Policy-driven rubber plantation and its driving factors: a case of smallholders in northeast Thailand

References

• Ahrends A, Hollingsworth PM, Ziegler AD, Fox JM, Chen H, Su Y, Xu J. 2015. Current trends of rubber plantation expansion may threaten biodiversity and livelihoods. Glob Environ Chang. 34:48–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosselmann AS. 2012. Mediating factors of land use change among coffee farmers in a biological corridor. Ecological Econ. 80:79–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briassoulis H. 2000. Factors influencing land-use and land-cover change Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS). Vol. 1. Oxford: EOLSS Publishers; p. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Chiputwa B, Langyintuo AS, Wall P. 2011. Adoption of conservation agriculture technologies by smallholder farmers in the Shamva District of Zimbabwe: a Tobit application. Paper accepted for the 2011 meeting of the Southern Agricultural Economics Association (SAEA); Texas, USA; Feb 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Cho KM. 2005. Land-use change and their driving forces in northeastern Thailand. In: Zoebisch M, Cho KM, Hein S, Mowla R, editor. Integrated watershed management: studies and experiences from Asia. Bangkok: AIT; p. 777–796.
   Google Scholar
• Ekasingh B, Sungkapitux C, Kitchaicharoen J, Suebpongsang P. 2007. Competitive commercial agriculture in the Northeast of Thailand. Chiang Mai, Thailand: Chiang Mai University. In: Background paper for the Competitive Commercial Agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa (CCAA) Study. Washington (DC): World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Evans TP, Phanvilay K, Fox J, Vogler J. 2011. An agent-based model of agricultural innovation, land-cover change and household inequality: the transition from swidden cultivation to rubber plantations in Laos PDR. J Land Use Sci. 6:151–173.
   Google Scholar
• [FAO] Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 1983. Guidelines: land evaluation for rainfed agriculture. Rome (Italy): FAO. (Soils Bulletin No.52).
   Google Scholar
• Fox J, Castella J-C. 2013. Expansion of rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in Mainland Southeast Asia: what are the prospects for smallholders? J Peasant Stud. 40:155–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geist HJ, Lambin EF. 2002. Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. BioScience. 52:143–150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iqbal SMM, Ireland CR, Rodrigo VHL. 2006. A logistic analysis of the factors determining the decision of smallholder farmers to intercrop: a case study involving rubber–tea intercropping in Sri Lanka. Agric Syst. 87:296–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin EG, Geoghegan J. 2001. Theory, data, methods: developing spatially explicit economic models of land use change. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 85:7–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isvilanonda S, Bunyasiri I. 2009. Food security in Thailand: status, rural poor vulnerability, and some policy options. Bangkok (Thailand): Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Faculty of Economics, Kasetsart University. (ARE Working Paper No. 2552/1).
   Google Scholar
• Jawjit W, Pavasant P, Kroeze C. 2013. Evaluating environmental performance of concentrated latex production in Thailand. J Clean Prod. 98:84–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph J, George K. 2010. Report on the socio-economic impact of Natural Rubber cultivation under the block planting scheme in Tripura. Kerala: Rubber Research Institute of India. (MPRA Paper No. 52370).
   Google Scholar
• Kroeksakul P, Naipinit A, Sakolnakorn TPN. 2011. The economic and social effects of farmers growing para rubber in northeast Thailand: a case study of Sapsomboon village, Dun Sad sub-district, Kranoun district, Khon Kaen province. J Bus Case Stud. 7:113–118.
   Google Scholar
• Lambin EF, Geist HJ, Lepers E. 2003. Dynamics of land-use and land-cover change in tropical regions. Annu Rev Environ Resour. 28:205–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [LDD] Land Development Department. 1996. Land evaluation for economic crops. Ministry of Agriculture and cooperatives. Bangkok (Thailand): LDD.
   Google Scholar
• Li H, Aide TM, Ma Y, Liu W, Cao M. 2007. Demand for rubber is causing the loss of high diversity rain forest in SW China. Biodivers Conserv. 16:1731–1745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Fox JM. 2011. Rubber tree distribution mapping in Northeast Thailand. Int J Geosciences. 2:573–584.
   Google Scholar
• Mutoko MC, Hein L, Shisanya CA. 2014. Farm diversity, resource use efficiency and sustainable land management in the western highlands of Kenya. J Rural Stud. 36:108–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [OAE] Office of Agricultural Economics. 2013. Agriculture statistics of Thailand 2013. Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives. Bangkok (Thailand): OAE.
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers A, Sinaga BM, Budidarsono S. 2010. Economic analysis of smallholder rubber agroforesty system efficiency. Forum Pasca Sarjana. 33:67–77.
   Google Scholar
• Salisbury DS, Schmink M. 2007. Cows versus rubber: changing livelihoods among Amazonian extractivists. Geoforum. 38:1233–1249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suyanto S, Tomich TP, Otsuka K. 2001. Land tenure and farm management efficiency: the case of smallholder rubber production in customary land areas of Sumatra. Agroforestry Syst. 52:145–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taotawin N, Taotawin P. 2015. Crop booms and changing land use and land control in Thailand’s agricultural frontier. Paper present at: An international academic conference. Conference Paper No. 66; RCSD Chiang Mai University; Chiang Mai.
   Google Scholar
• Trisurat Y, Alkemade R, Verburg PH. 2010. Projecting land-use change and its consequences for biodiversity in northern Thailand. Environ Manage. 45:626–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veldkamp A, Lambin EF. 2001. Predicting land-use change. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 85:1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viswanathan P. 2008. Emerging smallholder rubber farming systems in India and Thailand: a comparative economic analysis. Asian J Agric Dev. 5:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Wang J, Chen Y, Shao X, Zhang Y, Cao Y. 2012. Land-use changes and policy dimension driving forces in China: present, trend and future. Land Use Policy. 29:737–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wannasai N, Shrestha RP. 2008. Role of land tenure security and farm household characteristics on land use change in the Prasae Watershed, Thailand. Land Use Policy. 25:214–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar