The effect of three interactive reading approaches on language ability: an exploratory study in early childhood education

References

• Adan-Dirks, R. 2012. “Assessing Vocabulary Development.” In Developmental Education for Young Children: Concept Practice and Implementation, edited by B. van Oers, 87–104. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Birbili, M. 2006. “Mapping Knowledge: Concept Maps in Early Childhood Education.” Early Childhood Research and Practice 8 (2). http://ecrp.uiuc.edu/v8n2/birbili.html.
   Google Scholar
• Boerma, I., F. van der Wilt, R. Bouwer, M. van der Schoot, and C. van der Veen. in preparation. “Mind mapping during interactive book reading in early childhood classrooms: Does it support young children’s language abilities?”
   Google Scholar
• Bus, A. G., M. H. Van IJzendoorn, and A. D. Pellegrini. 1995. “Joint Book Reading Makes for Success in Learning to Read: A Meta-Analysis on Intergenerational Transmission of Literacy.” Review of Educational Research 65 (1): 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buzan, T. 2003. Mind Maps for Kids: An Introduction. New York, NY: Harpercollins Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, K., J. V. Oakhill, and C. Elbro. 2003. “The Ability to Learn New Word Meanings from Context by School-age Children with and Without Language Comprehension Difficulties.” Journal of Child Language 30 (3): 681–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, R. N., and J. R. Levin. 2002. “Pictorial Illustrations Still Improve Students’ Learning from Text.” Educational Psychology Review 14 (1): 5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti-Ramsden, G., and K. Durkin. 2012. “Language Development and Assessment in the Preschool Period.” Neuropsychology Review 22 (4): 384–401. doi:10.1007/s11065-012-9208-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darch, C., and R. C. Eaves. 1986. “Visual Displays to Increase Comprehension of High School Learning-Disabled Students.” The Journal of Special Education 20 (3): 309–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Koning, B. B., and M. van der Schoot. 2013. “Becoming Part of the Story! Refueling the Interest in Visualization Strategies for Reading Comprehension.” Educational Psychology Review 25 (2): 261–287. doi:10.1007/s10648-013-9222-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeTemple, J., and C. E. Snow. 2003. “Learning Words from Books.” In On Reading Books to Children: Parents and Teachers, edited by A. van Kleeck, S. A. Stahl, and E. B. Bauer, 16–36. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Driessen, G. 2016. “Zoals de Ouden Zongen, Piepen de Jongen? De Taal van Ouders en Taal en Taalvaardigheid van hun Kinderen [The Language of Parents and Language Profiency of Their Children].” Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics 5 (2): 145–159. doi:10.1075/dujal.5.2.03dri.
   Google Scholar
• Droop, M., S. Peters, C. Aarnoutse, and L. Verhoeven. 2005. “Effecten van Stimulering van Beginnende Geletterdheid in Groep 2 [Effects of Early Language Teaching in Preschool].” Pedagogische Studien 82 (2): 160–180.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, S., and N. Cooper. 2010. “Mind Mapping as a Teaching Resource.” The Clinical Teacher 7 (4): 236–239.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elsäcker, W., A. van der Beek, J. Hillen, and S. Peters. 2009. De taallijn: Interactief taalonderwijs in groep 1 en 2 [Interactive Language Teaching in Preschools]. Nijmegen, the Netherlands: Expertisecentrum Nederlands.
   Google Scholar
• Farrand, P., F. Hussain, and E. Hennessy. 2002. “The Efficacy of the Mind Map Study Technique.” Medical Education 36 (5): 426–431. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2923.2002.01205.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freed, J. 2017. “Assessing School-Aged Children’s Inference-Making: The Effect of Story Test Format in Listening Comprehension.” International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 52 (1): 95–105. doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghonem-Woets, K. 2008. Elke dag boekendag! Verslag van een onderzoek naar het voorlezen van prentenboeken in groep 1 en 2. [Research Report of Book Reading in Preschools]. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Stichting Lezen.
   Google Scholar
• Gosen, M. 2012. “Tracing Learning in Interaction. An Analysis of Shared Reading of Picture Books at Kindergarten.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, D. P., and M. G. Ahrens. 1988. “Vocabulary Simplification for Children: A Special Case of ‘Motherese’?” Journal of Child Language 15 (02): 395–410.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henderson, L., A. Weighall, and G. Gaskell. 2013. “Learning New Vocabulary During Childhood: Effects of Semantic Training on Lexical Consolidation and Integration.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 116 (3): 572–592. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofma, R., and C. van der Veen. 2015. “Mindmappen met Kleuters. Je Kunt er Niet Vroeg Genoeg mee Beginnen! [Mind Mapping with Preschoolers. You can’t Start Early Enough].” MeerTaal 2 (2): 19–21.
   Google Scholar
• Ilter, I. 2016. “The Power of Graphic Organizers: Effects on Students’ Word-Learning and Achievement Emotions in Social Studies.” Australian Journal of Teacher Education 41 (1): 42–64. doi: 10.14221/ajte.2016v41n1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isbell, R. 2004. “The Effects of Storytelling and Story Reading on the Oral Language Complexity and Story Comprehension of Young Children.” Early Childhood Education Journal 32 (3): 157–163. doi: 10.1023/B:ECEJ.0000048967.94189.a3
   Google Scholar
• Kim, A.-H., S. Vaughn, J. Wanzek, and S. Wei. 2004. “Graphic Organizers and Their Effects on the Reading Comprehension of Students with LD.” Journal of Learning Disabilities 37 (2): 105–118. doi:10.1177/00222194040370020201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lansink, N. 2009. LOVS Taal voor kleuters groep 1 en 2 [Student Monitoring System Language for Preschoolers]. Arnhem, the Netherlands: Cito.
   Google Scholar
• Leathers, P. 2013. The Black Rabbit. Sommerville, MA: Candlewick Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lever, R., and M. Sénéchal. 2011. “Discussing Stories: On How a Dialogic Reading Intervention Improves Kindergartners’ Oral Narrative Construction.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 108 (1): 1–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lonigan, C. J., and G. J. Whitehurst. 1998. “Relative Efficacy of Parent and Teacher Involvement in a Shared-Reading Intervention for Preschool Children from Low-Income Backgrounds.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 13 (2): 263–290. doi: 10.1016/S0885-2006(99)80038-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merchie, E., and H. Van Keer. 2016. “Mind Mapping as a Meta-Learning Strategy: Stimulating pre-Adolescents’ Text-Learning Strategies and Performance?” Contemporary Educational Psychology 46: 128–147. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2016.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaels, S., and C. B. Cazden. 1986. “Teacher/Child Collaboration as Oral Preparation for Literacy.” In The Acquisition of Literacy Ethnographic Perspectives, edited by B. B. Schieffelin, and P. Gilmore, 132–154. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Milburn, T. F., L. Girolametto, E. Weitzman, and J. Greenberg. 2014. “Enhancing Preschool Educators’ Ability to Facilitate Conversations During Shared Book Reading.” Journal of Early Childhood Literacy 14 (1): 105–140. doi: 10.1177/1468798413478261
   Google Scholar
• Mol, S. E., and A. G. Bus. 2011. “To Read or not to Read: A Meta-Analysis of Print Exposure from Infancy to Early Adulthood.” Psychological Bulletin 137 (2): 267–296. doi: 10.1037/a0021890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, S. E., A. G. Bus, and M. T. de Jong. 2009. “Interactive Book Reading in Early Education: A Tool to Stimulate Print Knowledge as Well as Oral Language.” Review of Educational Research 79 (2): 979–1007. doi: 10.3102/0034654309332561
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, S. E., A. G. Bus, M. T. de Jong, and D. J. Smeets. 2008. “Added Value of Dialogic Parent–Child Book Readings: A Meta-Analysis.” Early Education and Development 19 (1): 7–26. doi: 10.1080/10409280701838603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill, D. K., M. J. Pearce, and J. L. Pick. 2004. “Preschool Children’s Narratives and Performance on the Peabody Individualized Achievement Test – Revised: Evidence of a Relation between Early Narrative and Later Mathematical Ability.” First Language 24: 149–183. doi: 10.1177/0142723704043529
   Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. 1991. “Dual Coding Theory: Retrospect and Current Status.” Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie 45 (3): 255–287. doi: 10.1037/h0084295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivers, W. M. 1987. Interactive Language Teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlichting, L. 2005. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III NL. Handleiding. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Harcourt Test Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Sénéchal, M., and J. A. LeFevre. 2002. “Parental Involvement in the Development of Children’s Reading Skill: A Five-Year Longitudinal Study.” Child Development 73 (2): 445–460. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E. 2008. “Perspectives on Evidence-Based Research in Education—What Works? Issues in Synthesizing Educational Program Evaluations.” Educational Researcher 37 (1): 5–14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X08314117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, C. 2002. Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. E., M. V. Porche, P. O. Tabors, and S. R. Harris. 2007. Is Literacy Enough? Pathways to Academic Success. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Sulzby, E. 1985. “Children’s Emergent Reading of Favorite Storybooks: A Developmental Study.” Reading Research Quarterly 20 (4): 458–481. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.20.4.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sulzby, E., and W. H. Teale. 2003. “The Development of the Young Child and the Emergence of Literacy.” In Handbook of Research on Teaching the English Language Arts, edited by J. Flood, D. Lapp, J. Squire, and J. Jensen, 300–313. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Teunissen, J. M. F. B. G., and H. I. Hacquebord. 2002. Onderwijs met taalkwaliteit: kwaliteitskenmerken voor effectief taalonderwijs binnen onderwijskansenbeleid. [Quality Criteria for Effective Language Teaching]. ‘s-Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands: KPC Groep.
   Google Scholar
• van der Veen, C., M. Dobber, and B. van Oers. 2016. “Implementing Dynamic Assessment of Vocabulary Development as a Trialogical Learning Process: A Practice of Teacher Support in Primary Education Schools.” Language Assessment Quarterly 13 (4): 329–340. doi: 10.1080/15434303.2016.1235577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Wilt, F., C. van Kruistum, C. van der Veen, and B. van Oers. 2016. “Gender Differences in the Relationship between Oral Communicative Competence and Peer Rejection: An Exploratory Study in Early Childhood Education.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 25 (2): 807–817. doi: 10.1080/1350293X.2015.1073507
   Google Scholar
• Van der Wilt, F., C. van der Veen, C. van Kruistum, and B. van Oers. 2018. “Why can’t I join? Peer Rejection in Early Childhood Education and the Role of Oral Communicative Competence.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 54: 247–254. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Oers, B., and D. Duijkers. 2013. “Teaching in a Play-Based Curriculum: Theory, Practice and Evidence of Developmental Education for Young Children.” Journal of Curriculum Studies 45 (4): 511–534. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2011.637182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Veen, K., R. Zwart, and J. Meirink. 2012. “What Makes Teacher Professional Development Effective? A Literature Review.” In Teacher Learning That Matters: International Perspectives, edited by M. Kooy, and K. van Veen, 23–41. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vekiri, I. 2002. “What is the Value of Graphical Displays in Learning?” Educational Psychology Review 14 (3): 261–312. doi: 10.1023/A:1016064429161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhallen, M. 2010. “Low-Income Immigrant Pupils Learning Vocabulary Through Digital Picture Storybooks.” Journal of Educational Psychology 102 (1): 54–61. doi: 10.1037/a0017133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, L., and A. Vermeer. 2006. Verantwoording Taaltoets Alle Kinderen (TAK) [Justification Language Test for All Children]. Arnhem, the Netherlands: Centraal Instituut voor Toetsontwikkeling.
   Google Scholar
• Zucker, T., A. Ward, and L. Justice. 2009. “Print Referencing during Read-Alouds: A Technique for Increasing Emergent Readers’ Print Knowledge.” The Reading Teacher 63 (1): 62–72. doi: 10.1598/RT.63.1.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar