The community with the bad brain? – neuroscience as discourse in early childhood intervention

References

• Allen, G. 2011. Early Intervention: the Next Steps. An Independent Report to Her Majesty's Government. London: Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• Aronsson, L., and L. Taguchi. 2018. “Mapping a Collaborative Cartography of the Encounters Between the Neurosciences and Early Childhood Education Practices.” Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education 39 (2): 242–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1998. “General Introduction.” In Critical Realism: Essential Readings, edited by M. Archer, R. Bhaskar, A. Collier, T. Lawson, and A. Norrie, ix–xxiv. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice. CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1993. Sociology in Question, R. Nice (trans). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1998. Acts of Resistance: Against the New Myths of Our Time. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 2004. Science of Science and Reflexivity. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 2006. “The Forms of Capital.” In Education, Globalisation and Social Change, edited by H. Lauder, P. Brown, J. Dillabouough, and A. H. Haysley, 105–119. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P., and L. Wacquant. 1992. An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Bruer, J. T. 2011. Special Briefing, CPCS Event, Monitoring Parents: Science, Evidence, Experts and the New Parenting Culture. Canterbury: University of Kent.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 1997. Excitable Speech: A Politics of the Performative. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, C. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chouliaraki, L., and N. Fairclough. 1999. Discourse in Late Modernity – Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, R., V. Gillies, and N. Horsley. 2015. “Brain Science and Early Years Policy: Hopeful Ethos or ‘Cruel Optimism’?” Critical Social Policy 35 (2): 167–187. doi: 10.1177/0261018315574020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1980. “Questions of Method.” In Michel Foucault: Power. Vol. 3., edited by J. D. Faubion, 223–238. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2002. Power: The Essential Works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984: v.3. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Gillies, V., R. Edwards, and N. Horsley. 2017. Challenging the Politics of Early Intervention : Who’s “Saving” Children and Why. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knox, C. 2016. “Northern Ireland: Where is the Peace Dividend?” Policy & Politics 44 (3): 485–503. doi: 10.1332/030557314X14042296270069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, A. 1999. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Issues in Educational Research, edited by J. P. Keeves and G. Lakomski. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macvarish, J., E. Lee, and P. Lowe. 2015. “Neuroscience and Family Policy: What Becomes of the Parent?” Critical Social Policy 35 (2): 248–269. doi: 10.1177/0261018315574019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggio, R. 2018. “Neuro-Discourse: Neuro-Enthusiasm or Neuro-Scepticism? Neuro-Ethics (?)” [Blog Post] Wellcome Centre Ethics and Humanities 2 August. Accessed January 8, 2019. https://www.weh.ox.ac.uk/news/neuro-discourse-neuro-enthusiasm-or-neuro-scepticism-neuro-ethics.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. 1988. Case study Research in Education: A Qualitative Approach.
   Google Scholar
• Nash, R. 2005. “Explanation and Quantification in Educational Research: The Arguments of Critical and Scientific Realism.” British Educational Research Journal 31 (2): 185–204. doi: 10.1080/0141192052000340206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawson, R., and N. Tilley. 1997. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Perry, B. 2002. “Childhood Experience and the Expression of Genetic Potential: What Childhood Neglect Tells us about Nature and Nurture.” Brain and Mind 3: 79–100. doi: 10.1023/A:1016557824657
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D. 2007. “Critical Realism and Statistical Methods—a Response to Nash.” British Educational Research Journal 33 (2): 141–154. doi: 10.1080/01411920701208167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shonkhoff, J., and D. Phillips. 2000. From Neurons to Neighbourhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development. Washington: National Research Council Committee on Integrating the Science of Early Childhood Development, National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenbroeck, M. 2014. “The Brainification of Early Childhood Education and Other Challenges to Academic Rigour.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 22 (1): 1–3. doi: 10.1080/1350293X.2013.868206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenbroeck, M., Penn, H., De Vos, J., Mariett Olsson, L., and Fias, W., eds. 2017. Constructions of Neuroscience in Early Childhood Education. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar