Engineering curriculum in the preschool classroom: the teacher's experience

References

• Adams, R. S., A. Dias de Figueiredo, D. Evangelou, L. D. English, N. Mousoulides, A. Pawley, C. Schifellite, R. Stevens, M. Svinicki, J. Trenor, and D. Wilson. 2011. “Multiples Perspectives on Engaging Future Engineers.” Journal of Engineering Education, Special Centennial Issue. 100 (1): 48–88. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00004.x
   Google Scholar
• Bagiati, A. 2011. Early Engineering: A Developmentally Appropriate Curriculum for Young Children. Doctoral Dissertation, School of Engineering Education, Purdue University.
   Google Scholar
• Bagiati, A., and D. Evangelou. 2009. An examination of web-based P-12 engineering curricula: Issues of pedagogical and engineering content fidelity. Paper presented at the 2009 Research in Engineering Education Symposium, July 20–23, Palm Cove, Queensland, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Bagiati, A. and D. Evangelou. 2011. Starting young: Outcomes of a Developmentally Appropriate PreK Engineering Curriculum, Research in Engineering Education Symposium, Madrid, Spain, October 4–7.
   Google Scholar
• Bagiati, A., S. Yoon Yoon, D. Evangelou, and I. Ngambeki. 2010. “Engineering Curricula in Early Education: Describing the Landscape of Open Resources.” Early Education Research and Practice 12 (2). http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v12n2/bagiati.html
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, S. P., and D. Evangelou. 2007. Precursors to engineering thinking (PET). Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education. Washington, DC: ASEE
   Google Scholar
• Brophy, S., S. Klein, M. Portsmore, and C. Rogers. 2008. “Advancing Engineering Education in the P-12 Classrooms.” Journal of Engineering Education 97 (3): 369–87. doi: 10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantor, J. A. 1992. Delivering Instruction to Adult Learners. Toronto: Wall & Emerson.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. 2003. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Dodge, D. T. and L. J. Colker. 1992. The Creative Curriculum for Early Childhood. Washington, DC: Teaching Strategies, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Evangelou, D. 2010. “Guest Editorial: Child Developmental Perspectives in Engineering Education.” Early Education Research and Practice 12 (2). http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v12n2/editorial.html
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, K. J. (2009). Etic and emic stories. GIALens 3 (2). Retrieved from http://www.gial.edu/gialens/vol3-2/franklin-etic-emic-stories.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. G. 1982. The Meaning of Educational Change. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. G. 1990. “Staff Development, Innovation, and Institutional Development.” In Changing School Culture through Staff Development. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Deelopment Yearbook, 3–25. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Curriculum Development.
   Google Scholar
• Headland, T. N., K. L. Pike, and M. Harris. 1990. Emics and Etics: The Insider/Outsider Debate. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Katehi, L., G. Pearson, and M. Feder. 2009. “The Status and Nature of K-12 Engineering Education in the United States.” The Bridge 39 (3): 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, L. G., and S. C. Chard. 1990. Engaging Children's Minds: The Project Approach. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex publishing corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Lieb, S. 2011. Principles of Adult Learning. Retrieved on March 2011 from: http://www.amschool.edu.sv/mined/links/PRINCIPLES%20OF%20ADULT%20LEARNING.doc
   Google Scholar
• Louis, K. S., and M. B. Miles. 1990. Improving the Urban High School: What Works and Why. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., and A. M. Huberman. 1994. An Expanded Workbook: Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• National Academy of Engineering. 2004. Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Association for the Education of Young Children. 2009. Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8, edited by C. Copple, and S. Bredekamp, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, S. J. 1999. Reflection of a Title I school wide program: The facilitators and barriers of the change process. Unpublished Ed.D. The University of Akron, The University of Akron, United States, Ohio
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, V. 1998. “How Teachers Change. What will lead to change that most benefits student learning?.” Focus on Basics. Connecting Research and Practice, 2(c). http://www.ncsall.net/index.php?id=395
   Google Scholar
• Sashkin, M., and J. Egermeier. 1993. School Change Models and Processes: A Review and Synthesis of Research and Practice. Washington, DC: US. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Schunn Lab. 2012. Design Based Learning for STEM. Retrieved January 19th 2012 from http://www.lrdc.pitt.edu/schunn/research/design.html.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C., J. Hofer, M. Gillespie, M. Solomon, and K. Rowe. 2006. “How Teachers Change: a Study of Professional Development in Adult Education.” In Teacher Change and Development, edited by P. R. Villa, 11–155. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar