Theories of well-being and well-being policy: a view from methodology

References

• Adler, M. (2013). Happiness surveys and public policy: What’s the use? Duke Law Journal, 62, 1509–1601. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/414
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, M., & Fleurbaey, M. (2016). Oxford handbook of well-being and public policy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alexandrova, A. (2017). A philosophy for the science of well-being. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Angner, E. (2018). What preferences really are. Philosophy of Science, 85(4), 660–681. https://doi.org/10.1086/699193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arneson, R. (1999). Human flourishing versus desire satisfaction. Social Philosophy and Policy, 16(1), 113–142. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500002272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, J. (1997). Utilitarianism, institutions, and justice. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bok, D. (2010). The politics of happiness: What government can learn from the new research on well-being. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crisp, R. (2006). Reasons and the good. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Diener, E., Lucas, R., Schimmack, U., & Helliwell, J. (2009). Well-being for public policy. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, F. (1997). On the intrinsic value of pleasures. Ethics, 107(3), 448–466. https://doi.org/10.1086/233744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fletcher, G. (2013). A fresh start for the objective-list theory of well-being. Utilitas, 25(2), 206–220. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820812000453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijters, P., Clark, A., Krekel, C., & Layard, R. (2020). A happy choice: Wellbeing as the goal of government. Behavioural Public Policy, 4(2), 126–165. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2019.39
   Google Scholar
• Fumagalli, R. (2013). The futile search for true utility. Economics and Philosophy, 29(3), 325–347. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267113000291
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fumagalli, R. (2016). Decision sciences and the new case for paternalism: Three welfare-related justificatory challenges. Social Choice and Welfare, 47(2), 459–480. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-016-0972-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fumagalli, R. (2018). Eliminating ‘life worth living’. Philosophical Studies, 175(3), 769–792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-0892-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fumagalli, R. (2019). (F)utility exposed. Philosophy of Science, 86(5), 955–966. https://doi.org/10.1086/705454
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, J. (1986). Well-being: Its measure and importance. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, D. (2010). Hedonism and welfare economics. Economics and Philosophy, 26(3), 321–344. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267110000398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman, D. (2012). Preference, value, choice, and welfare. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, D. (2015). Valuing health: Well-being, freedom, and suffering. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, D. (2016). On the econ within. Journal of Economic Methodology, 23(1), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2015.1070525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausman, D. (2020). Enhancing welfare without a theory of welfare. Behavioural Public Policy, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2019.34
   Google Scholar
• Hausman, D., & McPherson, M. (2009). Preference satisfaction and welfare economics. Economics and Philosophy, 25(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267108002253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haybron, D., & Tiberius, V. (2015). Well-being policy: What standard of well-being? Journal of American Philosophical Association, 1(4), 712–733. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2015.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersch, G. (2015). Can an evidential account justify relying on preferences for well-being policy? Journal of Economic Methodology, 22(3), 280–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2015.1071507
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hersch, G. (2018). The narrowed domain of disagreement for well-being policy. Public Affairs Quarterly, 32, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/26897020
   Google Scholar
• Hersch, G. (2020). No theory-free lunches in well-being policy. Philosophical Quarterly, 70(278), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqz029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelman, M. (2005). Hedonic psychology and the ambiguities of ‘welfare’. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 33(4), 391–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2005.00038.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, E. (2017). Against welfare subjectivism. Noûs, 51(2), 354–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscati, I. (2012). A review of Daniel M. Hausman's Preference, value, choice, and welfare. Cambridge University Press, 2012. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 5, 125–131.
   Google Scholar
• Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and persons. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sarch, A. (2015). Hausman and McPherson on welfare economics and preference satisfaction theories of welfare: A critical note. Economics and Philosophy, 31(1), 141–159. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267114000431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlon, T. (1993). Value, desire, and quality of life. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 185–200). Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sobel, D. (1994). Full information accounts of well-being. Ethics, 104(4), 784–810. https://doi.org/10.1086/293655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sobel, D. (1997). On the subjectivity of welfare. Ethics, 107(3), 501–508. https://doi.org/10.1086/233747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumner, L. (1996). Welfare happiness and ethics. Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodard, C. (2013). Classifying theories of welfare. Philosophical Studies, 165(3), 787–803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-012-9978-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar