Drawing out critical thinking: testing the methodological value of drawing collaboratively

References

• Bain-King, G., and J. Moss. 2008. “Visuality and Reflexive Lines of Flight: Studying Boys’ Assemblages of Learning in a Year 8 Classroom.” In Researching Education: Visually – Digitally – Spatially, edited by J Moss, 53–86. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Barone, T., and E.W. Eisner. 2012. Arts Based Research. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bland, D. 2012. “Analysing Children's Drawings: Applied Imagination.” International Journal of Research and Method in Education 35 (2): 235–242. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2012.717432
   Google Scholar
• Butler-Kisber, L. 2010. Qualitative Inquiry: Thematic, Narrative and Arts-Informed Perspectives. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N.K., and Y.S. Lincoln. 2008. The Landscape of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. 2009. Belonging, being and becoming – The early years learning framework for Australia. Australian Government. Available at: http://foi.deewr.gov.au/system/files/doc/other/belonging_being_and_becoming_the_early_years_learning_framework_for_australia.pdf (accessed 12 April 2013)
   Google Scholar
• Derry, C. 2005. “Drawings as a Research Tool for Self-study: An Embodied Method of Exploring Memories of Childhood Bullying.” In Just who do we Think we are? Methodologies for Autobiography and Self-Study in Teaching, edited by C. Mitchell, S. Weber, and K. O'Reilly-Scanlon, 34–46. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dixon, M. 2008. “Images of Teacher and Student Positionings: Storylines from Speech Acts to Body Acts.” In Researching Education: Visually – Digitally – Spatially, edited by J. Moss, 87–106. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Eisner, E. 2006. “Does Arts-Based Research Have A Future?” Studies in Art Education 48 (1): 9–10.
   Google Scholar
• Emme, M.J. 2007. “Art-Based Research/Research-Based art: On Wonder and Rigor.” Canadian Review of Art Education, Research and Issues 34: 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, U. 2007. Managing Quality in Qualitative Research. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Franz, J. 2007. “Arts-Based Research in Design Education.” Qualitative Research Journal 7 (2): 22–35. doi: 10.3316/QRJ0702022
   Google Scholar
• Garner, S. 2008. “Towards a Critical Discourse in Drawing Research.” In Writing on Drawing: Essays on Drawing Practice and Research, edited by S. Garner, 15–26. Bristol: Intellect Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gildersleeve, R.E., A.M. Kuntz, and P.A. Pasque. 2010. “The Role of Critical Inquiry in (re)Constructing the Public Agenda for Higher Education: Confronting the Conservative Modernization of the Academy.” The Review of Higher Education 34 (1): 85–121. doi: 10.1353/rhe.2010.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosz, E. 1994. Volatile Bodies: Toward A Corporeal Feminism. Indianapolis: Indiana Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guillemin, M. 2004. “Understanding Illness: Using Drawings as Research Method.” Qualitative Health Research 14 (2): 272–289. doi: 10.1177/1049732303260445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HarperCollins. 2007. Collins Australian Dictionary, 9th ed. Glasgow: HarperCollins Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, B. 2002. “Children's Drawing, Self-Expression, Identity and the Imagination.” International Journal of Education in Arts and Design 21 (3): 209–219. doi: 10.1111/1468-5949.00318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, G. 2008. Thinking and Learning Through Drawing. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, R.L., and S. Springgay. 2008. “A/R/Tography as Practice-Based Research.” In Being with A/R/Tography, edited by S. Springgay, R.L. Irwin, C. Leggo, and P. Gouzouasis, xix–xxxiii. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kalmbach Phillips, D., G. Harris, M. Legard Larson, and K. Higgins. 2009. “Trying on-Being in-Becoming: Four Women's Journey(S) in Feminist Poststructural Theory.” Qualitative Inquiry 15 (9): 1455–1479. doi: 10.1177/1077800409347097
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindler, A.M., and B. Darras. 1998. “Culture and Development of Pictorial Repertoires.” Studies in Art Education 39 (2): 147–167. doi: 10.2307/1320466
   Google Scholar
• Knight, L. 2009. “Dreaming of Other Spaces: What do we Think About When we Draw?” Psychology of Education Review 33 (1): 10–17.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, L. 2009b. Mother and Child Sharing through Drawing: Intergenerational Collaborative Processes for Making Artworks. International Art in Early Childhood Research Journal 1, article 2. Available at http://www.artinearlychildhood.org/artec//
   Google Scholar
• Knight, L. 2012. Deleuzian Dolls: Subverting Identities through Intergenerational Collaborative Drawing. Tracey Journal May 2012. Available at: http://www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/sota/tracey
   Google Scholar
• Knight, L., F. McArdle, T. Cumming, J. Bone, L. Li, C. Peterken, and A. Ridgway. 2015. “Intergenerational Collaborative Drawing: A Research Method for Researching with/About Young Children.” Australasian Journal of Early Childhood 40 (4): 21–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, E.B. 2005. “Children's Drawing and Painting From A Cognitive Perspective: A Longitudinal Study.” Early Years 25 (3): 249–269. doi: 10.1080/09575140500251855
   Google Scholar
• Leitch, R. 2006. “Limitations of Language: Developing Arts-Based Creative Narratives in Stories of Teachers’ Identities.” Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice 12 (5): 549–569. doi: 10.1080/13540600600832270
   Google Scholar
• Levy, P. 2009. Method Meets art: Arts-Based Research Practice. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Literat, I. 2013. ““A Pencil for Your Thoughts”: Participatory Drawing as A Visual Research Method with Children and Youth.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 13 (12): 84–98.
   Google Scholar
• McNiff, S. 2008. “Art-Based Research.” In Handbook of the Arts in Qualitative Research: Perspectives, Methodologies, Examples, and Issues, edited by J.G. Knowles, and A.L. Cole, 29–40. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reason, P., and H. Bradbury. 2008. “Introduction.” In The Sage Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice, edited by P. Reason, and H. Bradbury, 1–13 2nd ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, L. 2000. “Skirting a Pleated Text: De-disciplining an Academic Life.” In Working the Ruins: Feminist Postructural Theory and Methods in Education, edited by E.A. St.Pierre, and W.S. Pillow, 153–164. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• St.Pierre, E.A. 2004. “Deleuzian Concepts for Education: The Subject Undone.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 36 (3): 283–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2004.00068.x
   Google Scholar
• Siraj-Blatchford, I. 2007. “Creativity, Communication and Collaboration: The Identification of Pedagogic Progression in Sustained Shared Thinking.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Research in Early Childhood Education 1 (2): 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Spencer, L., J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, and L. Dillon. 2003. Quality in Qualitative Evaluation: A Framework for Assessing Research Evidence. London: National Centre for Social Research. Accessed April 12, 2013. http://www.civilservice.gov.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/a_quality_framework_tcm6-7314.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan, G. 2008. “Afterword.” In Being with A/R/Tography, edited by S. Springgay, R.L. Irwin, C. Leggo, and P. Gouzouasis, 233–244. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Torrance, H. 2008. “Building Confidence in Qualitative Research: Engaging the Demands of Policy.” Qualitative Inquiry 14 (4): 507–527. doi: 10.1177/1077800407309380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, K., E. Hall, and P. Woolner. 2012. “Visual Methodology: Previously, now and in the Future.” International Journal of Research and Method in Education 35 (3): 223–226. doi: 10.1080/1743727X.2012.723923
   Google Scholar