944223
   Google Scholar
• Kment, B. (2017 Spring). Varieties of modality. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/modality-varieties/.
   Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (1979). Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade. Journal of International Economics, 9(4), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(79)90017-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (1980). Scale economies, product differentiation, and the pattern of trade. American Economic Review, 70(5), 950–959. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1805774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1086/261763. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2937739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kung, P. (2010). Imagining as a guide to possibility. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81(3), 620–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00377.x. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41057497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuorikoski, J., & Ylikoski, P. (2015). External Representations and scientific understanding. Synthese, 192(12), 3817–3837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-014-0591-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the best explanation (2nd ed). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lipton, P. (2009). Understanding without explanation. In H. W. De Regt, S. Leonelli, & K. Eigner (Eds.), Scientific understanding philosophical perspectives (pp. 43–63). University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mäki, U. (2009). Realistic realism about unrealistic models. In H. Kincaid & D. Ross (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy of economics (pp. 68–98). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mäki, U., & Marchionni, C. (2011). Is geographical economics imperializing economic geography? Journal of Economic Geography, 11(4), 645–665. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbq021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchionni, C. (2004). Geographical economics versus economic geography: Towards a clarification of the dispute. Environment and Planning A, 36(10), 1737–1753. https://doi.org/10.1068/a36305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchionni, C. (2006). Contrastive explanation and unrealistic models: The case of the new economic geography. Journal of Economic Methodology, 13(4), 425–446. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501780601048758
   Google Scholar
• Marchionni, C. (2012). Geographical economics and its neighbours – forces towards and against unification. In U. Mäki (Ed.), Philosophy of economics (pp. 425–458). North Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. (1999). The new “geographical turn” in economics: Some critical reflections. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/23.1.65. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23600667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massimi, M. (2019). Two kinds of exploratory models. Philosophy of Science, 86(5), 869–881. https://doi.org/10.1086/705494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northcott, R. (2018). The efficiency question in economics. Philosophy of Science, 85(5), 1140–1151. https://doi.org/10.1086/699688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlin, B. (1933). Interregional and international trade. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prize Committee of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. (2008). Trade and geography: Economies of scale, differentiated products and transport costs: scientific background on the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel 2008. Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, J. (2008). Error in economics: Towards a more evidence-based methodology. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Reiss, J. (2013). The explanation paradox. Journal of Economic Methodology, 19(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2012.661069
   Google Scholar
• Resnik, D. B. (1991). How-possibly explanations in biology. Acta Biotheoretica, 39(2), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00046596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ricardo, D. (1817). On the principles of political economy, and taxation. John Murray.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, C. (2016). Factive scientific understanding without accurate representation. Biology & Philosophy, 31(1), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-015-9510-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohwer, Y., & Rice, C. (2013). Hypothetical pattern idealization and explanatory models. Philosophy of Science, 80(3), 334–355. https://doi.org/10.1086/671399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, A. (1992). Economics: Mathematical politics or science of diminishing returns? University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. C. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(2), 143–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1971.9989794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schelling, T. C. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, E. (2001). How ‘economists’ Think: about geography, for example. Journal of Economic Geography, 1(1), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/1.1.131. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26160404.
   Google Scholar
• Sjölin Wirling, Y., & Grüne-Yanoff, T. (2020). Epistemic and objective possibility in science. Unpublished manuscript, KTH Stockholm.
   Google Scholar
• Sugden, R. (1986). The economics of rights, co-operation, and welfare. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/406755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verreault-Julien, P. (2017). Non-causal understanding with economic models: The case of general equilibrium. Journal of Economic Methodology, 24(3), 297–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2017.1335424
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verreault-Julien, P. (2019). How could models possibly provide How-possibly explanations? Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 73, 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.06.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, D. A. (1997). Advances in general equilibrium theory. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg, M. (2013). Simulation and similarity. Using models to understand the world. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, T. (2007). Philosophical knowledge and knowledge of counterfactuals. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 74(1), 89–123. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401204651_006
   Google Scholar
• Ylikoski, P., & Emrah Aydinonat, N. (2014). Understanding with theoretical models. Journal of Economic Methodology, 21(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2014.886470
   Google Scholar