Hybrid, public and private environmental governance: the case of sustainable coastal zone management in Quintana Roo, Mexico

References

• Álvarez Tovar JA. 2013. Why has the transition to democracy led the Mexican presidential system to political instability? A proposal to enhance institutional arrangements. Mex Law Rev. 5(2):277–304.
   Google Scholar
• Adger WN. 2000. Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Hum Geog. 24(3):347–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almada-Villela P, Mcfield M, Kramer P, Richards Kramer P, Arias-Gonzalez E. 2002. Status of coral reefs of Mesoamerica-Mexico, Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and El Salvador. In: Wilkinson C, editor. Status of coral reefs of the world. Townsville (AU): Australian Institute of Marine Science; p. 303–324.
   Google Scholar
• Andonova LB. 2010. Public-private partnerships for the Earth: politics and patterns of hybrid authority in the multilateral system. Global Environ Polit. 10(2):25–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts B, de Koning J. 2017. Community forest management: an assessment and explanation of its performance through QCA. World Dev. 96:315–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand K. 2006. Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. Environ Policy Gov. 16:290–306.
   Google Scholar
• Baker S. 2015. Sustainable development: a new perspective. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Baker S, Chapin FS III. 2018. Going beyond “it depends”: the role of context in shaping participation in natural resource management. Ecol Soc. 23(1):20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer-Gottwein P, Gondwe BRN, Charvet G, Marín LE, Rebolledo-Vieyra M, Merediz-Alonso G. 2011. Review: the Yucatán Peninsula karst aquifer, Mexico. Hydrogeol J. 19(3):507–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes F. 2011. Restoring unity. In: Ommer RE, Perry RI, Cochrane K, Cury P, editors. World fisheries: a social-ecological analysis. Oxford (UK): Wiley-Blackwell; p. 9–28.
   Google Scholar
• Binder CR, Hinkel J, Bots PWG, Pahl-Wostl C. 2013. Comparison of frameworks for analyzing social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc. 18(4):26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boggio Vázquez J. 2008. Planeación estratégica para el desarrollo: el caso de Quintana Roo [Strategic planning for development: the case of Quintana Roo]. Teoría y Praxis. 5:69–84.
   Google Scholar
• Börzel TA, Risse T. 2002. Public-private partnerships: effective and legitimate tools of international governance? In: Grande E, Pauly LW, editors. Complex sovereignty: reconstitution of political authority in the 21st century. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; p. 195–216.
   Google Scholar
• Bray DB, Ellis EA, Armijo-Canto N, Beck CT. 2004. The institutional drivers of sustainable landscapes: a case study of the ‘Mayan Zone’ in Quintana Roo, Mexico. Land Use Policy. 21(4):333–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner L, Engelbauer M, Job H. 2018. Mitigating tourism-driven impacts on mangroves in Cancún and the Riviera Maya, Mexico: an evaluation of conservation policy strategies and environmental planning instruments. J Coast Conserv. 22(4):755–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrero Mendoza E. 2010. Gobierno y política local en México: luces y sombras de las reformas descentralizadoras [Local government and politics in Mexico: lights and shadows of decentralizing reforms]. Política y Sociedad. 47(3):165–187.
   Google Scholar
• Careaga Viliesid L, Higuera Bonfil A. 2011. Historia breve de Quintana Roo [Brief history of Quintana Roo]. Distrito Federal (MX): El Colegio de México/Fondo de Cultura Económica.
   Google Scholar
• Climo J. 1978. Collective farming in northern and southern Yucatan, Mexico: ecological and administrative determinants of success and failure. Am Ethnol. 5(2):191–205.
   Google Scholar
• Colona F, Jaffe R. 2016. Hybrid governance arrangements. Eur J Dev Res. 28(2):175–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dachary A. 1992. Quintana Roo: los retos del fin de siglo ¿Hacia un desarrollo desigual? [Quintana Roo: the challenges of the end of the century, Towards unequal development?]. In: Dachary A, Navarro López D, Arnaiz SM, editors. Quintana Roo: los retos del fin de siglo. Chetumal (MX): Centro de Investigaciones de Quintana Roo; p. 9–29.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis EA, Romero Montero JA, Hernandez Gomez IU. 2017. Deforestation processes in the state of Quintana Roo, Mexico: the role of land use and community forestry. Trop Conserv Sc. 10:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faust BB. 2001. Maya environmental successes and failures in the Yucatan Peninsula. Environ Sc Policy. 4(4–5):153–169.
   Google Scholar
• Folke C. 2006. Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environ Chang. 16(3):253–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke C, Carpenter S, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B. 2002. Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio. 31(5):437–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner TA, Côté IM, Gill JA, Grant A, Watkinson AR. 2003. Long-term region-wide declines in Caribbean corals. Science. 301(5635):958–960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerring J. 2007. Case study research: principles and practices. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glasbergen P. 2007. Setting the scene: the partnership paradigm in the making. In: Glasbergen P, Biermann F, Mol APJ, editors. Partnerships, governance and sustainable development: reflections on theory and practice. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing; p. 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Glasbergen P. 2011. Understanding partnerships for sustainable development analytically: the ladder of partnership activity as a methodological tool. Environ Policy Gov. 21(1):1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández G. 2017. El cambio político en Quintana Roo y el riesgo de la persistencia del equilibrio institucional [The political change in Quintana Roo and the risk of the persistence of the institutional balance]. Espiral. 24(70):85–134.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. 2005. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research. 15(9):1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufmann D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M 2010. Governance Matters VIII: Governance indicators for 1996-2008. Working Paper No. 4978. World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Kooiman I. 2003. Governing as governance. London (UK): Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lemos MC, Agrawal A. 2006. Environmental Governance. Annu Rev Env Resour. 31:297–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz W, Prieto L, Sanderson WC. 2000. Population, development, and environment on the Yucatan peninsula: from ancient Maya to 2030. Laxenburg (AT): International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Manuel-Navarrete D, Pelling M. 2015. Subjectivity and the politics of transformation in response to development and environmental change. Global Environ Chang. 35:558–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May J, Guillén G 2003 Mar 4. Erradicarán corrupción en desarrollos turísticos. El Universal. [accessed 2020 Jan 6; https://archivo.eluniversal.com.mx/estados/48624.html
   Google Scholar
• Mayring P. 2000. Qualitative content analysis. Forum Qualitative Social Research. 1(2):2.
   Google Scholar
• Mcfield M, Kramer P, Álvarez-Filip L, Drysdale I, Rueda-Flores M, Giró-Petersen A, Soto M 2018. Report Card for the Mesoamerican Reef. Healthy Reef Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Melbourne-Thomas J, Johnson CR, Perez P, Eustache J, Fulton EA, Cleland D. 2011. Coupling biophysical and socioeconomic models for coral reef systems in Quintana Roo, Mexican Caribbean. Ecol Soc. 16:3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris S. 2018. Corruption in Mexico: continuity amid change. In: Warf B, editor. Handbook on the geographies of corruption. Cheltenham (UK): Edward Elgar Publishing; p. 132–152.
   Google Scholar
• Murray G. 2007. Constructing paradise: the impacts of big tourism in the Mexican coastal zone. Coast Manage. 35(2–3):339–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell P, Pattberg P, Schroeder H. 2012. Multiactor governance and the environment. Annu Rev Env Resour. 37:365–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieto N. 2011. Corruption, decentralisation and caciquismo in Mexico in the last decade. SudHistoria: Revista Digital en Estudios desde el Sur. 3:102–120.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science. 325(5939):419–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paddock J, Baker S, Cullen-Unsworth L, Smith A, Unsworth R. 2018. Coupled social-ecological systems: insights from seagrass meadows in the Turks and Caicos Islands. In: Marsden T, editor. Sage handbook of nature. London: SAGE; p. 392–418.
   Google Scholar
• Pattberg P. 2005. The institutionalization of private governance: how business and nonprofit organizations agree on transnational rules. Governance. 18(4):589–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perramond EP. 2008. The rise, fall, and reconfiguration of the Mexican “ejido”. Geogr Rev. 98(3):356–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter-Bolland L, Bonilla-Moheno M, Garcia-Frapolli E, Morteo-Montiel S. 2015. Forest ecosystems and conservation. In: Islebe GA, Calmé S, León-Cortés J, Schmook B, editors. Biodiversity and Conservation of the Yucatan Peninsula. Switzerland: Springer; p. 377–398.
   Google Scholar
• Primack RB, Bray D, Galletti HA, Ponciano I. 1998. Timber, tourists, and temples: conservation and development in the Maya Forest of Belize, Guatemala, and Mexico. Washington DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Proceso Redacción. 2004 Ago 22. Cancún, el botín. Proceso [accessed 2020 Jan 6; https://www.proceso.com.mx/193037/cancun-el-botin
   Google Scholar
• Rudder CE. 2008. Private governance as public policy: A paradigmatic shift. J Politics. 70(4):899–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salazar JG. 2007. Decentralisation, politics and service delivery in Mexico. IDS Bulletin. 38(1):70–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samaniego Santamaría LG. 2010. Quintana Roo. Historia de las instituciones jurídicas [Quintana Roo. History of the legal institutions]. Ciudad de México (MX): Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México / Senado de la República.
   Google Scholar
• Scharf F 2003. Problem-solving effectiveness and democratic accountability in the EU. MPIfG Working Paper 03/1. Available at www.mpifg.de
   Google Scholar
• Schreier M. 2012. Qualitative content analysis in practice. London (UK): Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Transparency International. 2017. Corruption percentage index 2016. [accessed 2020 Jan 16].  Available online at:https://www.transparency.org/news/feature/corruption_perceptions_index_2016#regional.
   Google Scholar
• Walker B, Salt D. 2006. Resilience thinking: sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Washington DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2001. Mexico Land Policy - A decade after the Ejido Reform, Report No. 22187-ME, June 15.
   Google Scholar