1,010
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Gender equality in five- to six-year-old preschoolers’ early competences in science do not protect schoolgirls from gender stereotypes

ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon

References

  • Acar, Ömer, Ayşe Büber, and Zehra Tola. 2015. “The Effect of Gender and Socio-Economic Status of Students on Their Physics Conceptual Knowledge, Scientific Reasoning, and Nature of Science Understanding.” International Conference on New Horizons in Education, INTE, June 25–27, 2014, Paris, 174: 2753–2756, February. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.962.
  • Arulampalam, Wiji, Alison L. Booth, and Mark L. Bryan. 2007. “Is There a Glass Ceiling over Europe? Exploring the Gender Pay Gap Across the Wage Distribution.” ILR Review 60 (2): 163–186.
  • Ashcraft, Paul G. 2006. “A Comparison of Student Understanding of Seasons Using Inquiry and Didactic Teaching Methods.” AIP Conference Proceedings 818 (1): 85–88. doi:10.1063/1.2177029.
  • Aubrecht, Gordon J. 2000. “Seasons Reasons.” The Science Teacher 67 (6): 70.
  • Baker, Erin R., Marie S. Tisak, and John Tisak. 2016. “What Can Boys and Girls Do? Preschoolers’ Perspectives Regarding Gender Roles Across Domains of Behavior.” Social Psychology of Education 19 (1): 23–39.
  • Bakker, Merel, Joke Torbeyns, Nore Wijns, Lieven Verschaffel, and Bert De Smedt. 2019. “Gender Equality in 4- to 5-Year-Old Preschoolers’ Early Numerical Competencies.” Developmental Science 22 (1): e12718. doi:10.1111/desc.12718.
  • Bandura, Albert. 2001. “Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective.” Annual Review of Psychology 52 (1): 1–26.
  • Bandura, Albert, Claudio Barbaranelli, Gian Vittorio Caprara, and Concetta Pastorelli. 2001. “Self-Efficacy Beliefs as Shapers of Children’s Aspirations and Career Trajectories.” Child Development 72 (1): 187–206. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00273.
  • Behr, Andreas, and Katja Theune. 2018. “The Gender Pay Gap at Labour Market Entrance: Evidence from Germany.” International Labour Review 157 (1): 83–100. doi:10.1111/ilr.12037.
  • Bian, Lin, Sarah-Jane Leslie, and Andrei Cimpian. 2017. “Gender Stereotypes About Intellectual Ability Emerge Early and Influence Children’s Interests.” Science 355 (6323): 389–391.
  • Binns, Jane C., and Robert C. Branch. 1995. Gender Stereotyped Computer Clip-Art Images as an Implicit Influence in Instructional Message Design. Blacksburg, VA: ERIC.
  • Blaise, Mindy. 2012. Playing It Straight: Uncovering Gender Discourse in the Early Childhood Classroom. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Blakemore, Judith E. Owen. 2003. “Children’s Beliefs About Violating Gender Norms: Boys Shouldn’t Look Like Girls, and Girls Shouldn’t Act Like Boys.” Sex Roles 48 (9): 411–419. doi:10.1023/A:1023574427720.
  • Blotnicky, Karen A., Tamara Franz-Odendaal, Frederick French, and Phillip Joy. 2018. “A Study of the Correlation Between STEM Career Knowledge, Mathematics Self-Efficacy, Career Interests, and Career Activities on the Likelihood of Pursuing a STEM Career among Middle School Students.” International Journal of STEM Education 5 (1): 22. doi:10.1186/s40594-018-0118-3.
  • Brandes, Holger, Markus Andrä, Wenke Röseler, and Petra Schneider-Andrich. 2015. “Does Gender Make a Difference? Results from the German “Tandem Study” on the Pedagogical Activity of Female and Male ECE Workers.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 23 (3): 315–327. doi:10.1080/1350293X.2015.1043806.
  • Bristow, Becky. 2000. “The Effects of Hands-on Instruction on 6th Grade Student Understanding of Electricity and Magnetism … .” Texas Woman’s University.
  • Butcher, Frank. 1987. “Circular Motion Studies with a Toy Airplane.” The Physics Teacher 25 (9): 572–573. doi:10.1119/1.2342383.
  • Callaway, Rick, Rex Fuller, and Richard Schoenberger. 1996. “Gender Differences in Employment and Starting Salaries of Business Majors During the 1980s: The Impact of College-Acquired Characteristics.” Research in Higher Education 37 (5): 599–614.
  • Cardador, M. Teresa, Rodica Ioana Damian, and Justin P. Wiegand. 2020. “Does More Mean Less? Interest Surplus and the Gender Gap in STEM Careers.” Journal of Career Assessment 29 (1): 76–97.
  • Care, Esther, Jan Deans, and Robert Brown. 2007. “The Realism and Sex Type of Four- to Five-Year-Old Children’s Occupational Aspirations.” Journal of Early Childhood Research 5 (2): 155–168. doi:10.1177/1476718X07076681.
  • Cheema, Jehanzeb R. 2019. “Cross-Country Gender DIF in PISA Science Literacy Items.” European Journal of Developmental Psychology 16 (2): 152–166. doi:10.1080/17405629.2017.1358607.
  • Cheryan, Sapna, Sianna A. Ziegler, Amanda K. Montoya, and Lily Jiang. 2017. “Why Are Some STEM Fields More Gender Balanced Than Others?” Psychological Bulletin 143 (1): 1–35. doi:10.1037/bul0000052.
  • Cimpian, Joseph R., Sarah T. Lubienski, Jennifer D. Timmer, Martha B. Makowski, and Emily K. Miller. 2016. “Have Gender Gaps in Math Closed? Achievement, Teacher Perceptions, and Learning Behaviors Across Two ECLS-K Cohorts.” AERA Open 2 (4): 1–19.
  • Cohen, Leslie B., Leslie J. Rundell, Barbara A. Spellman, and Cara H. Cashon. 1999. “Infants’ Perception of Causal Chains.” Psychological Science 10 (5): 412–418.
  • Coyne, Sarah M., Jennifer Ruh Linder, Eric E. Rasmussen, David A. Nelson, and Victoria Birkbeck. 2016. “Pretty as a Princess: Longitudinal Effects of Engagement With Disney Princesses on Gender Stereotypes, Body Esteem, and Prosocial Behavior in Children.” Child Development 87 (6): 1909–1925. doi:10.1111/cdev.12569.
  • Croft, Alyssa, Toni Schmader, and Katharina Block. 2015. “An Underexamined Inequality: Cultural and Psychological Barriers to Men’s Engagement With Communal Roles.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 19 (4): 343–370. doi:10.1177/1088868314564789.
  • Dam-o, Punsiri, Joanna Gondek, Michał Karbowiak, and Tadeusz Wibig. 2018. “Observation of the Effect of Gender on Children’s Concept of Motion; Sustainability Issue.” Sustainability 10 (9): 3076.
  • Dasgupta, Nilanjana, and Jane G. Stout. 2014. “Girls and Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics: STEMing the Tide and Broadening Participation in STEM Careers.” Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (1): 21–29. doi:10.1177/2372732214549471.
  • DeJarnette, Nancy. 2012. “America’s Children: Providing Early Exposure to STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Math) Initiatives.” Education 133 (1): 77–84.
  • del Río, M. Francisca, and Katherine Strasser. 2013. “Preschool Children’s Beliefs About Gender Differences in Academic Skills.” Sex Roles 68 (3): 231–238.
  • DeWitt, Jennifer, Jonathan Osborne, Louise Archer, Justin Dillon, Beatrice Willis, and Billy Wong. 2013. “Young Children’s Aspirations in Science: The Unequivocal, the Uncertain and the Unthinkable.” International Journal of Science Education 35 (6): 1037–1063. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.608197.
  • Docktor, Jennifer, and Kenneth Heller. 2008. “Gender Differences in Both Force Concept Inventory and Introductory Physics Performance.” AIP Conference Proceedings 1064 (1): 15–18. doi:10.1063/1.3021243.
  • Dodge, Diane Trister. 1988. The Creative Curriculum for Early Childhood. Washington, DC: ERIC.
  • Donaldson, Stewart I., Dale E. Berger, and Kathy Pezdek. 2012. Applied Psychology: New Frontiers and Rewarding Careers. Mahwah: Psychology Press.
  • Donnelly, Robyn, Cait MacPhee, and Simon Bates. 2012. “The Performance Gender Gap in Undergraduate Physics.” In Proceedings of the HEA STEM Learning and Teaching Conference.
  • Eccles, Jacquelynne S. 1994. “Understanding Women’s Educational And Occupational Choices: Applying the Eccles et al. Model of Achievement-Related Choices.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 18 (4): 585–609. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01049.x.
  • Eccles, Jacquelynne, Allan Wigfield, Rena D. Harold, and Phyllis Blumenfeld. 1993. “Age and Gender Differences in Children’s Self- and Task Perceptions During Elementary School.” Child Development 64 (3): 830–847. doi:10.2307/1131221.
  • Eckstein, Shulamith G., and Michal Shemesh. 1993. “Development of Children’s Ideas on Motion: Impetus, the Straight-Down Belief and the Law of Support.” School Science and Mathematics 93 (6): 299–305. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1993.tb12250.x.
  • Ehrtmann, Lisa, Ilka Wolter, and Bettina Hannover. 2019. “The Interrelatedness of Gender-Stereotypical Interest Profiles and Students’ Gender-Role Orientation, Gender, and Reasoning Abilities.” Frontiers in Psychology 10 (June): 1402–1402. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01402.
  • Eshach, Haim, and Michael N. Fried. 2005. “Should Science Be Taught in Early Childhood?” Journal of Science Education and Technology 14 (3): 315–336. doi:10.1007/s10956-005-7198-9.
  • Fırat, Mehmet. 2017. “How Real and Model Visuals Affect the Test Performance of Elementary Students.” Computers in Human Behavior 71 (June): 258–265. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.021.
  • Gerstner, Sabine, and Franz X. Bogner. 2010. “Cognitive Achievement and Motivation in Hands-on and Teacher-Centred Science Classes: Does an Additional Hands-on Consolidation Phase (Concept Mapping) Optimise Cognitive Learning at Work Stations?” International Journal of Science Education 32 (7): 849–870. doi:10.1080/09500690902803604.
  • Gibbs, Benjamin G. 2010. “Reversing Fortunes or Content Change? Gender Gaps in Math-Related Skill Throughout Childhood.” Social Science Research 39 (4): 540–569. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.02.005.
  • Gobert, Janice D. 2000. “A Typology of Causal Models for Plate Tectonics: Inferential Power and Barriers to Understanding.” International Journal of Science Education 22 (9): 937–977.
  • Göksun, Tilbe, Nathan R. George, Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, and Roberta M. Golinkoff. 2013. “Forces and Motion: How Young Children Understand Causal Events.” Child Development 84 (4): 1285–1295. doi:10.1111/cdev.12035.
  • Gonzalez, Michelle, and Christine Fryer. 2014. “A Collaborative Initiative: STEM and Universally Designed Curriculum for At-Risk Preschoolers.” National Teacher Education Journal 7 (3): 13–21.
  • Graham, Charles R. 2006. “Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions.” In Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs, edited by C. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham, 3–21. San Francisco: Pfeiffer Publishing. doi:10.2307/4022859.
  • Granger, Kristen L., Laura D. Hanish, Olga Kornienko, and Robert H. Bradley. 2017. “Preschool Teachers’ Facilitation of Gender-Typed and Gender- Neutral Activities During Free Play.” Sex Roles 76 (7): 498–510. doi:10.1007/s11199-016-0675-1.
  • Günther-Hanssen, Anna, Anna T. Danielsson, and Kristina Andersson. 2020. “How Does Gendering Matter in Preschool Science.” Gender and Education 32 (5): 608–625. doi:10.1080/09540253.2019.1632809.
  • Haladyna, Thomas M., Steven M. Downing, and Michael C. Rodriguez. 2002. “A Review of Multiple-Choice Item-Writing Guidelines for Classroom Assessment.” Applied Measurement in Education 15 (3): 309–333.
  • Halloun, Ibrahim, R. R. Hake, E. P. Mosca, and D. Hestenes. 1995. “Force Concept Inventory.” The Test Is Available, Password Protected, at http://modeling.la.asu.edu/R&E/Research.html.
  • Harris, Justin, Nathan R. George, Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, and Nora S. Newcombe. 2018. “Where Will It Go? How Children and Adults Reason About Force and Motion.” Cognitive Development 45 (January): 113–124. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.01.002.
  • Häussler, Peter, and Lore Hoffmann. 2002. “An Intervention Study to Enhance Girls’ Interest, Self-Concept, and Achievement in Physics Classes.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (9): 870–888. doi:10.1002/tea.10048.
  • Hazari, Zahra, Robert H. Tai, and Philip M. Sadler. 2007. “Gender Differences in Introductory University Physics Performance: The Influence of High School Physics Preparation and Affective Factors.” Science Education 91 (6): 847–876. doi:10.1002/sce.20223.
  • Helwig, Andrew A. 1998. “Developmental and Sex Differences in Workers’ Functions of Occupational Aspirations of a Longitudinal Sample of Elementary School Children.” Psychological Reports 82 ((3): 915–921. doi:10.2466/pr0.1998.82.3.915.
  • Henderson, Rachel, John Stewart, and Adrienne Traxler. 2019. “Partitioning the Gender Gap in Physics Conceptual Inventories: Force Concept Inventory, Force and Motion Conceptual Evaluation, and Conceptual Survey of Electricity and Magnetism.” Physical Review Physics Education Research 15 (1): 010131. doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010131.
  • Heyman, Gail D., and Cristine H. Legare. 2004. “Children’s Beliefs About Gender Differences in the Academic and Social Domains.” Sex Roles 50 (3): 227–239. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000015554.12336.30.
  • Hill, Clara E., Barbara J. Thompson, and Elizabeth Nutt Williams. 1997. “A Guide to Conducting Consensual Qualitative Research.” The Counseling Psychologist 25 (4): 517–572. doi:10.1177/0011000097254001.
  • Hoffmann, Lore. 2002. “Promoting Girls’ Interest and Achievement in Physics Classes for Beginners.” Learning and Instruction 12 (4): 447–465.
  • Holcombe, Arthur N. 1922. “Public Opinion. By Walter Lippmann. (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company. 1922. Pp. x, 427.).” American Political Science Review 16 (3): 500–501.
  • Horn, Stacey S., and Stefanie M. Sinno. 2014. “Gender, Sexual Orientation, and Discrimination Based on Gender and Sexual Orientation.” In Handbook of Moral Development, 317–339, edited by M. Killen and J. G. Smetana. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Howe, Christine. 2017. “Developing Understanding of Object Fall: Going Beyond Inhibitory Processes.” British Journal of Developmental Psychology 35 (3): 463–468. doi:10.1111/bjdp.12187.
  • Hutchison, Jane E., Ian M. Lyons, and Daniel Ansari. 2019. “More Similar Than Different: Gender Differences in Children’s Basic Numerical Skills Are the Exception Not the Rule.” Child Development 90 (1): e66–e79.
  • Hyde, Janet S., Sara M. Lindberg, Marcia C. Linn, Amy B. Ellis, and Caroline C. Williams. 2008. “Gender Similarities Characterize Math Performance.”Science 321 (5888): 494–495. doi:10.1126/science.1160364.
  • Kaiser, Mary Kister, Dennis R. Proffitt, and Michael McCloskey. 1985. “The Development of Beliefs About Falling Objects.” Perception & Psychophysics 38 (6): 533–539.
  • Kalkan, Huseyin, and Kasim Kiroglu. 2007. “Science and Nonscience Students’ Ideas About Basic Astronomy Concepts in Preservice Training for Elementary School Teachers.” Astronomy Education Review 6 (1): 15–24.
  • Kang, Jingoo, Jonathan Hense, Annette Scheersoi, and Tuula Keinonen. 2019. “Gender Study on the Relationships Between Science Interest and Future Career Perspectives.” International Journal of Science Education 41 (1): 80–101. doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1534021.
  • Keung, Chrysa Pui Chi, and Alan Chi Keung Cheung. 2019. “Towards Holistic Supporting of Play-Based Learning Implementation in Kindergartens: A Mixed Method Study.” Early Childhood Education Journal 47 (5): 627–640.
  • Kim, In-Kyeong, and Elizabeth S. Spelke. 1999. “Perception and Understanding of Effects of Gravity and Inertia on Object Motion.” Developmental Science 2 (3): 339–362. doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00080.
  • Knupfer, Nancy Nelson. 1997. “Gendered by Design.” Educational Technology 37 (2): 31–37.
  • Krinzinger, Helga, Liane Kaufmann, Jacques Gregoire, Annemie Desoete, Hans-Christoph Nuerk, and Klaus Willmes. 2012. “Gender Differences in the Development of Numerical Skills in Four European Countries.” International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology 4 (1): 62–77.
  • Krohn, Franklin B. 2004. “A Generational Approach to Using Emoticons as Nonverbal Communication.” Journal of Technical Writing and Communication 34 (4): 321–328.
  • Kunze, Astrid. 2003. “Gender Differences in Entry Wages and Early Career Wages.” Annales d’Economie et de Statistique 71/72: 245–265.
  • Kurtz-Costes, Beth, Stephanie J. Rowley, April Harris-Britt, and Taniesha A. Woods. 2008. “Gender Stereotypes About Mathematics and Science and Self-Perceptions of Ability in Late Childhood and Early Adolescence.” Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 54: 386–409.
  • Kyle Jr, William C. 1985. “What Research Says: Science Through Discovery: Students Love It.” Science and Children 23 (2): 39–41.
  • Larimore, Rachel A. 2020. “Preschool Science Education: A Vision for the Future.” Early Childhood Education Journal 48: 703–714.
  • Lazonder, A. W., and S. Ehrenhard. 2014. “Relative Effectiveness of Physical and Virtual Manipulatives for Conceptual Change in Science: How Falling Objects Fall.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 30 (2): 110–120. doi:10.1111/jcal.12024.
  • Lee, Victor R. 2010. “How Different Variants of Orbit Diagrams Influence Student Explanations of the Seasons.” Science Education 94 (6): 985–1007. doi:10.1002/sce.20403.
  • Leibham, Mary Beth, Joyce M. Alexander, and Kathy E. Johnson. 2013. “Science Interests in Preschool Boys and Girls: Relations to Later Self-Concept and Science Achievement.” Science Education 97 (4): 574–593.
  • Leuchter, Miriam, Henrik Saalbach, Ueli Studhalter, and Annette Tettenborn. 2020. “Teaching for Conceptual Change in Preschool Science: Relations among Teachers’ Professional Beliefs, Knowledge, and Instructional Practice.” International Journal of Science Education 42 (12): 1941–1967.
  • Liben, Lynn S., Rebecca S. Bigler, Diane N. Ruble, Carol Lynn Martin, and Kimberly K. Powlishta. 2002. “The Developmental Course of Gender Differentiation: Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Evaluating Constructs and Pathways.” Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 67 (2): i–183.
  • Lindberg, Sara M, Janet Shibley Hyde, Jennifer L Petersen, and Marcia C Linn. 2010. “New Trends in Gender and Mathematics Performance: A Meta-Analysis.” Psychological Bulletin 136 (6): 1123–1135. doi:10.1037/a0021276.
  • Lorenzo, Mercedes, Catherine H. Crouch, and Eric Mazur. 2006. “Reducing the Gender Gap in the Physics Classroom.” American Journal of Physics 74 (2): 118–122. doi:10.1119/1.2162549.
  • Lubinski, David S., and Camilla Persson Benbow. 2007. Sex Differences in Personal Attributes for the Development of Scientific Expertise. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Maccoby, Eleanor E. 1999. The Two Sexes: Growing up Apart, Coming Together (vol. 4). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Makarova, Elena, Belinda Aeschlimann, and Walter Herzog. 2019. “The Gender Gap in STEM Fields: The Impact of the Gender Stereotype of Math and Science on Secondary Students’ Career Aspirations.” Frontiers in Education 4: 60. doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00060.
  • Makous, John L. 2000. “Variations of a Circular-Motion Lab.” The Physics Teacher 38 (6): 354–355. doi:10.1119/1.1321817.
  • Mann, Allison, and Thomas A. DiPrete. 2013. “Trends in Gender Segregation in the Choice of Science and Engineering Majors.” Social Science Research 42 (6): 1519–1541. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.07.002.
  • Mantzicopoulos, Panayota, Brian F. French, and Helen Patrick. 2019. “The Quality of Mathematics Instruction in Kindergarten: Associations with Students’ Achievement and Motivation.” The Elementary School Journal 119 (4): 651–676. doi:10.1086/703176.
  • Master, Allison, Sapna Cheryan, Adriana Moscatelli, and Andrew N. Meltzoff. 2017. “Programming Experience Promotes Higher STEM Motivation among First-Grade Girls.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 160 (August): 92–106. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.03.013.
  • Mayer, Richard E. 2002. “Multimedia Learning.” Psychology of Learning and Motivation 41: 85–139.
  • Mayer, Richard E., Mary Hegarty, Sarah Mayer, and Julie Campbell. 2005. “When Static Media Promote Active Learning: Annotated Illustrations Versus Narrated Animations in Multimedia Instruction.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 11 (4): 256–265.
  • McClure, Elisabeth R., Lisa Guernsey, Douglas H. Clements, Susan Nall Bales, Jennifer Nichols, Nat Kendall-Taylor, and Michael H. Levine. 2017. ‘STEM Starts Early: Grounding Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Education in Early Childhood.’ In Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop, ERIC.
  • McGuire, Luke, Kelly Lynn Mulvey, Eric Goff, Matthew J. Irvin, Mark Winterbottom, Grace E. Fields, Adam Hartstone-Rose, and Adam Rutland. 2020. “STEM Gender Stereotypes from Early Childhood Through Adolescence at Informal Science Centers.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 67 (March): 101109. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2020.101109.
  • Mellis, Birgit, Patricia Soto, Chrystal D. Bruce, Graciela Lacueva, Anne M. Wilson, and Rasitha Jayasekare. 2018. “Factors Affecting the Number and Type of Student Research Products for Chemistry and Physics Students at Primarily Undergraduate Institutions: A Case Study.” PLOS ONE 13 (4): e0196338. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196338.
  • Miller, David I., Kyle M. Nolla, Alice H. Eagly, and David H. Uttal. 2018. “The Development of Children’s Gender-Science Stereotypes: A Meta-Analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw-A-Scientist Studies.” Child Development 89 (6): 1943–1955. doi:10.1111/cdev.13039.
  • Mislevy, Robert J., John T. Behrens, Randy E. Bennett, Sarah F. Demark, Dennis C. Frezzo, Roy Levy, Daniel H. Robinson, Daisy Wise Rutstein, Valerie J. Shute, and Ken Stanley. 2010. “On the Roles of External Knowledge Representations in Assessment Design.” The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment 8 (2).
  • Morgan, Paul L., George Farkas, Marianne M. Hillemeier, and Steve Maczuga. 2016. “Science Achievement Gaps Begin Very Early, Persist, and Are Largely Explained by Modifiable Factors.” Educational Researcher 45 (1): 18–35.
  • Mou, Yi, Liqi Zhu, and Zhe Chen. 2015. “Developmental Changes in Children’s Understanding of Horizontal Projectile Motion.” International Journal of Psychology 50 (4): 256–264. doi:10.1002/ijop.12095.
  • Müller, Florian, and Klaus Rothermund. 2012. “Talking Loudly but Lazing at Work—Behavioral Effects of Stereotypes Are Context Dependent.” European Journal of Social Psychology 42 (5): 557–563. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1869.
  • Mulvey, Kelly Lynn, and Matthew J. Irvin. 2018. “Judgments and Reasoning About Exclusion from Counter-Stereotypic STEM Career Choices in Early Childhood.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 44 (July): 220–230. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2018.03.016.
  • Mulvey, Kelly Lynn, and Melanie Killen. 2015. “Challenging Gender Stereotypes: Resistance and Exclusion.” Child Development 86 (3): 681–694.
  • Nilsson, Monica, Beth Ferholt, and Robert Lecusay. 2017. ““The Playing-Exploring Child”: Reconceptualizing the Relationship Between Play and Learning in Early Childhood Education.” Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 19 (3): 231–245. doi:10.1177/1463949117710800.
  • O’Dea, R. E., M. Lagisz, M. D. Jennions, and S. Nakagawa. 2018. “Gender Differences in Individual Variation in Academic Grades Fail to Fit Expected Patterns for STEM.” Nature Communications 9 (1): 3777. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06292-0.
  • Oppermann, Elisa, Martin Brunner, and Yvonne Anders. 2019. “The Interplay Between Preschool Teachers’ Science Self-Efficacy Beliefs, Their Teaching Practices, and Girls’ and Boys’ Early Science Motivation.” Learning and Individual Differences 70: 86–99.
  • Osborne, Jonathan, Shirley Simon, and Sue Collins. 2003. “Attitudes Towards Science: A Review of the Literature and Its Implications.” International Journal of Science Education 25: 1049–1079. doi:10.1080/0950069032000032199.
  • Park, Babette, Jan L. Plass, and Roland Brünken. 2014. “Cognitive and Affective Processes in Multimedia Learning.” Learning and Instruction 29 (February): 125–127. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.005.
  • Parsons, Jacquelynne E., Terry Adler, and Judith L. Meece. 1984. “Sex Differences in Achievement: A Test of Alternate Theories.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 (1): 26–43.
  • Patrick, Helen, Panayota Mantzicopoulos, and Ala Samarapungavan. 2009. “Motivation for Learning Science in Kindergarten: Is There a Gender Gap and Does Integrated Inquiry and Literacy Instruction Make a Difference.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (2): 166–191. doi:10.1002/tea.20276.
  • Pattison, Scott A., and Lynn D. Dierking. 2019. “Early Childhood Science Interest Development: Variation in Interest Patterns and Parent–Child Interactions among Low-Income Families.” Science Education 103 (2): 362–388. doi:10.1002/sce.21486.
  • Perry, David G., Rachel E. Pauletti, and Patrick J. Cooper. 2019. “Gender Identity in Childhood: A Review of the Literature.” International Journal of Behavioral Development 43 (4): 289–304. doi:10.1177/0165025418811129.
  • Plummer, Julia D., and L. Maynard. 2014. “Building a Learning Progression for Celestial Motion: An Exploration of Students’ Reasoning About the Seasons.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51 (7): 902–929. doi:10.1002/tea.21151.
  • Potvin, Patrice, Abdelkrim Hasni, Ousmane Sy, and Martin Riopel. 2018. “Two Crucial Years of Science and Technology Schooling: A Longitudinal Study of the Major Influences on and Interactions Between Self-Concept, Interest, and the Intention to Pursue S&T.” Research in Science Education 50: 1739–1761.
  • Price, C. Aaron, F. Kares, G. Segovia, and Aerika Brittian Loyd. 2019. “Staff Matter: Gender Differences in Science, Technology, Engineering or Math (STEM) Career Interest Development in Adolescent Youth.” Applied Developmental Science 23 (3): 239–254. doi:10.1080/10888691.2017.1398090.
  • Randler, Christoph, and Madeleine Hulde. 2007. “Hands-on Versus Teacher-Centred Experiments in Soil Ecology.” Research in Science & Technological Education 25 (3): 329–338. doi:10.1080/02635140701535091.
  • Renno, Maggie P., and Kristin Shutts. 2015. “Children’s Social Category-Based Giving and Its Correlates: Expectations and Preferences.” Developmental Psychology 51 (4): 533–543. doi:10.1037/a0038819.
  • Riegle-Crumb, Catherine, Menglu Peng, and Tatiane Russo-Tait. 2020. “Committed to STEM? Examining Factors That Predict Occupational Commitment among Asian and White Female Students Completing STEM U.S. Postsecondary Programs.” Sex Roles 82 (1): 102–116. doi:10.1007/s11199-019-01038-8.
  • Robinson, Joseph Paul, and Sarah Theule Lubienski. 2011. “The Development of Gender Achievement Gaps in Mathematics and Reading During Elementary and Middle School: Examining Direct Cognitive Assessments and Teacher Ratings.” American Educational Research Journal 48 (2): 268–302.
  • Ruble, Diane N., Carol Lynn Martin, and Sheri A. Berenbaum. 2007. “Gender Development.” In Handbook of Child Psychology, edited by N. Eisenberg, W. Damon, and R. M. Lerner, 858–932. New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Saçkes, Mesut, Kathy Cabe Trundle, Randy L. Bell, and Ann A. O’Connell. 2011. “The Influence of Early Science Experience in Kindergarten on Children’s Immediate and Later Science Achievement: Evidence from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (2): 217–235. doi:10.1002/tea.20395.
  • Simpkins, Sandra D., Pamela E. Davis-Kean, and Jacquelynne S. Eccles. 2006. “Math and Science Motivation: A Longitudinal Examination of the Links Between Choices and Beliefs.” Developmental Psychology 42 (1): 70–83.
  • Sinclair, Samantha, Artur Nilsson, and Elmedina Cederskär. 2019. “Explaining Gender-Typed Educational Choice in Adolescence: The Role of Social Identity, Self-Concept, Goals, Grades, and Interests.” Journal of Vocational Behavior 110 (February): 54–71. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2018.11.007.
  • Siyanova-Chanturia, Anna, Paul Warren, Francesca Pesciarelli, and Cristina Cacciari. 2015. “Gender Stereotypes Across the Ages: On-Line Processing in School-Age Children, Young and Older Adults.” Frontiers in Psychology 6: 1388.
  • Slater, Stephanie J. 2014. “The Development and Validation of the Test Of Astronomy STandards (TOAST).” Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education (JAESE) 1 (1): 1–22.
  • Steffens, Melanie C., and Petra Jelenec. 2011. “Separating Implicit Gender Stereotypes Regarding Math and Language: Implicit Ability Stereotypes Are Self-Serving for Boys and Men, but Not for Girls and Women.” Sex Roles 64 (5): 324–335. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9924-x.
  • Stites, Michele L., and Elizabeth Todd Brown. 2021. “Observing Mathematical Learning Experiences in Preschool.” Early Child Development and Care 191 (1): 68–82.
  • Stoet, Gijsbert, and David C. Geary. 2020. “The Gender-Equality Paradox Is Part of a Bigger Phenomenon: Reply to Richardson and Colleagues (2020).” Psychological Science 31 (3): 342–344. doi:10.1177/0956797620904134.
  • Sturm, Heike, and Franz X. Bogner. 2008. “Student-Oriented Versus Teacher-Centred: The Effect of Learning at Workstations About Birds and Bird Flight on Cognitive Achievement and Motivation.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (7): 941–959.
  • Su, Rong, James Rounds, and Patrick Ian Armstrong. 2009. “Men and Things, Women and People: A Meta-Analysis of Sex Differences in Interests.” Psychological Bulletin 135 (6): 859–884.
  • Tao, Ying, Mary Oliver, and Grady Venville. 2013. “Chinese and Australian Children’s Understandings of the Earth: A Cross Cultural Study of Conceptual Development.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 8 (2): 253–283. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9415-1.
  • Taylor, Ian. 1998. “Teaching Seasons.” The Science Teacher 65 (4): 58–60.
  • Trawick-Smith, Jeffrey, and Traci Dziurgot. 2011. ““Good-Fit” Teacher–Child Play Interactions and the Subsequent Autonomous Play of Preschool Children.” Early Childhood Research Quarterly 26 (1): 110–123. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2010.04.005.
  • Trice, Ashton D., and Kimberly Rush. 1995. “Sex-Stereotyping in Four-Year-Olds’ Occupational Aspirations.” Perceptual and Motor Skills 81 (2): 701–702.
  • Trumper, Ricardo. 2006. “Teaching Future Teachers Basic Astronomy Concepts—Seasonal Changes—At a Time of Reform in Science Education.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 43 (9): 879–906.
  • Tsong, Chau Kien, Toh Seong Chong, and Zarina Samsudin. 2012. “Designing Tangible Multimedia for Preschoolers Based on Multimedia Design Theories.” International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research 3 (8): 2229–5518.
  • Türk, Cumhur, and Hüseyin Kalkan. 2018. “Teaching Seasons with Hands-on Models: Model Transformation.” Research in Science & Technological Education 36 (3): 324–352. doi:10.1080/02635143.2017.1401532.
  • Wang, Ming-Te, and Jessica L. Degol. 2017. “Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions.” Educational Psychology Review 29 (1): 119–140. doi:10.1007/s10648-015-9355-x.
  • Wang, Zhidan, Rebecca A. Williamson, and Andrew N. Meltzoff. 2018. “Preschool Physics: Using the Invisible Property of Weight in Causal Reasoning Tasks.” PLOS ONE 13 (3): e0192054.
  • Ward, R. Bruce, Philip M. Sadler, and Irwin I. Shapiro. 2007. “Learning Physical Science Through Astronomy Activities: A Comparison Between Constructivist and Traditional Approaches in Grades 3–6.” Astronomy Education Review 6 (2): 1–19.
  • Weisgram, Erica S., Rebecca S. Bigler, and Lynn S. Liben. 2010. “Gender, Values, and Occupational Interests Among Children, Adolescents, and Adults.” Child Development 81 (3): 778–796. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01433.x.
  • Whitley, Elise, and Jonathan Ball. 2002. “Statistics Review 6: Nonparametric Methods.” Critical Care 6 (6): 509–513.
  • Whittaker, Jeff. 2008. “Demonstrating Circular Motion with a Model Satellite/Earth System.” The Physics Teacher 46 (4): 237–239. doi:10.1119/1.2895676.
  • Whittaker, Jessica V., Mable B. Kinzie, Virginia Vitiello, Jamie DeCoster, Christina Mulcahy, and Emily A. Barton. 2020. “Impacts of an Early Childhood Mathematics and Science Intervention on Teaching Practices and Child Outcomes.” Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness 13 (2): 177–212. doi:10.1080/19345747.2019.1710884.
  • Wilbourn, Makeba Parramore, and Daniel W. Kee. 2010. “Henry the Nurse Is a Doctor Too: Implicitly Examining Children’s Gender Stereotypes for Male and Female Occupational Roles.” Sex Roles 62 (9): 670–683. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9773-7.
  • Xu, Yonghong Jade. 2016. “Attrition of Women in STEM: Examining Job/Major Congruence in the Career Choices of College Graduates.” Journal of Career Development 44 (1): 3–19.
  • Zeilik, Michael, and Vicky J. Morris. 2003. “An Examination of Misconceptions in an Astronomy Course for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Majors.” Astronomy Education Review 2 (1): 101–119.
  • Zippert, Erica L., Sarah H. Eason, Sharise Marshall, and Geetha B. Ramani. 2019. “Preschool Children’s Math Exploration During Play with Peers.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 65 (November): 101072. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2019.101072.
  • Zollman, Dean A., N. Sanjay Rebello, and Kirsten Hogg. 2002. “Quantum Mechanics for Everyone: Hands-on Activities Integrated with Technology.” American Journal of Physics 70 (3): 252–259.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.