To what extent is Nepal’s community forestry contributing to the sustainable development goals? An institutional interaction perspective

References

• Adhikari S, Kingi T, Ganesh S. 2014. Incentives for community participation in the governance and management of common property resources: the case of community forest management in Nepal. For Policy Econ. 44:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal B. 2018. Gender equality, food security and the sustainable development goals. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 34:26–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen C, Metternicht G, Wiedmann T. 2017. An iterative framework for national scenario modelling for the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Sustainable Dev. 25:372–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelsen A, Jagger P, Babigumira R, Belcher B, Hogarth NJ, Bauch S, Börner J, Smith-Hall C, Wunder S. 2014. Environmental income and rural livelihoods: a global-comparative analysis. World Dev. 64:S12–S28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baral S, Gautam AP, Vacik H. 2018. Ecological and economical sustainability assessment of community forest management in Nepal: a reality check. J Sustainable For. 37:820–841.
   Google Scholar
• Bastakoti RR, Davidsen C. 2014. REDD+ and forest tenure security: concerns in Nepal’s community forestry. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 21:168–180.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastakoti RR, Davidsen C. 2017. Framing REDD+ at national level: actors and discourse around Nepal’s policy debate. Forests. 8:57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastos Lima MG, Kissinger G, Visseren-Hamakers IJ, Braña-Varela J, Gupta A. 2017. The sustainable development goals and REDD+: assessing institutional interactions and the pursuit of synergies. Int Environ Agreements. 17:589–606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baynes J, Herbohn J, Smith C, Fisher R, Bray D. 2015. Key factors which influence the success of community forestry in developing countries. Global Environ Change. 35:226–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattarai RC. 2011. Economic impact of community forestry in Nepal: a case of mid-hill districts of Nepal. Econ J Develop Issues. 1:75–96.
   Google Scholar
• Birch JC, Thapa I, Balmford A, Bradbury RB, Brown C, Butchart SHM, Gurung H, Hughes FMR, Mulligan M, Pandeya B, et al. 2014. What benefits do community forests provide, and to whom? A rapid assessment of ecosystem services from a Himalayan forest, Nepal. Ecosyst Serv. 8:118–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonan GB. 2008. Forests and climate change: forcings, feedbacks, and the climate benefits of forests. Science. 320:1444–1449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boström M. 2012. The problematic social dimension of sustainable development: the case of the Forest Stewardship Council. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 19:3–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen KJ, Cradock-Henry NA, Koch F, Patterson J, Häyhä T, Vogt J, Barbi F. 2017. Implementing the “Sustainable Development Goals”: towards addressing three key governance challenges—collective action, trade-offs, and accountability. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 26–27:90–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brack D. 2014. Sustainable development goals and forests: a summary of UN open working group debates and country reflections. London: International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED).
   Google Scholar
• Chakraborty RN. 2001. Stability and outcomes of common property institutions in forestry: evidence from the Terai region of Nepal. Ecol Econ. 36:341–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapagain N, Banjade MR. 2009. Community forestry and local development: experiences from the Koshi Hills of Nepal. J For Livelihood. 8:78–92. 1.
   Google Scholar
• Chhetri BBK, Johnsen FH, Konoshima M, Yoshimoto A. 2013. Community forestry in the hills of Nepal: determinants of user participation in forest management. For Policy Econ. 30:6–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corning PA. 1998. “The synergism hypothesis”: on the concept of synergy and its role in the evolution of complex systems. J Social Evol Syst. 21:133–172.
   Google Scholar
• Dahal GR, Chapagain A. 2008. Community forestry in Nepal: decentralized forest governance. Lessons from forest decentralization: money, justice and the quest for good governance in Asia-Pacific. In: Pierce Colfer CJ, Dahal GR, Capistrano D, editors. Lessons from forest decentralization: money, justice and the quest for good governance in Asia-Pacific. London, UK: Earthscan; p. 67–81.
   Google Scholar
• de França Doria M, Boyd E, Tompkins EL, Adger WN. 2009. Using expert elicitation to define successful adaptation to climate change. Environ Sci Policy. 12:810–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong W, Pokorny B, Katila P, Galloway G, Pacheco P. 2018. Community forestry and the sustainable development goals: a two way street. Forests. 9:331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devkota B, Thwaites R, Race D, Thwaites R, Race D 2017. Community forestry and community development in Nepal. Community forestry in Nepal [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Mar 4]. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/.
   Google Scholar
• DOF. 2018. Community forestry bulletin [place unknown]. Kathmandu (Nepal):Department of Forests (DOF).
   Google Scholar
• Duguma LA, Minang PA, van Noordwijk M. 2014. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in the land use sector: from complementarity to synergy. Environ Manage. 54:420–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. 2018. Forests pathways to sustainable development [place unknown]. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). editor.
   Google Scholar
• Filho WL, Tripathi SK, Guerra JBSODA, Giné-Garriga R, Lovren VO, Willats J. 2019. Using the sustainable development goals towards a better understanding of sustainability challenges. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 26:179–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilmour D 2016. Forty years of community-based forestry: a review of its extent and effectiveness. FAO Forestry Paper (FAO) eng no 176 [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Apr 27]. http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=XF2017000018.
   Google Scholar
• Giribabu D, Mohapatra C, Reddy CS, Rao PVVP. 2019. Holistic correlation of world’s largest social safety net and its outcomes with sustainable development goals. Int J Sustainable Dev World Ecol. 26:113–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratzer G, Keeton WS. 2017. Mountain forests and sustainable development: the potential for achieving the United Nations’ 2030 agenda. Mt Res Dev. 37:246–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregersen H, El Lakany H, Blaser J 2017. Forests for sustainable development: a process approach to forest sector contributions to the UN 2030 agenda for sustainable development [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Mar 3]. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/cfa/ifr/2017/00000019/a00101s1/art00002.
   Google Scholar
• Gurung A, Bista R, Karki R, Shrestha S, Uprety D, Oh S-E. 2013. Community-based forest management and its role in improving forest conditions in Nepal. Small-Scale For. 12:377–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajjar R, Oldekop JA, Cronkleton P, Etue E, Newton P, Russel AJM, Tjajadi JS, Zhou W, Agrawal A. 2016. The data not collected on community forestry. Conserv Biol. 30:1357–1362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanel KR. 2006a. Nepal’s forest policies on community forestry development. Linking People Resour. 2:53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Kanel KR 2006b. Current status of community forestry in Nepal [Internet] [Kathmandu, Nepal]. [accessed 2019 Mar 3]. http://nepalpolicynet.com/images/documents/forest/research/Current%20Status%20of%20CF%20in%20Nepal.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Karki R, Shrestha KK, Ojha H, Paudel N, Khatri DB, Nuberg I, Adhikary A. 2018. From forests to food security: pathways in Nepal’s community forestry. Small-Scale For. 17:89–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katila P, De Jong W, Galloway G, Pokorny B, Pacheco P 2017. Harnessing community and smallholder forestry for sustainable development goals.
   Google Scholar
• Khadka C, Vacik H. 2012. Comparing a top-down and bottom-up approach in the identification of criteria and indicators for sustainable community forest management in Nepal. Forestry (Lond). 85:145–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotru R. 2009. Nepal’s national REDD framework: how to start?. J For Livelihood. 6:51–56.
   Google Scholar
• Lal R. 2005. Forest soils and carbon sequestration. For Ecol Manage. 220:242–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudari HK. 2018. Linkage of Nepal’s REDD+ to SDGs and NDC. In: Oo TN editor, Regional workshop on role of REDD+ in supporting SDGs and NDCs. Nay Pyi Taw (Myanmar): MONREC and Forest Research Institute; 22–25.
   Google Scholar
• Leach M, Mearns R, Scoones I. 1999. Environmental entitlements: dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management. World Dev. 27:225–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luintel H, Bluffstone RA, Scheller RM, Adhikari B. 2017. The effect of the Nepal community forestry program on equity in benefit sharing. J Environ Dev. 26:297–321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund JF, Baral K, Bhandari NS, Chhetri BBK, Larsen HO, Øj N, Puri L, Rutt RL, Treue T. 2014. Who benefits from taxation of forest products in Nepal’s community forests? For Policy Econ. 38:119–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansuri G, Rao V. 2004. Community-based and -driven development: a critical review. World Bank Res Obs. 19:1–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meilby H, Smith-Hall C, Byg A, Larsen HO, Øj N, Puri L, Rayamajhi S. 2014. Are forest incomes sustainable? Firewood and timber extraction and productivity in community managed forests in Nepal. World Dev. 64:S113–S124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori-Clement Y. 2019. Impacts of CDM projects on sustainable development: improving living standards across Brazilian municipalities? World Dev. 113:222–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakicenovic N, Rockström J, Gaffney O, Zimm C 2016. Global commons in the anthropocene: world development on a stable and resilient planet [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Mar 3]. http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/14003/.
   Google Scholar
• Nambiar AOEKS. 2015. Forestry for rural development, poverty reduction and climate change mitigation: we can help more with wood. Aust For. 78:55–64.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson M, Griggs D, Visbeck M. 2016. Policy: map the interactions between sustainable development goals. Nature News. 534:320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niraula RR, Pokharel BK. 2016. Community forest management as climate change adaptation measure in Nepal’s Himalaya. In: Salzmann N, Huggel C, Nussbaumer SU, Ziervogel G, editors. Climate change adaptation strategies – an upstream-downstream perspective [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 101–120. [acessed 2019 Mar 3]. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40773-9_6.
   Google Scholar
• NPC. 2016. Sustainable development goals, status and roadmap: 2016-2030. Kathmandu:Government of Nepal/National Planning Commission (NPC).
   Google Scholar
• Oberthür S, Gehring T. 2006. Institutional interaction in global environmental governance: synergy and conflict among international and EU policies. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ojha H, Kanel K. 2005. 25 years of community forestry in Nepal: a review of fourth national workshop proceedings. J For Livelihood. 4(2): 56–60.
   Google Scholar
• Ojha HR 2014. Beyond the “local community”: the evolution of multi-scale politics in Nepal’s community forestry regimes [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Mar 4]. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/cfa/ifr/2014/00000016/00000003/art00007.
   Google Scholar
• Ojha HR, Banjade MR, Sunam RK, Bhattarai B, Jana S, Goutam KR, Dhungana S. 2014. Can authority change through deliberative politics?: lessons from the four decades of participatory forest policy reform in Nepal. For Policy Econ. 46:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paudel J. 2018. Community-managed forests, household fuelwood use and food consumption. Ecol Econ. 147:62–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paudyal K, Baral H, Burkhard B, Bhandari SP, Keenan RJ. 2015. Participatory assessment and mapping of ecosystem services in a data-poor region: case study of community-managed forests in central Nepal. Ecosyst Serv. 13:81–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paudyal K, Baral H, Lowell K, Keenan RJ. 2017. Ecosystem services from community-based forestry in Nepal: realising local and global benefits. Land Use Policy. 63:342–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persha L, Andersson K. 2014. Elite capture risk and mitigation in decentralized forest governance regimes. Global Environ Change. 24:265–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pokharel BK, Branney P, Nurse M, Malla YB. 2007. Community forestry: conserving forests, sustaining livelihoods and strengthening democracy. J For Livelihood. 6(2): 8–19.
   Google Scholar
• Pokharel RK. 2009. Pro-poor programs financed through nepal’s community forestry funds: does income matter? Mt Res Dev. 29:67–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pokharel RK, Neupane PR, Tiwari KR, Köhl M. 2015. Assessing the sustainability in community based forestry: a case from Nepal. For Policy Econ. 58:75–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahaman MM. 2009. Integrated Ganges basin management: conflict and hope for regional development. Water Policy. 11:168–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockström J, Sukhdev P. 2016. How food connects all the SDGs: a new way of viewing the sustainable development goals and how they are all linked to food. Stockholm Sweden: Stockholm Resilience Centre. Zugriff am.
   Google Scholar
• Rutt RL 2015. Reconceptualizing the social contributions of community forestry as citizenship [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Mar 4]. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/cfa/ifr/2015/00000017/00000003/art00006.
   Google Scholar
• Saito O, Managi S, Kanie N, Kauffman J, Takeuchi K. 2017. Sustainability science and implementing the sustainable development goals. Sustain Sci. 12:907–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapkota P, Keenan RJ, Ojha HR. 2018. Community institutions, social marginalization and the adaptive capacity: a case study of a community forestry user group in the Nepal Himalayas. For Policy Econ. 92:55–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour F, Busch J. 2016. Why forests? Why now? The science, economics, and politics of tropical forests and climate change. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shackleton CM, Shackleton SE, Buiten E, Bird N. 2007. The importance of dry woodlands and forests in rural livelihoods and poverty alleviation in South Africa. For Policy Econ. 9:558–577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shrestha KK, McManus P. 2008. The politics of community participation in natural resource management: lessons from community forestry in Nepal. Aust For. 71:135–146.
   Google Scholar
• Staddon S, Ojha HR, Nepal F, Shrestha K, Shrestha A, Adhikari A, Prasain S, Nepal F, Staddon S. 2009. Carbon financing and community forestry: a review of the questions, challenges and the case of Nepal. J For Livelihood. 8 (1): 25–32.
   Google Scholar
• Sunam RK, McCarthy JF 2010. Advancing equity in community forestry: recognition of the poor matters [Internet]. [accessed 2019 Mar 4]. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/cfa/ifr/2010/00000012/00000004/art00006.
   Google Scholar
• Swamy L, Drazen E, Johnson WR, Bukoski JJ. 2018. The future of tropical forests under the United Nations sustainable development goals. J Sustainable For. 37:221–256.
   Google Scholar
• Thoms CA. 2008. Community control of resources and the challenge of improving local livelihoods: a critical examination of community forestry in Nepal. Geoforum. 39:1452–1465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timko J, Le Billon P, Zerriffi H, Honey-Rosés J, de la Roche I, Gaston C, Sunderland TC, Kozak RA. 2018. A policy nexus approach to forests and the SDGs: tradeoffs and synergies. Curr Opin Environ Sustainability. 34:7–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESC. 2017. Report of the United Nations Forum on forests on its 2017 special session. New York (USA): United Nations Economic and Social Council.
   Google Scholar
• Vaidya A, Mayer AL. 2016. Critical review of the millennium project in Nepal. Sustainability. 8:1043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Noordwijk M, Minang PA, Dewi S, Duguma L, Bernard F. 2015. Transforming REDD+ and achieving the SDGs through support for adaptation-mitigation synergy. Nairobi, Kenya: ASB Partnership for the Tropical Forest Margins.
   Google Scholar