A new fuzzy BWM approach for evaluating and selecting a sustainable supplier in supply chain management

References

• Abdel-Baset M, Chang V, Gamal A, Smarandache F. 2019. An integrated neutrosophic ANP and VIKOR method for achieving sustainable supplier selection: A case study in importing field. Comput Ind. 106:94–110. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2018.12.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdel-Basset M, Mohamed M, Smarandache F. 2018. A hybrid neutrosophic group ANP-TOPSIS framework for supplier selection problems. Symmetry. 10(6):226.
   Google Scholar
• Ahi P, Searcy C. 2015. An analysis of metrics used to measure performance in green and sustainable supply chains. J Clean Prod. 86:360–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amindoust A, Ahmed S, Saghafinia A, Bahreininejad A. 2012. Sustainable supplier selection: A ranking model based on fuzzy inference system. Appl Soft Comput. 12(6):1668–1677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadi M, Jafarian M, Saen RF, Mirhedayatian SM. 2015. A new fuzzy DEA model for evaluation of efficiency and effectiveness of suppliers in sustainable supply chain management context. Comput Oper Res. 54:274–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azimifard A, Moosavirad SH, Ariafar S. 2018. Selecting sustainable supplier countries for Iran’s steel industry at three levels by using AHP and TOPSIS methods. Resour Policy. 57:30–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badri Ahmadi H, Kusi-Sarpong S, Rezaei J. 2017. Assessing the social sustainability of supply chains using Best Worst Method. Resour Conserv Recycl. 126:99–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai C, Kusi-Sarpong S, Badri Ahmadi H, Sarkis J. 2019. Social sustainable supplier evaluation and selection: a group decision-support approach. Int J Prod Res. 57(22):1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai C, Sarkis J. 2010. Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. Int J Prod Econ. 124(1):252–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai C, Sarkis J. 2014. Determining and applying sustainable supplier key performance indicators. Supply Chain Manag An Int J. 19(3):275–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai C, Sarkis J. 2018. Integrating sustainability into supplier selection: a grey-based TOPSIS analysis. Technol Econ Dev Econ. 24(6):2202–2224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas A, Pal BB. 2005. Application of fuzzy goal programming technique to land use planning in agricultural system. Omega. 33(5):391–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bojadziev G, Bojadziev M. 2007. Fuzzy logic for business, finance, and management. Singapore: World Scientific.
   Google Scholar
• Büyüközkan G, Çifçi G. 2011. A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information. Comput Ind. 62(2):164–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campagnolo L, Eboli F, Farnia L, Carraro C. 2018. Supporting the UN SDGs transition: methodology for sustainability assessment and current worldwide ranking. Econ Open-Access, Open-Asses E-Jl. 12(2018–10):1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Chaharsooghi SK, Ashrafi M. 2014. Sustainable supplier performance evaluation and selection with neofuzzy TOPSIS method. Int Sch Res Not.  2014:434168.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Vargas Mores G, Finocchio CPS, Barichello R, Pedrozo EA. 2018. Sustainability and innovation in the Brazilian supply chain of green plastic. J Clean Prod. 177:12–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fei L, Deng Y, Hu Y. 2019. DS-VIKOR: A new multi-criteria decision-making method for supplier selection. Int J Fuzzy Syst. 21(1):157–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feil AA, de Quevedo DM, Schreiber D. 2015. Selection and identification of the indicators for quickly measuring sustainability in micro and small furniture industries. Sustain Prod Consum. 3:34–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Arca J, Garrido A, Prado-Prado JC. 2017. Sustainable packaging logistics”. The link between sustainability and competitiveness in supply chains. Sustainability. 9(7):1098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giribabu D, Mohapatra C, Reddy CS, Prasada Rao P VV. 2019. Holistic correlation of world’s largest social safety net and its outcomes with Sustainable Development Goals. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 26(2):113–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girubha J, Vinodh S, Kek V. 2016. Application of interpretative structural modelling integrated multi criteria decision making methods for sustainable supplier selection. J Model Manag. 11(2):358–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govindan K, Khodaverdi R, Jafarian A. 2013. A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. J Clean Prod. 47:345–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimm JH, Hofstetter JS, Sarkis J. 2014. Critical factors for sub-supplier management: A sustainable food supply chains perspective. Int J Prod Econ. 152:159–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GüNeri AF, Ertay T, YüCel A. 2011. An approach based on ANFIS input selection and modeling for supplier selection problem. Expert Syst Appl. 38(12):14907–14917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo S, Zhao H. 2017. Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications. Knowledge-Based Syst. 121:23–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta H, Barua MK. 2017. Supplier selection among SMEs on the basis of their green innovation ability using BWM and fuzzy TOPSIS. J Clean Prod. 152:242–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haghighi SM, Torabi SA, Ghasemi R. 2016. An integrated approach for performance evaluation in sustainable supply chain networks (with a case study). J Clean Prod. 137:579–597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain M. 2011. Modelling the enablers and alternatives for sustainable supply chain management [MSc Thesis]. Concordia University.
   Google Scholar
• Ishibuchi H, Morioka K, Tanaka H. 1994. A fuzzy neural network with trapezoid fuzzy weights. Proc 1994 IEEE 3rd Int Fuzzy Syst Conference. IEEE; p. 228–233.
   Google Scholar
• Izadikhah M, Saen RF. 2016. Evaluating sustainability of supply chains by two-stage range directional measure in the presence of negative data. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 49:110–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kannan D, Govindan K, Rajendran S. 2015. Fuzzy Axiomatic design approach based green supplier selection: a case study from Singapore. J Clean Prod. 96:194–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodakarami M, Shabani A, Saen RF, Azadi M. 2015. Developing distinctive two-stage data envelopment analysis models: an application in evaluating the sustainability of supply chain management. Measurement. 70:62–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S, Luthra S, Govindan K, Kumar N, Haleem A. 2016. Barriers in green lean six sigma product development process: an ISM approach. Prod Plan Control. 27(7–8):604–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai H, Liao H, Šaparauskas J, Banaitis A, Ferreira FAF, Al-Barakati A. 2020. Sustainable cloud service provider development by a Z-number-based DNMA method with Gini-coefficient-based weight determination. Sustainability. 12(8):3410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leal Filho W, Tripathi SK, Andrade Guerra JBSOD, Giné-Garriga R, Orlovic Lovren V, Willats J. 2019. Using the sustainable development goals towards a better understanding of sustainability challenges. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 26(2):179–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee AHI, Kang H-Y, Hsu C-F, Hung H-C. 2009. A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Syst Appl. 36(4):7917–7927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li G-D, Yamaguchi D, Nagai M. 2008. A grey-based rough decision-making approach to supplier selection. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 36(9–10):1032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Fang H, Song W. 2019. Sustainable supplier selection based on SSCM practices: A rough cloud TOPSIS approach. J Clean Prod. 222:606–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin K-P, Tseng M-L, Pai P-F. 2018. Sustainable supply chain management using approximate fuzzy DEMATEL method. Resour Conserv Recycl. 128:134–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liou JJH, Chuang Y-C, Zavadskas EK, Tzeng G-H. 2019. Data-driven hybrid multiple attribute decision-making model for green supplier evaluation and performance improvement. J Clean Prod. 241:118321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu K, Liu Y, Qin J. 2018. An integrated ANP-VIKOR methodology for sustainable supplier selection with interval type-2 fuzzy sets. Granul Comput. 3(3):193–208.
   Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Eckert C, Yannou-Le Bris G, Petit G. 2019. A fuzzy decision tool to evaluate the sustainable performance of suppliers in an agrifood value chain. Comput Ind Eng. 127:196–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luthra S, Govindan K, Kannan D, Mangla SK, Garg CP. 2017. An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. J Clean Prod. 140:1686–1698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdiloo M, Saen RF, Lee K-H. 2015. Technical, environmental and eco-efficiency measurement for supplier selection: an extension and application of data envelopment analysis. Int J Prod Econ. 168:279–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mani V, Agrawal R, Sharma V. 2014. Supplier selection using social sustainability: AHP based approach in India. Int Strateg Manag Rev. 2(2):98–112.
   Google Scholar
• Matić B, Jovanović S, Das DK, Zavadskas EK, Ž S, Sremac S, Marinković M. 2019. A new hybrid MCDM model: sustainable supplier selection in a construction company. Symmetry. 11(3):353.
   Google Scholar
• Memari A, Dargi A, Jokar MRA, Ahmad R, Rahim ARA. 2019. Sustainable supplier selection: A multi-criteria intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS method. J Manuf Syst. 50:9–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orji IJ, Wei S. 2015. An innovative integration of fuzzy-logic and systems dynamics in sustainable supplier selection: A case on manufacturing industry. Comput Ind Eng. 88:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osiro L, Lima-Junior FR, Carpinetti LCR. 2018. A group decision model based on quality function deployment and hesitant fuzzy for selecting supply chain sustainability metrics. J Clean Prod. 183:964–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pishchulov G, Trautrims A, Chesney T, Gold S, Schwab L. 2019. The voting analytic hierarchy process revisited: a revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection. Int J Prod Econ. 211:166–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei J. 2015. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega. 53:49–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos LF de OM, Osiro L, Lima RHP. 2017. A model based on 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation and analytic hierarchy process for supplier segmentation using qualitative and quantitative criteria. Expert Syst Appl. 79:53–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkis J, Talluri S. 2002. A model for strategic supplier selection. J Supply Chain Manag. 38(4):18–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sengupta A, Pal TK, Chakraborty D. 2001. Interpretation of inequality constraints involving interval coefficients and a solution to interval linear programming. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 119(1):129–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha AK, Anand A. 2018. Development of sustainable supplier selection index for new product development using multi criteria decision making. J Clean Prod. 197:1587–1596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Y, Li G. 2019. A large-scale group decision-making with incomplete multi-granular probabilistic linguistic term sets and its application in sustainable supplier selection. J Oper Res Soc. 70(5):827–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaiser V, Scott K, Owen A, Holland R. 2019. Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions in the sustainable development Goals Agenda. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol. 26(4):282–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su C-M, Horng D-J, Tseng M-L, Chiu ASF, Wu K-J, Chen H-P. 2016. Improving sustainable supply chain management using a novel hierarchical grey-DEMATEL approach. J Clean Prod. 134:469–481.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavana M, Yazdani M, Di Caprio D. 2017. An application of an integrated ANP–QFD framework for sustainable supplier selection. Int J Logist Res Appl. 20(3):254–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vahidi F, Torabi SA, Ramezankhani MJ. 2018. Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation under operational and disruption risks. J Clean Prod. 174:1351–1365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis K. 2016. International development planning and the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Int Dev Plan Rev. 32(2):105–111.
   Google Scholar
• Yazdani M, Chatterjee P, Zavadskas EK, Zolfani SH. 2017. Integrated QFD-MCDM framework for green supplier selection. J Clean Prod. 142:3728–3740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdani M, Wen Z, Liao H, Banaitis A, Turskis Z. 2019. A grey combined compromise solution (CoCoSo-G) method for supplier selection in construction management. J Civ Eng Manag. 25(8):858–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu C, Shao Y, Wang K, Zhang L. 2019. A group decision making sustainable supplier selection approach using extended TOPSIS under interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl. 121:1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Wei G, Gao H, Wei C, Wei Y. 2019. method for multiple criteria group decision making with picture fuzzy information and its application to green suppliers selections. Technol Econ Dev Econ. 25(6):1123–1138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Liao H, Al-Barakati A, Zavadskas EK, Antuchevičienė J. 2020. Supplier selection for housing development by an integrated method with interval rough boundaries. Int J Strateg Prop Manag. 24(4):269–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimon D, Tyan J, Sroufe R. 2020. Drivers of sustainable supply chain management: practices to alignment with UN sustainable development goals. Int J Qual Res. 14(1):219–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar