Transitions to sustainability in small islands: combining foresight scenarios with multi-criteria analysis to develop viable sustainability strategies in an EOR

References

• Antunes P, Karadzic V, Santos R, Beça P, Osann A. 2011. Participatory multi-criteria analysis of irrigation management alternatives: the case of the Caia irrigation district, Portugal. Int J of Agr Sust. 9(2):334–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azores Regional Government (2013) [accessed 2018 Mar 3] http://www.azores.gov.pt
   Google Scholar
• Baldacchino G. 2006. Managing the hinterland beyond: two ideal-type strategies of economic development for small islands territories. A Pac. 47(1):45–60.
   Google Scholar
• Benedicto J. 2014. Identity and decision-making for sustainability in the context of small islands. JICZ. 14(2):199–213.
   Google Scholar
• Benedicto Royuela J, Malcolm E, Buckingham S. 2016. Participative foresight scenario mapping: adapting an MCM method to appraise foresight scenarios for the long term sustainable development of a small island. IJMDM. 6(2):118–137.
   Google Scholar
• Berkhout F, Hertin J. 2002. Foresight futures scenarios. Developing and applying a participative strategic planning tool. GMI. 37:37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Briguglio L. 1995. Small island developing states and their economic vulnerabilities. W Dev. 23(9):1615–1632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess J. 2000. Situating knowledges, sharing values and reaching collective decisions: the cultural turn in environmental decision-making. In: Naylor S, Ryan J, Cook I, Crouch D, editors. Cultural turns/geographical turns. Harlow (UK): Prentice Hall; p. 273–287.
   Google Scholar
• Burgess J, Stirling A, Clark J, Davies G, Eames M, Mayer M, Staley K, Williamson S. 2007. Deliberative mapping: a novel analytic-deliberative methodology to support contested science-policy decisions. Publ Und of S. 16(3):299–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnam-Fink M. 2015. Creating narrative scenarios: science fiction prototyping at emerge. Futures. 70:48–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambers G. 2006. Islanders’ perspectives on sustainable living. ISJ.1. 1:125–142.
   Google Scholar
• Campling L. 2006. A critical political economy of the small island developing states concept: south-south cooperation for island citizens? J of Dev Soc. 22(3):235–285.
   Google Scholar
• Cinelli M, Coles SR, Kirwan K. 2014. Analysis of the potentials of multi criteria decision analysis methods to conduct sustainability assessment. Eco Indic. 46:138–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• COM. 2008. The outermost regions: and asset for Europe, nº642 final. [accessed 2016 Nov 28]. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52008DC0642
   Google Scholar
• Davies G. 2006. Mapping deliberation: calculation, articulation and intervention in the politics of organ transplantation. Eco and Soc. 35(2):232–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daw TM, Coulthard S, Cheung WWL, Brown K, Abunge C, Galafassi D, Peterson GD, McClanahan TR, Omukoto JO, Munyi L. 2015. Evaluating taboo trade-offs in ecosystems services and human well-being. PNAS. 112(22):6949–6954.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depraetere C. 2008. The challenge of Nissology: A global outlook on the world archipelago. Part II: the global and scientific vocation of Nissology. ISJ. 3(1):17–36.
   Google Scholar
• Duic N, Krajacic G, Da Graça Carvalho M. 2008. RenewIslands methodology for sustainable energy and resource planning for islands. Ren and Sust En Rev. 12(4):1032–1062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumont Y, Russell JC, Lecomte V, Le Corre M. 2010. Conservation of endangered endemic seabirds within a multi-predator context: the Barau’s petrel in Réunion Island. Nat Res Mod. 23(3):381–436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eames M, Egmose J. 2011. Community foresight for urban sustainability: insights from the Citizens Science for Sustainability (SuScit) project. Tech For & Soc Cha. 78(5):769–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eames M, McDowall W. 2010. Sustainability, foresight and contested futures: exploring visions and pathways in the transition to a hydrogen economy. Tec Anal and Strat Manag. 22(6):671–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estévez RA, Gelcich S. 2015. Participative multi-criteria decision analysis in marine management and conservation: research progress and the challenge of integrating value judgments and uncertainty. Mar Pol. 61:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2009. Mémorandum conjoint des Régions Ultrapériphériques, Les RUP à l’horizon 2020, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria; [accessed 2016 Nov 28]. http://www.eurosfaire.prd.fr/7pc/bibliotheque/consulter.php?id=1812.
   Google Scholar
• Gamboa G. 2006. Social multi-criteria evaluation of different development scenarios of the Aysén region, Chile. Eco Eco. 59(1):157–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamper CD, Turcanu C. 2007. On the governmental use of multi-criteria analysis. Eco Eco. 62(2):298–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowdy J, Erickson JD. 2005. The approach of ecological economics. Camb J of Eco. 29(2):207–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grydehøj A. 2011. Making the most of smallness: economic policy in microstates and subnational island jurisdictions. Sp and Pol. 15(3):183–196.
   Google Scholar
• Haughton G. 1999. Environmental justice and the sustainable city. J of Plan Ed and Res. 18:233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr SA. 2005. What is small island sustainable development about? Oc and Coas Manag. 48(7–8):503–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotlok N 2005. Emigration et insularisme au Cap-Vert.; [accessed 2016 Nov 25]. https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00610193/document. French.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger R, Gibbs D. 2007. Introduction: problematizing the politics of sustainability. In: Krueger R, Gibbs D, editors. The sustainable development paradox. Urban political economy in the United States and Europe. New York (USA): Guildford Press; p. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• McDowall W, Eames M. 2007. Towards a sustainable hydrogen economy: a multi-criteria mapping of the UK-SHEC hydrogen futures. Int J of Hyd Ene. 32:4611–4626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milojevic I, Inayatullah S. 2015. Narrative foresight. Fut. 73:151–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munda G. 2004. Social multi-criteria evaluation: methodological foundations and operational consequences. Eur J of Op Res. 158(3):662–677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munier N. 2004. Multicriteria environmental assessment. A practical guide. Dordrecht (NL): Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Paschen JA, Ison R. 2014. Narrative research in climate change adaptation –exploring a complementary paradigm for research and governance. Res Pol. 43:1083–1092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Péron F. 2004. The contemporary lure of the island. Tijd Eco En Soc Geo. 95(3):326–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putz G 1984. On Islanders. In: Conkling P, Platt DD, editors. Holding ground. The best of Island Journal 1984-2004. Rockland (Canada): Island institute; p.28–31.
   Google Scholar
• Renn O. 2006. Participatory processes for designing environmental polities. LUP. 23(1):34–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Secretaria Regional do Ambiente e do Mar (SRAM) 2006. PReDSA: perspectivas para a sustentabilidade na Região Autónoma dos Açores, Contributo para a elaboração de um plano regional de desenvolvimento sustentável. Azores (Portugal): SRAM. Portuguese.
   Google Scholar
• Serviço Regional de Estatística dos Açores (SREA) 2015. Query ad-hoc; [accessed 2018 Mar 18]. http://estatistica.azores.gov.pt:90/Default.aspx. Portuguese
   Google Scholar
• Stirling A. 1997. Multi-criteria mapping, mitigating the problems of environmental valuation? In: Foster J, editor. Valuing nature?: economics, ethics and environment. London (UK): Routledge; p. 186–210.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling A. 1998. Risk at a turning point? J of Ris Res. 1(2):97–109.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling A. 2006. Analysis, participation and power: justification and closure in participatory multi-criteria analysis. LUP. 23(1):95–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling A, Lobstein T, Millstone E. 2007. Methodology for obtaining stakeholder assessments of obesity policy options in the PorGrow project. Ob Rev. 8(2):17–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stirling A, Mayer S 1999. Rethinking risk: a pilot multi-criteria mapping of a genetically modified crop in agricultural systems in the UK, report for the UK roundtable on genetic modification. Science and Technology Policy Research Unit (SPRU), University of Sussex. [accessed 2018 Mar 18]. http://www.sussex.ac.uk/Users/prfh0/Rethinking%20Risk.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UN. 1992. Agenda 21, Earth summit – the United Nations program of action from Rio, section III, paragraph 23.2. accessed 2018 Mar 18]. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UN. 2010. Sustainable development: from Brundtland to Rio 2012 background paper. New York (NY): United Nations Headquarters. [accessed 2018 Mar 18. http://www.surdurulebilirkalkinma.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Background_on_Sustainable_Development.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wynne B 2007. Taking European knowledge society seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research, European Commission; accessed 2018 Mar 18. http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/european-knowledge-society_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Zionts S. 1979. MCDM - if not a Roman numeral, then what? Int. 9(4):94–101.
   Google Scholar