Perceived importance of sustainability dimensions in the Portuguese metal industry

References

• [INE] Instituto Nacional de Estatística. 2017. Empresas em Portugal – 2015. Lisbon: Instituto Nacional de Estatística.
   Google Scholar
• Annunziata E, Pucci T, Frey M, Zanni L. 2018. The role of organizational capabilities in attaining corporate sustainability practices and economic performance: evidence from Italian wine industry. J Clean Prod. 171:1300–1311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arena M, Azzone G, Platti M. 2012. ISO14001: motivations and benefits in the Italian metal industry. Int J of Eng Bus Manag. 4(41):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Arevalo JA, Aravind D. 2017. Strategic outcomes in voluntary CSR: reporting economic and reputational benefits in principles-based initiatives. J of Bus Ethics. 144:201–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashrafi M, Adams M, Walker TR, Magnan G. 2018. How corporate social responsibility can be integrated into corporate sustainability: a theoretical review of their relationships. Int J Sust Dev World Ecol.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attig N, Boubakri N, El Ghoul S, Guedhami O. 2016. Firm internationalization and corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics. 134(2):171–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayuso S, Navarrete-Baéz FE. 2018. How does entrepreneurial and international orientation influence SMEs’ commitment to sustainable development? Empirical evidence from Spain and Mexico. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Mgmt25:80–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bansal P. 2005. Evolving sustainability: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strat Manag J. 26:197–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner RJ, Rauter R. 2017. Strategic perspectives of corporate sustainability management to develop a sustainable organization. J Clean Prod. 140:81–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caiado RGG, Dias RF, Mattos LV, Veiga L, Quelhas OLG, Leal Filho W. 2017. Towards sustainable development through the perspective of eco-efficiency - a systematic literature review. J Clean Prod. 165:890–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caiado RGG, Quelhas OLG, Nascimento DLM, Anholon R, Leal Filho W. 2018. Measurement of sustainability performance in Brazilian organizations. Int J of Sust Dev and World Ecol. 25(4):312–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvo-Mora A, Domínguez-CC M, Criado F. 2017. Assessment and improvement of organisational social impact through the EFQM excellence model. Total Qual Manag Bus Excellence. 29(11-12):1259–1278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciegis R, Ramanauskiene J, Martinkus B. 2009. The concept of sustainable development and its use for sustainability scenarios. Eng Econ. 62(2):28–37.
   Google Scholar
• Dsouli O, Khan N, N K K, Skouloudis A. 2017. Mitigating the Davos dilemma: towards a global self-sustainability index. Int J of Sust Dev and World Ecol. 25(1):81–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkington J. 1998. Cannibals with forks – the triple bottom line of 21^st century business. Grabiola Island: New Society Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Field A. 2009. Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca LM. 2015. Strategic drivers for implementing sustainability programs in Portuguese organizations - let’s listen to Aristotle: from triple to quadruple bottom line. Sust. 8(3):136–142.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca LM, Ferro RL. 2016. Does it pay to be social responsible? Portuguese SMEs feedback. Intang Cap. 12(2):487–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forza C. 2002. Survey research in operations management: a process-based perspective. Int J of Oper and Prod Manag. 22(2):152–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman RE. 1984. Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier J. 2013. Institutional theory and corporate sustainability: determinant versus interactive approaches. Org Manag J. 10(2):86–96.
   Google Scholar
• Giddings B, Hopwood B, O’Brien G. 2002. Environment, economy and society: fitting them together into sustainable development. Sust Dev. 10(4):187–196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjølberg M. 2009. Measuring the immeasurable? Constructing an index of CSR practices and CSR performance in 20 countries. Scand J of Manag. 25(1):10–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halbesleben JRB, Whitman MV. 2013. Evaluating survey quality in health services research: a decision framework for assessing nonresponse bias. Health Serv Res. 48:913–930.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansmann R, Mieg HA, Frischknecht P. 2012. Principal sustainability components: empirical analysis of synergies between the three pillars of sustainability. Int J of Sust Dev and World Ecol. 19(5):451–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood I, Humby S, Harwood A. 2011. On the resilience of corporate social responsibility. Eur Manag J. 29(4):283–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkes J. 2001. The fourth pillar of sustainability. Culture’s essential role in public planning. Melbourne: Cultural Development Network and Common Ground Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Henriques J, Catarino J. 2015. Sustainable value and cleaner production - research and application in 19 Portuguese SME. J Clean Prod. 96:379–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilsdorf WC, De mattos CA, De Campos Maciel LO. 2017. Principles of sustainability and practices in the heavy-duty vehicle industry: a study of multiple cases. J Clean Prod. 141:1231–1239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hörisch J, Ortas E, Schaltegger S, Álvarez I. 2015. Environmental effects of sustainability management tools: an empirical analysis of large companies. Ecol Econ. 120:241–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hribar MS, Bole D, Pipan P. 2015. Sustainable heritage management: social, economic and other potentials of culture in local development. Procedia Soc and Behav Sci. 188:103–110.
   Google Scholar
• Jonckheere AR. 1954. A distribution-free k-sample test against ordered aAlternatives. Biometrika. 41(1–2):133–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk A, Van Tulder R. 2010. International business, corporate social responsibility and sustainable development. Int Bus Rev. 19(2):119–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuei C, Lu MH. 2013. Integrating quality management principles into sustainability management. Total Qual Manag Bus Excellence. 24(1–2):62–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamm E, Tosti-Kharas J, King CE. 2015. Empowering employee sustainability: perceived organizational support toward the environment. J of Bus Ethics. 128(1):207–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leal Filho W, Azeiteiro U, Alves F, Pace P, Mifsud M, Brandli L, Caeiro SS, Disterheft A. 2017. Reinvigorating the sustainable development research agenda: the role of the sustainable development goals (SDG). Int J of Sust Dev and World Ecol. 25(2):131–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano R. 2008. Envisioning sustainability three-dimensionally. J Clean Prod. 16(17):1838–1846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozano R. 2012. Towards better embedding sustainability into companies’ systems: an analysis of voluntary corporate initiatives. J Clean Prod. 25:14–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margolis JD, Walsh JP. 2003. Misery loves companies: rethinking social initiatives by business. Adm Sci Q. 48:268–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marimon F, Llach J, Bernardo M. 2011. Comparative analysis of diffusion of the ISO 14001 standard by sector of activity. J Clean Prod. 19(15):1734–1744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Conesa I, Soto-Acosta P, Palacios-Manzano M. 2017. Corporate social responsibility and its effect on innovation and firm performance: an empirical research in SMEs. J Clean Prod. 142:2374–2383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miroshnychenko I, Barontini R, Testa F. 2017. Green practices and financial performance: a global outlook. J Clean Prod. 147:340–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moa G, Gonçalves JS, Vasconcelos RM. 2017. Sustainable development: case study in the implementation of renewable energy in Brazil. J Clean Prod. 142:461–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myllyviita T, Antikainen R, Leskinen P. 2017. Sustainability assessment tools–their comprehensiveness and utilization in company-level sustainability assessments in Finland. Int J of Sust Dev and World Ecol. 24(3):236–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlitzky M, Schmidt FL, Rynes SL. 2003. Corporate Social and Financial Performance: a Meta-Analysis. 24:403–441.
   Google Scholar
• Pantouvakis A, Vlachos I, Zervopoulos PD. 2017. Market orientation for sustainable performance and the inverted-U moderation of firm size: evidence from the Greek shipping industry. J Clean Prod. 165:705–720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto R, Dominguez C. 2012. Characterization of the practice of project management in 30 Portuguese metalworking companies. Procedia Technol. 5:83–92.
   Google Scholar
• Porter ME, Kramer MR. 2011. Creating Shared Value. Harv Bus Rev. 89(1–2):62–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajeev A, Rupesh K, Sidhartha K. 2017. Evolution of sustainability in supply chain management: a literature review. J Clean Prod. 162:299–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revilla MA, Saris WE, Krosnick JA. 2014. Choosing the number of categories in agree-disagree scales. Sociol Methods Res.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha M, Searcy C, Karapetrovic S. 2007. Integrating sustainable development into existing management systems. Total Qual Manag Bus Excellence. 18(1–2):83–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Severo EA, Jcf DG, Dorion ECH, Nodari CH. 2015. Cleaner production, environmental sustainability and organizational performance: an empirical study in the Brazilian metal-mechanic industry. J Clean Prod. 96:118–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvestre JW, Antunes P, Amaro A, Leal Filho W. 2015. Assessment of corporate sustainability: study of hybrid relations using hybrid bottom line model. Int J of Sust Dev and World Ecol. 24(5):302–312.
   Google Scholar
• Silvestre JW, Antunes P, Leal Filho W. 2014. Hybrid bottom line: another perspective on the sustainability of organizations. Int J Sust Dev and World Ecol. 21(5):456–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvestre JW, Antunes P, Leal Filho W. 2016. The corporate sustainability typology: analysing sustainability drivers and fostering sustainability at enterprises. Technol and Econ Dev of Economy. 24(2):513–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siva V, Gremyr I, Bergquist B, Garvare R, Zobel T, Isaksson R. 2016. The support of quality management to sustainable development: a literature review. J Clean Prod. 138(2):148–157.
   Google Scholar
• Skouloudis A, Evagelinos K. 2012. A research design for mapping national CSR terrains. Int J of Sust Dev and World Ecol. 19(2):130–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skouloudis A, Isaac D, Evagelinos K. 2016. Revisiting the national corporate social responsibility index. Int J of Sust Dev and World Ecol. 23(1):61–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soini K, Birkeland I. 2014. Exploring the scientific discourse on cultural sustainability. Geoforum. 51:213–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand R, Freeman RE, Hockerts K. 2015. Corporate social responsibility and sustainability in scandinavia: an overview. J Bus Ethics. 127:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukitsch M, Engert S, Baumgartner RJ. 2015. The implementation of corporate sustainability in the european automotive industry: an analysis of sustainability reports. Sustain. 7:11504–11531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarí JJ. 2011. Research into quality management and social responsibility. J of Bus Ethics. 102:623–638.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson MC, Wu J. 2017. The problems of weak sustainability and associated indicators. Int J Sust Dev and World Ecol. 24(1):44–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wu MW, Shen CH. 2013. Corporate social responsibility in the banking industry: motives and financial performance. J Bank Financ. 37:3529–3547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar