Ecological literacy and socio-demographics: who are the most eco-literate in our community, and why?

References

• Ackerman PL, Bowen KR, Beier M, Kanfer R. 2001. Determinants of individual differences and gender differences in knowledge. J Educ Psychol. 93:797–825.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcury T. 1990. Environmental attitude and environmental knowledge. Hum Organ. 49:300–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatley T. 2010. Biophilic cities: integrating nature into urban design and planning. Washington DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz A, Brewer C, McBride B. 2008. Essential elements of ecological literacy and the pathways needed for all citizens to achieve it. Paper presented at: 93rd Ecological Society of America Annual Meeting, Symposium 12, August 3-8. Available from: http://eco.confex.com/eco/2008/techprogram/P9585.HTM.
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz A, Ford M, Brewer C. 2005. A framework for integrating ecological literacy, civics literacy, and environmental citizenship in environmental education. In: Johnson E, Mappin M, editors. Environmental education and advocacy: changing perspectives of ecology and education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Capra F. 2004. The hidden connections: a science for sustainable living. New York (NY): Random House Digital.
   Google Scholar
• Capra F. 2008. The new facts of life. Center for Ecoliteracy. Available from: http://www.ecoliteracy.org/essays/new-facts-life
   Google Scholar
• Capra F. 2011. Ecological principles. Center for Ecoliteracy. Available from: http://www.ecoliteracy.org/essays/ecological-principles
   Google Scholar
• Capra F, Stone MK. 2010. Smart by nature: schooling for sustainability. J Sust Educ. Available from: http://www.jsedimensions.org/wordpress/tags/smart-by-nature/
   Google Scholar
• Cope B, Kalantzis M, McCarthey S, Vojak C, Kline S. 2011. Technology-mediated writing assessments: principles and processes. Comput Composit. 28:79–96. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S8755461511000284
   Google Scholar
• Coyle K. 2005. Environmental literacy in America: what ten years of NEETF/Roper research and related studies say about environmental literacy in the US. The National Environmental Education and Training Foundation. Available from: http://www.neefusa.org/pdf/ELR2005.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Curthoys L, Cuthbertson B. 2002. Listening to the landscape: interpretive planning for ecological literacy. Can J Environ Educ. 7:224–240.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson MJ 2010. Ecological literacy evaluation of the University of Iceland faculty, staff, and students: implications for a university sustainability policy [ dissertation]. Reykjavik (Iceland): University of Iceland. Available from: http://s3.amazonaws.com/zanran_storage/skemman.is/ContentPages/115928815.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gherardi S, Nicolini D, Odella F. 1998. Toward a social understanding of how people learn in organizations: the notion of situated curriculum. Manag Learn. 29:273–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith RE, Feygina I, Jost JT. 2013. The gender gap in environmental attitudes: a system justification perspective. In: Alston M, Whittenbury K, editors. Research, action and policy: addressing the gendered impacts of climate change. Netherlands: Springer; p. 159–171.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood D. 2008. The best of both worlds: a critical pedagogy of place. Environ Educ Res. 14:308–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansman CA. 2001. Context‐based adult learning. New Dir Adult Cont Educ. 2001:43–52.
   Google Scholar
• Haraway DJ. 2013. Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature. New York (NY): Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Harding S. 1996. Gendered ways of knowing and the ‘epistemological crisis’ of the West. In: Goldberger NRE, Tarule JME, McVicker C, Belenky MFE, editors. Knowledge, difference, and power: essays inspired by “Women’s Ways of Knowing”. New York (NY): Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes ER. 2001. A new look at women’s learning. New Dir Adult Cont Educ. 2001:35–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins HD, Stanley JC, Hopkins BR. 1990. Educational and psychological measurement and evaluation. 7th ed. Needham Heights (MA): Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu S, Roth R. 1996. An assessment of environmental knowledge and attitudes held by community leaders in the Hualien area of Taiwan. J Environ Educ. 28:24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson JB. 1952. The almost perfect town. In: LeGates RT, Stout F, editors. The city reader. 3rd ed. Oxford (UK): Routledge; p. 164–171.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan RC, Singer F, Vaughan J, Berkowitz A. 2008. What should every citizen know about ecology? Front Ecol Environ. 7:495–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgore DW. 2001. Critical and postmodern perspectives on adult learning. New Dir Adult Cont Educ. 2001:53–62.
   Google Scholar
• Louv R. 2005. Last child in the woods. Chapel Hill (NC): Algonquin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Louv R. 2012. The nature principle: reconnecting with life in a virtual age. Chapel Hill (NC): Algonquin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Mancl K, Carr K, Morrone M. 2003. Profile of Ohio adults with low environmental literacy. Ohio J Sci. 103:38–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin JB. 2011. Principles of student assessment in adult education. In: Wang VCX, editor. Encyclopedia of information communication technologies and adult education integration. Information Science Reference. New York (NY): Hershey; p. 674–686.
   Google Scholar
• Martin P. 2008. Teacher qualification guidelines, ecological literacy and outdoor education. Aust J Outdoor Educ. 12:32–38.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews MH. 1987. Gender, home range and environmental cognition. Trans Inst Br Geogr. 12:43–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDaniel J, Alley KD. 2005. Connecting local environmental knowledge and land use practices: a human ecosystem approach to urbanization in West Georgia. Urban Ecosyst. 8:23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Miller JD. 1998. The measurement of civic scientific literacy. Public Underst Sci. 7:203–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minnesota EE. 2002-2008. The Minnesota report cards on environmental literacy. Available from: http://www.seek.state.mn.us/eemn_b.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Morrone M, Mancl K, Carr K. 2001. Development of a metric to test group differences in ecological knowledge as one component of environmental literacy. J Environ Educ. 32:33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy TP, Olson AM. 2008. The third Minnesota report card on environmental literacy. Available from: http://www.seek.state.mn.us/publications/reportcard2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Orr DW. 1992. Ecological literacy: education and the transition to a postmodern world. Albany (NY): State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pe’er S, Goldman D, Yavetz B. 2007. Environmental literacy in teacher training: attitudes, knowledge, and environmental behavior of beginning students. J Environ Educ. 39:45–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitman SD, Daniels CB. 2016. Quantifying ecological literacy in an adult western community: the development and application of a new assessment tool and community standard. Plos One. 11:e0150648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scholz RW. 2011. Environmental literacy in science and society: from knowledge to decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler S. 1998. Planning sustainable and livable cities. In: Legates RT, Stout F, editors. The city reader. 3rd ed. Oxford (UK): Routledge; p. 486–496.
   Google Scholar
• Wooltorton S. 2006. Ecological literacy: ‘basic’ for a sustainable future. Available from: http://www.afssse.asn.au/seaa/conf2006/wooltorton_s.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wridt P. 1999. The worlds of girls and boys: geographic experience and informal learning opportunities. J Geogr. 98:253–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar