Temporal settings in kindergarten: a lens to trace historical and current cultural formation ideals?

References

• Alanen, L. 2009. “Generational Order.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Childhood Studies, edited by J. Qvortrup, W. A. Corsaro, and M.-S. Honig, 159–174. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, M., and A.-M. Markström. 2011. “The Making of the Ordinary Child in Preschool.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 55 (5): 517–535. doi: 10.1080/00313831.2011.555919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berge, A. 2015. Barnehagen i en brytningstid: Tradisjoner i spill og praksiser under press i den store barnehagen. Universitetet i Stavanger: Stavanger.
   Google Scholar
• Berthen, D. 2007. Föberedelse för särskilthet: Särskolans pedagogiska arbete i ett verksamhetsteoretisk perspektiv. Karlstad: Estetisk-filosofisk fakultet.
   Google Scholar
• Birkeland, Å. 2012. “Barnehagens vegger som danningsagenter.” In Barnehagen som danningsarena, edited by E. E. Ødegaard, 157–180. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Birkeland, Å. 2013a. “Kindergarten Teachers’ Educational Ideals – Tensions and Contradictions.” Cultural-Historical Psychology 8 (2): 45–53.
   Google Scholar
• Birkeland, Å. 2013b. “Research Dilemmas Associated with Photo Elicitation in Comparative Early Childhood Education Research.” Research in Comparative and International Education 8 (4): 455–467. doi: 10.2304/rcie.2013.8.4.455
   Google Scholar
• Blue, S. 2017. “Institutional Rhythms: Combining Practice Theory and Rhythmanalysis to Conceptualise Processes of Institutionalisation.” Time & Society. doi:10.1177/0961463X17702165.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiklin, S., M. Hedegaard, and U. Juul Jensen. 1999. Activity Theory and Social Practice: Cultural Historical Approaches. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emilson, A. 2008. Det önskvärda barnet: fostran uttryckt i vardagliga kommunikationshandlingar mellan lärare och barn i förskolan. Vol. 268. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
   Google Scholar
• Fleer, M., M. Hedegaard, J. Bang, and P. Hviid. 2008. Studying Children: A Cultural-Historical Approach. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fleer, M., Hedegaard, M., & Tudge, J. 2009. Childhood Studies and the Impact of Globalization: Policies and Practices at Global and Local Levels. Vol. 2009. London: Nichols.
   Google Scholar
• Franck, K. 2014. Constructions of Children In-Between Normality and Deviance in Norwegian Day-care Centres. (PhD Article), Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim. (36).
   Google Scholar
• Gao, H., L. Huo, et al. 2017. “The Early Learning and Development Guidelines in China: Retrospective and Prospective View.” In Contemporary Issues and Challenge in Early Childhood Education in the Asia-Pacific Region, 181–197. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gilliam, L., E. Gulløv, D. Bach, and K. F. Olwig. 2015. Siviliserende institusjoner: om idealer og distinksjoner i oppdragelse. Bergen: Fagbokforl.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, L. 2000. Modernisation and Marketisation: The Chinese Kindergarten in the 1990s. (nr 56), Pedagogiska institutionen, Umeå: Umeå universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Gulløv, E., and S. Højlund. 2003. Feltarbejde blandt børn: metodologi og etik i etnografisk børneforskning. København: Gyldendal.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. H. 2014. Educating the Chinese Individual: Life in a Rural Boarding School. Vancouver: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. H., and R. Svarverud. 2010. IChina: The Rise of the Individual in Modern Chinese Society, Vol. 45. Copenhagen: SIAS.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, B. J., M. G. Jones, and O. Figueras. 2005. “More Than Clocks and Calendars: The Construction of Timekeepers by Eleven Kindergarten Children in Mexico and the United States.” Journal of Research in Childhood Education 19 (3): 223. doi:10.1080/02568540509595067.
   Google Scholar
• Hedegaard, M. 2008. “Children's Development from a Cultural-Historical Approach: Children’s Activity in Everyday Local Settings as Foundation for Their Development.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 16 (1): 64–82. doi: 10.1080/10749030802477374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedegaard, M., A. Edwards, and M. Fleer. 2012. Motives in Children’s Development: Cultural-Historical Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, B. Y., Y. Zhou, and K. Li. 2014. “Pinpointing Chinese Early Childhood Teachers’ Professional Development Needs Through Self-Evaluation and External Observation of Classroom Quality.” Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education 35 (1): 54–78. doi:10.1080/10901027.2013.874386.
   Google Scholar
• Hung, C.-T. 2014. “Turning a Chinese Kid Red: Kindergartens in the Early People’s Republic.” Journal of Contemporary China 23 (89): 841–863. doi: 10.1080/10670564.2014.882544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo, L., S. B. Neuman, and A. Nanakida. 2015. Early Childhood Education in Three Cultures: China, Japan and the United States. Berlin Heidelberg: Imprint: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• James, A., C. Jenks, and A. Prout. 1998. Theorizing Childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, B., J. Kampmann, and H. Brembeck. 2004. Beyond the Competent Child: Exploring Contemporary Childhoods in the Nordic Welfare Societies. Fredriksberg: Roskilde University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kjørholt, A. T. 2010. Barnehagen som lekegrind for autonomi og valgfrihet? AnneTrine Kjørholt. In Barn som samfunnsborgere: til barnets beste?, 152–171. Oslo: Universitetsforl.
   Google Scholar
• Kjørholt, A. T., and M. Seland. 2012. “Kindergarten as a Bazaar: Freedom of Choice and New Forms of Regulation.” In The Modern Child and the Flexible Labour Market: Early Childhood Education and Care, 168–185. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kunnskapsdepartementet. 2011. Rammeplan for barnehagens innhold og oppgaver. Oslo: Kunnskapsdepartementet.
   Google Scholar
• Li, M., J. Fox, S. Grieshaber, and SpringerLink. 2017. Contemporary Issues and Challenge in Early Childhood Education in the Asia-Pacific Region. Singapore: Imprint: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lyså, I. M. 2012. “Danningsbegrepet som analytisk begrep i lys av nyere barndomssosiologi.” In Barnehagen som Danningsarena, edited by E. E. Ødegaard, 49–70. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Markström, A.-M. 2005. Förskolan som normaliseringspraktik: en etnografisk studie, Vol. 1. Linköping: the Department.
   Google Scholar
• MOE. 2001. Guidelines for Kindergarten Education (Trial Basis). Beijing: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• MOE. 2012. Early Learning and Development Guidelines for Children Aged 3 to 6 Years. Beijing.
   Google Scholar
• Nordin-Hultman, E. 2004. Pedagogiska miljöer och barns subjektskapande. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet.
   Google Scholar
• Ødegaard, E. E., and T Krüger. 2012. “Studier av barnehagen som danningsarena – sosialepistemologiske perspektiver.” In Barnehagen som danningsarena, edited by E. E. Ødegaard, 19–47. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Palludan, C. 2005. Børnehaven gør en forskel. København: Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitets Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Qi, X., and E. C. Melhuish. 2017. “Early Childhood Education and Care in China: History, Current Trends and Challenges.” Early Years 37 (3): 268–284. doi:10.1080/09575146.2016.1236780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R. 2006. “The Time of Activity.” Continental Philosophy Review 39 (2): 155–182. doi:10.1007/s11007-006-9026-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seland, M. 2009. Det moderne barn og den fleksible barnehagen: en etnografisk studie av barnehagens hverdagsliv i lys avnyere diskurser og kommunal virkelighet. (2009:258), Norges teknisk-naturvitenskapelige universitet, Trondheim.
   Google Scholar
• Seland, M. 2011. “Individet og fellesskapet: valgfrihet og medvirkning som konkurrerende praksiser i dagens barnehage.” In Barnehagens grunnsteiner: formålet med barnehagen, edited by V. Glaser, 162–175. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Stetsenko, A. 2005. “Activity as Object-Related: Resolving the Dichotomy of Individual and Collective Planes of Activity.” Mind, Culture, and Activity 12 (1): 70–88. doi: 10.1207/s15327884mca1201_6
   Google Scholar
• Stetsenko, A. 2008. “From Relational Ontology to Transformative Activist Stance on Development and Learning: Expanding Vygotsky’s (CHAT) Project.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 3: 471–491. doi: 10.1007/s11422-008-9111-3
   Google Scholar
• Stetsenko, A. 2009. “Vygotsky and the Conceptual Revolution.” In World Yearbook of Education 2009. Childhood Studies and the Impact of Globalization: Policies and Practices at Global and Local Levels, edited by M. Fleer, M. Hedegaard, and J. Tudge, 125–141. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sutterby, J. A., and J. Sutterby. 2012. Advances in Early Education & Day Care: Early Education in a Global Context. Bingley, GB: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Tillman, M. M. 2013. A Review of Precocious Politics: Preschool Education and Child Protection in China. (PhD). Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, J. J., Y. Hsueh, and M. Karasawa. 2009. Preschool in Three Cultures Revisited: China, Japan and the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, Y. 2009. The Individualization of Chinese Society, Vol. 77. London: Athlone Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, Y. 2010. “Introduction: Conflicting Images of the Individual and Contested Process of Individualization.” In I China: The Rise of the Individual in Modern Chinese Society, edited by M. H. Hansen, and R. Svarverud, 1–38. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, J., and J. Zhang. 2008. “Contemporary Trends and Developments in Early Childhood Education in China.” Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development 28 (2): 173–182. doi: 10.1080/09575140802163584
   Google Scholar