Selection and integration of environmental impacts in the Danish transport infrastructure assessment process

References

• Barfod MB. 2012. Optimising Transport Decision Making using Customised Decision Models and Decision Conferences [dissertation]. Department of Transport, Technical University of Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Barfod MB. 2018. Sustainable transport planning: involving stakeholders in the decision support process using planning workshops and MCDA. Transport. 33(4). Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Barfod MB, Salling KB. 2015. A new composite decision support framework for strategic and sustainable transport appraisals. In: Transportation research Part A: policy and practice. Vol. 72. Elsevier; p. 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• [CC and MF] City of Copenhagen and Mayor of Frederiksberg. 2006. The City Ring (in Danish). Copenhagen. VVM report and Environmental report.
   Google Scholar
• Belton V, Stewart TJ. 2002. Multi criteria decision analysis: an integrated approach. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Booz & Co. and Temple. 2011. HS2 London to the West Midlands appraisal of sustainability.
   Google Scholar
• Cornet Y. 2016. Indicators and beyond: Assessing the sustainability of transport projects [dissertation]. DTU Management Engineering, Technical University of Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Cornet Y, Barradale MJ, Gudmundsson H, Barfod MB. 2018. Engaging multiple actors in large-scale transport infrastructure project appraisal: an application of MAMCA to the case of HS2 high-speed rail. J Adv Transp. 2018:1–22. Article ID 9267306.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza, R., D’Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G. Sutton, P. and van den Belt, M. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 387:253–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [DTA] Danish Transport Agency. 2009. Copenhagen – Ringsted project (in Danish). Copenhagen. Environmental Report part 1.
   Google Scholar
• [DRD] Danish Road Directorate. 2010a. New fixed link at Frederikssund (in Danish). Report 351. Summary report.
   Google Scholar
• [DRD] Danish Road Directorate. 2010b. By-pass road abound Næstved (in Danish). Report 365. Summary report.
   Google Scholar
• [DRD] Danish Road Directorate. 2011. The 3th fixed link across the Limfjord (in Danish). Report 379. Summary report.
   Google Scholar
• [DRD] Danish Road Directorate. 2014a. Fixed link across Storstrøm (in Danish). Report 516. Summary report.
   Google Scholar
• [DRD] Danish Road Directorate. 2014b. By-pass road abound Haderup (in Danish). Report 509. Summary report.
   Google Scholar
• [DME] Danish Ministry of Environment. 2015. Act. 1832: Assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (in Danish), according to Danish law for planning.
   Google Scholar
• [DRD] Danish Road Directorate. 2015. By-pass road abound Ribe (in Danish). Report 533. Summary report.
   Google Scholar
• [DMT] Danish Ministry of Transport. 2015. Light-rail in Ring corridor 3 (in Danish). Copenhagen. VVM report.
   Google Scholar
• Daly HE. 1990. Toward some operational principles of sustainable development. Ecol Econ. 2(1):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• EU. 2014. Amending Directive 2011/92/EU on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private provects on the environment. Directive 2014/52/EU of 16 April 2014. European Comission.
   Google Scholar
• GOV. 2013. Guidance V: Appraisal tables of Department for Transport. London.
   Google Scholar
• Gudmundsson H, Hall RP, Marsden G, Zietsman J. 2015. Sustainable transportation – indicators, frameworks, and performance management. 1st ed. Denmark: Samfundslitteratur; p. 159.
   Google Scholar
• HS2 Ltd. 2013. HS2 phase one environmental statement: documents. Accessed May 17th, 2018. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/hs2-phase-one-environmental-statement-documents.
   Google Scholar
• Joumard R, Gudmundsson H. 2010. Indicators of environmental sustainability in transport.  An interdisciplinary approach to methods. INRETS, p. 422, Recherches, A. Lauby.
   Google Scholar
• [MÄ and KC] Municipality of Älmhult and Kronoberg County. 2011. Environemtal impact assessment appurtenant work plan for road 23 Älmhult-Växjö, part âlmhult-Ljungstorp and part Ljungstorp-Mölleryd (in Swedish). Jönköping. Examination report, approved by the Swedish Transport Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Joumard R, Nicolas JP. 2010. Transport project assessment methodology within the framework of sustainable development. Ecol Indic. 10(2):136–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• [MN and SC] Municipality of Nacka and Stockholm County. 2014. Environmental impact assessment appurtenant road plan, road 222 Skurubron (in Swedish). Sundbyberg. Examination report. Approved by the Swedish Transport Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Leleur S. 2012. Complex strategic choices: applying systemic planning for strategic decision making. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• [NCHOD] National Centre for Health Out-comes Development. 2005. Compendium of clinical and health indicators user guide. London: National Centre for Health Out-comes Development (NCHOD), London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
   Google Scholar
• Marsden G, Kelly C, Snell C. 2006. Selecting indicators for strategic performance management. J Transp Res Board. 1956(1):21–29.
   Google Scholar
• Morris P, Therivel R. 2001. Methods of environmental impact assessment. 2nd ed. New York: Spon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen O.A. (2011). Fremtidens behov for Transportkorridorer i Hovedstadsområdet. Report from DTU Transport (in Danish)
   Google Scholar
• Niemeijer D. 2002. Developing indicators for environmental policy: data-driven and theorydriven approaches examined by example. Environ Sci Policy. 5:91–103.
   Google Scholar
• Niemeijer D, de Groot RS. 2008. A conceptual framework for selecting environmental indicator sets. Ecol Indic. 8:14–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesen IM. 2016. Transport Infrastructure Assessment and EIA: Determination and integration of Environmental Impacts in a Socio-Economic Perspective [B.Eng thesis]. Department of Transport, Technical University of Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce D., Atkinson G.Mourato S. (2006). Cost-benefit analysis and the environment: Recent developments. OECD Environment Working Paper
   Google Scholar
• [RND and DNA] Rail Net Denmark and Danish Nature Agency. 2014. Electrification and upgrading of speed limits, North of Køge – Næstved (in Danish). Copenhagen. Final VVM report.
   Google Scholar
• Pryn MR, Cornet Y, Salling KB. 2015. Applying sustainability theory to transport infrastructure assessment using a multiplicative AHP decision support model. Transport. 30(3):330–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty TL. 1977. Scenarios and priorities in transport planning: application to the Sudan. Transport Res. 11:343–350.
   Google Scholar
• Salling KB. 2008. Assessment of Transport Projects: Risk Analysis and Decision Support [dissertation]. Department of Transport, Technical University of Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• [SRA] The Swedish Rail Administration. 2009. Environmental consequence description, railway report, Ostlänken section Norrköping C – Linköping C (in Swedish). Sundbyberg. Final report.
   Google Scholar
• [STA] The Swedish Transport Administration. 2013. Report, railway plan Mälar track, Tomteboda-Huvudstra, Municipality of Solna (in Swedish). Spånga. Examination report.
   Google Scholar
• Sund, Bælt. 2007. Resume af indledende undersøgelser Havnetunnel København Nordhavn til Sjællandsbroen. Summarizing report (in Danish)
   Google Scholar
• [TAG] Transport Analysis Guidance. 2014. The Transport Appraisal Process Department for Transport. London: Transport Appraisal and Strategic Modelling (TASM) Division.
   Google Scholar
• The Engineer. 2013. Femern ends with the largest VVM appraisals in Danish history, by Birgitte Marfelt.
   Google Scholar
• Tsamboulas DA. 2007. A tool for prioritizing multinational transport infrastructure investments. Transp Policy. 14:11–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vreeker R, Nijkamp P, Welle CT. 2002. A multicriteria decision support methodology for evaluating airport expansion plans. Transp Res Part D. 7:27–47.
   Google Scholar
• Wright S, Nelson JD, Cooper JM, Murphy S. 2009. An evaluation of the transport to employment (T2E) scheme in Highland Scotland using social return on investment (SROI). J Transp Geogr. 17:457–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zietsman J, Ramani T, Potter J, Reeder V, DeFlorio J. 2011. NCHRP REPORT 708 a guidebook for sustainability performance measurement for transportation agencies. Vol. 708. Transportation Research Board. The Transportation Research Board’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program
   Google Scholar