Practitioner inquiry: troubling certainty

References

• Alanen, L., and B. Mayall, eds. 2001. Conceptualising Child-Adult Relations. 1st ed. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203467220
   Google Scholar
• Baker, M., S. Brown, T. Bruce, C. Gill, C. McCormick, L. McNair and J. Whinnett. 2019. “Communities of Froebelian Practice: Strawberry Runners and the Edinburgh Froebel Network.” In The Routledge International Handbook of Froebel and Early Childhood Practice. 1st ed. [Online], 231–244. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, R. 2013. “Now I See It, Now I Don’t: Researcher’s Position and Reflexivity in Qualitative Research.” Qualitative Research 15 (2): 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Brehony, K. 2001. Frederick the Great: The Origins of Nursery Education: The Froebelian Experiment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bruce, T. 2021. Friedrich Froebel: A Critical Introduction to Key Themes and Debates. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Brydon-Miller, M., and P. Macquire. 2008. “Participatory Action Research: Contributions to the Development of Practitioner Inquiry in Education.” Educational Action Research: Connecting Research and Practice for Professionals and Communities 17 (1): 79–93.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, K. 2013. “A Call to Action: Why We Need More Practitioner Research.” Democracy Education 21 (2): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Castle, K. 2012. “Professional Development Through Early Childhood Teacher Research.” Voices of Practitioners 7 (2): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Chaney, D. 2002. “Cosmopolitan Art and Cultural Citizenship.” Theory, Culture & Society 19 (1-2): 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327640201900108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. 2017. Listening to Young Children, Expanded Third Edition: A Guide to Understanding and Using the Mosaic Approach. London: Jessica Kingsley.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and S. L. Lytle. 1993, eds. Inside/Outside: Teacher Research and Knowledge. New York & London: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and S. L. Lytle. 2004. “Practitioner Inquiry, Knowledge and University Culture.” In International Handbook of Self-Study of Teaching and Teacher Education Practices, 12, edited by J. J. Loughran, M. L. Hamilton, V. K. LaBoskey, and T. Russell, 601–649. Dordrecht: Springer International Handbooks of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and S. L. Lytle. 2007. “Everything’s Ethics: Practitioner Inquiry and University Culture.” In An Ethical Approach to Practitioner Research, edited by A. Campbell, and S. Groundwater-Smith, 40–57. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and S. L. Lytle. 2009. Inquiry as a Stance: Practitioner Research for the Next Generation. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran-Smith, M., and S. L. Lytle. 2015. Inquiry as Stance: Practitioner Research for the Next Generation. New York and London: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, L. 2008. “Children’s Lived Experiences with Reading: A Phenomenological Study.” PhD doctoral thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Dana, N. F., and D. Yendol-Hoppey. 2008. The Reflective Educator’s Guide to Classroom Research: Learning to Teach and Teaching to Learn Through Practitioner Inquiry. 1st ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dana, N. F., and D. Yendol-Hoppey. 2009. The Reflective Educator’s Guide to Classroom Research: Learning to Teach Through Practitioner Inquiry. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dewis, P., and J. Kay. 2019. Data Analysis. In. C. Carter. Successful Dissertations: The Complete Guide for Education, Childhood and Early Childhood Studies Students. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz-Diaz, C., and P. Semenec. 2020. Posthumanist and New Materialist Methodologies: Research After the Child. Singapore: Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Education Scotland. 2020. Realising the Ambition: Being Me. Accessed 26 December 2022. https://www.google.com/search?q = realising+the+ambition+being+me&oq = realising+the&aqs = chrome.0.35i39j69i57j35i39j0i512l7.4637j1j7&sourceid = chrome&ie = UTF-8.
   Google Scholar
• Elfer, P., E. Goldshmied, and D. Selleck. 2011. Key Persons in the Early Years: Building Relationships for Quality Provision in Early Years Settings and Primary Schools. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, A., S. L. Kagan, and E. K. M. Tisdall, eds. 2015. The SAGE Handbook of Early Childhood Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorentini, D., and V. M. Crecci. 2015. “Dialogues with Marilyn Cochran-Smith.” The Clearing House. A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas 88 (1): 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2014.977841
   Google Scholar
• Flewitt, R., and K. Cowan. 2019. Valuing Young Children’s Signs of Learning: Observation and Digital Documentation of Play in Early Years Classrooms. London: The Froebel Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Froebel, F. 1886. Autobiography of Friedrich Froebel, transl by Michaelis and Moore. London: Swan Sonnenschein.
   Google Scholar
• Froebelian Futures. 2022. The Inspiration Directory. Accessed 12 July 2022. https://www.froebel.ed.ac.uk/resources/the-inspiration-directory/.
   Google Scholar
• Gallacher, L. A., and M. Gallagher. 2008. “Methodological Immaturity in Childhood Research? Thinking Through ‘Participatory Methods.” Childhood (Copenhagen, Denmark) 15 (4): 499–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568208091672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giroux, H. 1990. “Reading Texts, Literacy and Textual Authority.” The Journal of Education 172 (1): 84–103. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205749017200113
   Google Scholar
• Giroux, H., and P. McLaren. 1986. “Teacher Education and the Politics of Engagement: The Case for Democratic Schooling.” Harvard Educational Review 56 (3): 213–239. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.56.3.trr1473235232320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groundwater-Smith, S., and N. Mockler. 2007. “Ethics in Practitioner Research: An Issue of Quality.” Research Papers in Education 22 (2): 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520701296171
   Google Scholar
• Guillemin, M., and L. Gillam. 2004. “Ethics, Reflexivity, and “Ethically Important Moments” in Research.” Qualitative Inquiry 10 (2): 261–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800403262360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammersley, M. 1993. “On the Teacher as Researcher.” Educational Action Research 1 (3): 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965079930010308
   Google Scholar
• Hemphill, P. 2022. The Use of Block Play as Symbolic Representation. Froebelian Futures Practitioner Inquiry Project, Accessed 12 July 2022. https://www.froebel.ed.ac.uk/project/the-use-of-block-play-as-symbolic-representation/.
   Google Scholar
• Horton, J., and P. Kraftl. 2006. “Not Just Growing up, but Going on: Materials, Spacings, Bodies, Situations.” Children’s Geographies 4 (3): 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733280601005518
   Google Scholar
• Johansson, I., A. Sandberg, and T. Vuorinen. 2007. “Practitioner-Oriented Research as a Tool for Professional Development.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 15 (2): 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/13502930701321782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keirl, S. 2022. The Politics of Technology Curriculum. Accessed 2 January 2023. https://dandtfordandt.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/the-politics-of-technology-curriculum.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kincheloe, J., P. McLaren, and S. R. Steinberg. 2011. “Critical Pedagogy and Qualitative Research: Moving to the Bricolage.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin, and Y. S. Lincoln, 163–178. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kustatscher, M. 2014. “Informed Consent in School-Based Ethnography – Using Visual Magnets to Explore Participation, Power and Research Relationships.” International Journal of Child, Youth and Family Studies 5 (4.1): 686–701. https://doi.org/10.18357/ijcyfs.kustatscherm.5412014
   Google Scholar
• Laloux, F. 2014. Reinventing Organizations: A Guide to Creating Organizations Inspired by the Next Stage in Human Consciousness. Paris: Diateino.
   Google Scholar
• Leggett, N., and L. Newman. 2019. “Owning it: Educators’ Engagement in Researching Their Own Practice.” European Early Childhood Research Journal 27 (1): 138–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2018.1556539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M., and K. Weller. 2017. “Redefining our Roles as Teachers, Learners, and Leaders Through Continuous Cycles of Practitioner Inquiry.” The New Educator 13 (2): 137–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2016.1144121
   Google Scholar
• MacNaughton, G., and P. Hughes. 2009. Doing Action Research In Early Childhood Studies: A Step-By-Step Guide: A Step-by-Step Guide. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marilyn, C., and S. L. Lytleb. 2004. “Practitioner Inquiry, Knowledge and University Culture.” Practitioner Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6545-3_16
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, C., and G. B. Rosman. 2016. Designing Qualitative Research. 6th ed. London / Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McLaren, P., and J. L. Kincheloe, eds. 2007. Critical Pedagogy: Where Are We Now? New York: Library of Congress Cataloguing-in-Publication Data.
   Google Scholar
• McNair, L. J. 2023. “Practitioner Inquiry: Gifts for Our Future. Edinburgh Froebel Network Conference 2023.” John McIntyre Conference. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• McNair, L. J., C. Blaisdell, J. M. Davis, and L. J. Addison. 2021. “Acts of Pedagogical Resistance: Marking out an Ethical Boundary Against Human Technologies.” Policy Futures in Education 19 (4): 478–492. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210320976978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNair, L., and S. Powell. 2021. “Friedrich Froebel: A Path Least Trodden.” Early Child Development and Care 191 (7-8): 1175–1185. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2020.1803299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, R. 2003. “Perspectives of Childhood.” In Childhood Studies:A Reader in Perspectives of Childhood, edited by J. Mills, and R. Mills, 7–38. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mockler, N., and A. Casey. 2015. “(In)Sights from 40 Years of Practitioner Action Research in Education: Perspectives from the US, UK and Australia.” In Practitioner Research in Early Childhood. International Issues and Perspectives, edited by L. Newman, and C. Woodrow, 122–135. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, P. 2007. “Meetings Across the Paradigmatic Divide.” Educational Philosophy and Theory 39 (3): 229–245. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2007.00325.x
   Google Scholar
• Moss, P. 2022. The Image of the Child [Webinar]. [Online]. Froebelian Futures/University of Edinburgh. Accessed 7 November 2022. https://www.froebel.ed.ac.uk/audio-video/our-image-of-the-child-with-peter-moss/.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, P., and G. Roberts-Holmes. 2022. “Now is the Time! Confronting Neo-Liberalism in Early Childhood.” Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood 23 (1): 96–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463949121995917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, L., and N. Leggett. 2019. “Practitioner Research: with Intent.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 27 (1): 120–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2018.1556538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, L., C. Woodrow, and L. Arthur. 2016. “Valuing and Celebrating Practitioner Research.” In Practitioner Research in Early Childhood International Issues and Perspectives, 1–6. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ormerod, F., and R. Ivanic. 2000. “Texts in Practices: Interpreting the Physical Characteristics of Texts.” In Situated Literacies: Reading and Writing in Context, edited by D. Barton, M. Hamilton, and R. Ivanic, 91–107. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Oulton, K., F. Gibson, D. Sell, A. Williams, L. Pratt, and J. Wray. 2016. “Assent for Children’s Participation in Research: Why it Matters and Making it Meaningful.” Child: Care, Health and Development 42 (4): 588–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascal, C., and T. Bertram. 2012. “Praxis, Ethics and Power: Developing Praxeology as a Participatory Paradigm for Early Childhood Research.” European Early Childhood Education Research Journal 20 (4): 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2012.737236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrie, K. 2022. The Benefits of Introducing Community Gardening to Our Setting. Froebelian Futures Practitioner Inquiry Project. Accessed 12 July 2022. https://www.froebel.ed.ac.uk/project/the-benefits-of-introducing-community-gardening-to-our-setting/.
   Google Scholar
• Prout, A., and A. James. 1997. “A New Paradigm for The Sociology of Childhood? Provenance, Promise and Problems.” In Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood. Contemporary Issues in The Sociological Study of Childhood. 2nd Edition, edited by A. James, and A. Prout, 7–32. London/ Philadelphia: Routledge/ Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Ravitch, S., and M. Riggan. 2017. Reason & Rigor: How Conceptual Frameworks Guide Research. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Reinharz, S. 1992. Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Robert-Holmes, G., and P. Moss. 2021. Neoliberalism and Early Childhood. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. J., and I. S. Rubin. 1995. Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sacha, J. 2000. “The Activist Professional.” Journal of Educational Change 1 (1): 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010092014264
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, L., and B. Somekh. 2009. “Action Research and Educational Change: Teachers as Innovators.” In The Sage Handbook of Educational Action Research, edited by S. Noffke, and B. Somekh, 190–201. Los Angeles: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish Government. 2022. Scottish Attainment Challenge - 2022 to 2023–2025 to 2026: Fairer Scotland Duty Assessment. Edinburgh: Scottish Government. Accessed 11 July 2022. https://www.gov.scot/publications/fairer-scotland-duty-assessment-scottish-attainment-challenge-2022-2023-2025-2026/documents/
   Google Scholar
• Skattebol, J., and L. Arthur. 2014. “Collaborative Practitioner Research: Opening a Third Space for Local Knowledge Production.” Asia Pacific Journal of Education 34 (3): 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2013.871690
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soltis, J. 1994. “The new Teacher.” In Teacher Research and Educational Reform, edited by S. Hollingsworth, and H. Sockett, 245–260. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solvason, C. 2013. “Research and the Early Years Practitioner Researcher.” Early Years 33 (1): 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2012.665360
   Google Scholar
• Somekh, B., and S. E. Noffke. 2009. The SAGE Handbook of Educational Action Research. The SAGE Handbook of Educational Action Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, D. 2022. Unity and Connectedness in the Face of a Pandemic. Froebelian Futures Practitioner Inquiry Project. Accessed 12 July 2022. https://www.froebel.ed.ac.uk/project/unity-and-connectedness-in-the-face-of-a-pandemic/.
   Google Scholar
• Stenhouse, L. 1975. An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development. London: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, D. M., M. Brydon-Miller, and M. Raider-Roth. 2016. “Structured Ethical Reflection in Practitioner Inquiry: Theory, Pedagogy, and Practice.” The Educational Forum 80 (4): 430–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2016.1206160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tisdall, K., J. M. Davis, and M. Gallagher. 2008. Researching with Children and Young People: Research Design, Methods and Analysis. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Tovey, H. 2013. Bringing the Froebel Approach to Your Early Years Practice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• University of Edinburgh. 2021. Froebelian Futures [Website]. Accessed 7 November 2022. https://www.froebel.ed.ac.uk/frobelian-futures/.
   Google Scholar
• Vescio, V., D. Ross, and A. Adams. 2008. “A Review of Research on the Impact of Professional Learning Communities on Teaching Practice and Student Learning.” Teaching and Teacher Education 24 (1): 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodrow, C., and L. Newman. 2015. “Recognising, Valuing and Celebrating Practitioner Research.” In Practitioner Research in Early Childhood: International Issues and Perspectives, edited by L. Newman, and C. Woodrow, 1–16. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Wrigley, T. 2017. “Synthetic Phonics and the Phonics Check: The Hidden Politics of Early Literacy.” In Reading the Evidence: Synthetic Phonics and Literacy Learning, edited by M. Clarke. Chapter 10, Kindle Edition https://www.spelfabet.com.au/2017/11/alternative-facts-about-phonics/.
   Google Scholar