Influence of eco-innovation on Indian manufacturing sector sustainable performance

References

• Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull. 103:411–423. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arhonditsis GB, Stowb CA, Steinberg LJ, Kenney MA, Lathrop RC, McBride SJ, Reckhowa KH. 2006. Exploring ecological patterns with structural equation modeling and Bayesian analysis. Ecol Modelling. 192:385–409. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.07.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai C, Sarkis J, Wei X, Koh L. 2012. Evaluating ecological sustainable performance measures for supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag Int J. 17:78–92. doi:10.1108/13598541211212221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskaran V, Nachiappan S, Rahman S. 2011. Supplier assessment based on corporate social responsibility criteria in Indian automotive and textile industry sectors. Int J Sustainable Eng. 4:359–369. doi:10.1080/19397038.2011.579360
   Google Scholar
• Beske P. 2012. Dynamic capabilities and sustainable supply chain management. Int J Phys Distribution Logistics Manag. 42:372–387. doi: 10.1108/09600031211231344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boons F, Montalvo C, Quist J, Wagner M. 2013. Sustainable innovation, business models and economic performance: an overview. J Cleaner Production. 45:1–8. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrillo-Hermosilla J, Del Río P, Könnölä T. 2010. Diversity of eco-innovations: reflections from selected case studies. J Cleaner Production. 18:1073–1083. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetinkaya B, Cuthbertson R, Ewer G, Klaas-Wissing T. 2011. Sustainable supply chain management: practical ideas for moving towards best practice, Vol. XVIII. London: Springer; 283p.
   Google Scholar
• Chaabane A, Ramudhin A, Paquet M. 2012. Design of sustainable supply chains under the emission trading scheme. Int J Production Econ. 135:37–49. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.10.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chachamovich E, Fleck MP, Power M. 2009. Literacy affected ability to adequately discriminate among categories in multipoint likert scales. J Clin Epidemiol. 62:37–46. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin WW. 1998. Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly. 22:VII–XVI.
   Google Scholar
• Cook M, Gottberg A, Angus A, Longhurst P. 2012. Receptivity to the production of product service systems in the UK construction and manufacturing sectors: a comparative analysis. J Cleaner Production. 32:61–70. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.03.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cozzarin BP, Jeffrey SA. 2004. Human resource management practices and longitudinal workplace performance. Appl Econ Letters. 21:344–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curkovic S. 2003. Environmentally responsible manufacturing: the development and validation of a measurement model. Eur J Oper Res. 146:130–155. doi:10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00182-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dangayach GS, Deshmukh SG. 2000. Manufacturing strategy: experiences from select Indian organizations. J Manufacturing Syst. 19:134–148. doi:10.1016/S0278-6125(00)80006-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dangayach GS, Deshmukh SG. 2003. Evidence of manufacturing strategies in Indian industry: a survey. Int J Production Econ. 83:279–298. doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(02)00372-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despeisse M, Ball PD, Evans S, Levers A. 2012a. Industrial ecology at factory level – a conceptual model. J Cleaner Production. 31:30–39. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.02.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despeisse M, Mbaye F, Ball PD, Levers A. 2012b. The emergence of sustainable manufacturing practices. J Production Plann Control. 23:354–376. doi:10.1080/09537287.2011.555425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diedrich A, Uphamb P, Levidowe L, Hove SV. 2011. Framing environmental sustainability challenges for research and innovation in European policy agendas. Environ science policy. 14:935–939. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2011.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociological Rev. 48:147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkington J. 1997. Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone.
   Google Scholar
• Esty DC, Winston AS. 2006. Green to gold: how smart companies use environmental strategy to innovate, create value, and build competitive advantage. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Cote RP. 2005. Towards sustainability: objectives, strategies and barriers for cleaner production in China. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 12:443–460. doi:10.1080/13504500509469653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell C. 1992. A national customer satisfaction barometer: the Swedish experience. J Marketing. 56:6–21. doi:10.2307/1252129
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foronda-Robles C, Galindo-Pérez-de-Azpillaga L. 2012. Working with indicators: description of states of territorial adjustment for protected natural areas. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 19:287–296. doi:10.1080/13504509.2011.626085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredericks SE. 2012. Justice in sustainability indicators and indexes. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 19:490–499. doi:10.1080/13504509.2012.714807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannakis M. 2007. Performance measurement of supplier relationships. Supply Chain Manag Int J. 12:400–411. doi:10.1108/13598540710826335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimenez C, Sierra V, Rodon J. 2012. Sustainable operations: their impact on the triple bottom line. Int journal Production Econ. 140:149–159. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-García S, Raúl García Lozano RG, Teresa Moreira MT, Gabarrell X, Rieradevall J, Feijoo G, Murphy RJ. 2012. Eco-innovation of a wooden childhood furniture set: an example of environmental solutions in the wood sector. Sci Total Environ. 426:318–326. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitchcock T. 2012. Low carbon and green supply chains: the legal drivers and commercial pressures. Supply Chain Manag Int J. 17:98–101. doi:10.1108/13598541211212249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho HP, Choi TM. 2012. A Five-R analysis for sustainable fashion supply chain management in Hong Kong: a case analysis. J Fashion Marketing Manag. 16:161–175. doi:10.1108/13612021211222815
   Google Scholar
• Horbach J, Rammer C, Rennings K. 2012. Determinants of eco-innovations by type of environmental impact-the role of regulatory push/pull, technology push and market pull. Ecological Econ. 78:112–122. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayal AD, Badurdeen F, Dillon OW, Jawahir IS. 2010. Sustainable manufacturing: modeling and optimization challenges at the product, process and system levels. CIRP J Manufacturing Sci Technol. 2:144–152. doi:10.1016/j.cirpj.2010.03.006
   Google Scholar
• Joo YG, Sohn SY. 2008. Structural equation model for effective CRM of digital content industry. Expert Syst with Appl. 34:63–71. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2006.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketchen Jr DJ, Hult GTM. 2007a. Bridging organization theory and supply chain management: the case of best value supply chains. J Operations Manag. 25:573–580. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketchen Jr DJ, Hult GTM. 2007b. Toward greater integration of insights from organization theory and supply chain management. J Operations Manag. 25:455–458. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2006.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klassen RD, McLaughlin CP. 1996. The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Informs J Inst Operations Res Manag Sci. 42:1199–1214.
   Google Scholar
• Kurk F, Eagan P. 2008. The value of adding design-for-the-environment to pollution prevention assistance options. J Cleaner Production. 16:722–726. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.02.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai K, Wong CWY, Cheng TCE. 2006. Institutional isomorphism and the adoption of information technology for supply chain management. J Comput Ind. 57:93–98. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2005.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitham S, McQuaid RW, Nelson JD. 2000. The influence of transport on industrial location choice: a stated preference experiment. J Transportation Res Part A. 34:515–535.
   Google Scholar
• Lin H. 2007. Effects of extrinsic and intrinsic motivation on employee knowledge sharing intentions. J Inf Sci. 33:135–149. doi:10.1177/0165551506068174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu F, Zhang H, Wu P, Cao HJ. 2002. A model for analyzing the consumption situation of product material resources in manufacturing systems. J Mater Process Technol. 122:201–207. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00028-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Kasturiratne D, Moizer J. 2012. A hub-and-spoke model for multi-dimensional integration of green marketing and sustainable supply chain management. Ind Marketing Manag. 41:581–588. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2012.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malaeb ZA, Summers JK, Pugesek BH. 2000. Using structural equation modelling to investigate relationships among ecological variables. Environ Ecological Stat. 7:93–111. doi:10.1023/A:1009662930292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malarvizhi P, Sangeeta Y. 2008. Corporate environmental disclosures on the internet: an empirical analysis of Indian companies. Issues Soc Environ Account. 2:211–232.
   Google Scholar
• McCune B, Grace JB. 2002. Analysis of ecological communities [Internet]. MjM Software, Gleneden Beach, OR. [cited 2014 Apr 9]. Available from: www.pcord.com
   Google Scholar
• Meyer MW. 2002. Rethinking performance measurement. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mol APJ. 2003. Global institutional clashes: economic versus environmental regimes. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 10:303–318. doi:10.1080/13504500309470107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondragon AEC, Lalwani C, Mondragon CEC. 2011. Measures for auditing performance and integration in closed-loop supply chains. Supply Chain Manag Int J. 16:43–56. doi:10.1108/13598541111103494
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montabon F, Sroufe R, Narasimhan R. 2007. An examination of corporate reporting, environmental management practices and firm performance. J Operations Manag. 25:998–1014. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2006.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nidumolu R, Prahalad CK, Rangaswami MR. 2009. Why sustainability is now the key driver of innovation. Harvard Bus Rev. 87:57–64.
   Google Scholar
• Nunnally JC. 1978. Psychometric theory. 2nd ed. New York (NY): McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• O’Rafferty S. 2008. Designing interventions for ecodesign? Business Strategy Environ. 17:77–78. doi:10.1002/bse.610
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2009. Sustainable manufacturing and eco-innovation. Framework, practices and measurement – synthesis report. [Internet]. [cited 2014 Apr 6]. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/science/inno/43423689.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ooi KB, Lin B, Teh PL, Chong AYL. 2012. Does TQM support innovation performance in Malaysia’s manufacturing industry? J Business Econ Manag. 13:366–393. doi:10.3846/16111699.2011.620155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL. 2003. Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organ Stud Sage Publications. 24:403–441. doi:10.1177/0170840603024003910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel PC, Jayaram J. 2014. The antecedents and consequences of product variety in new ventures: an empirical study. J Operations Manag. 32:34–50. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2013.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter ME. 1996. What is strategy? Boston (MA): Harvard Business Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rho BH, Park K, Yu Y. 2001. An international comparison of the effect of manufacturing strategy-implementation gap on business performance. Int J Production Econ. 70:89–97. doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00049-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkis J, Ni N, Zhu Q. 2011. Winds of change: corporate social responsibility in China. Social responsibility. Ivey Business J [Internet]. [cited 2014 Apr 6]. Available from: http://www.iveybusinessjournal.com/topics/social-responsibility/winds-of-change-corporate-social-responsibility-in-china#.UNINsW997tt
   Google Scholar
• Selles H. 2013. The relative impact of countries on global natural resource consumption and ecological degradation. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 20:97–108. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2013.780190 10.1080/13504509.2013.780190
   Google Scholar
• Singh LP, Bhardwaj A, Sachdeva A. 2006. Quality management practices vs. performance of SMEs: an empirical study of Indian industries. Technol Manag Global Future. 5:2393–2399.
   Google Scholar
• Subramanian N, Gunasekaran A, Yu J, Cheng J, Ning K. 2014. Customer satisfaction and competitiveness in the Chinese E-retailing: structural equation modeling (SEM) approach to identify the role of quality factors. Expert Syst with Appl. 41:69–80. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidd J, Bessant John PK. 2005. Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change. 3rd ed. West Sussex: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Triguero A, Moreno-Mondéjar L, Davia MA. 2013. Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs. Ecological Econ. 92:25–33. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulusoy G. 2003. An assessment of supply chain and innovation management practices in the manufacturing industries in Turkey. Int J Production Econ. 86:251–270. doi:10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00064-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehrmeyer W, Tyteca D. 1998. Measuring environmental performance for industry: from legitimacy to sustainability and biodiversity? Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 5:111–124. doi:10.1080/13504509809469975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilts H, Dehoust G, Jepsen D, Knappe F. 2013. Eco-innovations for waste prevention – best practices, drivers and barriers. Sci Total Environ. 461–462:823–829. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C, Hunt N. 2000. Development of environmental policy, objectives and targets. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 7:357–361. doi:10.1080/13504500009470054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang CJ, Chen JL. 2012. Forecasting the design of eco-products by integrating TRIZ evolution patterns with CBR and Simple LCA methods. Expert Syst with Appl. 39:2884–2892. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang M. 2006. Energy efficiency policy impact in India: case study of investment in industrial energy efficiency. J Energy Policy. 34:3104–3114. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2005.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarong Z, Xin Y. 2011. Research on the sustainable development and the objective of Chinese government performance audit. Energy Procedia. 5:1230–1236. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.03.215
   Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Liu H, Dong R. 2008. Sustainable urban development: policy framework for sustainable consumption and production. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 15:318–325.doi: 10.3843/SusDev.15.4:5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu Q, Cordeiro J, Sarkis J. 2013. Institutional pressures, dynamic capabilities and environmental management systems: investigating the ISO 9000 – Environmental management system implementation linkage. J Environ Manag. 114:232–242. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar