Multi-temporal land use and cover changing analysis: the environmental impact in Mediterranean area

References

• Agnoletti M. 2007. The degradation of traditional landscape in a mountain area of Tuscany during the 19th and 20th centuries: implications for biodiversity and sustainable management. For Ecol Manage. 249:5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberti M. 2000. Urban form and ecosystem dynamics: Empirical evidence and practical implications. In: Williams K, Burton E, Jenks M, editors. Achieving sustainable urban form. London: E & FN Spon; p. 84–96.
   Google Scholar
• Antrop M. 2004. Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landsc Urban Plan. 67:9–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker WL, Cai Y. 1992. The rule programs for multiscale analysis of landscape structure using the GRASS geographical information system. Landscape Ecol. 7:291–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balram S, Dragićević S, Meredith T. 2004. A collaborative GIS method for integrating local and technical knowledge in establishing biodiversity conservation priorities. Biodivers Conserv. 13:1195–1208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bender O, Boehmer HJ, Jens D, Schumacher KP. 2005. Using GIS to analyse long-term cultural landscape change in Southern Germany. Landsc Urban Plan. 70:111–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biasi R, Botti F, Barbera G, Cullotta S. 2012. The role of Mediterranean fruit tree orchards and vineyards in maintaining the traditional agricultural landscape. Acta Hortic. 940:79–88.
   Google Scholar
• Biasi R, Brunori E, Smiraglia D, Salvati L. 2015. Linking traditional tree-crop landscapes and agro-biodiversity in central Italy using a database of typical and traditional products: a multiple risk assessment through a data mining analysis. Biodivers Conserv. 24:3009–3031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhard B, Petrosillo I, Costanza R. 2010. Ecosystem services – bridging ecology, economy and social sciences. Ecol Complexity. 7:257–259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caporali F, Mancinelli R, Campiglia E. 2003. Indicators of cropping system diversity in organic and conventional farms in Central Italy. Int J Agric Sustainability. 1:67–72.
   Google Scholar
• Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A, Hooper DU, Perrings C, Venail P, Narwani A, Mace GM, Tilman DA, Wardle D, et al. 2012. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature. 486:59–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daily G. 1997. Nature’s services. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Di Felice V, Mancinelli R, Proulx R, Campiglia E. 2012. A multivariate analysis for evaluating the environmental and economical aspects of agroecosystem sustainability in central Italy. J Environ Manage. 98:119–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Pacheco J, García-Palomares JC. 2014. Urban sprawl in the Mediterranean Urban Regions in Europe and the crisis effect on the Urban Land Development: Madrid as study case. Urban Stud Res. 2014:1–13. Article ID 807381, 13 pages.
   Google Scholar
• Dramstad WE, Fry G, W J F, Skar B, Helliksen W, Sollund M-LB, Tveit MS, Geelmuyden AK, Framstad E. 2001. Integrating landscape-based values—Norwegian monitoring of agricultural landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan. 57:257–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EC. 2005. Trends of some agri-environmental indicators in the European Union: report EUR 21565 EN. European commission. Bruxelles (Belgium): Joint Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Feld CK, de Bello F, Bugter B, Grandin U, Hering D, Lavorel S, Mountford O, Pardo I, Partel M, Römbke J, et al. 2007. Assessing and monitoring ecosystems-indicators, concepts and their linkage to biodiversity and ecosystem services. RUBICODE Project deliverable. [cited 2016 Jan 14]. Available from: http://www.rubicode.net/rubicode/RUBICODE_Review_on_Indicators.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Feranec J, Jaffrain G, Soukup T, Hazeu G. 2010. Determining changes and flows in European landscapes 1990-2000 using CORINE land cover data. Appl Geogr. 30:19–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forman RTT. 1995. Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landscape Ecol. 10:133–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grădinaru SR, Iojă CI, Onose DA, Gavrilidis AA, Pătru-Stupariu I, Kienast F, Hersperger AM. 2015. Land abandonment as a precursor of built-up development at the sprawling periphery of former socialist cities. Ecol Indic. 57:305–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Organisation of Vine and Wine (OIV). 2012. Statistical Report on World Vitiviniculture 2012. Intergovernmental Organisation. 18 rue d´Aguesseau 75008. Paris. [uptated 2012 Sep 11; cited 2016 Jan 14]. Available from: http://www.oiv.int.
   Google Scholar
• ISTAT (Istituto Nazionale di Statistica). 2010. 6th General census of agriculture 2010. [cited 2016 Jan 14]. Available from: http://dati-censimentoagricoltura.istat.it/
   Google Scholar
• Kadlecova V, Dramstad WE, Semancikova E, Edwards KR. 2012. Landscape changes and their influence on the heterogeneity of landscape of the South Bohemian Region, the Czech Republic. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 19:546–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefebvre M, Espinosa M, Gomez Y Paloma S, Paracchini ML, Piorr A, Zasada I. 2015. Agricultural landscapes as multi-scale public good and the role of the Common Agricultural Policy. J Environ Plann Manag. 58:2088–2112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magurran AE. 1988. Ecological diversity and its measurement. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mancinelli R, Di Felice V, Radicetti E, Campiglia E. 2015. Impact of land ownership and altitude on biodiversity evaluated by indicators at the landscape level in Central Italy. Land Use Policy. 45:43–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Ene E 2012. FRAGSTATS v4: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical and continuous maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst. [cited 2016 Jan 14]. Available from: http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html
   Google Scholar
• McGarigal K, Marks BJ. 1995. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Portland (OR): Coastal Oregon Productivity Enhancement Program.
   Google Scholar
• McKinney M. 2002. Urbanization, Biodiversity and conservation. BioScience. 52:883–890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pielou EC. 1975. Ecological diversity. New York (NY): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pinto-Correia T, Gustavsson R, Pirnat J. 2006. Bridging the gap between centrally defined policies and local decisions – towards more sensitive and creative rural landscape management. Landsc Ecol. 21:333–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piorr A, Müller K. 2009. Rural landscapes and agricultural policies in Europe. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Riitters KH, O’Neill RV, Hunsaker CT, Wickham JD, Yankee DH, Timmins SP, Jones KB, Jackson BL. 1995. A factor analysis of landscape pattern and structure metrics. Landsc Ecol. 10:23–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutledge D. 2003. Landscape indices as measures of the effects of fragmentation: can pattern reflect process? Wellington: Department of Conservation, Science Internal Series 98.
   Google Scholar
• Salvati L, Perini L, Sabbi A, Bajocco S. 2012. Climate aridity and land use changes: a regional-scale analysis. Geog Res. 50:193–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvati L, Sabbi A. 2011. Exploring long-term land cover changes in an urban region of southern Europe. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 18:273–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saura S, Martinez-Millan J. 2001. Sensitivity of landscape pattern metrics to map spatial extent. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 67:1027–1036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serra P, Pons X, Saurí D. 2008. Land-cover and land-use change in a Mediterranean landscape: a spatial analysis of driving forces integrating biophysical and human factors. Appl Geogr. 28:189–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shannon CE, Weaver W. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sitzia T, Semenzato P, Trentanovi G. 2010. Natural reforestation is changing spatial patterns of rural mountain and hill landscapes: a global overview. For Ecol Manag. 259:1354–1362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner MG. 1989. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 20:171–197.
   Google Scholar
• Turner MG, Gardner RH. 1990. Quantitative methods in landscape ecology. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Turner MG, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV. 2001. Landscape ecology in theory and practice. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Turner MG, O’Neill RV, Gardner RH, Milne BT. 1989. Effects of changing spatial scale on the analysis of landscape pattern. Landsc Ecol. 3:153–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vimal R, Geniaux G, Pluvinet P, Napoleone C, Lepart J. 2012. Detecting threatened biodiversity by urbanization at regional and local scales using an urban sprawl simulation approach: Application on the French Mediterranean region. Landsc Urban Plan. 104:343–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward W, Tockner T. 2001. Biodiversity: towards a unifying theme for river ecology. Freshwater Biol. 46:807–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weng Y. 2007. Spatiotemporal changes of landscape pattern in response to urbanization. Landsc Urban Plan. 81:341–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wratten S, Sandhu H, Cullen R, Costanza R. 2013. Ecosystem services in agricultural and urban landscapes. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Yue TX, Xu B, Liu JY. 2004. A patch connectivity index and its change in relation to new wetland at the Yellow River Delta. Int J Remote Sens. 25:4617–4628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar