The understanding and role of uncertainty and risk in climate change adaptation: local and central authorities in Norway

References

• Beck U, Bonss W, Lau C. 2003. The theory of reflexive modernization: problematic, hypotheses and research programme. Theory Culture Society. 20(2):1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonneuil C, Fressoz JB. 2017 [2013]. The shock of the anthropocene. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Brown JD, Damery SL. 2009. Uncertainty and risk. In: Castree N, Demeritt D, Liverman D, Rhoads B, editors. A companion to environmental geography. Oxford (UK): Wiley-Blackwell; p. 81–94.
   Google Scholar
• Burton I, Dirringer E, Smith J. 2006. Adaptation to climate change: international policy options. Arlington (US): Pew Center on Global Climate Change.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson M. 2008. Wrongful harm to future generations: the case of climate change. Environ Values. 17:471–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DSB. 2010. Nasjonalt risikobilde – prosess og metode [National risk images: process and method]. Tønsberg (Norway): Norwegian Directorate for Civil Protection and Emergency Planning.
   Google Scholar
• DSB. 2015. Fremgangsmåte for utarbeidelse av Nasjonalt risikobilde (NRB) [An approach for formulating national scale risk images]. Tønsberg (Norway): Norwegian Directorate for Civil Protection and Emergency Planning.
   Google Scholar
• DSB. 2016. Risikoanalyse av regnflom i by. Krisescenarioer 2016–analyser av alvorlige hendelser som kan ramme Norge [Risk analysis for flash floods in cities – extreme event scenarios that may hit Norway]. Tønsberg (Norway): Norwegian Directorate for Civil Protection and Emergency Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis EC. 2011. Human resilience on an artificial earth. In: Shellenberger M, Nordhaus T, editors. Love your monsters: postenvironmentalism and the anthropocene. Oakland (CA): Breakthrough Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Field CB, Barros VR, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Van Aalst M, Adger WN, Arent DJ, Barnett J, Betts R, Bilir TE, et al. 2014. Technical summary. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, et al., Editors. Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part A: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; p. 35–94.
   Google Scholar
• Hanssen-Bauer I, Drange H, Førland EJ, Roald LA, Børsheim KY, Hisdal H, Lawrence D, Nesje A, Sandven S, Sorteberg A, et al. 2009. Klima i Norge 2100 [The climate of Norway in 2100]. Oslo: The Norwegian Climate Service Centre .
   Google Scholar
• Hanssen-Bauer I, Førland EJ, Haddeland I, Hisdal H, Mayer S, Nesje A, Nilsen JEØ, Sandven S, Sandø AB, Sorteberg A, et al., editors. 2015. Klima i Norge 2100 [The climate of Norway in 2100]. Oslo: The Norwegian Climate Service Centre. NCCS-report no. 2/2015.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstad H. 2013. Håndtering av ‘wicked problems’ i kommunal planlegging. Lokal oversettelse av målsettingene om bærekraftig utvikling og bedre folkehelse i ulike planleggingspraksiser [Coping with ‘wikced problems’ in municipal planning – translating sustainable development goals and better public health in local planning practices]. Oslo: University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Hovik S, Naustdalslid J, Reitan M, Muthanna T. 2015. Adaptation to climate change: professional networks and reinforcing institutional environments. Environ Planning C: Government Policy. 33(1):104–117.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme M. 2010. Cosmopolitan climates hybridity, foresight and meaning. Theory Culture Society. 27:267–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordbakke A, Jul Røsjø M, Skogvold T, Karstensen H 2017. Kartlegging av 11 kommuners arbeid med klimatilpasning [Mapping the climate change adaptation activities and actions in 11 municipalities]. Analyse & Strategi and Multiconsult report M-647/2016. Oslo, Norway: Multiconsult.
   Google Scholar
• Knieling J. 2016. Climate adaptation governance in cities and regions: theoretical fundamentals and practical evidence. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Knight FH. 1921. Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Markussen A. 1999. Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: the case of rigour and policy relevance of critical regional studies. Reg Stud. 33(9):869–884.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore J. 2015. Capitalism in the web of life: ecology and the accumulation of capital. London (UK): Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Naustdalslid J. 2011. Climate change - the challenge of translating scientific knowledge into action. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 18(3):243–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NOU 2010:10. 2010. Et klima i endring [A changing climate]. Oslo (Norway): the Ministries’ Service Centre, Department of Information.
   Google Scholar
• NOU 2015:16. 2015. Overvann i byer og tettsteder [Surface water in cities and towns]. Oslo (Norway): the Ministries’ Service Centre, Department of Information.
   Google Scholar
• O’Riordan T, Rayner S. 1991. Risk management for global environmental change. Global Environ Change. 1(2):91–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orderud GI, Naustdalslid J. 2017. Kunnskap og klimatilpasning i offentlig forvaltning [The knowledge base of local and central government actors in adapting to climate change]. Oslo (Norway): Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences. NIBR-report 2017:4.
   Google Scholar
• Orderud GI, Winsvold M. 2012. The role of learning and knowledge in adapting to climate change: a case study of Norwegian municipalities. Int J Environ Stud. 69(6):946–961.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel HWJ, Webber MM. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci. 4(2):155–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruddiman WF. 2008. Earth’s climate: past and future. 2nd ed. New York (USA): W.H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Schelling TC. 1995. Intergenerational discounting. Energy Policy. 23(4–5):395–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner DJC, Rocks SA, Pollard SJT. 2014. A review of uncertainty in environmental risk: characterising potential natures, locations and levels. J Risk Res. 17(2):195–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen W, Broadgate W, Deutsch L, Gaffney O, Ludwig C. 2015. The trajectory of the anthropocene: the great acceleration. Anthropocene Rev. 2(1):81–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw E. 1999. Modernity and hybridity: nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890-1930. Ann Assoc Am Geographers. 89(3):443–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2013. Summary for Policymakers. In: Tf S, Qin D, Plattner GK, Tignor M, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V, Midgley PM, editors. Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van der Vegt RG. 2017. A literature review on the relationship between risk governance and public engagement in relation to complex environmental issues. J Risk Res. 1–18. doi:10.1080/13669877.2017.1351466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker WE, Herremoës P, Rotmans J, van der Sluijs JP, Van Asselt MBA, Janssen P, von Krauss MPK. 2003. Defining uncertainty. A conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model based decision support. Integr Assess. 4:5–17.
   Google Scholar
• Westskog H, Vevatne J, editors, 2007. Tilpasning til klimaendringer i Oslo-regionen [Adapting to climate change: the case of Oslo region]. Oslo (Norway): CIENS. CIENS-report 1–2007.
   Google Scholar
• White Paper 33 (2012–2013). 2013. Klimatilpasning i Norge [Climate adaptation in Norway]. Oslo (Norway): The Government.
   Google Scholar
• Zandvoort M, van der Vlist MJ, van den Brink A. 2017. Handling uncertainty through adaptiveness in planning approaches: comparing adaptive delta management and the water diplomacy framework. J Environ Policy Plann. 1–15. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2017.1347035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar