Incorporation of environmental issues in South Africa’s municipal Integrated Development Plans

References

• Atkinson D. 2002. Local government, local governance and sustainable development: getting the parameters right. Integrated Rural and Regional Development Research Programme, Occasional Paper 4, Cape Town: HSRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Binns T, Nel E. 2002. Devolving development: integrated development planning and developmental local government in post-apartheid South Africa. Reg Stud. 36:921–932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J. 2005. Across the apocalypse on horseback: imperfect legal responses to biodiversity loss. Wash U J L & Pol’y. 17:13–35.
   Google Scholar
• City of Cape Town. 2002. Integrated metropolitan environmental policy. Cape Town: Cape Town Metropolitan Council.
   Google Scholar
• City of Tshwane. 2005. Tshwane integrated environmental policy. Pretoria: City of Tshwane.
   Google Scholar
• Coetzee M. 2002. Local pathway to sustainable development in South Africa: summary document on the IDP-LA21 relationship. Pretoria: South African government printers (package presented to the World Summit on Sustainable Development, Johannesburg).
   Google Scholar
• [CSIR] Council for Scientific and Industrial Research. 2004. Integrating conservation planning into the Integrated Development Planning process. Stellenbosch: CSIR.
   Google Scholar
• Dalal-Clayton B, Bass S. 2009. The challenges of environmental mainstreaming: experience of integrating environment into development institutions and decisions. London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).
   Google Scholar
• Department for Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs. 2009. State of local government overview report. Pretoria. Available from http://www.pmg.org.za/files/docs/091017tas.pdf
   Google Scholar
• [DEAT] Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism. 2003. National framework document: strengthening environmental sustainability into the Integrated Development Planning process. Pretoria: Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism.
   Google Scholar
• [DEAT] Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism. 2004. Overview of Integrated Environmental Management. Pretoria: Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism (DEAT). Integrated Environmental Management, Information Series.
   Google Scholar
• [DEAT] Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism. 2006. South Africa environment outlook: a report on the state of the environment. Pretoria: Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism. Executive summary and key findings.
   Google Scholar
• Department of National Treasury. 2011. The 2011 local government budgets and expenditure review. Pretoria: National Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• Du Plessis A, Kotzé LJ. 2014. The heat is on: local government and climate governance in South Africa. J Afr L. 58:145–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durban Metropolitan Council. 1999. Durban metropolitan environmental management policy. Durban: Durban Metropolitan Council.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser EDG, Dougill AJ, Mabee WE, Reed M, McAlpine P. 2006. Bottom up and top down: analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. J Environ Manage. 78:114–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Provincial and Local Government [DPLG], German Agency for Technical Cooperation [GTZ]. 2001. IDP guide pack series, guides 0–6. Pretoria: Department of Provincial and Local Government.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Provincial and Local Government [DPLG], United Nations Development Programme [UNDP], South Africa Local Government Association [SALGA]. 2002. Case studies on sustainability in local governance. Pretoria: UNDP South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz AM. 2003. National women’s machinery: state-based institutional advocacy for gender equality. In: Rai S, editor. Mainstreaming gender, democratising the state? Institutional mechanisms for the advancement of women. Manchester: Manchester University Press; p. 69–95.
   Google Scholar
• Gunasekaran A, Jabbour CJC, Jabbour ABL. 2014. Managing organizations for sustainable development in emerging countries: an introduction. Int J Sustain Dev World. 21:195–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta C. 2014. Sustainability, self-reliance and aloha aina: the case of Molokai, Hawai’i. Int J Sustain Dev World. 21:389–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwedla N, Shackleton CM. 2015. The development visions and attitudes towards urban forestry of officials responsible for greening in South African towns. Land Use Policy. 42:17–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison P. 2001. The genealogy of South Africa’s Integrated Development Plan. Third World Plan Rev. 23:175–192.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison P 2003. Towards integrated inter-governmental planning in South Africa: the IDP as a building block. Report to the Department of Provincial and Local Government and Municipal Demarcation Board, South Africa.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob DJ, Winner DA. 2009. Effect of climate change on air quality. Atmos Environ. 43:51–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern K, Koll C, Schophaus M 2004. Local Agenda 21 in Germany from a comparative perspective: an inter- and intranational comparison. Discussion Paper SP IV 2004 104, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin fur Sozialforschung, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Khadka C, Vacik H. 2012. Use of multi-criteria analysis (MCA) for supporting community forest management. Iforest. 5:60–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafferty WM, Coenen F. 2001. Conclusions and perspectives. In: Lafferty WM, editor. Sustainable Communities in Europe. London: Earthscan; p. 266–304.
   Google Scholar
• Lafferty WM, Hovden E. 2003. Environmental policy integration: towards an analytical framework. Environ Polit. 12:1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manyaka RK. 2014. Collection of municipal own revenue in South Africa: challenges and prospects. J Public Admin. 49:127–139.
   Google Scholar
• Marques AS, Ramos TB, Caeiro S, Costa MH. 2013. Adaptive participative sustainability indicators in marine protected areas: design and communication. Ocean Coast Manage. 72:36–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser P. 2001. Glorification, disillusionment or the way into the future? The significance of Local Agenda 21 processes for the needs of local sustainability. Local Environ Int J Justice Sustain. 6:453–467.
   Google Scholar
• Nunan F, Campbell A, Foster E. 2012. Environmental mainstreaming: the organizational challenges of policy integration. Public Admin Develop. 32:262–277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyalunga D. 2006. The revitalisation of local government in South Africa. Int NGO J. 1:15–20.
   Google Scholar
• O’Riordon T, Preston-Whyte RA, Hamann R, Manqele M. 2000. The transition to sustainability: a South African perspective. S Afr Geogr J. 82:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Pasquini L, Cowling RM, Ziervogel G. 2013. Facing the heat: barriers to mainstreaming climate change adaptation in local government in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Habitat Int. 40:225–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasquini L, Shearing C. 2014. Municipalities, politics, and climate change: an example of the process of institutionalizing an environmental agenda within local government. J Environ Develop. 23:271–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasquini L, Ziervogel G, Cowling RM, Shearing C. 2015. What enables local governments to mainstream climate change adaptation? Lessons learned from two municipal case studies in the Western Cape, South Africa. Clim Develop. 7:60–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope J, Annandale D, Saunders AM. 2004. Conceptualising sustainability assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 24:595–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney KE. 2003. Taking sustainable cities seriously: economic development, the environment, and quality of life in American Cities. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson DM, Holmes PM, Esler KJ, Galatowitsch SM, Stromberg JC, Kirkman SP, Pyšek P, Hobbs RJ. 2007. Riparian vegetation: degradation, alien plant invasions, and restoration prospects. Divers Distrib. 13:126–139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts D, Diederichs N. 2002. Durban’s Local Agenda 21 programme: tackling sustainable development in a post-apartheid city. Environ Urban. 14:189–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson PS, Brown AL, Todes AE, Kitchin F. 2003. Methods of achieving integration in development planning. Int Develop Plan Rev. 25:263–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenstroma U, Kyllonenb S. 2007. Impacts of a participatory approach to developing national level sustainable development indicators in Finland. J Environ Manage. 84:282–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santana NB, Rebelatto DA, Périco AE, Mariano EB. 2014. Sustainable development in the BRICS countries: an efficiency analysis by data envelopment. Int J Sustain Dev World. 21:259–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith L. 2011. The limits to public participation in strengthening public accountability: a reflection on the ‘citizens’ voice’ initiative in South Africa. J Asian Afr Stud. 46:504–517.
   Google Scholar
• Sowman M. 2002. Integrating environmental sustainability issues into local government decision-making processes. In: Parnell S, Pieterse E, Swilling M, Wooldridge D, editors. Democratising local government: the South African experiment. Cape Town: UCT Press; p. 233–251.
   Google Scholar
• Sowman M. 2005. Governance for sustainable development: from rhetoric to practice. Paper presented at the Western Cape Sustainable Development Conference. Cape Town: International Convention Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Sowman M, Brown AL. 2006. Mainstreaming environmental sustainability into South Africa’s Integrated Development Planning process. J Environ Plan Manage. 49:695–712.
   Google Scholar
• StatSoft Inc. 2012. STATISTICA (Data Analysis Software System), Version 12. Available from http://www.statsoft.com.
   Google Scholar
• Stead D. 2014. Urban planning, water management and climate change strategies: adaptation, mitigation and resilience narratives in the Netherlands. Int J Sust Dev World. 21:15–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todes A. 2004. Regional planning and sustainability: limits and potentials of South Africa’s integrated development plans. J Environ Plan Manage. 47:843–861.
   Google Scholar
• Todes A, Sim V, Singh P, Hlubi M, Oelofse C 2005. Relationship between environment and planning. Final report prepared for the KwaZulu-Natal Planning and Development Commission, KwaZulu-Natal Provincial Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Tuts R. 1998. Localizing Agenda 21 in small cities in Kenya, Morocco and Vietnam. Environ Urban. 10:175–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upadhyay N, Brinkmann R. 2010. Green local governments in Florida: assessment of sustainability performance. Sustain Sci Prac Pol. 6:18–27.
   Google Scholar
• Videira N, Antunes P, Santos R, Gamito S. 2003. Participatory modelling in environmental decision-making: the Ria Formosa Natural Park Case Study. J Environ Ass Pol Manage. 5:421–447.
   Google Scholar
• Warner K. 2002. Linking local sustainability initiatives with environmental justice, local environment. Int J Justice Sustain. 7:35–47.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm-Rechmann A, Cowling RM, Difford M. 2014. Using social marketing concepts to promote the integration of systematic conservation plans in land use planning in South Africa. Oryx. 48:71–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziervogel G, Parnell S. 2012. South African coastal cities: governance responses to climate change adaptation. In: Cartwright A, Parnell S, Oelofse G, Ward S, editors. Climate change at the city scale: impacts, mitigation and adaptation in Cape Town. Abingdon: Routledge; p. 223–243.
   Google Scholar