Barriers to worldwide institutionalization of social and environmental disclosure

References

• Aerts W, Cormier D, Magnan M. 2006. Intra-industry imitation in corporate environmental reporting: an international perspective. J Accounting Public Policy. 25(3):299–331.
   Google Scholar
• Aoki M. 2001. Toward a comparative institutional analysis. London: MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Beckert J. 2010. Institutional isomorphism revisited: convergence and divergence in institutional change. Sociol Theor. 28(2):150–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxenbaum E, Jonsson S. 2008. Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling. The Sage Handb F Organ Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin & R. Suddaby, Chap. 2, 78–98.
   Google Scholar
• Brammer S, Jackson G, Matten D. 2012. Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: new perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Rev. 10:3–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busenitz L, Gomez C, Spencer J. 2000. Country institutional profiles: unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Acad Manag J. 43(5):994–1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell JL. 2007. Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Acad Management Rev. 32(3):946–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayannis EG, Pirzadeh A, Popescu D. 2012. Institutional learning and knowledge transfer across epistemic communities: new tools of global governance. Vol 13. Washington, DC: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Chen S, Bouvain P. 2009. Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany. J Bus Ethics. 87(1):299–317.
   Google Scholar
• Cormier D, Gomez Dutierrez L. 2018. On the search for mimetic patterns in environmental disclosure: an international perspective. Int J Sust Dev World. doi:10.1080/13504509.2018.1439849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormier D, Ledoux M-J, Magnan M. 2011. The informational contribution of social and environmental disclosures for investors. Manag Decis. 49(8):1276–1304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cormier D, Magnan M. 1999. Corporate environmental disclosure strategies: determinants, costs and benefits. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance. 14(4):429–451.
   Google Scholar
• Cormier D, Magnan M. 2003. Environmental reporting management: a continental European perspective. J Accounting Public Policy. 22(1):43–62.
   Google Scholar
• Cormier D, Magnan M. 2014. The impact of social responsibility disclosure and governance on financial analysts’ information environment. Cor Gov. 14(4):467–484.
   Google Scholar
• de Villiers C, Alexander D. 2014. The institutionalisation of corporate social responsibility reporting. Br Accounting Rev. 46(2):198–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio P, Powell W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev. 48(2):147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. 1991. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis vol. 17. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• EIU. 2014. Democracy index 2014. The economist. [accessed 2017 Nov 09]. https://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx?campaignid=Democracy0115.
   Google Scholar
• EIU. 2015. Democracy index 2015: democracy in an age of anxiety. The economist. [accessed 2017 Nov 09]. https://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx?campaignid=DemocracyIndex2015.
   Google Scholar
• EIU. 2017. The economist intelligence unit. [accessed 2017 Nov 09]. https://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx?campaignid=DemocracyIndex2017.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein MJ, Buhovac AR. 2014. Making sustainability work: best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts. California, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Fortanier F, Kolk A, Pinkse J. 2011. Harmonization in CSR reporting. Manag Int Rev. 51(5):665–696.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortin F, Gagnon J. (edited by). 2010. Fondements et étapes du processus de recherche: méthodes quantitatives et qualitatives. Montréal (QC):Chenelière Éducation.
   Google Scholar
• Gendron C, Lapointe A, Turcotte MF. 2004. Responsabilité sociale et régulation de l’entreprise mondialisée. Relations Industrielles/Industrial Relations. 59(1):73–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouvernement C. ALENA @ 20 ans - faits saillants 2012 [accessed 2015 oct 10]. http://www.international.gc.ca/trade-agreements-accords-commerciaux/agr-acc/nafta-alena/facts.aspx?lang=fra.
   Google Scholar
• Haniffa RM, Cooke TE. 2005. The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. J Accounting Public Policy. 24(5):391–430.
   Google Scholar
• Haunschild P, Chandler D. 2008. Institutional-level learning: learning as a source of institutional change. The Sage Handb F Organ Institutionalism, edited by R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin & R. Suddaby, Chap. 26, 624–649.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins C, Stubbs W, Milne M. 2018. Is sustainability reporting becoming institutionalised? The role of an issues-based field. J Bus Ethics. 147(2):309–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstede G. 1980. Motivation, leadership, and organization: do American theories apply abroad? Organ Dyn. 9(1):42–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk A. 2005. Environmental reporting by multinationals from the triad: convergence or divergence? Manag Int Rev. 45(1):145–166.
   Google Scholar
• La Porta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny RW. 1998. Law and finance. J Polit Econ. 106(6):1113–1155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrinaga C. 2007. Sustainability reporting: insights from neo-institutional theory. Sustainability accounting and accountability. London (u.a.): Routledge. 150–167. 978-0-415-38488-9.
   Google Scholar
• Lim A. 2017. Global corporate responsibility disclosure: A comparative analysis of field, national, and global influences. Int Sociol. 32(1):61–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim A, Tsutsui K. 2012. Globalization and commitment in corporate social responsibility. Am Sociol Rev. 77(1):69–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Ferrero J, García-Sánchez IM. 2017. Coercive, normative and mimetic isomorphism as determinants of the voluntary assurance of sustainability reports. Int Business Rev. 26(1):102–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matten D, Moon J. 2008. “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Acad Management Rev. 33(2):404–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer JW, Rowan B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am J Sociol. 83(2):340–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer JW, Scott WR. 1992. Organizational environments: ritual and rationality. California, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• North D. 2010. Understanding the process of economic change. New Jersey, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North DC. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, Angleterre: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Radavoi CN, Bian Y. 2014. Enhancing the accountability of transnational corporations: the case for ‘Decoupling’Environmental issues. Environ Law Rev. 16(3):168–182.
   Google Scholar
• Scott WR. 1995. Institutions and organizations. Vol. 2. USA (CA): Sage Thousand Oaks.
   Google Scholar
• Scott WR, Levitt RE, Orr RJ. 2011. Global projects: institutional and political challenges. Cambridge, Angleterre: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suchman MC. 1995. Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Management Rev. 20(3):571–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittrock B. 1998. Early modernities: varieties and transitions. Daedalus. 127(3):19–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar